HomeMy WebLinkAbout100-90 - Res. Mason County - City of Shelton Regional Strategy EstablishedMASON COUNTY RESOLUTION NO. 100-9 0
CITY OF SHELTON RESOLUTION NO. 56.E-90
MASON COUNTY / CITY OF SHELTON REGIONAL STRATEGY ESTABLISHED
WHEREAS, the City of Shelton and Mason County have chosen to participate in Growth
Management efforts as mandated by the State of Washington through the Growth
Management Act of 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Community Development has chosen to distribute grant funds
to Growth Management participants based on submission of regional strategies that describe
the process by which requirements and schedules will be met in the Act; and
WHEREAS, it is the belief of the undersigned jurisdictions that efforts made toward
regionalization of planning issues will encourage a more smooth and expeditious permitting
process and more compatible land uses;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Shelton City Commission and the Mason
County Board of Commissioners that the attached document is established as the City of
Shelton and Mason County Regional Strategy for Growth Management.
Dated this 18 th day of December, 1990.
CITY OF SHELTON
Mayor ,faros
Comrrlissioner Knee
MA
rt
Chairperson Gibson
f
Commissioner Ruhl
Commissioner Hunter
Commissioner Porter
Clerk df the Board
AP TO TO FORM/:
(-
Mason County Pr. ecutor
�
MASON COUNTY / CITY OFSHELTON
MULTI -YEAR REGIONAL STRATEGY TO IMPLEMENT
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
PURPOSE
Toensure, through coordinated procedures,that genuine regional growth management
will occur in Mason County byestablishing erocipr000| relationship among participants.
The desired end result is a community that is environmentally, economically and
resourcefully sound. Anunderlying theme throughout will bethe encompassment of |oca|,
regional, and state planning goals and recommendations into enintegrated, well -
functioning system. The regional strategy to accomplish these objectives is described
below.
1' Governmental Framework
Mason County and the City ofShelton, eathe two political jurisdictions within the region,
will work together under their legally recognized governmental frameworks. The Mason
County Board of Commissioners and the Shelton City Commission will each provide staff
direction and review the plan elements at strategic irten/m|o. Each body will appoint one
or more Plan Advisory Groups to ensure early and continuous citizen participation in the
development ofthe two comprehensive plans. Amechanism will bedeveloped toensure
the interchange of ideas and opinions between elected representatives of each locality as
well oathe citizen groups appointed byeach. |rtedooa|agreements orother tools may be
used tofacilitate this exchange.
2' Rmg|ona|ApproacM
Mason County and the City of Shelton will integrate work programs for each plan at the
staff level. This will ensure the generation ofcompatible data bases, coordinated
development of the various plan elements, and timely feedback from each citizen advisory
group. In developing congruent work programs, particular emphasis will be focused in the
areas of transportation, urban growth boundaries, capital planning, and public
participation so that joint strategies for addressing these aspects of the plan can be
formulated for the benefit of all incorporated and unincorporated residents of Mason
County.
The city and the county will develop adetailed strategy to approach each plan element.
Certain plan elements and tasks easily lend themselves to clearly defined lead roles. Data
bases must becompatible; therefore ecomprehensive, county -wide approach will be
undertmken. Transportation is obviously a regional issue and may be coordinated through
a Regional Transportation Planning Organization or joint city/county cooperation. It is
appropriate for the City of Shelton to take the lead in designating its urban growth
boundary, while the county will address unincorporated urban growth areas. The impacts
of these designations will be mutually examined and adjusted, if necessary. Capital
facilities needs have both local and regional significance. Because demographics and
service goals may vary between jurisdictions, the approach will progress from the local
level tothe regional level. At this point, careful coordination between jurisdictions in
planning for these facilities will minimize duplication and ensure investment of public
dollars inthe most efficient manner. |nkeeping with the spirit ofHB292Q.bwill be
3. General Time Frames/Milestones Process
See Attachments 1 & 2 for approximate time frames needed to complete the plan process
and for milestones to complete the tasks required by 2929. Actual dates may vary as the
plan process develops. While there are separate entries in this section for each
jurisdiction, the differences are procedural rather than substantive; therefore no
explanation of deviations is provided.
4. Identification of Priorities
A. Mason County
1990 --Regional Strategy
Begin establishing vision
Communication strategies
Timeline & work program outline
1991 --Data Base Development
Amend subdivision ordinance to meet RCW 58.17.212 or .215
Begin exploring regulatory/implementation framework
Begin other element inventories
Communication/participation strategies (citizens, intergovernmental, special
districts)
Continue development of vision statement (set goals to establish comp plan theme
early on)
Establish RTPO, membership status
Existing conditions/needs analysis
Implement potable water regulation
Land use inventory
Preliminary urban growth area/open space designations
Resource land and criticals areas inventory
Resource land and critical areas regulations
1992 --Identify Public Use Areas
Begin drafting plan elements
Citizen input
Establish priority list for public use areas
Existing conditions/needs analysis -- identify financial picture (putlic facilities
Identify capital facility, utility and transportation needs
Identify public use areas
Land use inventory
Policy development
Summarize other element inventories
1993 --Combine Pre -finalized Plans and Conduct Review
Continue drafting & begin summarizing regulatory framework for other elements
Comprehensive plan adoption
Establish priority list for public use areas
Future land use -- designations
Plan refinement
Policy refinement
1994 --Develop regulations and begin plan implementation
Long Term:
Fulfill continual, annual, five-year, ten-year, and twenty-year mandates.
B. City of Shelton
1990 Regional Strategy
Work Program
1991 Data Base Development
Citizen Participation Strategy/Intergovernmental Coordination/Special Districts
Existing Conditions / Needs Analysis Documentation
Resource Lands & Critical Areas Inventory
Resource Lands & Critical Areas Regulation
RTPO Mechanism & Work Program
Urban Growth Area / Open Space -- Preliminary Designation
Vision Statement / Goals & Objectives
1992 Data Refinement / Analysis
Urban Growth Area / Open Space Designations -- Refinement
Identification of Public Purpose Lands
Identification of Capital Facilities Needs / Costs
Draft Plan Elements
Citizen Input
Policy Development
1993 Policy / Element Refinement
Future Land Use Designations
Capital Facilities Plan
Comprehensive Plan Adoption
Preliminary Regulatory Framework
1994 Develop Regulations / Plan Implementation
essential to seek broad -based citizen input on all planning issues, especially within the
designated urban growth areas. Joint nby\countyconsultations inthe professional,
political and public spheres will benecessary throughout the plan process. This will bg
carried through tothe development ofimplementing regulations.
Regional Coordination Procedures: Plan Elements
Intergovernmental coordination for each Growth Management element will proceed in the
following manner:
1.|nbial staff conference to identify particular issues meriting special treatment within that
element, and establish regional aspects and lead roles. Formulation ofcitizen input
strategy.
2. Staff drafts of approach tuthe element, including common regional components amwell
as jurisdiction -specific portions.
8.Combine strategies byidentifying common aspects and deviations from initial regional
4. Final draft ofelement
6. Briefings for appropriate elected and appointed boards.
6. Final revisions, if necessary. Implementation of joint approach to the plan element.
Regional Coordination Procedures: Plan Development
Actual development of the plan document will be coordinated as follows to ensure
compatibility between city and county plans:
1.Oraft framework documents with standard sections common to city and county ...o.Q,
overview, statement of goals, results of inventory for appropriate elements, identified
regional issues and unique city/county concerns, etc.
2. Staff efforts toachieve unity in regional portions where the county and the city have
similar needs and take the same approach; consultations on portions where the city or the
county differ in needs or approach --thus ensuring regional consistency.
3` Briefings toelected and appointed boards and the general public.
4. Worksessions for city and county elected officials to resolve any factors or solutions
suggested during the citizen participation process that may conflict with econsistent
regional approach.
5. Final element draft.
5. Grant Funds Disbursement
Mason County Board of Commissioners will be responsible for contracting with the
Department ofCommunity Development. Grant funds will bedisbursed 0zthe City of
ATTACHMENT 1 - GENERAL TIMEFRAMES - MASON COUNTY
-0
r-1-4 i0
F"
0
.0
0
0°0
IIo
c
I 0E
I I
I •
I I
•
1111
ri
iri
Irl
11
1
ni
cv
!Ts.
1
0
0
II
0
-3
1111111111111111111111111111••••;•:1••••1•::1•••1::1••••:
_c _c
2 2
2
a
ffi
ignimonammoomm
immmaimilmminn
mminmminomon
aimummoimmmum
Immo -ii<s).L.-rn 71:4)
11111111111 11111111 111111
11111111111 11111111 111111
11111111111 11111111 1E1111
11111111111 11111111 111111
11111111111 11111111 I
11111111111
11111111111
111111111
Z
a )
0
> >
0 0
Z Z
PLAN DEVELOPMENT
(r)
0
, c
0
c c
ra 0-
ag 0 0
13 a>
> as 2.7 •••-
0
>.
t C _ c trs
0 0 V 0 acr; aa - 0- LH'
0
2"--- ° c
o E a 0 a) c
0 0 a 0 0
1
la 0 TD -6 c EC cr)
C \ I <
T, -0 (a a
cs) 2 (3) z
0.I v
,-,
0 .0 = ID- = td
0 a E ca -
2c-5-
.
, as o I u.J1
-a > o- -a 0 0
CC
NVENTORY
RESOURCE LANDS/C.A.
0
0
co IC
i0 . . eo 0 0. 0.)
au
,D 0_ 0 :- C
N 0 il= (7)
>, TD t c C 0_
000.
0 > a) o N 0
C 0
0 10 13 2 0 E
* •k * * .K
0
0
0
0
0
E
12)
a>
LANDS/C.A. REGS
o
c 0
a
c 0 0
0 13:
0
a) -5 0
a 0) 0
o 0 -8
E
if's) c c
13
-i 4 ='0C ? 5 c
0 .c xo --0-1a5 ac '65
cc >
DE o c 0
0 8- .0 0 0 2
> N 0
0) 0 > 0 :-
W -a 2 -a 0 _
cc * * * * -lc
wable uses
URBAN GROWTH BOUND
-a o
.t3
0
a) 0 '2
o
-0 CZ
>, 0. 0
(‚20
C C 70
0 0 c C
0 CI- 0 a)
0 0 a) E
't-.' 1- 2 -5
a.
0
itl .15.•
a 1:3/ °
° > c c
0 rn ,
...... cD 0 a 0
0 7,5 .5 N 0- 0)
rd 0 0 :;.-I as
0 E c -a TS ....
.14 * * * * *
ATTACHMENT 2 -- GENERAL TIMEFRAMES -CITY OF SHELTON
r)
d)
O a) m a)
a c c c
c z
0
0
N
Ig1
1®1 111II11IIII111I11IIIIII11I11
1811111111111111111111111111111
I®1I111II111II111111IuII111I111
Ia1 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 11¢Q�i1
1®1::111111111111111111111 111111
El 111111111111 IIIII®®I 1119
11I IIIIIIIIIIII II®1®1II mom
1 • II11II1111II//111111
III111IlIlI1111 11111111
1A 111111111M 1111111
11 IlIlIlIlIlI11I111111
Io1 1111111111
-c
N
2
0
m
0
L
U
O
2
U
N
0
E
a)
a
a)
00
5.0z
0
u-
0 0 0 0 0
2
LAN DEVELOPMENT
data collection/a
O
RESOURCE LANDS/C.A. INVENTOR
I
cc
URBAN GROWTH BOUND
0 c
-0 0
O Tzi
0 C
a) 'a
N 0 O
A d O
N U
cc <a
al a) c C
C 0- O a)
g C 0 5 c
N o-
o c w
U C $ c Q
m N N
N •
N
-a $ 2 o E c