HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018/10/22 - Briefing Packet BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DRAFT BRIEFING MEETING AGENDA
411 North Fifth Street, Shelton WA 98584
Week of October 22, 2018
Monday, October 22, 2018
Commission Chambers
9:00 A.M. Economic Development Council — Jennifer Baria
9:30 A.M. MCSO — Chief Jason Dracobly
9:45 A.M. Support Services — Frank Pinter
10:15 A.M. BREAK
10:20 A.M. Public Works — Jerry Hauth
Utilities & Waste Management
10:50 A.M. Probation Services — Jim Madsen
11:00 A.M. Community Services — Dave Windom
11:30 A.M. Executive Session — RCW 42.30.110 (1)(b) Property Purchase
11:45 A.M. Closed Session — RCW 42.30.140(4) Labor Discussion
Commissioner Discussion — as needed
BREAK— NOON
2:00 P.M. 2019 Budget Workshop
Support Services Budgets
Support Services, Human Resources (includes Risk Management, Civil
Services & Board of Equalization) Emergency Management;
Information Technology; Facilities, Parks &Trails, LEOFF 1, REET 1,
REET 2
3:30 P.M. 2019 Budget Workshop -Auditor
Commissioner Discussion — as needed
Briefing Agendas are subject to change,please contact the Commissioners'office for the most recent version.
Last printed 10/18/18 at 11:36 AM
If special accommodations are needed,contact the Commissioners'office at ext.419,Shelton 4360-427-9670;Belfair
#275-4467,Elma#482-5269.
Tuesday, October 23, 2018
Commission Chambers
2:30 P.M. 2019 Budget Workshop
Therapeutic Court
Juvenile Court
Law Library
4:00 p.m. 2019 Budget Workshop —Coroner
Wednesday, October 24, 2018
Commission Chambers
11:00 A.M. 2019 Budget Workshop
Review of Policy Level Requests to Date
Briefing Agendas are subject to change,please contact the Commissioners'office for the most recent version.
Last printed 10/18/18 at 11:36 AM
If special accommodations are needed,contact the Commissioners'office at ext.419,Shelton#360-427-9670;Belfair
#275-4467,Elma#482-5269.
MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONER BRIEFING INFORMATION FOR WEEK OF
October 22, 2018
In the spirit of public information and inclusion, the attached is a draft of
information for Commissioner consideration and discussion at the above briefing.
This information is subject to change, additions and/or deletion and is not all
inclusive of what will be presented to the Commissioners.
We have changed the packet format so that it is an interactive document. Please
click on the agenda item which then takes you to the cover sheet of that section in
the document. To get back to the agenda, hit your "home" key on the keyboard.
Please see draft briefing agenda for schedule.
CO
1854
2018-2019 COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES PROJECT LIST
Project Title Project Type Secured Funding Funding 'Phase
Lead Organization Request
Mason Transit Authority wsDDT Transportation Division,Mason county, park&Ride Development ,r portaeion,Utilities,land Use,Economo $10,285,000 $4,750,000 RMG Planning Design Construction
1 City of Shelton SCI Alliance(consulting) Development,Public Safety,Environmental $4,585,000 Leg.
Mason County PW Mason county,City of Bremerton Belfair Sewer Extension/Belfair Freight Corridor Utilities,Economic Development $14,000,000 $1,500,000 City of $ 11,000,000.00 Final Design/Construction
Bremerton,$525,000 Leg.
2
$250,000 Mason County
---- -.................................-..........._._._
Mason County PW DOT,Mason Transit,Belfair Community,Utilities, SR3 Freight Corridor-Romance Hill Connector utilities,Transportation,Public Safety,land $1,320,000 $ 220,000.00 $ 1,100,000.00 Design Construction
3 PAC Use,Economic Development
.-.........................----..................................._............. ...................................._...___..............................................................................................................................................................-_.........................................._................................................._._..............._-_.............__............__..................................................................._.................................................................................................._._.................
Mason County PW DOT,Navy,Mason Transit,Belfair community, Belfair UGA east of SR3 and west of new Freight Corridor Utilities,Transportation,Public Safety,Land $1,920,000 $ 320,000.00 $ 1,600,000.00 Design Construction
4 Utilities,PAC Use,Economic Development
Mason County PW DoT,Mason Transit,Utilities Trails Road Alternative-Razor Road Extension Utilities,Transportation,Public Safety,Land $2,500,000 $ 750,000.00 $ 1,750,000.00 Design Construction
5 Use,Economic Development
Mason County PUD No.3 Hoods Canal communications,iFiberone,NoaNet,Mason County Fiberhoods-Rural Broadband Fiber Networks Utilities,Public Safety,Healthcare,Economic $5,279,044 $TBD-Mason PUD 3 Design
6 businesses,residents,community groups within Development
Fiberhood Program
project areas
Mason County PUD No,3 Taylor Shellfish,Squaxin Island Tribe,businesses, Totten Substation Utilities,Economic Development $3,000,000 $TBD-Mason PUD 3 Design Construction
residents Fiberhood Program
8 City of Shelton Evergreen Safe Routes to School Transportation $1,000,000 $ - Design Construction
9 City of Shelton Squaxin Island Tribe Sanitation Plant Reclaim Water Tank Utilities $2,000,000 $ - Design Construction
10 City of Shelton Intersection Improvements on Wallace Kneeland Boulevard Transportation,Economic Development $2,000,000 $ _ Design Construction
-....................
---.-...._...
City of Shelton Evergreen Town Square Community Development $1,Soo,000 $ - Design Construction
City of Shelton Mason County Historical Museum Community Development $150,000 $ - Planning Design Construction
City of Shelton Shelton Civic Center Parking Lot Paving Transportation $500,000 $ _ Design Construction
City of Shelton Well 1 Water MainUtilities $2,000,000 $ _ Design Construction
- --. .._._.__....................--
Mason County PW DOT,Port of Allyn,Mason Transit,Allyn Allyn Parking Improvements Utilities,Transportation,Land Use,Economic TBD $ - Planning
Community Development
Mason County PW DOT,Port of Allyn,Mason Transit,Allyn Allyn Street Network Planning,Design,and ROW Utilities,Transportation,Land Use,Economic $25,000 $ - Planning
Community Preservation Development
Mason County PW Port of Allyn,Mason Transit,Allyn Community Allyn Street Network ROW Preservation Utilities,Transportation,Land Use,Economic $300,000 $ - Design
Develo ment _ _
Mason County PW DOT,Navy,Mason Transit,Belfair Community, Belfalr Bypass Connector Feasibility Utilities,Transportation,Public Safety,Land $30,000 $ - Planning
Utilities,PAC Use,Economic Development
Mason County PW Belfair Sewer Collection System Expansion Utilities TBD $ - Planning
Mason County PW Rustlewood Sewer System Inflow&Infiltration(1&1) utilities $450,000 $ - Design Construction
Reduction
....._........_._..---........................-- -................................................................_................_.._'---....__...,,...._......_......................................_.—_.............................................................................---.._.._._.._...................... ---.._......_......................_.......----......_.....- .-._....-'-----'-'----._........_._. ._........._....--_'...�___
Mason County PW OOT,Port of Allyn,Mason Transit,Allyn SR3 Complete Street Improvements and Intersection Control Titles,Transportation,Land Use,Economic TBD $ - Planning
Community Analysis ICA Development
Mason Transit Authority ADA Imporovements and Operations Building Remodel Transportation $500,000 $ - Design Construction
....................................._...--..._..........._....-___..._......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................---..._.........................................................._....................................................._.._.............._............_..............,,...._.-_,_......._.........._..............
Mason Transit Authority WSDOT,Mason County Allyn Transit Center Planning project Transportation $50,000 $ - Planning
Mason Transit Authority WSDOT,(other local agency participation Construct wet maintenance facility at Johns Prairie location Transportation $350,000 $ - Design Construction
possible)
Mason Transit Authority WSDOT,Mason County(Hoodsport Master Plan Hoodsport Transit Center Planning Transportation $50,000 $ - Planning
Inclusion)
Port of Shelton - Aviation Business Park - Economic Development --- $20 000 000 $ _ Planning Design Construction
Port of Shelton Tenant Consolidation&Expansion Economic Development $2,500,000 $ - Planning Design Construction
2018 Q3 Report: Economic Development Council of Mason County
The Mason EDC is the lead designated economic development agency for Mason County. We represent
the County and local businesses on a number of statewide, national and international issues.At the
heart of the work the EDC does are four main principles:
• RECRUIT investment and employment opportunities to the region,
• RETAIN existing local businesses by providing technical assistance and advocacy,and
• EXPAND operational capacity for local employers by providing them with new market
opportunities.
• COORDINATE economic development efforts in Mason County,the region, and the state.
2018 Scope of Services
Q CONTRACTOR to provide a budget by expense category totaling$68,000 for the 2018,one-year
contract to the BOCC within fifteen days (15) of contract execution. COMPLETED
Q CONTRACTOR to provide update to Board of County Commissioner...
Deliverable: At a minimum of once per quarter the Executive Director or designee will provide a
brief update on EDC work during public testimony at commission meetings.
Q2:06.25.2018
RECRUITMENT& MARKETING
Q CONTRACTOR to market Mason County as excellent locations to expand or relocate ...
Deliverable: number of businesses contacted.
Q2: New leads: 2
Potentials Pipeline: 13
Sites: Industrial Land -Work beginning on examination of current industrial land and
potential development areas. Property portfolio development and distribution at
Economix that directly engaged site selectors in industrial development.
Commercial sites-identification of potential projects areas, review of current
infrastructure,assessment of needed infrastructure to make marketable. Retail
Coach partnership with City of Shelton led to 25 one-on-one meetings at RECon with
the potential of two letters of intent.
Runway Business Park-initial demolition work scheduled and site plan
development moving forward.
0 CONTRACTOR to provide site location assistance ...
Deliverable: Quarterly list of project names.
Q2: Project AECH—specialty beverage processor
Industrial Lands Project in Belfair
BUSINESS RETENTION &EXPANSION ACTIVITIES
Q CONTRACTOR to work with partners throughout the county ...
Deliverable:`copy of communication plan on or before 3/31/2018 COMPLETED
Deliverable: quarterly dashboard of communication analytics.
Q2: DASHBOARD OF ANALYTICS:2018 Q2
WEBSITE
57 405 89% 1,260
SOCIAL MEDIA
Followers:715 Followers: 10
New Followers:27 New Followers:6
Page Views:451 New Tweets:0
Likes:706
Post Reach:18,760
0 CONTRACTOR to provide business retention and expansion services ...
Work has begun to transition the 'Business Spotlights' into a formal BRE program.This program will
incorporate a wide range of tools and services designed to help local businesses become more
competitive and to grow where they are rather than relocate.We are on track to start
implementation by September 1, 2018.
Deliverable: number of businesses visited.
Q2: 41
Deliverable: number of follow-ups with existing businesses.
Q2: 19
0 CONTRACTOR to participate ... in the coordination of the job skills training program and the
customized training program within its region.
Q2: Pacific Mountain Workforce Development Council—nomination of Jennifer Baria to the
board
CDBG Business Builder Course—promotion continues,work started on new grant
application to continue program, additional branding course added and completed.
BUSINESS ASSISTANCE
Q CONTRACTOR to provide or facilitate the provision of export assistance.
Q CONTRACTOR to provide business assistance ...
Deliverable: number of businesses that direct assistance was provided.
Q2: 20
Deliverable: and number of follow-up interactions.
Q2: 10
READINESS&CAPACITY BUILDING
IBJ CONTRACTOR to solicit, compile and rank the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy
(CEDS) list annually. Submit to COUNTY for review and approval on or before 6/30/18.—Deadline
extended to 8/31/2018.
Q CONTRACTOR to provide an annual economic report.
Deliverable: report of economic indicators and comparisons in Mason County.
Q CONTRACTOR to participate in economic development system-wide discussions regarding gaps in
business start-up assistance in Mason County.
Q CONTRACTOR to participate in development of a countywide economic development plan in
conjunction with other governmental jurisdictions and institutions.
o Opportunity Zones
Q CONTRACTOR to provide an annual snapshot of local economic conditions ...
Deliverable: Economic Vitality index.
i
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Chief Deputy Jason Dracobly
DEPARTMENT: Mason County Sheriff's Office EXT: 313
BRIEFING DATE: TBA
PREVIOUS BRIEFING DATES:
(If this is a follow-up briefing, please provide only new information
ITEM: Overtime Contract with the Skokomish Indian Tribe.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: On 8/17/18 the Mason County Sheriff's Office entered into
an Overtime Contract with the Skokomish Indian Tribe for the purpose of
supplementing their Police Services. For the time frame between September-
December 2018 the Mason County Sheriff's Deputies will have worked a total of
twenty-two shifts. This work will have costs approximately $11000.00. This cost is
being reimbursed by the Skokomish Tribe after the work has been completed.
BUDGET IMPACTS: net zero impact.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION: Request a supplemental increase to
the revenues for the Sheriff's 2018 budget and to then increase the Patrol OT
expenditures, both for $11,000.00
ATTACHMENTS:
Copy of the contract.
i
Briefing Summary 10/16/2018
i
SLD NO.2018-K-00208
MASON • OFFICE EXTRA DUTY
SERVICE CONTRACT FOR 2018
Contract Code#
THIS IS A CONTRACT between the MASON COUNTY SHERIFF'S
OFFICE, hereinafter referred to as SHERIFF, located at 322 N 3rd St Shelton WA
98584, and the Skokomish Indian Tribe, hereinafter referred to as Entity with a
billing address:
Celeste Vigil, GIC Accountant
Skokomish Indian Tribe
80 N Tribal Center Rd
Skokomish Nation,WA 98584
Jointly, the SHERIFF and the ENTITY are referred to herein as the 'PARTIES".
This is an Extra-duty service contract in which the SHERIFF agrees to provide
Deputy Sheriff's to the ENTITY as stipulated in the following provisions:
THE PARTIES agree as follows:
1. PERFORMANCE
a. The SHERIFF shall provide the ENTITY extra duty Sheriff Deputy
services to include: Security,Vehicle speed enforcement and
criminal investigations.
b. Specific location of service: As need for the individual requests
throughout the year
C. Services by more uniformed Sheriff Deputies will be assigned,
approved and coordinated through the MASON County Sheriff's
Office.
d. Assignment of Sheriff Deputies shall be based on the ENTITY's
needs and the availability of Sheriff Deputies.
e. The Parties shall agree upon the length of assignment for Sheriff
Deputies at the time of service.
f. Subsequently, if the conditions dictate a need for Sheriff Deputy
services over a longer period than is initially specified and agreed
upon, any additional hours and dates are nonetheless covered by
this contract as renegotiated and agreed upon by the parties.
l
Extra Duty Service Contract 1
I
SLD NO.20 1 8-K-0020 8
g. The ENTITY shall provide the SHERIFF a site familiarization tour
for safety of the deputies, familiarity with facility layouts, site terrain
and workforce orientation,
2. CONTRACT TERM
The provisions of this contract shall be in effect commencing for the year
of 2018.
Either party may cancel this contract at any time with thirty days notice to
the other party in writing. i
3. COMPENSATION
The ENTITY shall pay the SHERIFF as full compensation for everything
furnished and done under this contract. The overtime rate billed is based
on actuals and can be up to $75.00 per hour. The ENTITY agrees to pay
for any and all costs incurred by the county under this contract, including
but not limited to any costs that may be incurred by the county if the
ENTITY cancels the overtime detail.
4. PAYMENT
The ENTITY shall pay for the services under this contract in accordance
with Paragraph B of the General Terms and Conditions.
5. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIIONS `
The parties have read and agree to the General Ter s and C d' hs set
forth on "Exhibit"A.
BY: BY:
Entity ignature Sheri 's c
Rep a tativ ignatu e
�. � ltd S�
Printed name Printed name Q
Date Signed: ( "1 I (� Date Signed: U �D
j
Approved as to Form by the Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Extra Duty Service Contract 2
SLD NO, 2018-K-00208
EXHIBIT"A"
GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS
A. FEES: The Sheriff has established fees for services as follows:
Sheriff Deputy/Sergeant:
Overtime hourly rate is based on a range from bottom step Deputy to
top step Sergeant. That range is from $50.00 to $75,00 for 2018.
All overtime is bid out according to seniority.
B. PAYMENT:
The Sheriffs Office shall produce a billing to the Entity within sixty-
days of the work. All checks shall be made payable to the MASON
County Sheriff and mailed to: I
MASON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Attn: Finance Department
322 N 3" St
Shelton WA 98584
C. DUTY STATUS:
Each Deputy Sheriff engaged in extra duty employment of a law
enforcement nature is considered to be an on-duty status. Sheriff
Deputies are subject to call by the Sheriff of MASON County or his j
designee at any time for emergencies, special assignment, or overtime
duty. Extra duty employment does not infringe on this obligation. I
Should this occur the organization would be billed only for the hours for j
which the Deputy was present.
D. ADHERENCE TO SHERIFF POLICIES AND PROCEDURES:
Sheriff Deputies engaged in extra duty employment are obligated to
discharge all duties of their office and to adhere to MASON County
Sheriff's Office policies and procedures at all times.
E. PRIMARY DUTY TO THE SHERIFF:
Sheriff Deputies on extra duty assignment have a primary obligation to
the SHERIFF, not the ENTITY. They are expected to discharge all
duties of their position, to enforce all laws and ordinances, and to
Extra Duty Service Contract 3
I
I
SLD NO. 201 8-K-00208
adhere to all Sheriff's Office policies, procedures, rules and
regulations, as well as meeting the ENTITY's needs.
F. NON-DISCRIMINATION:
During the performance of this Contract,the ENTITY shall not
discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin,
creed, marital status veteran status, sexual orientation, age or the
presence of any sensory, mental or physical disability.
G. LIABILITY:
Each PARTY shall be responsible and liable for the consequences of
any act or failure to act on the part of itself, its employees and its
agents. Each party shall be responsible for its own negligence,
H. EVENT SCHEDULING:
All events will be scheduled with Chief Deputy Jason Dracobly, 360-
427-9670 x 313, or his designee.
I. DISPUTE RESOLUTION:
In the event of a dispute among the parties, both parties shall go
before the ADR Alternative Dispute Resolution Center and their
decision shall be final. Any legal dispute will be subject to Washington
Law.
J. COMPLAINTS:
i
Service complaints, questions or issues shall be directed to the On- i
Duty Shift Supervisor. The supervisor may be contacted via
MACECOM (360) 426-4441.
I
Extra Duty Service Contract 4
i
i
SLD N0.2018-K-0020$
EXTRA-DUTY DETAIL
ENTITY
Contract created_
Forwarded for signature
Signed contract returned
Authorizing signature by
Final co sent to customer_ D (�
pY
Copies to accounting
Sign-up created/posted patrol_
Detail logged telestaff
Personnel logged teiestaff
i
I
;
i
1
Extra Duty Service Contract $
• i
i
i
i
a
3
SLD NO,2018-K-00208
ENTITY
Code#
�e
i
i
i
1
i
. I
Extra Duly Servlce Ccntract 6
• i
I
= Mason County Support Services Department Budget Management
411 North 51" Street Commissioner Administration
Emergency Management
Shelton, WA 98584 Facilities, Parks&Trails
360.427.9670 ext. 419 Human Resources
Information Services
' mr Labor Relations
Risk Management
MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONER BRIEFING ITEMS FROM SUPPORT SERVICES
October 22, 2018
• Specific Items for Review
o Request for Proposals for new Jail facility—Frank
o Strategic Plan Questionnaire - Frank
• Commissioner Discussion
JADLZ\Briefing Items\2018\2018-10-22.docx
GRAYS HARBOR AND MASON COUNTIES
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
ENGINEERING SERVICES
The Grays Harbor and Mason County Board of County Commissioners are soliciting statements
of qualifications from funis possessing the required experience and resources to assist the
Counties in the development of a study document to guide the development of a Regional Jail
Facility. The study shall provide an analysis of existing conditions at each facility and options for
individual upgrades or the construction of a regional facility located on the border of the two
Counties.
I. REQUESTED SERVICES
The study to be provided may include but will not be limited to,the following elements:
1. Analysis of County demographic and criminal justice system use data regarding growth,
changing populations in the criminal justice system, average daily population in the Jails
and Superior and District Court caseloads, calls for service, and the like, for the purposes
of determining the space needs of current services and the potential for expansion of
those services.
2. Analysis of County needs for Alternative Sentencing,Pre-Trial Services, End of Sentence
Programs and Transitional Reentry programs that could be housed within a jail facility.
3. Space Needs and Architectural / Site Program, with estimated square footages, based on
the application of the data analysis in item 1. above, and on programming discussions
with county staff and project leadership, for the following projects:
• Regional Grays Harbor& Mason County Jail Facility
• Stand Alone Mason County Jail Expansion to include local tribal participation
• Stand Alone Grays Harbor County Jail Expansion
4. Costs comparisons for each County to pursue individual expansions vs. a regional
facility, including projected cost increases due to inflation, direct and indirect costs, and
other cost information as needed to optimize the County's project approach.
5. The study shall include an overall project development timeline including recommended
phases, scope, and phase sequencing for both the individual projects and the regional
facility option.
6. Consulting and recommendations regarding potential funding mechanisms for the
accomplishment of the proposed projects to include partnerships with regional or local
tribes.
7. Recommendation to the Counties regarding
c:\users\fpinter\desktop\new jail project\bocc rfq engineering study draft fp.doc
a. the best approach for the improvement of or re-purposing to existing facilities
b. the development a joint venture regional jail facility.
Statements of qualifications should clearly demonstrate the ability of the respondent firm to
manage and execute projects of this type. Submittals shall be limited to ten pages, excluding
resumes, and shall include the following information:
1. A description of the project team, including staff resources available to complete this
project.
2. A description of related work experience and expertise of the firm directly related to jail
facilities.
3. Resumes of key personnel to be involved in the project. The experience cited should
relate specifically to similar types of projects.
II. SUBNHTTAL REQUIREMENTS:
1. Letter of Interest: The cover letter shall briefly summarize the firm's qualifications and
past experience relevant to the scope. A principal or officer of the firm authorized to execute
contracts or other similar documents on the firm's behalf must sign the letter.
2. Outline your firm's experience on the scope of work required for the appropriate
discipline.
3. Describe your firm's overall approach, including team organization and work tasks
necessary to accomplish the objectives. If it is your firm's practice to have specific sub-
categories of the Scope of Work performed by sub-consultant(s), please identify the sub-
consultant(s) you anticipate using for the project, indicate their specific role(s), and outline
their experience on similar or related work.
4. Describe your quality control process.
5. Identify qualifications/expertise of the key personnel on your team, and evidence of
availability of staff to begin immediately upon awarding of the contract.
6. Provide a list of key personnel, including sub-consultants personnel, indicating the
specific role of each, and clearly identify the Project Manager.
7. Provide a professional resume for each of the named key personnel, indicating the extent
of his/her experience on projects related to this type of work. Each of the key personnel
proposed for use on the project must have current professional registration or certifications
and, if applicable, be currently licensed in the State of Washington.
8. Past performance and record of successful completion of a correctional facility of similar
size and scope.
c:\users\fpinter\desktop\new jail project\bocc rfq engineering study draft fp.doc
a. Describe any previous projects (firm and individual) of similar scope to our
project, and include a description of specific responsibilities of such projects.
b. Describe any previous projects where your firm participated in the site selection
process for correctional facilities where you provided site analysis and feasibility
studies involving public engagement
c. Note any information useful in demonstrating successful resulte on prior projects.
d. Provide reference contact names, phone numbers, email address and mailing
addresses related to the above prior projects.
III. CONSULTANT EVALUATION CRITERIA:
Consultant's RFQ will be evaluated based on the criteria listed in this section. In preparing the
RFQ it is important to clearly demonstrate expertise in the areas described in this document. The
RFQ must demonstrate expertise and funis must have available, experienced personnel in all of
the areas described in the appropriate discipline either through in-house staff or sub-consultant.
Firms are encouraged to identify and clearly label in their RFQ how each criterion is being fully
addressed. Evaluation of responses to the RFQ will be based only on the information provided in
the RFQ package, and if applicable, during an interview and reference review process. The two
Counties reserve the right to request additional information or documentation from the firm
regarding its RFQ documents, personnel, or other items in order to complete the selection
process.
The following criteria, with a point system of relative importance with an aggregate total of 100
points will be utilized to evaluate the qualifications of each firm.
Evaluation Criteria Weighting
1. Staff Qualifications 10 Points
2. Past Performance on relevant projects 10 Points
3. Project approach 10 Points
4. Site analysis/selection experience 5 Points
5. Self-performed work, firm location. Current workload 5 Points
6. Experience with different contracting methods (GC/CM; Design/Bid/Build 10 Points
Subtotal 50 Points
Interviews
1. Presentation: Clarity and thoroughness of presentation, and the firm's understanding of
and approach to the requirements of the Project. 20 Points
2. Specific Questions: Thoroughness and insight in providing direct and clear answers to the
questions asked. 20 Points
c:\users\fpinter\desktop\new jail project\bocc rfq engineering study draft fp.doc
3. Communication: Overall quality of the team's presentation, including interpersonal
communications between team members and the interview panel. Quality of questions
asked by the firm. 10 points
Subtotal 50 Points
The firm receiving the highest combined score as a result of the FRQ and interview will be
selected to enter into an agreement with the Counties.
As Part of the evaluation, the Counties will consider prior experience in correctional facility
planning and design to be a significant component of the proposal from the successful firm or
team. In particular, the Counties places substantial emphasis correctional facility planning and
design experience on behalf of other public agencies.
IV.SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
1. Upon Receipt of each FRQ, the Counties will date-stamp it to show the exact time
and date of receipt. Upon request, the Counties will provide the firm with an
acknowledgement of receipt. All FRQ's received will become the property of the
Counties and will not be returned.
2. Required Number of Copies: Firms responding to this RFQ shall submit ten (10)
copies of the RFQ to the address listed below. Firms shall also submit two (2)
electronic copies one to each email address listed below.
3. The County reserves the right to waive as informally any irregularities in the RFQ
and/or to reject any or all submittals.
V. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
All responses to this RFQ will be screened for eligibility. As time permits, a selection panel will
rate eligible responses, according to the criteria listed above, and may conduct reference checks
as part of the process. If there is insufficient information the Counties reserves the right to
request additional information and to interview firms to discuss their RFQ. It is the Counties
intent to interview the top two or three firms based upon the submitted written materials.
1. The firm receiving the highest combined scores as a result of the RFQ and interview
will be selected to enter into an agreement with the Counties.
2. This solicitation does not obligate the Counties to award a contract to any
respondent. At its option the Counties reserve the right to waive as informality any
irregularities in the RFQ and/or reject any or all submittals.
3. The Counties reserve the right to request clarification information submitted and to
request additional information from any firm.
4. If the Counties award a firm the contract to provide consultation services the
successful firm shall be issued a written Notice of Intent to Award. The successful
firm shall execute an agreement acceptable to the Counties within thirty (30) days
from the date of Notice of Intent to Award. Failure by the successful firm to execute
an agreement within the stipulated 30 day period shall constitute non-conformance
c:\users\fpinter\desktop\new jail project\bocc rfq engineering study draft fp.doc
with the RFQ, allowing the Counties to unilaterally withdraw and terminate such
intent to award.
5. The Counties reserve the right to award and contract to the next most qualified firm.
If the successful firm does not execute a contract within the 30 days from the date of
the Notice of Intent to Award.
6. The Counties reserve the right to individually award and contract with the most
qualified firm.
7. The Counties shall not be responsible for any costs incurred by the firms in
preparing, submitting or presenting its response to this RFQ.
8. A public relations
9. Approximate Selection Timeline:
a. FRQ Deadline:November 20, 2018 at 4:30 PM
b. Consultant Shortlist:
c. Consultant Interviews:
d. Consultant Selection:
e. Scope and Fee Negotiations:
f. Agreement Approval by Board of Commissioners
g. Execute Contract:
VI.ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION:
1. Minority-owned and Women-owned Business Enterprises: The Counties strongly
encourage minority owned and women owned businesses, socially and economically
disadvantaged business enterprises, and small business to respond to this RFQ, to
participate as partners, or to participate in other business activity in response to this RFQ.
2. Basic Eli ibilit . Any successful firm must be licensed to do business in the State of
Washington and must have a state Unified Business Identifier(UBI)number. In addition,
the successful firm must not be debarred, suspended or otherwise ineligible to contract
with the Counties.
3. Payment Requirements: Firms should be aware that the Counties will only make payment
on invoices after the work being billed has been completed and will pay reimbursable
expenses to the firm only upon receipt of an itemized invoice for the reimbursable
expenses. No advance payments will be made to the firm: who must have the capacity to
meet all project expenses in advance of payments by the Counties:
4. Approval of Sub-Consultants: The Counties retain the right of final approval of any sub-
consultant of the elected firm who must inform all sub-consultants of this provision.
5. Documents Produced: All construction drawings, reports, specifications and other
documents produced under Contract to the Counties must be submitted to the Counties in
both hard copy and digital formats that meet the Counties requirements. All documents
shall become the exclusive property of the Counties.
6. Civil Ri ts: The Counties embrace civil rights and equal opportunity. If any events
occur involving the firm or sub-consultants that would violate those rights, the firm shall
take full responsibility for said actions.
7. Insurance: Successful consultant will be expected to enter into a standard consultant
agreement that includes the standard general insurance requirements as follows:
c:\users\fpinter\desktop\new jail project\bocc rfq engineering study draft fp.doc
The consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the Agreement, Insurance against
claims for injuries to persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with
the performance of the work hereunder by the consultant, its agent's representatives, or
employees. Consultant's maintenance of insurance as required by the agreement shall not be
construed to limit the liability of the Consultant to the coverage provided by such insurance, or
otherwise limit the Counties recourse to any remedy available at law or in equity.
A. Minimum Amounts and Scope of Insurance: Consultants shall obtain insurance of the
types and with the limits described below:
a. Automobile Liability insurance with a minimum combined single limit for bodily
injury and property damage of $1,000,000 per accident. Automobile Liability
insurance shall cover all owned, non-owned, hired and leased vehicles. Coverage
shall be written on Insurance Services Office (ISO) form CA 00 01 or a substitute
form providing equivalent liability coverage. If necessary, the policy shall be
endorsed to provide contractual liability coverage.
b. Commercial General Liability insurance with limits no less than $1,000,000 each
occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate. Commercial General Liability
insurance shall be written in ISO occurrence form CG 00 01 and shall cover
liability arising from premises, operations, independent contractors and personal
injury and advertising injury. The Counties shall be named as an insured under the
Consultant's Commercial General Liability insurance policy with respect to the
work performed for the Counties.
c. Workers' Compensation coverage as required by the Industrial Insurance laws of
the State of Washington.
d. Professional Liability with limits no less than $1,000,000 per claim and
$1,000,000 policy aggregate limit. Professional Liability Insurance shall be
appropriate to the Consultant's profession.
B. Other Insurance Provisions: The Consultant's Automobile Liability and Commercial
General Liability insurance policies are to contain, or be endorsed by contain that they
shall be primary insurance with respect to the Counties. Any insurance, self-insurance or
insurance pool coverage maintained by the Counties shall be in excess of the
Consultant's insurance and shall bet be contributed or combined with it.
C. Acceptability of Insurers: Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M
Best rating of not less than ANII.
D. Verification of Coverage: Consultant shall furnish the Counties with original certificates
and a copy of the amendatory endorsements, including but not necessarily limited to the
additional insured endorsement, evidencing the insurance requirements of the Consultant
before commencement of the work. Certificates of coverage and endorsements as
required by this section shall be delivered to the Counties within fifteen (15) days of
execution of the Agreement.
E. Indemnification and Hold Harmless language (as permitted by statute with immunities
under RCW 4.324.115) To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant agrees to indemnify,
defend and hold County and its departments, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents
and volunteers, harmless from and against any and all claims, damages, losses and expenses,
including but not limited to court costs,attorney's fees and alternative dispute resolution costs,for
any personal injury, for any bodily injury, sickness, disease or death and for any damage to or
c:\users\fpinter\desktop\new jail project\bocc rfq engineering study draft fp.doc
destruction of any property (including the loss of use resulting therefrom)which 1) are caused in
whole or in part by any act or omission, negligent or otherwise, of Consultant, its employees,
agents or volunteers or Consultant's subcontractors and their employees, agents or volunteers; or
2) are directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from, or in connection with performance of
this contract; or 3) are based upon Consultant's or its subcontractors' use of, presence upon or
proximity to the property of County for the value of the contract or$1,000,000,whichever is less.
This indemnification obligation of the Provider shall not apply in the limited circumstance where
the claim,damage,loss or expense is caused by the sole negligence of County. In the event of the
concurrent negligence of Consultant, its subcontractors, employees or agents, and County, its
employees or agents,this indemnification obligation of Consultant shall be valid and enforceable
only to the extent of the negligence of Consultant, its subcontractors,employees and agents. This
indemnification obligation of Consultant shall not be limited in any way by the Washington State
Industrial Insurance Act, RCW Title 51, or by application of any other workmen's compensation
act, disability benefit act or other employee benefit act, and Consultant hereby expressly waives
any immunity afforded by such acts. The foregoing indemnification obligations of Consultant are
a material inducement to County to enter into this contract, are reflected in Consultant's
compensation,and have been mutually negotiated by the parties.
F. Notice of Cancellation: The consultant shall provide the Counties with written notice of
any policy cancellation within two business days of their receipt of such notice.
G. Failure to Maintain Insurance: Failure on the part of the Consultant to maintain the
insurance as required shall constitute a material breach of the contract, upon which the
Counties may, after giving five business days' notice to the Consultant to correct the
breach, immediately terminate the contractor, at its discretion, procure or renew such
insurance and pay any and all premiums in connection therewith, with any sums so
expended to be repaid to the County's on demand, or at the sole discretion of the
Counties offset against funds due the Consultant from the Counties.
Grays Harbor and Mason Counties are Equal Opportunity Employers. Women and minority
owned(W/MB)businesses are encouraged to participate.
No other notifications for this proposal will be made, and no further action beyond submission of
the above data is required. Following an evaluation of the data submitted, the firm considered to
be the most highly qualified to provide the services required will be selected. The County may
make the selection based solely on the statement of qualifications, or at the sole discretion of the
County,the selection process may include an interview of selected firm(s).
Please submit three copies by 4:30 p.m. on November 20, 2018, to Grays Harbor County
Commissioners Office, 100 W Broadway Suite 1, Montesano, WA 98563. Questions should be
directed to Mark Cox, Director of Utilities and Facilities at 360-249-4222.
Publish November 1St and November 8d'
c:\users\fpinter\desktop\new jail project\bocc rfq engineering study draft fp.doc
Mason County Employee Survey
Thank you for y9uF aking this survey. The goal of this survey is to better understand
employee perceptions of working for Mason County. Your participation is essential to a
complete understanding of the experience of employees of the county.
The survey should take less than 10 minutes of your time. Your participation is voluntary, and
your responses will remain completely confidential.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact the survey administrator, Christina
Sanders (crosanders@wsu.edu).
Goal 1: To have managers and employees who are courteous, effective and efficient,
whose morale is high because they recognize their work is valued and they are part of
the planning process.
Page 1 of 10
1. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements. Response options
range from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree.
Strongly Somewhat Neither agree Somewhat Strongly
agree agree nor disagree disagree disagree
Education and
training programs
are developed
based on an
assessment of
employees' training
needs.
Managers and
supervisors let
employees know
how their work -
contributes to your
county's mission
and goals.
Employees receive
the training they
need to perform
their jobs. (for
example, on-the-
job training,
conferences,
workshops).
Employees receive
the everyday
guidance and
assistance they
need to perform
their jobs (for
example, help from
supervisors, team
leaders, or co-
workers).
Employees are
provided with
training that
enhances their
career
advancement
opportunities (for
example, through
cross-training,
detail assignments,
project work).
Page 2 of 10
Employees have
the tools they need -,
to be successful.
Employees receive
training and
guidance in
providing high Q
quality customer
service.
Goal 2: To increase confidence among the general public by providing efficient
coordinated cost-effective programs and services to the people of Mason County.
2. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements. Response options
range from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree.
Strongly Somewhat Neither agree Somewhat Strongly
agree agree nor disagree disagree disagree
Employees are
provided with
training when new
technologies and li
tools are
introduced.
Creativity and
innovation are O O
rewarded.
New practices and
ways of doing
business are
encouraged.
Goal 3: To institute a management planning process in Mason County. The process
should include employee accountability and evaluation through clearly defined
department objectives.
Page 3 of 10
3. What are some of the issues that either currently face your county or are expected to face it
in the very near future?
4. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements. Response options
range from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree.
Strongly Somewhat Neither agree Somewhat Strongly
agree agree nor disagree disagree disagree
My supervisor - - -_- -
provides me with
constructive
suggestions to a Q L;
improve my job
performance.
Task
responsibilities and
performance
standards are U O 0
clearly
communicated to
me at work.
have enough
information to do
my job well.
I feel encouraged to
come up with new
and better ways of _
doing things.
Goal 4: To have a work environment where all individuals can feel they are a trusted
member of the organization as well as promoting public trust in the abilities of all levels
of Mason County Government.
Page 4 of 10
5. What role does communication (inter-personal, inter-departmental) play in your ability to
perform your job?
6. What role does communication play in the capacity of your county government to function?
Does this vary from department to department?
7. Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements. Response options
range from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree.
Strongly Somewhat Neither agree Somewhat Strongly
agree agree nor disagree disagree disagree
Manager and
supervisors
communicate the -
goals and priorities -of your county.
Managers and
supervisors follow
up on employee
suggestions for
improvement in Q J Q Q
products, services
and work
processes.
Employees are kept
informed on issues Q Q Q Q
affecting their jobs.
Managers and
supervisors promote
communication
among different
work units (for Q Q
example, about
projects, goals,
needed resources).
Page 5 of 10
Please tell us about your perceptions of trust among departments in the county
government.
8. What would you say is the general level of trust between the various departments and actors
in your county government?
9. Does this trust dynamic have an influence on the effectiveness and productivity of your
county government?
10. Is trust among departments a major or a minor issue in your mind?
A big issue
An issue
A small issue
Not an issue at all
No opinion
11. How do you see yourself involved in bringing about greater trust between departments at
your county government?
Page 6 of 10
In the next section, please tell us more about your employment with the county.
12. How long have you worked in the county?
Less than a year
0 1-5 years
0 5-10 years
O More than 10 years
13. What motivated you to work for the county?
14. What has motivated you to continue to work for the county?
Demographics
In order to allow researchers to best understand the representativeness of survey
respondents compared to the general population of county employees, please share
some basic demographic information in the section below.
Page 7 of 10
SF DIoas`m,dicat, your raGe. Please mark all that pp4,
;;RIaGk nr Afrinan 4meriean
;;AmeF'Gan IndiaR GF Alaska Native
640ther (PEeasespeGif„)
�Drofor not to anc�emr
-&4e-s
Prefer net to aRswer
Page 8 of 10
17. Please indicate your age in years.
018-20
021-29
030-39
0; 40-49
050-59
0, 60-69
n 70 and over
18. Please inrlinate vee r gender
Male
Female
Transgender
�
Other
Page 9 of 10
19. What is the highest level of education you have completed?
Completed grade school
High School Graduate
Some college (degree not completed)
Graduate Degree
Associate Degree
Bachelor Degree
Some Graduate Coursework
Prefer not to answer
Page 10 of 10
PUBLIC WORKS
MONDAY OCTOBER 22.2018— BRIEFING ITEMS
FROM PUBLIC WORKS
(For Commissioners Meeting November 6,2018)
Items for this meeting are due to Diane Zoren on Wednesday, October 31, 2018
5.0 CORRESPONDENCE AND ORGANIZATIONAL BUSINESS
(None)
8.0 APPROVAL OF ACTION ITEM
• 2019 Day of Caring
• 2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
9.0 OTHER BUSINESS
(None)
10.0 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND ITEMS SET FOR A CERTAIN TIME
(None)
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Attendees:
Commissioners: Public Works: Other Dept.: Press: Public:
_Randy Neatherlin _Jerry Hauth List below: List below List Below:
_Kevin Shutty _Bart Stepp
Terri Drexler _Sarah Grice
Others-List below:
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Bart Stepp, Deputy Director/ Utilities and Waste Management
DEPARTMENT: Public Works EXT: 652
BRIEFING DATE: October 22, 2018
ITEM: 2019 Day of Caring Clean Up Day Proposal
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The last two years Mason County has used a free cleanup day under the contract with
Republic Services in conjunction with United Way's Day of Caring. This year the cleanup
site was at the Oakland Bay Middle School parking lot. This was a substantially larger site
than their location in 2017 in downtown Shelton.
The response was far greater than 2017. Most of the people who showed up were unable
to be serviced. Once United Way closed their site, many people went to Eells Hill, causing
a backup along Eells Hill Road. Reviewing what happened two things became clear:
1) The Day of Caring cleanup is to provide services for residents with limited means, but
people with the means to pay for disposal at Eells Hill were willing to wait hours for
free disposal, contributing to the large response.
2) There is no spot in Mason County that could adequately handle the volume United
Way saw. Even the transfer station would be overwhelmed with that kind of traffic.
Because of that we are proposing to change the process. For 2019 staff is proposing that
United Way be in charge of a voucher program. United Way would issues vouchers to one
of two set days next year. The vouchers would only be good for 1,000 pounds of waste.
On the cleanup days United Way volunteers would be at Eells Hill to check and verify
vouchers. Customers without vouchers could still use the facility like normal. The number
of vouchers for each day would be limited to prevent Eells Hill from being too congested.
To obtain a voucher residents will need to go to United Way and sign up for it. They will
also need to obtain the voucher a set amount of time before the actual voucher day. The
hope is this type of extended process will prevent people who can pay for solid waste
service from using the voucher system.
Cost Impact to the County
The cleanup day is no cost to the County through the contract with Republic. The
additional customers on the two voucher days will not require overtime or additional labor
costs for the County.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION: The Board of Commissioners approves
the use of two (2) cleanup days in 2019 as part of the County's contract with Republic
Services to provide free services to residents that receive vouchers from United Way.
Attachment
1. 2019 Day of Caring Voucher Information from United Way
Briefing Summary
LIVE UNITED R
' n
f
REPUBLIC
SERVICES
Free Dump Day May 3rd, 2019
What: In partnership with Mason County Public Works and Republic Services, United Way of Mason
County will be giving away 150 vouchers to be used at Mason County Landfill, on May 3rd,2019. The vouch-
ers are good for up to 1,000 lbs. only, of household garbage. Two miscellaneous items will be allowed per
voucher (i.e. couch, mattress, tables) One trip only per voucher.
See below for restrictions .
1"0: 150 Mason County residents. With Valid I.D. and proof of address. ( I.E. power, cable, or
water bill)
When: On Feb 26th,2019-March 25th, 2019 Vouchers will be handed out to 150 Mason County resi-
dents. Vouchers can be redeemed at Mason County Landfill in Shelton, WA on May 3rd,2019, only.
How: Starting February 26th,2019, until vouchers are gone. Monday-Friday 10a.m.-2p.m. you can come
into United Way of Mason County's office and fill out required paper work to receive the voucher. Require-
ments for vouchers are first come first serve, valid ID. with proof of Mason County address.( I.E. power, ca-
ble, or water bill) You will be eligible for one voucher per address. Voucher will only cover 1,000 lbs of
household garbage. If load exceeds 1,000lbs you will be responsible for charges.
Items that will not be covered by the Voucher.
• Anything over 1,000lbs ( if the load of garbage exceeds 1,000lbs YOU will be responsible for the extra cost)
• Tires of any kind.
• Liquids—Latex paint cans must be completely dry. Fill cans with leftover paint with kitty litter, or dirt.
• No fertilizers, oil, or"mystery fluids".
• Explosives, Flammables or Ammunition—this includes fireworks, blasting caps, flares or unstable materials that
can ignite or explode.
• Dirt or Rocks—some incidental dirt that gets swept in is fine, but no boxes or quantities of dirt.
• Biohazard, radioactive or medical wastes
• Bio solids or septage
• No Freezers, Refrigerators, air conditioners
For any questions please contact
United Way of Mason County at (360)-426-4999
Mason County Landfill for more information on their rules and restrictions for household garbage (360)427-
5271
501 W Eells Hill Rd, Shelton, WA 98584 https://www.co.mason.wa.us/utilities-waste/solid-waste/index.php
R
LIVE UNITED
�k REPUBLIC
� n
SERVICES
Voucher Process
Step 1-Verification process-
Persons come into United Way, with Valid ID and proof of address (garbage, cable,water
bill,etc.)
➢ They fill out the information sheet and sign acknowledgment of process (see attached)
➢ We photocopy ID onto the information sheet
Step 2-Excel Spreadsheet-
UW logs the Persons information, Last name first(see attached)
➢ UW cross checks that only 1 Voucher per address is given
Step 3-Voucher pick up-
UW calls Person to have them come back (within a few days)
➢ We have them read over voucher(sign and initial bottom of voucher)
➢ Verify individual understand process and timeline
➢ UW signs and date
➢ Stamp/sticker for final approval
Step 4-Day of Event May 3rd-
Voucher verification prior to entrance of Mason County Landfill
➢ Persons hands us the Voucher and ID (no entry without)
➢ UW confirms that it matches the info we have on Excel spreadsheet
➢ Landfill tenant will accept and record weight
Used Vouchers to be returned to United Way
R
LIVE UNITED
Z
9soN co REPUBLIC
SERVICES
VOUCHER 101
Name:
Address:
Phone:
Issue Date:
Voucher Only Valid on May 3rd
PLEASE NOTE: GIVE THIS VOUCHER ALONG WITH CURRENT PHOTO ID,
TO THE UNITED WAY/SCALE ATTENDANT BEFORE DUMPING.
Voucher Terms & Details
Inbound and outbound weights will be recorded. Customer will be required
to pay current disposal rate ( $99.16 ) for weight in excess of 1,000 lbs. Be
prepared to pay, in case load exceeds 1,000 lbs. Initial
This voucher is valid for Mason County residents only, for the disposal of Household
waste and 2 miscellaneous items (chair, table, mattress). One voucher per year and
one voucher only per primary residence. One trip only per voucher. Business waste is
not accepted with this voucher. Expired or lost vouchers cannot be replaced or
honored.
THIS VOUCHER MAY NOT BE TRANSFERRED OR DUPLICATED. Initial
I have read and understood............
Signature of Recipient
Signature of UWMC staff
*See reverse for more details
*Will not be accepted without voucher and ID
OFFICE USE-NET WEIGHT
Mason County Landfill
501 W Ells Hill Rd, Shelton WA
Friday 9-4 for Vouchers
Phone: (360) 427-5271
*Items not allowed with the voucher include -
Tires, Liquids (latex paint cans must be completely dry. Fill cans with leftover
paint with kitty litter, or dirt. No fertilizers, oil, or "mystery fluids".
Explosives, Flammables or Ammunition (this includes fireworks, blasting
caps, flares or unstable materials that can ignite or explode.
Dirt or Rocks (some incidental dirt that gets swept in is fine, but no boxes or
quantities of dirt.
Biohazard, radioactive or medical waste
No Refrigerators, Freezers or Air conditioners
Signature
i
Voucher Information
*Person picking up and using the voucher*
Today's Date
Last name
First name
Street
Address
City
Telephone Cell
Signature
*Copy of current photo ID, address must match information listed above.
• UWMC Employee take a photo copy of the Washington State ID
• Give Voucher
• Ask if they have any questions
• Add to Excel spreadsheet
• Make copy of signed Voucher
• Proof of address (I.E. Power Bill, cable, or water)
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Bart Stepp, Deputy Director/ Utilities and Waste Management
DEPARTMENT: Public Works EXT: 652
BRIEFING DATE: October 22, 2018
PREVIOUS BRIEFING DATE: August 7, 2017; Public Hearing September 5, 2017
ITEM: Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Since 2015 the Solid Waste Advisory Committee for the County
has been working on a revision of the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
(CSWMP). Mason County is required to have a CSWMP under RCW 70.95.080.
The approval process of the CSWMP requires several steps. This includes:
1) Presentation at Planning Advisory Commission Meeting — 8/28/17
2) SEPA determination — DNS 8/31/17
3) Holding a public hearing — BOCC 9/5/17
4) Review by state agencies and incorporation of their comments into CSWMP
a. Utilities and Transportation Commission 10/26/17
b. Department of Agriculture 10/31/17
c. Department of Ecology 2/9/18
5) Approval by the City of Shelton — 10/02/18
6) Approval by Mason County of CSWMP and Waste Reduction and Recycling Element —
Current Step
7) Review of Waste Reduction and Recycling Element by Solid Waste Advisory Committee
(SWAC) — Scheduled for November SWAC Meeting
8) Final approval by Ecology.
The attached CSWMP with this briefing is being presented for approval by the Board of
Commissioners so it can be forwarded to Ecology.
Cost Impact to the County: This Plan was completed by the SWAC with the help of
County Staff using existing resources except for the Capital Investment Needs report
(Appendix A of the CSWMP) which was completed by a consultant in 2016. Approval of the
plan by Ecology will make Mason County and the City of Shelton eligible for certain types of
funding programs from the state like the Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance (LSWFA)
Program.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION: Recommend the Board of Commissioners
approve the 2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan, which
includes a waste reduction and recycling element.
Attachment
1) 2018 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
2) 10/4/18 City of Shelton Concurrence Letter (Page 136)
Briefing Summary
MASON
COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
I
Wl
y r�T.��a Ls♦is i�z:., ,r r. .. wte Yr:�)x .`.:t .1�•
t.
A
t
Mason •unty Solid Waste Advisory Committee
Mason • Public Works
11 W. Public Works
Shelton, • 98584
PURPOSE OF DOCUMENT
This Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan meets the requirements of RCW 70.95 and the
Washington Department of Ecology's requirements for a Solid Waste Management Plan.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Mason County Would Like to acknowledge the following people who assisted in the development and
approval of the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan:
Mason County Solid Waste Advisory Committee
Eric Nelson, PE, District 1 Representative (Previous)
Jeff Bickford, District 2 Representative
Cheryl Williams, District 3 Representative (Previous)
Kevin Schmelzen, District 3 Representative (Previous)
Jason Dose, City of Shelton Representative (Previous)
Rik Fredrickson, Mason County Garbage, Industry Representative
Delroy Cox,JDEL Consulting, Industry Representative
Dan Teuteberg,WSU Extension,Agriculture Representative
Mason County Board of Commissioners
Randy Neatherlin, District 1
Kevin Shutty, District 2
Terri Drexler, District 3
Mason County Staff
Zachery Foster,Solid Waste Manager, Public Works
Maria Machado, Environmental Health Specialist I (Previous), Environmental Health Division
Melissa McFadden, PE, Deputy Director/County Engineer(Previous), Public Works
Debbie Riley, Environmental Health Manager(Previous), Environmental Health Division
Bart Stepp, PE, Deputy Director/Utilities &Waste Management, Public Works
PUBLICATION DATE OCTOBER 10, 2018
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY.................................................................................................................................ES- 1
CHAPTER 1-GOALS FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT....................................................................................1
CHAPTER 2- PLAN OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES................................................................................................3
2.1 Waste Reduction............................................................................................................................... 3
2.2 Recycling........................................................................................................................................... 4
2.3 Organics............................................................................................................................................ 4
2.4 Enforcement..................................................................................................................................... 5
2.5 Wood Waste..................................................................................................................................... 5
2.6 Biosolids............................................................................................................................................ 6
2.7 White Goods..................................................................................................................................... 6
2.8 Construction and Demolition (C&D)Waste...................................................................................... 7
2.9 Asbestos Contaminated Wastes....................................................................................................... 7
2.10 Medical Wastes ................................................................................................................................. 7
2.11 Waste Tires........................................................................................................................................ 8
2.12 Disaster Waste................................................................................................................................... 8
2.13 Collection Activities........................................................................................................................... 9
2.14 Eells Hill Transfer Station and Rural Transfer Stations...................................................................... 9
2.15 Administration and Management................................................................................................... 10
CHAPTER 3-SOLID WASTE HANDLING METHODS&SYSTEMS........................................................................11
3.1 Description of the Mason County Solid Waste System................................................................... 11
3.1.1 The Eells Hill Transfer Station.................................................................................................. 11
3.1.2 Rural drop box stations............................................................................................................ 11
3.1.3 Known Landfills Located In Mason County.............................................................................. 13
3.1.4 Surveillance and Control.......................................................................................................... 13
3.2 Service Levels................................................................................................................................... 14
3.2.1 City Provided Services.............................................................................................................. 14
3.2.2 Franchised Waste Collection Company................................................................................... 14
3.2.3 Self-haul................................................................................................................................... 15
3.2.4 Construction and Demolition (C&D)Waste............................................................................. 15
3.2.5 Import/Export.......................................................................................................................... 15
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan TC-1
3.3 Permits Required and Administration Methods.............................................................................. 15
3.4 Solid Waste Service Collection Rates............................................................................................... 16
3.4.1 Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. rates for City of Shelton....................................................... 16
3.4.2 Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. rates for Unincorporated Mason County.......................... 167
3.4.3 Self-Haul Rates......................................................................................................................... 18
3.5 Existing Operational Practices........................................................................................................ 19
3.5.1 Eells Hill Transfer Station Operations...................................................................................... 19
3.5.2 Drop Box Station Operations................................................................................................... 20
3.6 Facilities Siting Review..................................................................................................................... 20
3.7 Needs and Opportunities ................................................................................................................ 20
CHAPTER 4-WASTE REDUCTION, REUSE AND RECYCLING .............................................................................21
4.1 Waste Reduction ............................................................................................................................. 21
4.1.1 Existing Practices..................................................................................................................... 21
4.1.2 Needs and Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 22
4.2 Recycling.......................................................................................................................................... 22
4.2.1 Existing Practices ..................................................................................................................... 22
4.2.2 Needs and Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 24
4.3 Composting...................................................................................................................................... 24
4.3.1 Existing Practices ..................................................................................................................... 24
4.3.2 Needs and Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 25
4.4 Public Education and Outreach ....................................................................................................... 25
4.4.1 Existing Practices ..................................................................................................................... 25
4.4.2 Needs and Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 26
CHAPTER S- MODERATE RISK WASTE MANAGEMENT....................................................................................27
5.1 Overview.......................................................................................................................................... 27
5.1.1 Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)....................................................................................... 27
5.1.2 Commercial Hazardous Waste ................................................................................................ 28
5.2 Household and Small Business Collection....................................................................................... 28
5.2.1 Existing Practices..................................................................................................................... 28
5.2.2 Needs and Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 28
5.3 Public Education and Technical Assistance..................................................................................... 29
5.3.1 Existing Practices..................................................................................................................... 29
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan TC-2
5.3.2 Needs and Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 30
5.4 Household Hazardous Waste Training, Health, and Safety............................................................. 31
5.5 Hazardous Waste Generators.......................................................................................................... 31
5.6 Site Inventories................................................................................................................................ 31
5.7 Hazardous Waste Transporters and Facilities................................................................................. 31
CHAPTER 6-CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WASTE STREAM.............................................................................32
6.1 Municipal Solid Waste..................................................................................................................... 32
6.1.1 MSW Composition................................................................................................................... 32
6.1.2 MSW Per Capita Generation Nationwide................................................................................ 33
6.1.3 MSW Generation in Mason County......................................................................................... 33
6.1.4 Countywide Trends.................................................................................................................. 34
6.2 Special Wastes................................................................................................................................. 35
6.2.1 Animal Carcasses..................................................................................................................... 35
6.2.2 Asbestos................................................................................................................................... 35
6.2.3 Biomedical Waste.................................................................................................................... 36
6.2.4 Biosolids.................................................................................................................................. 36
6.2.5 Septic Tank Sludge................................................................................................................... 37
6.2.6 Construction and Demolition (C&D)Wastes........................................................................... 37
6.2.7 Disaster Debris......................................................................................................................... 38
6.2.8 Electronic Waste...................................................................................................................... 38
6.2.9 Waste Tires.............................................................................................................................. 39
CHAPTER 7- CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PLANNING AREA............................................................................40
7.1 Physical Description......................................................................................................................... 40
7.1.1 Geology.................................................................................................................................... 40
7.1.2 Hydrology and Hydrogeology.................................................................................................. 40
7.1.3 Climate..................................................................................................................................... 41
7.1.4 Air Quality................................................................................................................................ 41
7.2 Population ....................................................................................................................................... 42
7.3 Employment and Economic Statistics.............................................................................................. 42
7.3.1 General Trends ........................................................................................................................ 42
7.3.2 Labor Force and Unemployment Rates................................................................................... 43
7.3.3 Median Household Income ..................................................................................................... 44
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan TC-3
CHAPTER 8- PARTICIPANT ROLES IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................45
8.1 Overview.......................................................................................................................................... 45
8.2 Participating Jurisdictions................................................................................................................ 45
8.3 Role of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee ................................................................................. 45
8.4 Role of Staff..................................................................................................................................... 46
8.5 Role of Citizens................................................................................................................................ 46
8.6 Washington State Laws and Administrative Codes......................................................................... 46
8.7 Board of County Commissioners..................................................................................................... 46
8.8 Solid Waste Administration............................................................................................................. 46
8.8.1 Existing Practices..................................................................................................................... 47
8.8.2 Needs and Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 47
CHAPTER 9- RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS AND PERMITTING OF SOLID WASTE FACILITIES.....................48
9.1 State Solid and Hazardous Waste Plan............................................................................................ 48
9.2 Previous County Solid Waste Planning............................................................................................ 48
9.2.1 Previous Solid Waste Management Plans............................................................................... 49
9.2.2 Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan................................................................................ 49
9.3 Resource Lands and Critical Areas Designations............................................................................ 49
9.4 Economic Development Plan.......................................................................................................:... 49
9.5 Other County Plans.......................................................................................................................... 49
9.6 Permitting of Solid Waste Facilities................................................................................................. 50
CHAPTER 10-OVERVIEW OF PLANNING TO DATE...........................................................................................51
10.1 Previous Solid Waste Plans.............................................................................................................. 51
10.2 Jurisdictional Involvement............................................................................................................... 53
10.3 Plan Review...................................................................................................................................... 53
10.3.1 Annual Review......................................................................................................................... 53
10.3.2 Five-Year Review: 2022 ........................................................................................................... 53
10.4 Plan Amendment............................................................................................................................. 53
10.5 Plan Revision.................................................................................................................................... 54
10.6 Solid Waste Financial Plan............................................................................................................... 54
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan TC-4
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A-SOLID WASTE SYSTEM CAPITAL INVESTMENT NEEDS...........................................................56
APPENDIX B—REGULATORY OVERVIEW......................................................................................................96
APPENDIXC—GLOSSARY...........................................................................................................................102
APPENDIXD—ACRONYMS.........................................................................................................................106
APPENDIX E—UTC COST ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE..........................................................................108
APPENDIXF—SEPA CHECKLIST..................................................................................................................120
APPENDIX G—CITY OF SHELTON AND KITSAP COUNTY DOCUMENTATION .............................................135
APPENDIX H—PUBLIC OUTREACH AND STATE AGENCY DOCUMENTATION.................................................141
APPENDIX I —HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATORS AND FACILITIES................................................................156
LIST OF TABLES
3.1 Monthly Sanitation Service Charge for Residential Service ..................................................... 16
3.2 Monthly Services Charges for Commercial Pickup based on Container Volume..................... 17
3.3 Current Mason County Garbage Service Level and Associated Rates...................................... 17
3.4 Mason County Customers whose Garbage is Disposed in Kitsap County................................ 18
3.5 Mason County Solid Waste Tipping Fee Breakdown................................................................ 18
3.6 Mason County Solid Waste Facilities 2018 Self-Haul Disposal Rates....................................... 19
4.1 City of Shelton Recycling Collections (tons) ............................................................................. 22
4.2 Mason County Blue Box Collections (tons)............................................................................... 23
4.3 Mason County Residential Curbside Recycling......................................................................... 23
5.1 Hazardous Household Material Groups ................................................................................... 27
5.2 Moderate Risk Quantities Collected through the HHW Facility............................................... 30
6.1 Estimate of Total Municipal Solid Waste Stream, Percent of Total Tons................................. 32
6.2 Overall Statewide Disposed Waste Stream Composition by Material Class............................ 33
6.3 MSW Total and Per Capital Tonnage for Mason County as reported, 2010-2015................. 33
6.4 City of Shelton and Unincorporated Area Waste Generation Comparison, 2010-2015......... 34
6.5 Low, Intermediate, and High Projections for Total Waste Stream, 2020 through 2040.......... 34
7.1 Mason County Population 1990 to 2015.................................................................................. 42
7.2 Mason County Population Projections, 2015 to 2040.............................................................. 42
7.3 Mason County Unemployment versus Statewide Unemployment.......................................... 44
8.1 Membership of the Mason County SWAC................................................................................ 46
10.1 Status of Recommendations from the Previous Plan (2011) ................................................... 51
10.2 Mason County Six-Year Solid Waste Capital Improvement Program....................................... 54
10.3 Long Term Financial Projections for Solid Waste System, 2020 to 2040................................. 55
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan TC-5
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Background
This 2017 Mason County Consolidated Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP) is a complete revision
of, and supersedes, the Mason County Solid Waste Management Plan 2006 and its 2011 Addendum.
The Solid Waste Management Reduction and Recycling Act, Chapter 70.95 of the Revised Code of
Washington (CH 70.95 RCW) requires a review/update of the Department of Ecology (Ecology) approved
county solid waste management plans every five years to keep them current so timely update planning
of the existing documents began in 2013. However progress on the document revision was extremely
slow and due to turnover of Utilities and Waste Management Department personnel, along with
budgetary constraints, it became evident that a revised document could not be produced using normal
waste management plan development methods. Therefore a decision was made in May, 2015 that the
Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC), including the City of Shelton, would take primary
responsibility for developing the updated/revised solid waste management plan. Following discussions
during many preliminary planning and scoping meetings it became evident that the form and generic
content of the existing documents were not suitable for updating so the SWAC decided that a new
document would be produced.
This new CSWMP was developed using information contained in "Guidelines for Development of Local
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plans and Plan Revisions"(Ecology Publication No. 10-07-005)
and considering "Moving Washington Beyond Waste and Toxics"(Ecology Publication No. 15-04-019).
Organization
Chapter 1 describes the goals of this plan to reflect the desired outcomes for the waste stream, waste
reduction, and recycling to achieve over the next twenty years (2037) with emphasis on the first six
years (2023). Chapter 2 provides information about plan objectives and recommendations that
implement its goals for solid waste management. Chapters 3 through 7 discuss the various elements of
the solid waste management system in Mason County, and provide the information related to existing
conditions along with specific recommendations where applicable. Chapter 8 provides a discussion of
participant roles in the new plan development and Chapter 9 describes the relationship of this plan to
other relevant Mason County planning documents along with a short discussion of solid waste handling
facility permitting requirements. Chapter 10 is a status of how this plan continues to implement the
unfulfilled recommendations of the previous plan. The Appendices contain supporting information for
developing and understanding the CSWMP along with the resolution of comments received during the
plan review and approval process (including the SEPA review).
Summaries of Chapters 3 through 7
While Chapters 1 and 2 summarize the goals, objectives, and activities developed further in subsequent
chapters, it is worthwhile to emphasize some of the information contained in those chapters in this
Executive Summary to provide Utilities and Waste Management personnel and the Mason County Board
of County Commissioners (BOCC)with near-term planning considerations.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ES-1
Chapter 3—Solid Waste Handling Methods &Systems
The Eells Hill Transfer Station and Rural Drop Box facilities are described with a compilation of use
statistics and current user fees. The current status of known landfills in Mason County is also discussed
with a description of regulatory requirements that must be adhered to until these sites attain complete
closure as authorized by Ecology.
Specific Needs and Opportunities identified are:
• Evaluate the physical and economic impacts of implementing flow control at Mason County
solid waste facilities.
• For safety and operational considerations, implement suggested upgrades and improvements
at the Eells Hill and rural drop box stations (Detailed in Appendix A).
• Prior to the expiration of the hauling contract with Republic Services, the County should
evaluate the potential benefits of having a private contractor take over operations of facilities
as well as providing hauling services and issue a RFP to explore privatization of the facilities and
construction of a new transfer station at Eells Hill.
Chapter 4—Waste Reduction, Reuse and Recycling
Details of existing waste reduction, recycling and composting practices, collectively known as "waste
diversion" practices, are discussed and recycling statistics are presented. Useful waste diversion web
sites are identified for public use along with a discussion of the waste audit program offered to
businesses for their waste reduction use. Public Education and outreach programs related to waste
diversion are also discussed.
Specific Needs and Opportunities identified are:
• The ability to quantify the results of waste reduction activities needs to be developed to allow
measuring progress towards waste diversion goals
• Public awareness of recycling benefits must be increased.
• A usable food waste composting process would reduce landfill disposal volumes.
• Diversion of yard debris/wood waste volumes at drop box/transfer station should be increased.
• Increased Utilities and Waste Management Department presence in schools and at public
events is needed to bring attention to waste diversion options and services available. The last
known public solid waste survey was conducted in 2005.
• Unpaid internships could be used to conduct "special projects" (related to solid waste) for
Utilities Waste Management personnel encumbered by other priorities.
Chapter 5—Moderate Risk Waste Management
Moderate Risk Wastes (MRW) are household hazardous wastes that are exempted because they are
generated by consumers in their homes or are hazardous wastes that are below the threshold quantity
for regulation. Typical household use products are identified and disposal practices at the Eells Hill/rural
drop box facilities are discussed. Deficiencies at County Solid Waste facilities are referenced (Chapter 3
and Appendix A) and the most critical near-term items are identified. Mason County public education
efforts are described along with employee health and safety requirements. Ecology's database for
hazardous waste generators and hazardous sites is referenced.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ES-2
Specific MRW Needs and Opportunities identified are:
• Eells Hill immediate repair/upgrade needs
1. Repair/replace and freeze protect emergency eyewash/shower stations (Complete)
2. Install a new pump in the wastewater holding tank
3. Install a rain curtain in the waste oil handling bay
4. Assess the HHW facility for relevant Code compliance and functional performance
5. Assess fire risks and on-site response capabilities
• Drop Box Stations immediate repair/upgrade needs
1. Install and/or repair perimeter fencing(Complete)
2. Install secondary containment for HHW sheds (Complete)
3. Install or repair damaged asphalt pavement around HHW collection areas
Chapter 6—Characterization of the Waste Stream
Citing Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Ecology sources, it is noted that the Mason County
municipal solid waste (MSW) per capita generation rate is 25% lower than the national average (0.6 tons
versus 0.8 tons). The average percentage of total MSW volume being recycled from 2010 — 2015 is
8.78%. Statistics for MSW generated countywide (including the City of Shelton) are given for the years
2010 to 2015 along with 5-year increment projected generation rates for 2020 through 2040. Disposal
of "special wastes" i.e., animal carcasses, asbestos, biomedical wastes, biosolids, septic tank sludge,
construction & demolition wastes (C&D), disaster debris, electronic waste, and waste tires are
discussed. No needs or opportunities have been identified for these special wastes when the identified
methods are implemented.
Chapter 7—Characterization of the Planning Area
The physical environment of Mason County is described and a map of the service area is presented with
the location of all solid waste handling facilities. The past population data (1990 to 2015) is presented
along with projected trends from 2015 to 2040. Accompanying the population information is a
discussion of recent employment and economic data. The chapter ends with a brief discussion of land
use trends. No needs or opportunities have been identified that include expansion of solid waste
handling facilities beyond the areas already in use. Any expansion or new transfer station at Eells Hill
can be built within the existing Eells Hill property that is already approved for solid waste use.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan ES-3
CHAPTER 1
GOALS FOR SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Mason County has adopted the following goals for comprehensive solid waste management.
Planning Goals reflect the desired outcomes for the waste stream, waste reduction, and recycling to achieve
over the next twenty years (2037)with an emphasis on the first six years (2023).
The goals of this plan are to describe the existing system and then lay the foundation for the proper
management of solid waste systems in Mason County now and in the future. The standards by which
programs will be developed and implemented are consistent with the requirements of the Revised Code of
Washington (RCW), the Washington Administrative Code (WAC), and the Mason County Code of Ordinances.
These goals have been developed in consultation with affected sections of the community. Each element of
the Solid Waste Management Program must address the Plan's comprehensive goals,which are to:
1. Implement an economically sound solid waste management system, conforming to Federal,
Washington State, regional, and local statutes and rules.
2. Seek a balance between public health requirements, environmental protection measures, and public
expenditures.
3. Apply solid waste management priorities according to the state hierarchy.
4. Identify and consider implementation of emerging methods for improved management and handling
of all waste.
5. Maintain an efficient and effective system of waste stream measurement and monitoring.
6. Maintain sufficient flexibility to allow adaptation of strategies in accordance with local resources and
unanticipated changes, needs, and opportunities.
7. Foster cooperative and coordinated efforts among government agencies, citizens, and the private
sector.
8. Ensure education and information elements are an integral part of all programs related to solid waste
management and reduction.
9. Develop and implement a program evaluation and performance review schedule through the Solid
Waste Advisory Committee(SWAC)and the solid waste staff.
10. Emphasize the development and implementation of the most efficient technologies for waste
reduction, reuse, and recycling.
11. Consider waste reduction programs that will be a cooperative effort by Mason County and local
municipalities to the greatest extent possible.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 1
12. Evaluate public/private partnerships to consider if an arrangement can be made that benefits all
participants.
13. Budget improvements and repairs to all transfer stations for safety, productivity, and maintenance
improvements.
14. Enact and enforce a truck tarping ordinance in accordance with RCW 46.61 to reduce highway and
road litter.
15. Encourage Mason County and City of Shelton to create and maintain "Adopt A Road" litter programs.
16. Enforce event recycling at all public and sporting events. RCW 70.93.093
17. Evaluate alternative funding mechanisms or service regulations to ensure a stable budget for solid
waste program implementation and enforcement.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 2
CHAPTER 2
PLAN OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES
Mason County has adopted a series of plan objectives and recommendations that implements its goals for
Solid Waste Management. Work Plan Objectives are specific accomplishments to achieve over the next five
years that show progress in achieving the plan's goals (2017-2022). Waste Reduction Activities are specific
projects or actions to implement the Work Plan Objectives.
While each Work Plan Objective is important, five of them lead the way: waste reduction, recycling,
composting, enforcement, and moderate-risk waste management. County and municipal solid waste
management efforts will emphasize these objectives and their recommendations above the rest. As time,
resources, and unique opportunities arise, the County will resume implementing the remaining ones. The
Work Plan Objective for moderate-risk waste management follows separately in Chapter S.
Each Work Plan Objective and its recommendations show the responsible party for implementation and the
funding source. Implementation of these tasks is an ongoing process, with the Solid Waste Advisory
Committee (SWAC) holding an annual review in April to determine progress.
2.1 Waste Reduction
Work Plan Objective: Explore and support incentives and programs that encourage waste reduction
practices among citizens and within local governments, businesses, public institutions, and industry.
Establish a base line volume for all Mason County solid waste facilities and provide timely reports showing
diversion amounts and the annual amount of change for each facility and the system as a whole.
Waste Reduction Activities:
WR 1 Request technical assistance from the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) to
explore strategies for use by governments, institutions, businesses, and industry that encourage
the use and purchase of products containing pre- and post-consumer recycled material content in
the workplace.
• Solid Waste Program (SWP)staff to meet with Ecology to determine scope of assistance
• SWP staff to consult with SWAC in fall to determine scope of interest,topics
• Set the date to market a waste reduction workshop to interested groups, businesses
• Hold evening workshops(s)
Implementation:2018-2020
WR 2 Incorporate appropriate waste reduction strategies, including Product Stewardship programs,
identified by the SWAC into existing educational outreach efforts.
Implementation:Ongoing
WR 3 Continue to support material reuse websites to encourage reuse of common household items
among citizens.
Implementation:Ongoing
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 3
2.2 Recycling
Work Plan Objective: Reduce Mason County waste stream by 5%through an active recycling program.
Recycling Activities:
R 1 The SWP and the solid waste contractor will continue to market countywide the co-mingled
container recycling program.
Implementation:Ongoing
R 2 The SWP will continue to fund recycling public education and information programs. The program
will also explore new partnerships and techniques to deliver programs throughout Mason County.
Implementation:Ongoing
R 3 The SWAC will continue to explore new ways to expand recycling opportunities and programs for
the public. The SWAC will hold a solid waste review every April that will include analysis of
recycling activities over the past year and potential improvements.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund#402, Contractor Collection Rates
Responsibility: County,SWAC,Solid Waste Division,City of Shelton,Solid Waste Contractors
2.3 Organics
Work Plan Objective: Continue to expand services and educational outreach and opportunities for handling
organics.
Organics Activities:
01 The County will explore and / or consider working in cooperation with the Washington State
University (WSU) Cooperative Extension, Master Gardener Program to promote backyard
composter training, education, and sales to the public and school districts. The SWAC will support
an outreach program.
Implementation:Ongoing
02 The County will maintain and expand a yard and wood waste collection program through the Eells
Hill Transfer Station. At the annual Solid Waste Review, the SWAC will discuss status of public
interest and cost to establish a yard waste collection program at Eells Hill Transfer Station.
Implementation:Ongoing
03 Solid Waste Division staff will consult with SWAC annually during the Solid Waste Review to
determine if there is a need for technical assistance.
Implementation:Ongoing
04 Environmental Health Division (EHD)will continue to identify and track existing and past permitted
and exempt facilities; monitor for compliance.
Implementation:Ongoing
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 4
05 Encourage the creation of additional private outlets for organic processing in Mason County,
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund#402
Responsibility: County, City of Shelton, SWAC, Solid Waste Division, Solid Waste Contractors,
Environmental Health Division, Ecology
2.4 Enforcement
Work Plan Objective: Create a coordinated and effective approach for all enforcement agencies to resolve
illegal dumping and reduce littering.
Enforcement Activities:
E 1 Consider alternative enforcement methods to reduce illegal dumping on public and private
property.
Implementation:Ongoing
E 2 Mason County and the municipalities will continue to seek funding within their annual budget for
abatements and illegal dumping enforcement within their jurisdictions.
Implementation:Ongoing
E 3 Support volunteer litter control programs such as the Public Works Department's "Adopt A Road"
program and consider developing a fund for volunteer programs on public lands.
Implementation:Ongoing
E 4 Build public support to prevent dumping through education and outreach programs.
Implementation:Ongoing
E 5 Public Works or the Sheriff Office may provide assistance for the removal of abandoned vehicles.
Implementation:Ongoing
E 6 Strengthen and review countywide litter control activities.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: Solid Waste Plan Fund#402, LSWFA Grant
Responsibility: County,SWAC, Environmental Health Division, Solid Waste Division,Shelton
2.5 Wood Waste
Work Plan Objective: Support efforts to find beneficial uses for wood waste.
Wood Waste Activities:
WW 1 The SWAC and the SWP will monitor County or regional discussions or proposals regarding the
study and/or siting of wood waste landfills.
Implementation:Ongoing
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 5
WW 2 The SWAC may request technical assistance from Ecology to learn about opportunities for wood
waste reduction and reuse. SWP staff will consult with SWAC annually during the Solid Waste
Review to determine if there is a need for technical assistance
Implementation:Ongoing
WW 3 EHD will continue to identify and track existing and past facilities; monitor for compliance.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund #402
Responsibility:County,SWAC,Solid Waste Division, Environmental Health Division, Ecology
2.6 Biosolids
Work Plan Objective: Encourage wastewater treatment plants in Mason County to find cooperative
solutions to managing and disposing of biosolids.
Bio-Solids Activities:
BS 1 The County currently defers the management of biosolids to Ecology.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: Ecology
Responsibility: Ecology
2.7 White Goods
Work Plan Objective: Support the continued reuse or recycling of white goods through the Eells Hill
Transfer Station, rural transfer stations, and private businesses.
White Goods Activities:
WG 1 The County will maintain updated lists on its Solid Waste Program website of private firms that
recycle or reuse white goods.
Implementation:Ongoing
WG 2 The County will continue to encourage the recycling and reuse of white goods through the
educational component of the Waste Reduction and Recycling Plan (see Chapter 4).
Implementation:Ongoing
WG 3 The County will encourage private recycling events that include white goods collection.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund#402
Responsibility: County,Solid Waste Division
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 6
2.8 Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste
Work Plan Objective: Support private sector efforts that emphasize the reuse of construction, demolition,
and land-clearing wastes over land-filling
Construction and Demolition (C&D) Debris Activities:
C&D 1 The County will maintain updated lists on its Solid Waste Program website
(http://www.co.mason.wa.us/health/environmental/solid-waste/recycling php) of private firms
that manage, reuse, and/or dispose of C&D wastes.
Implementation: Ongoing
C&D 2 The County will continue to encourage the reuse and proper disposal of C&D waste through
educational component of waste reduction and recycling plan.
Implementation:Ongoing
C&D 3 The Solid Waste Program and the Environmental Health Division will continue to monitor private
C&D waste disposal sites regarding their long-term capacity.
Implementation: Ongoing
C&D 4 The County may request technical assistance from local interested parties, the construction
industry, and Ecology to improve practices for C&D waste reduction and reuse.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund#402
Responsibility: County, Solid Waste Division, Environmental Health Division, Ecology
2.9 Asbestos Contaminated Wastes
Work Plan Objective: Ensure asbestos wastes are disposed in accordance with best management practices.
Asbestos Contaminated Wastes Activities:
A 1 The County will maintain updated lists on its SWP website of private firms that manage, reuse,
and/or dispose of asbestos waste.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: Contractor Disposal Fees
Responsibility:County, Solid Waste Contractor
2.10 Medical Wastes
Work Plan Objective: Require the proper collection and disposal of personal medical wastes.
Medical Wastes Activities:
MW 1 Support private haulers of medical waste collection by maintaining updated lists of firms on its
Solid Waste Program website.
Implementation:Ongoing
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 7
MW 2 Support outreach programs aimed at educating the public about proper disposal of prescription
medications and Sharps. Sharps are defined in Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 70.95K.010 as
"all hypodermic needles, syringes with needles attached, intravenous (IV) tubing with needles
attached, scalpel blades and lancets that have been removed from the original sterile packaging,
and epipen or auto-injectors".
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund #402
Responsibility:County,Solid Waste Division, Environmental Health Division, Mason County Sheriff's Office.
2.11 Waste Tires
Work Plan Objective:Continue efforts that emphasize proper disposal methods for waste tires.
Waste Tires Activities:
WT 1 The Public Works Department will incorporate proper waste tire handling into the waste reduction
and recycling educational program.
Implementation:Ongoing
WT 2 The County encourages the use of the Ecology's Waste Tire Removal Account for sites that contain
more than 800 waste tires.
Implementation:Ongoing
WT 3 The County will allow the piling of waste tires only under permit from the Mason County
Environmental Health Division. The County may require financial assurances to ensure post-
closure clean-up.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund#402
Responsibility:County,Solid Waste Division, Environmental Health Division
2.12 Disaster Waste
Work Plan Objective: Establish and maintain an emergency management plan for handling wastes during
and after disaster situations.
Disaster Waste Activities:
DW 1 The County may provide a system for transfer and disposal in the event of a disaster, i.e.,
earthquake or flood. In the past, if a disaster has caused waste that could be classified as a health
hazard, the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) may pass a resolution on a case-by-case basis,
waving the tipping fees at Eells Hill Transfer Station.
Implementation:Ongoing
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 8
DW 2 The County may make free disposal options available to the public during periods of declared
emergency to ensure public health.
Implementation:Ongoing
DW 3 County Solid Waste Staff may contribute to County Disaster Planning as it relates to solid waste.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: Solid Waste Plan Fund #402, FEMA
Responsibility: County,Solid Waste Division,Solid Waste Contractors, Environmental Health Division
2.13 Collection Activities
Work Plan Objective: The County and its service provider will maintain effective and efficient collection
service that considers fairness, convenience, and accessibility of service for all County citizens.
Collection Activities:
CA 1 The County will ensure collection activities are consistent to evaluate success in meeting the Solid
Waste Management Plan.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: Solid Waste Plan Fund#402
Responsibility: City of Shelton, County, SWAC, Solid Waste Division, Certificated Solid Waste Haulers
and the Washington State Utilities and Transportation Commission.
2.14 Eells Hill Transfer Station and Rural Drop Box Stations
Work Plan Objective: Maintain and operate Eells Hill Transfer Station and the drop box stations to provide
cost and operational efficiency,convenience to the public, and opportunities for recycling.
Eells Hill Transfer Station and Rural Transfer Stations Activities:
STS 1 The staff will conduct an annual operational review of the Eells Hill Transfer Station and its satellite
system to evaluate whether the system continues to meet set objectives.
Implementation:Ongoing
STS 2 The Solid Waste Program and the contracted service provider will monitor the long-term transfer
capacity of the system.
Implementation:Ongoing
STS 3 Operate the transfer stations as self-supporting enterprises in accordance with Washington
Administrative Code (WAC) 173-350. Continue to structure user fees at the existing transfer
stations to cover all costs.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: Solid Waste Plan Fund#402, Contractor Disposal Rates
Responsibility: County,Solid Waste Division,Solid Waste Contractor
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 9
2.15 Administration and Management
Work Plan Objective: Continue the present administrative and management structure to solid waste
collection,transfer,and disposal.
Administration and Management Activities:
AM 1 Maintain staffing for the Solid Waste Program through the Public Works Department of Public
Works to plan,administer contracts, and manage the solid waste and recycling system.
Implementation: Ongoing
AM 2 The SWAC and the Solid Waste Program will explore and implement partnerships with other local
agencies and organizations for delivering of outreach and education programs.
Implementation:Ongoing
AM 3 Continue to monitor the contractual and management provisions in existing operating agreements
and permits with all Mason County solid waste handling facility operators.
Implementation:Ongoing
AM 4 The SWAC and the Solid Waste Program annually will evaluate its compliance with planning
requirements understate law.
Implementation:Ongoing
AM 5 The municipalities shall monitor their solid waste programs to ensure compliance with the Solid
Waste Management Plan.
Implementation:Ongoing
AM 6 Recruit memberships to the SWAC from each commissioner district,the Squaxin and Skokomish
Indian Nations,the City of Shelton and commercial accounts.
Implementation:Ongoing
AM 7 Review and amend if necessary the SWAC by-laws.
Implementation:Ongoing
Funding Source: LSWFA Grant,Solid Waste Plan Fund#402, Municipal Budgets
Responsibility: County,SWAC,Solid Waste Division
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 10
CHAPTER 3 - SOLID WASTE HANDLING METHODS &
SYSTEMS
3.1 Description of the Mason County Solid Waste System
The Mason County Solid Waste System (MCSWS) consists of a central waste transfer station at Eells Hill near
Shelton, three rural drop box stations, and four known non-operating landfill areas. Figure 3.1 on the next
page shows the location of the Eells Hill Transfer Station and the County's three drop box stations.
3.1.1 The Eells Hill Transfer Station
The purpose of the Mason County Eells Hill Transfer Station is to provide for the collection and transfer of
wastes to an out-of-county disposal facility. Mason County built the transfer station in 1993 at the site of
the former County landfill site which is located at 501 W. Eells Hill Road,Shelton, Washington.
The station is a full-service facility that accepts deliveries from private businesses, commercial collection
route vehicles, commercial drop box vehicles, County rural transfer stations, and the self-hauling public.
The station has two covered unloading areas. The larger building allows for direct unloading onto a
tipping floor for direct refuse unloading. A wheel-loader breaks down and places wastes into top-loading
100-cubic yard (CY) intermodal containers. A waste compaction or tamping arm compacts the waste.
Ideally, well compacted trailers have an average weight of 27.5 tons. Mason County trailers typically
average about 25 tons per trailer. Once loaded, trailers are hauled to a rail spur in Lewis County where
they are loaded on to a train and shipped to the Roosevelt Regional Landfill in Klickitat County.
A scale house, office/storage building and limited household hazardous waste (HHW) collection area are
also located at the Eells Hill Transfer Station. See Chapter 5 for a further discussion of HHW.
The design and operation of the facility complies with the State of Washington minimum Functional
Standards for Solid Waste Handling (WAC173-350).
3.1.2 Rural drop box stations
The three rural drop-box stations are owned and operated by Mason County. The rural
Sites accept most materials accepted at the Eells Hill Transfer Station, but cannot accept commercial or
institutional municipal solid waste, and some types of moderate-risk waste. See Chapter 5 for further
HHW details.
The rural stations are located in Belfair, Union and Hoodsport. Belfair has the greatest use followed by
Union and then Hoodsport. All three rural stations are similar in design and operation and each consists
of a covered steel building for unloading waste, recycle containers and an attendant's booth. 40-yard
containers are placed below the unloading area floor elevation and the solid waste is dropped directly
into the containers without compaction.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 11
3.1.3 Known Landfills Located In Mason County
The Eells Hill landfill is the only County-owned landfill which is closed and is currently undergoing the
required post-closure surveillance and reporting program. Mason County has a contract with Parametrix
to monitor the groundwater and complete the formal landfill closure documentation. To date the
monitoring program has shown no indication of groundwater-leachate contamination. The monitoring
information and results are available for public access on the County's website.
The Owner or Operator of any landfill must provide post-closure activities to allow for continued facility
maintenance and monitoring of air, land and water for as long as necessary for the landfill to stabilize to
protect human health and the environment. For budgetary planning purposes, the Owner or Operator
must plan for a minimum post-closure monitoring period of twenty years. The post-closure monitoring
period may end when authorized by the Environment Health Department(EHD)and approved by Ecology.
There are several other landfills within Mason County that were owned/operated by private or
commercial companies or the City of Shelton.
Shelton-Matlock Landfill
This landfill is located in the unincorporated Matlock area. It operated for an unknown period of time
prior to its closure in 2001. While the landfill was open, it was receiving wood waste from nearby
forest product operations. The landfill has a groundwater monitoring system in place and has been
monitored since 1997. It is currently in post-closure stage and has continued to have groundwater
monitoring as part of the post-closure agreement. As of early 2017, there is discussion on the
potential for this landfill to end its post-closure care due to evidence that suggests the landfill has
reached stability.
Simpson Dayton Landfill
This landfill is located in the unincorporated Dayton area. This landfill was also operated for an
unknown period of time prior to its discontinued use in 2006. The material that was accepted at this
site was mostly wood waste and wood ash. A groundwater monitoring system has been in place and
monitored since 1997. In 2016, the closure process was completed and the application for a post-
closure permit was submitted and officially accepted in early 2017. The landfill is now permitted for
post-closure care.
City of Shelton—C Street Landfill
The C Street landfill is located on a 16.7 acre parcel located southwest of the intersection of West C
Street and US Highway 101. The property was acquired by the City in 1928 for use as a municipal
landfill. Landfilling operations occurred at the site between 1928 and 1974. After that time, municipal
solid waste was sent to the Eells Hill facility to the northwest of Shelton. The City of Shelton has
entered into an Agree Order (DE 12929) with the Washington State Department of Ecology and is
working with the agency to conduct a Remedial Investigation and Cleanup Action Plan as well as to
finalize closure of the facility.
3.1.4 Surveillance and Control
Mason County Public Works and its employee's operate the Eells Hill Transfer Station and three drop box
facilities in Mason County. The Mason County Environmental Health Division (EHD) provides oversight
and compliance inspections of all Mason County solid waste facilities. The landfill closure sampling and
monitoring program is performed by Parametrix Incorporated. Required periodic reports for the
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 13
sampling and monitoring program are provided to Mason County Public Works and forwarded to the
Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology). The reports are also available electronically on the
Mason County Utilities and Waste Management website.
3.2 Service Levels
The level of solid waste disposal services provided and the associated costs depend on the customer and
waste source. As noted above, the Eells Hill Transfer Station is a full-service facility accepting deliveries
from private businesses, commercial collection route vehicles, commercial drop box vehicles, rural drop box
stations, and self-hauling public.
3.2.1 City Provided Services
Shelton is the only incorporated city in Mason County and Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. operates its
garbage collection system that serves approximately 3,500 residential and business customers within the
City limits. Waste and recycling collection in Shelton is mandatory and, while recycling is optional, a
recycling fee is included in the garbage rate whether or not the customer elects to recycle. Garbage is
collected five days a week using automated collection trucks to service the routes. This system is efficient
and significantly reduces work-related injuries associated with waste collection.
Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. provides waste collection carts in a variety of sizes to residents and
businesses at no charge. Residents place their carts at the curb or alley on their designated collection day.
Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. offers weekly and biweekly service with extra pickups for an additional fee.
All refuse collected in the City is hauled to the County's Eells Hill Transfer Station for disposal.
3.2.2 Franchised Waste Collection Company
One private, franchised service provider, Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. provides residential refuse
collection in all unincorporated parts of Mason County and to the City of Shelton. Mason County Garbage
Co. Inc. also provides commercial garbage collection service to unincorporated county businesses and
others requesting service as noted below. If Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. were to cease providing
collection services, the County and City of Shelton would work with the UTC to find another certificated
hauler to provide collection services to Mason County.
National Forest Service and Olympic National Park
Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. collects refuse from Forest Service offices and Olympic National Park
Staircase Park.
Squaxin Island and Skokomish Indian Tribes
The Squaxin Island and Skokomish Indian Tribes contract with Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. to
provide garbage service on Tribal lands. Garbage collection is mandatory in Tribal housing for
Squaxin and Skokomish residents. Skokomish residents outside of tribal housing voluntarily
subscribe to Mason County Garbage Co. Inc.services or self-haul.
Washington State Patrol Academv
Refuse is collected by Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. and transported to the Eells Hill Transfer
Station Facility for disposal.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 14
For the unincorporated areas Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. collects five days a week using 15 trucks
and drivers each day. Collection uses a combination of automated and manual collection for
residential cans and carts and uses specialized trucks for commercial containers.
Waste collected by Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. is currently being disposed of in both Mason and
Kitsap Counties. Waste collected in north Mason County is being disposed at the transfer station near
Bremerton in Kitsap County while waste collected from areas elsewhere in Mason County is disposed
of in the Eells Hill Transfer Station.
3.2.3 Self-haul
The waste generator is responsible for collecting and transporting refuse to one of the previously
described drop box or central transfer stations. Besides the residents in the unincorporated areas of
Mason County who do not use Mason County Garbage Co. Inc.services,self-haulers include:
National Forest Service& Olympic National Park
Forest Service and Park employees collect refuse within the National Forest or Park boundaries
located within Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. service area and transport it to the Eells Hill Transfer
Station for disposal. The amount of waste generated peaks during the summer when tourism
increases.
Washington State Facilities
The State of Washington operates several facilities within Mason County. Besides the State Patrol
Academy noted above, these include State Parks and the Washington Correction Center. Refuse from
the Washington Correction Center and State parks is collected and self-hauled by State employees to
the Eells Hill Transfer Station.
3.2.4 Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste
Construction, Demolition, and Land Clearing Debris consists primarily of materials from building
demolition or construction projects. Land clearing debris is currently recycled or disposed of at the Eells
Hill Transfer Station and/or at private companies in Mason County.
3.2.5 Import/Export
Mason County does not operate a municipal solid waste landfill and therefore does not import any solid
waste. All municipal solid waste generated disposed of at the Eels Hill Transfer Station is trucked to
Centralia, WA, where it is loaded on to a train and shipped to Klickitat County. The final disposal
destination is the Roosevelt Regional Landfill, owned and operated by Republic Services, Inc.
3.3 Permits Required and Administration Methods
The operation of solid waste disposal methods, transfer stations,transfer of solid waste, and final solid waste
disposal are governed by the regulations contained in Chapter 36.58 RCW. Mason County Public Works and
the City of Shelton implement these regulations at County and City-owned facilities through departmental
policies and procedures. The long-term contracts for collecting and hauling of solid waste from County
facilities or City of Shelton are governed by Chapter 81.77 RCW.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 15
Mason County EHD is responsible for issuing permits and enforcing county and State regulations governing
solid waste handling facilities. These regulations include, but are not limited to solid waste storage,
collection, processing, and transfer and disposal requirements pursuant to Mason County Code Chapter 6.72,
WAC 173-350, RCW 36.58, RCW 70.93, and RCW 70.95.
The Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP) is a "road map" to manage
system-wide operations to meet State and County requirements and is also used to determine
the need for additional or upgraded facilities. Mason County EHD ensures any proposed new solid
waste handling facility complies with the approved CSWMP prior to issuance of any permits.
3.4 Solid Waste Service Collection Rates
The County sets user fees at the Eells Hill Transfer Station and rural drop box stations. Solid waste operations
are an enterprise funded service, and as such, these rates recover the full costs of operating the stations and
disposal program. Additionally, rates are used to develop a replacement and repair recovery cost for future
operations. No funds from taxes are used to support the solid waste program.
Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. has several service level options to meet the needs of their customers. In
Mason County, options include a smaller can size, every-other week pick up, monthly and on-call services. In
Shelton they offer weekly and every other week pickups. This allows those who generate less waste to have a
lower cost option for collection services.
The Eells Hill Transfer Station is the only one of the four MCSWS facilities with scales to weigh incoming refuse
loads. The weight of a load determines the disposal fee. At the Drop Box facilities, costs are based on volume
which has been calculated based on a conversion from the per ton rate charged at the Transfer Station. The
current (2017) cost for transfer and disposal of refuse is$93.45 per ton (without tax). The actual fee charged to
customers using the 4 facilities includes the costs of operations, transfer, disposal, administration, waste
reduction and recycling programs, HHW collection and disposal, and solid waste enforcement. A discussion of
the solid waste rates,fees and charges follows.
3.4.1 City of Shelton rates (Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. starting in 2017)
In 2017 Mason County Garbage Co. Inc.took over operations of the solid waste and recycling collection
services from the City of Shelton. Prior to that change the City offered weekly and biweekly service with
extra pickups for an additional fee. Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. now provides every other week
service, alternating the weeks they collect solid waste and recyclables. Table 3.1 details the garbage
services and rates for the City of Shelton since 2014.
Table 3.1 Month1v Sanitation Service Char e or Service
Gallons Pickup 2014 March 2015 August 2015 January 2016 January 20181
35 1 Every other week $11.57 $12.40 $13.29 $14.25
$10.94
65 Every other week $16.47 $17.66 $18.93 $20.29 $15.56
65 Weekly $31.15 $33.39 $35.79 $38.37 $29.43
95 Every other week $24.38 $26.14 $28.02 $30.04 $23.05
95 Weekly $43.71 $46.86 $50.23 $53.85 $41.32
300 Weekly $95.84 $102.74 $110.14 $118.07 $90.58
12018 rates reflect change by Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. City code provides for mandatory every other week service.
Weekly service is optional. Prices do not include City of Shelton utility taxes or refuse taxes.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 16
Table 3.2 Monthly Service Charges for Commercial Pickup based on Container Volume 1X per week vickup
Gallons 2014 March 2015 August 2015 January 2016 January2018
65 $19.66 $21.08 $22.60 $24.23 $18.75
95 $29.48 $31.60 $33.88 $36.32 $28.12
300 $91.13 $97.69 $104.72 $112.26 $86.89
Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. also operates a voluntary yard waste recycling service in Shelton. For
$4.19 a month Shelton customers enjoy biweekly pick up of a 95-gallon container provided to the site.
The program can accept nearly all common green waste (no food scraps). Currently the program has 600
customers. Price does not include City of Shelton utility taxes.
3.4.2 Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. rates for Unincorporated Mason County
Table 3.3 details the garbage service levels and rates for Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. service in
unincorporated areas of Mason County. These rates include recycling pickup. Rates do not reflect the
recycling commodity credit which is $ 0.61 effective November 1, 2016. For more information on
the recycling commodity credit you can go to the UTC website www.utc.wa.eov.
Table 3.3 Current Mason CountE Garbage Co. Inc. Service Level and Associated Rates
Number of Units or Frequency of Garbage Service Recycle Service . .
Type of Containers Service* Rate/month Rate/month Rate/month
1-32 W $15.61 $9.16 $24.77
2-32 W $23.33 $9.16 $32.49
3-32 W $31.47 $9.16 $40.63
4-32 W $40.36 $9.16 $49.52
5-32 W $48.28 $9.16 $57.44
6-32 W $56.07 $9.16 $65.23
1-45 W $20.99 $9.16 $30.15
1-32 EOW $8.94 $9.16 $18.10
2-32 EOW $14.36 $9.16 $23.52
1-32 MO $4.94 $9.16 $14.10
Mini W $13.16 $9.16 $22.32
Recycling EOW $9.81
Automated Carts:
35 Gallons W $17.92 $9.16 $27.08
48 Gallons W $22.75 $9.16 $31.91
64 Gallons W $27.85 $9.16 $37.01
96 Gallons W $34.62 $9.16 $43.78
35 Gallons EOW $10.67 $9.16 $19.83
48 Gallons EOW $14.12 $9.16 $23.28
64 Gallons EOW $16.87 $9.16 $26.03
96 Gallons EOW $21.08 $9.16 $30.24
35 Gallons MO $6.36 $9.16 $15.52
48 Gallons MO $7.97 $9.16 $17.13
64 Gallons MO $9.42 $9.16 $18.58
96 Gallons MO $11.59 $9.16 20.75
*"W"indicates one service per week;"EOW"means every other week;"MO"means once per month.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 17
Table 3.4 Mason Countv Customers whose Garba e is Dis osed in Kitsap, Countv
Number of Units or Frequency of Garbage Service Recycle Service ..
Type of Containers Service* Rate/month Rate/month Rate/month
1-32 W $14.50 $9.16 $23.66
2-32 W $21.34 $9.16 $30.50
3-32 W $28.36 $9.16 $37.52
4-32 W $36.13 $9.16 $45.29
5-32 W $43.14 $9.16 $52.30
6-32 W $49.90 $9.16 $59.06
1-45 W $19.03 $9.16 $28.19
1-32 EOW $8.38 $9.16 $17.54
2-32 EOW $13.37 $9.16 $22.53
1-32 MO $4.68 $9.16 $13.84
Mini W $12.32 $9.16
$21.48
Recycling EOW $9.81
Automated Carts:
35 Gallons W $16.58 $9.16 $25.74
48 Gallons W $20.68 $9.16 $29.84
64 Gallons W $24.76 $9.16 $33.92
96 Gallons W $31.18 $9.16 $40.34
35 Gallons EOW $9.98 $9.16 $19.14
48 Gallons EOW $13.15 $9.16 $22.31
64 Gallons EOW $15.66 $9.16 $24.82
96 Gallons EOW $19.48 $9.16 $28.64
35 Gallons MO $6.04 $9.16 $15.20
48 Gallons MO $7.56 $9.16 $16.72
64 Gallons MO $8.90 $9.16 $18.06
96 Gallons MO $10.87 $9.16 $20.03
*"W"indicates one service per week;"EOW" means every other week;"MO"means once per month.
3.4.3 Self-Haul Rates
Residents and businesses haul solid waste directly to County solid waste facilities to dispose of waste.
Table 3.5 is a breakdown of the County tipping fees. Table 3.6 lists the costs for disposal based on amount
and type of solid waste. Disposal of recyclables and HHW is free. Eells Hill has a scale allowing cost to be
based on weight. Drop box stations do not have scales so the cost is based on volume instead.
Table 3.5 Mason Count-E Solid Waste Ti in Fee Breakdown
Item 2015 2016 2017 2018 Comment
Solid Waste Operations $34.59 $34.17 N35.5 $36.94 O&M and Capital Costs
Environmental Health $1.50 $1.50 $1.50 Permitting& Enforcement
Long Haul Contract $53.46 $53.82 $55.71 Annual CPI Adjustment
Recycle Drop Box Contract' $1.45 $2.47 $1.81
HHW Disposal' $0.25 $0.20 $0.20 $0.20 Various Vendors
Total Tipping Fee $91.25 $92.16 $93.45 $96.16
'Recycle contract and HHW disposal costs are subsidized by CPG (2015-2017) and LSWFA(2017-2018)Grants.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 18
Table 3.6 Mason Coun Solid Waste Facilities 2018 Sel-Haul Disposal Rates
Item Shelton Transfer Hoodsport,
Union:
Solid Waste(per ton at Shelton, cy
drop box) $96.16/ton $19.72/cy
Minimum Fee $15.60(340 lbs) $19.72 (>6 bags)
1 Can/Bag(32 gal) $5.22 $5.21
2 Cans/Bags(32 gal) $10.38 $10.40
3 Cans/Bags(32 gal) $11.96 $11.97
4 Cans/Bags (32 gal) $13.49 $13.53
5 Cans/Bags (32 gal) $15.61
6 Cans/Bags(32 gal) $17.16
155-gal drum $96.16/ton $10.40
2 55-gal drums $14.05
3 55-gal drums $17.16
Misc. Large Bulky Items $5.22 $19.72
Appliance w/Refrigerant $10.38 $26.02
Tire with Rim (1 only) $5.22 $18.10
Each additional Tire with Rim $5.21
Tire without Rim (1 only) $3.11 $5.21
Each additional Tire without Rim $3.12
Auto Battery $1.58 $1.58
Recyclable Scrap Metal $58.22/ton $5.21/32 gal
Construction Debris $96.16/ton
Separated Clean Yard Trimmings I $69.71/ton
(Refuse Collection Tax is 3.6%of the untaxed rates)
3.5 Existing Operational Practices
3.5.1 Eells Hill Transfer Station Operations
The Eells Hill Transfer Station is open Monday -Saturday 8 AM - 5 PM except for certain holidays.
Currently, Mason County is not openly accepting solid waste from outside of its county borders.
However this is not actively monitored at the four waste handling facilities and non-resident, self-
haul customers could be using the facilities, although this is not believed to be a significant source of
refuse brought to the facilities.
In 1993, a competitive bidding process for final disposal services was conducted by Thurston, Lewis
and Grays Harbor Counties with the provision that near-by counties could select to be included in the
bidding process. Mason County took advantage of that process and Republic Services Inc. was
selected to own, provide, and operate facilities to transport and dispose of waste for the Counties.
Under the contract, solid waste is transported from the Eells Hill Transfer Station in transfer trailers
by LeMay Inc., a subcontractor for Republic Services Inc.,to Lewis County. It is then transferred to rail
cars and taken to the Roosevelt Regional Landfill (owned and operated by Republic Services Inc.) in
Klickitat County,Washington.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 19
At contract award, Mason County negotiated a 5-year contract with Republic Services Inc. including
options for automatic renewal up to 20 years. In 1994 the contract was modified to include the use of
rail transportation. An addendum to the contract in 1997 extended the life of the contract through
2012. In 2012 the County executed a new contract extension to continue the operation until 2020. In
2015,30,063 tons of solid waste was transferred for disposal by Republic Services.
Users of the Eells Hill Transfer Station have the ability to divert wastes from disposal by separating
clean yard trimmings, scrap metal and household items such as cans, paper, cardboard, plastic and
glass bottles for recycling. The EellsHill Transfer Station also accepts used clothing and limited
HHW. These programs are discussed in detail in Chapters 4 and 5 of this Plan.
3.5.2 Drop Box Station Operations
The operating schedule for drop box stations is currently as follows:
• Belfair Drop Box Tuesday—Saturday 9am—4pm
• Union Drop Box Sunday, Monday 9am-4pm
• Hoodsport Drop Box Friday—Sunday 9am—4pm
Drop box stations are closed New Year's Day, Martin Luther King's Birthday, President's Day, Memorial
Day, Independence Day, Labor Day,Veteran's Day,Thanksgiving and the day after, and Christmas.
Drop box stations are only available for residential and small business self-haul loads and do not
accept large commercial loads of refuse or construction debris. Refuse is dumped into 40-yard
I i d d e d containers which minimize escaping airborne litter and entry by scavengers. Solid Waste
from the rural drop box stations is hauled by County Solid Waste employees, or by contract with
Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. to the Eells Hill Transfer Station.
3.6 Facilities Siting Review
RCW 70.95 states that each County or City siting a solid waste disposal facility shall review each potential
site for conformance with identified standards. No new municipal solid waste disposal facility in Mason
County is anticipated over the next twenty years but new or replacement of existing solid waste handling
facilities may occur in the next twenty years. A new or replacement solid waste handling facility should
be reviewed according to RCW 70.95.
3.7 Needs and Opportunities
• Flow control needs further evaluation to keep waste currently going to other counties in the Mason
County system.
• Upgrades and improvements to the Eells Hill Transfer Station and the Drop Box Stations detailed in
the Parametrix Inc. report (Appendix A) should be completed to assure user safety and maximize
efficiencies of the existing facilities.
• Prior to the expiration of the hauling contract with Republic Services, the County should evaluate the
potential benefits of having a private contractor take over operations of facilities as well as providing
hauling services.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 20
CHAPTER 4
WASTE REDUCTION, REUSE AND RECYCLING
This chapter provides more details for activities supporting Plan Objectives and Activities found in Chapter 2.
Each section will describe the existing conditions and discuss possible needs and opportunities for
improvement. The chapter is divided into Waste Reduction, Recycling, Composting, and Public Education and
Outreach sections.
The first part of this section focuses on reducing the amount of waste being generated, while the sections on
recycling and composting discuss methods that reduce the amount of solid waste being disposed. Collectively,
these approaches (waste reduction, recycling, and composting) are known as "waste diversion"and play a vital
role in solid waste management.
The State waste diversion requirements are based in the "Waste 2 Resources" Act, which are reflected in
various sections of the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) and Washington Administrative Codes (WAC). RCW
Chapter 70.95 requires that county and city governments assume the primary responsibility for solid waste
management and implement effective waste reduction and recycling strategies.
4.1 Waste Reduction
Activities and practices that reduce the amount of wastes that are created are classified as "waste reduction."
Waste reduction differs from the other two waste diversion techniques (recycling and composting) because
the other methods deal with wastes after the wastes have been generated.
Waste reduction is the highest priority for solid waste management and is preferred over recycling and
composting because the social, environmental and economic costs are typically lower for waste reduction. All
three methods avoid the cost of disposing the diverted materials as garbage, but recycling and composting
frequently require significant additional expenses for collecting and processing the materials.
4.1.1 Existing Practices
Three waste reduction activities are currently conducted in Mason County.
Web Site Links: Mason County and the City of Shelton maintain web sites that provide links or references
to government and non-government waste reduction services. Mason County links can be found on both
the Utilities/Waste Management and Public Health web pages. Website references include 2good2toss,
Habitat for Humanity, Offer up, Let Go, and Craig's List. The Department of Ecology "Waste 2 Resources
Program" provides options to help an individual figure out what he/she can do to reduce solid waste and
safely manage what remains. If not managed wisely,solid wastes can contribute to air and water pollution,
and pose a threat to human health. On-line references are preferred because they can be more frequently
changed as services are added or deleted.
Waste Audits: Free technical assistance is available to businesses that are looking to reduce the amount of
waste they generate through their daily operations. The potential exists to find a waste stream component
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 21
that can be easily identified and handled in an alternative manner, reducing waste, making a reusable
material available to an end user, or connecting the business with a recycling outlet for the given material.
This assistance is provided by Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. and is available to any requesting entity.
Environmentally Preferably Purchasing: Environmentally Preferable Purchasing (EPP) involves purchasing
products or services that have reduced negative effects on human health and the environment when
compared with competing products or services that serve the same purpose. They include products that
have recycled content, reduce waste, use less energy, are less toxic, and are more durable. Both Mason
County and the City of Shelton comply with the State-mandated EPP requirements.
4.1.2 Needs and Opportunities
A significant need in this area is the ability to measure the results of waste reduction activities. Residential
and commercial efforts in waste reduction cover a broad range and are not well documented. Waste
reduction could be shown to be handling significantly more waste if the residential and commercial efforts
could be measured more completely. Therefore, a method to quantify waste reduction is needed.
4.2 Recycling
The basic Mason County recycling objectives derived from the Solid Waste Management program goals are to:
• Support private efforts in waste recycling in Mason County.
• Achieve an increase in waste recycling throughout Mason County.
• Provide recycling opportunities at drop box/transfer station facilities
The County and City of Shelton websites should be checked for up-to-date recycling information.
4.2.1 Existing Practices
City of Shelton
The City of Shelton has operated a residential single-family curbside recycling program within the City
limits since September 1994. The City expanded the residential program to include multifamily facilities in
2009. The cost of recycling is based on the size of the customer's waste cart and is incorporated into their
overall solid waste fee, whether they use the service or not. The curbside program uses two lidded carts
for collection; a green cart for mixed paper, newspaper, magazines, and cardboard; and a blue cart for
glass bottles,jars, plastic bottles, aluminum and steel cans, plastic milk jugs, etc.
In cooperation with the Washington State Department of Ecology,the City of Shelton purchased several
reusable event recycling containers in 2010 and established a free event(sporting events, public events,
etc.) recycling program. The City offers the containers,free of charge,to event organizers and, in limited
circumstances,services the recycling containers for free during the events. All special event permits issued
by the City of Shelton include information about the program as well as contact information encouraging
organizers to take advantage of the program.
Table 4.1 Citv of Shelton recL;cling collections tons
Material 00• 2010 2011 2012 2013
Containers* 1205 1 200 1 186 1 272 1 279 1 304 1 319
Mixed Waste Paper 389 356 330 370 322 333 350
TOTALS 594 556 516 642 601 637 669
* Containers =glass, plastic, aluminum, etc.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 22
Mason County
The County began its self-haul recycling program in 1993. Over the years the number of recycling drop off
sites has fluctuated, but has now stabilized at four which includes the three rural drop box stations and the
main (Eells Hills) transfer station. Each site has at least five "blue boxes" (compartmentalized drop boxes
used to facilitate source separated collection) that collect corrugated cardboard, glass bottles and jars,
plastic bottles and jugs, aluminum and steel cans, and mixed waste paper. Recycling of metal and white
goods is also accepted at the Belfair Drop Box and Eells Hill Transfer Station.
The collection and transportation of recyclable materials from single-family and multifamily residences is
regulated under RCW 81.77 and RCW 36.58. Under these statutes, counties have the authority to directly
regulate the collection of source-separated recyclable materials. In an effort to expand recycling
opportunities for all county residents in unincorporated areas, Mason County Utilities and Waste
management, Mason County Garbage Co. Inc., and the SWAC membership sought an ordinance to provide
curbside recycling for all residential solid waste customers of Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. The Mason
County Board of Commissioners passed County Ordinance 147-08 in December of 2008 which was revised
in 2009 by Ordinance 68-09. Under this ordinance, all subscribers pay for garbage and recycling collection,
whether both services are utilized or not. Curbside service began in late 2009. Customers may also
choose recycling only services.
Table 4.2 shows the materials collected for the blue box program since 2010. Table 4.3 shows the
materials collected from residential curbside recycling since 2009.
Table 4.2 Mason CoitntE Blue Box Collections Tons
Material 010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
ONP* 89.21 94.81 103.63 88.18 81.56 80.09
OCC* 156.50 159.37 145.16 143.94. 148.44 154.14 177.72 178.99
MWP* 198.96 176.54 163.99 179.78 199.25 200.70 161.71 204.14
Plastics 59.20 46.70 26.95 59.21 68.78 59.10 78.66 76.81
Tin 24.47 22.06 22.89 26.78 25.99 28.06 35.49 23.01
Glass 204.00 204.00 204.00 204.00 204.72 264.00 294.1 281.3
Aluminum 13.71 9.08 9.6 9.98 9.6 8.99 10.68 11.79
TOTALS 1 746.05 712.56 676.22 711.87 738.34 795.08 758.36 776.04
* ONP=Old News Print, OCC=Corrugated Cardboard, MWP= Mixed Waste Paper
Table 4.3 Mason CoitntE Residential Curbside Rec clip
Material 00• 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201S 2016
ONP* 128.12 311.74 316.04 326.82 316.02 276.58 273.19 314
OCC* 311.06 878.87 891.00 921.39 890.93 948.26 936.65 1075
MWP* 113.97 341.53 346.24 358.05 346.22 491.32 485.30 557
Plastics 80.77 136.04 137.92 142.62 137.91 138.59 136.60 157
Tin 25.39 41.93 42.51 43.96 42.51 59.27 58.54 67
Aluminum 14.27 15.75 15.97 16.51 15.96 22.32 22.05 25
TOTALS 1 674.13 1725.86 1749.69 1809.37 1749.56 1936.03 1912.33 2195
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 23
4.2.2 Needs and Opportunities
City of Shelton
The City's curbside recycling program has enjoyed an increase in participation primarily beginning with the
implementation of a dual stream recycling system in 2007 and changing to every-other-week trash pickup
in 2009. With an increased local interest in recycling,the City of Shelton could see additional reductions in
landfill tonnages.
Mason Countv
The collection and transportation of recyclable materials from single-family and multifamily residences is
regulated under Chapter 81.77 RCW and Chapter 36.58 RCW. Under these statutes, counties have the
authority to directly regulate the collection of source-separated recyclable materials.
County residents who do not use the services of Mason County Garbage may instead self-haul their solid
waste. This option presents the most severe challenge to recycling rates because there is no incentive for
source separation. Unless self-haul County residents become more aware of the economics of volume-
reducing their solid waste, i.e. separating recyclables from trash, recycle amounts won't change
appreciably.
4.3 Composting
Composting is a form of recycling, transforming organic waste materials into usable or marketable materials
for use other than landfill disposal. Composting can be an effective tool in managing certain waste materials,
because it offers a means to generate a useful product while diverting significant amounts of organic materials
away from landfills.
Previous to the development of the CSWMP, there have been no solid waste planning goals for Mason County
in the area of composting and yard waste diversion. One of the initiatives of the "Moving Washington Beyond
Waste and Toxics Plan" is to increase recycling of organic materials. Burning of organic materials is also
common practice; however, with bans on burning and statewide changes in organics handling, composting
becomes increasingly attractive for organics.
4.3.1 Existing Practices
City of Shelton
The City of Shelton Public Works Department collects Christmas trees at curbside during the first week of
January at no charge from City utility customers. The trees are chipped and used at City facilities.
In 2009 the City initiated an optional residential yard waste composting service. The service provides
customers with a brown 95-gallon rolling cart that is picked up bi-weekly during recycling weeks. The
materials are brought to a local wood recycling facility that composts the materials. As of September
2016,the City has over 500 yard waste customers.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 24
Mason County
The County accepts Christmas trees from residents at no charge during the first couple of weeks in January
and accepts yard waste year round at its Eells Hill Transfer Station at a reduced rate from its regular solid
waste rate schedule. All of the clean yard waste the County receives is taken to Brady Trucking and Bark in
Shelton where it is chipped and composted. If Brady Trucking decided to no longer take wood waste
facilities the County would take it to one of the other permitted facilities in Mason County.
4.3.2 Needs and Opportunities
City of Shelton
Although the City has implemented a residential yard waste collection service, the inability to allow for
food scraps to be included in the cart is seen as the largest impediment to expanding the service. If a
viable way to include food waste in the program is identified, it is anticipated that use of the service would
expand greatly.
Mason County
The rural nature of Mason County lends itself to household onsite recycling. Yard debris does arrive at the
transfer station for recycling—both from landscape businesses and individual residents. Currently, if yard
wastes reach the drop box/transfer station facility they are separated out from the MSW stream, in the
same way that scrap metal and tires are diverted, and periodically sent to a wood recycler. There are
wood recyclers available within 10 miles of both solid waste facilities in Shelton and Belfair. Mason County
could provide outreach to utilize other wood recyclers in the area to increase diversion of wood waste.
4.4 Public Education and Outreach
To achieve the goals of the Solid Waste Management Program in the area of waste diversion, it will be
necessary to explore and implement partnerships with other government agencies and private organizations
to implement outreach and education programs. The focal points of these programs should be to:
• Educate and inform the public regarding waste reduction techniques.
• Educate and inform the public regarding existing and planned methods for recycling.
• Develop a sense of environmental responsibility in the public.
• Inform the public regarding community progress and to gain feedback on agency progress or needs.
4.4.1 Existing Practices
City of Shelton
The City of Shelton utilizes different methods of outreach. They include utility billing mailers, provision of
multilingual (English and Spanish) outreach materials available on the City's website and at the Utility
Billing counter, and appearances on the City's weekly radio show (Focus on Shelton) to discuss recycling.
Utility drivers also carry correction tags and recycle guides in their trucks and monitor collected materials
as they are dumped. If they see non-program materials in a container they will fill out a correction tag
and, oftentimes, leave a recycle guide as well informing the customer of allowed and non-allowed
materials. If problems persist the drivers forward the customers' address to the recycling coordinator who
will make a personal visit to the site and discuss correct recycling practices with the resident.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 25
Mason County
Mason County's outreach efforts primarily rely on local newspapers (primarily the Shelton-Mason County
Journal) and radio stations, both in paid advertising and press releases and public service announcements.
Each October Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. sends recycling information in all customer statements
coupled with a recycling calendar in January. In addition, all new customers are mailed the same
information when they sign up for service.
4.4.2 Needs and Opportunities
City of Shelton
The City of Shelton would benefit from a larger presence in schools and at public events to bring attention
to local recycling options and services available.
Mason County
There have not been any solid waste surveys conducted since the 2005 Mason County Fair which showed
that the majority of Mason County residents were unaware of the various services available to them
through the recycling and solid waste programs. Outside of the periodic information provided by Mason
County Garbage Co. Inc. there have been no programs since that time to change that reality. A Solid
Waste Program Manager, who could be present at a few annual events, would be able to reach a broader
audience in communities outside of the greater Shelton area—Allyn, Belfair, and Hoodsport in particular—
by participating in the various local community events (i.e. Allyn Days, Grapeview Day, Tahuya Day, and
Celebrate Hoodsport). A larger presence in schools is also needed with regard to recycling technical
assistance and education. The County also needs to address the communication needs of the increasing
bilingual population,and produce outreach materials in English and Spanish.
College Interns—City of Shelton and Mason Countv
Given the proximity to four colleges—Olympic College, The Evergreen State College, South Puget Sound
Community College, and Saint Martin's University —Mason County could employ one to two student
interns to work on special projects throughout the year.
Advantages: Unpaid interns may be available or those under a work-study program, creating little or no
expense for the County. Interns could focus on special projects that staff currently has not had the time to
work on.
Disadvantages: Unpaid interns are difficult to attract, especially those based in Olympia. Staff has been
unsuccessful over the last two years at attracting any applicants. Time spent to manage interns, if
recruited, is also a consideration.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 26
CHAPTER 5
MODERATE RISK WASTE MANAGEMENT
5.1 Overview
Moderate-risk waste (MRW) means solid waste that is limited to conditionally exempt small quantity
generator (CESQG) waste and household hazardous waste (HHW). HHW refers to any waste which exhibits
any of the properties of dangerous wastes that is exempt from regulation under chapter 70.105 RCW,
Hazardous waste management, solely because the waste is generated by households. Household hazardous
waste can also include other solid waste identified in the local hazardous waste management plan prepared
pursuant to chapter 70.105 RCW, Hazardous waste management.
5.1.1 Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)
While most hazardous wastes that are ignitable, reactive, corrosive or toxic are regulated in the United
States under Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Congress developed an
exclusion for household waste. Under this exclusion, found in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
Part 261.4(b)(1), wastes generated by normal household activities (e.g., routine house and yard
maintenance) are excluded from the definition of hazardous waste. This exemption also applies to
Household hazardous waste (HHW) collected during a HHW collection program. Specifically, wastes
covered by the HHW exclusion must satisfy two criteria:
1. The waste must be generated by individuals on the premise of a temporary or permanent residence,
and
2. The waste stream must be composed primarily of materials found in wastes generated by consumers
in their homes.
Household waste, including HHW, is subject to regulation under EPA Subtitle D of RCRA governing the
disposal of any solid waste described by "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and
Practices" (40 CFR Part 257). These regulations are general environmental performance standards that are
implemented in Washington by RCW Chapters 36.58 (Solid Waste Disposal) and 70.95 (Solid Waste
Management—Reduction and Recycling).
Table 5.1:Hazardoecs Household Material Grou s
Group Name Examples
Repair and Remodeling Adhesives,oil-based paint,thinner,epoxy, paint stripper, latex paint*
Cleaning Agents_ _ Oven cleaners,deck cleaners,degreasers,toilet cleaners
Pesticides & Fertilizers Wood preservatives, mole killer, herbicides, pesticides j
Auto, Boat& Equipment Batteries, paint,gasoline, oil,antifreeze,solvents
Hobby and Recreation Photo and pool chemicals, glaze, paint,white gas
Miscellaneous* _ Ammunition,fireworks, asbestos, alkaline batteries, medicines
* Not accepted at Eells Hill Transfer Station
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 27
5.1.2 Commercial Hazardous Waste
The second category of moderate risk wastes are those produced by small quantity generators (SQG). Per
WAC 173-303, these are non-residential wastes produced at a rate of less than 220 pounds per month or
per batch (or 2.2 pounds per month or per batch of extremely hazardous waste) and accumulate less than
2,200 pounds of hazardous waste onsite (or 2.2 pounds of extremely hazardous waste). Ecology has 20
hazardous waste generators in Mason County in their database. These businesses pay a Hazardous Waste
Generation Fee to Ecology.
When household wastes are mixed with hazardous wastes from small quantity generators, this resulting
mixture is subject to the small quantity generator rules in 40 CFR Part 261.5 (and subsequently WAC 173-
303). To minimize the cost of operating free HHW disposal, Mason County HHW collection programs limit
the participation in the HHW program to households and SQG's are required to dispose of their wastes
somewhere else.
5.2 Household and Small Business Collection
5.2.1 Existing Practices
County Public Works operates the HHW Facility at the Eells Hill Transfer Station to collect moderate risk
waste from households. It is permitted for Moderate Risk Waste (MRW) Handling per WAC 173-350-360
(4)-(10). This facility collects moderate risk wastes free of charge from county residents every Friday and
Saturday. There were 564 drop-off visits in 2014, 474 in 2015, and 394 in 2016. The County does not
accept wastes from business or small quantity generators. Kitsap County will also accept HHW from
Mason County residences. This is for residents in the north and east part of Mason County. In 2015 there
were 918 visits by Mason County residents to the Kitsap County HHW Facility in Port Orchard.
The physical layout of the Eells Hill Facility currently consists of an open-aired building over a concrete
surface. Materials accepted at the facility include oil-based paints and stains, automotive products,
flammable liquids like gasoline and solvents, household cleaners, aerosols, pesticides and herbicides, pool
and spa supplies, antifreeze, small propane bottles, lithium and NiCad batteries, and used motor oil. The
County currently contracts with Stericycle to dispose of these collected wastes. The County is also a
LightRecycle Collector and collects fluorescent tubes and bulbs.
The County also has used motor oil and antifreeze collection containers at our Belfair, Union, and
Hoodsport drop box stations. Auto and marine batteries are also accepted at all four facilities for $1.58
each. Table 5.2 summarizes quantities of moderate risk waste collected at the Household Hazardous
Waste Facility from 2013 through 2015.
5.2.2 Needs and Opportunities
As noted in Chapter 3, all the County solid waste handling facilities need varying amounts of repair or
upgrades as identified in the Parametrix "Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs" report
(Parametrix 553-1682-043, October 5, 2016; see Appendix A). To meet the six year planning window
required by Ecology (Guidelines for Development of Local Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plans
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 28
and Plan Revisions; Ecology Publication 10-07-005, February, 2010) and allow for an easy budget planning
reference, the "Immediate" (1 year) and "Mid-term" (6 year) deficiency items relative to HHW at Eells Hill
and the drop box stations have been extracted from the report and are listed below:
Eells Hill Transfer Station
1. Repair or replace and freeze protect the emergency eyewash and shower units(completed)
2. Install a new sump pump and wastewater holding tank(immediate)
3. Install a loading dock rain curtain at the waste oil handling bay(immediate)
4. Assess the HHW facility for relevant Code compliance and functional performance (immediate)
5. Assess fire hazard risks and on-site response capabilities (immediate)
6. Rehabilitate or replace the HHW facility to meet relevant Codes and performance requirements based
on assessment results (Mid-term)
7. Upgrade on-site fire response capabilities (Mid-term)
8. Prepare a stormwater management assessment and plan (Mid-term)
9. Implement stormwater management improvements (Mid-term)
Drop Box Stations
1. Install and/or repair perimeter fencing(completed)
2. Install secondary containment for MRW sheds(completed)
3. Install or repair damaged asphalt pavement around the MRW collection areas (immediate)
In 2016 prior to the expiration of the agreement with Kitsap County, Mason County evaluated different
options of providing HHW service to north Mason County. The County does not have the staff or facilities
to provide HHW services there, so using a mobile service from a private company was investigated. The
price per customer for those services was greater than what Kitsap County charges and Kitsap County
service is available year round. Continuing with Kitsap County is the best value for the County. In 2016
Mason County extended the service agreement by Kitsap County through 2018 (included in appendices).
Another opportunity would be to provide Hazardous Waste service to small businesses in addition to
households. This would increase costs to the County for a service currently paid for by Ecology grants
and tipping fees. To pay for the additional service the County would need to either increase tipping fees
or charge fees from businesses to dispose of their hazardous waste. It would also require additional
Hazardous Waste staffing and potentially an expansion of the existing facilities. Public Works has not
received any requests from businesses to increase our service so it is recommended this be looked at
only if the County expands the Hazardous Waste facilities at Eells Hill.
5.3 Public Education and Technical Assistance
5.3.1 Existing Practices
Mason County website, http://www.co.mason.wa.us/utilities-waste/solid-waste/hazardous-waste.php
provides the public with general information about HHW, disposal programs, and product alternatives.
The County also keeps flyers available for customers at Eells Hill or the rural drop box stations. The County
in partnership with Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. also sends out annually HHW flyers with information
on how to dispose of HHW to Mason County Garbage customers through their annual customer calendar
mailing and HHW flyers are sent out to all new customers.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 29
5.3.2 Needs and Opportunities
Mason County could provide HHW education and technical assistance through other venues besides what
is already provided. The following strategies were discussed to meet the objectives:
1. Informing residents, community groups, and business groups through fact sheets, public service
announcements,website links, and news articles via the internet and other technologies.
2. Establishing or expanding school programs to educate children about household hazardous waste.
3. Providing general moderate risk waste management information to businesses through fact sheets or
website links and other informational materials.
4. Targeting educational activities to focus on specific groups of businesses.
5. Providing technical assistance through on-site visits and workshops.
The County currently does not have the resources to pursue these additional strategies. Kitsap County
previously provided technical assistance to businesses in Mason County but lost funding for that in 2016.
The County should consider one or more of these strategies if additional funding becomes available.
Table 5.2:Moderate Risk Ouantities Collected through the HHW Facility_
2013 HHW i - HHW 2015 HHW 2016
Waste Type DIVI lbs. DIVI lbs. DMI lbs. DM lbs. DMI Lbs.
Antifreeze R 2,881 R 4,514 R 4,737 R 4,512
Oil non-contaminated R 1,043 R 44,060 R 53,350 R 41,572
Aerosols H 200 H 392 H 900 H 450 H 500
Acids H 250 W 250 W
Bases I H 250
Batteries (Auto Lead Acid) R 1,520 R 1,379 R 2,072 R 1,801
Batteries (Household Dry Cell) H 8.8
Flammable Liquids E 200 E 2,598 E 1,600 E 2,000 E 2,400
Flammable Liquid-Poison E 1,750 E 1,368 E 5,000
Flammable Gas-Poison E 1,600
Paint-Latex H 4,230
Paint-Oil Based H 500 H 9,370 H 10,250 H 8,500 H 7,500
Paint Related Materials H 3200
Pesticide/Poison Liquid H 990 H 750 H 2,500 H 1,750
Pesticide/Poison Solids H 750 H 500
PCB Containing Light Ballasts R 2100
Non-PCB Containing Light H 1
Ballasts
Fire Extinguishers R 27 R 27
Mercury-Fluorescent Tubes H 6,554 H 17,352 H 1,128 H 2,100
and CFL's bulbs
Non-Regulated Liquids H 1,409
(Soaps, Cleaners)
Notes: 1) Latex paint is no longer accepted. Customers are instructed to dry the paint and put it in with MSW.
2) Pharmaceuticals are accepted at the Sheriff's office in Shelton and Belfair.
3) Energy recovery materials go to the Covanta Facility in Marion County,Oregon
DM = Disposal Method Key: H-Hazardous Waste Facility, R-Recycled, E-Energy Recovery,W-Wastewater Disposal
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 30
5.4 Household Hazardous Waste Training, Health, and Safety
Existing Practices
WAC 173-303-330 spells out personnel training required for all employees working with hazardous waste. To
meet this in Mason County all employees working in hazardous waste have a minimum of 40 hours training in
hazardous waste operations and emergency response. Furthermore, employees attend an annual eight-hour
refresher course. Additional training is provided by sending staff to the Kitsap County HHW facility for job
shadowing for one or two days. County waste disposal vendors are required to use employees with additional
training for packaging and shipping in accordance with US Department of Transportation standards that
remove and dispose of HHW from Mason County Facilities.
5.5 Hazardous Waste Generators
Existing Practices
Counties are required to include an inventory provided by Ecology of generators of dangerous waste
generators and facilities, remedial action sites, list of hazardous waste transporters which service businesses
within the jurisdiction, and zones designated for hazardous waste treatments,storage,and disposal(TSD).
Hazardous waste generators are businesses in Mason County that have an EPA/State identification number
issued under Chapter 173-303 WAC. The Ecology database identifies 107 businesses and institutions in Mason
County as registered as hazardous waste generators as of February 2018. Appendix I is a copy of the list of
Hazardous Waste Generators found on the Ecology website database at www.ecy.wa.gov/fs/.
5.6 Site Inventories
Existing Practices
Ecology conducts Site Hazard Assessments for suspected contaminated properties and includes those
confirmed as a potential threat in its Facility/Site database. Ecology has five sites within Mason County on
Ecology's website identified on the active Toxics Release Inventory list as of February 2018. That list is
included in Appendix I. There are no sites listed under the enforcement stage for Hazardous Waste. Database
information can be found at www.ecy.wa.gov/fs/.
5.7 Hazardous Waste Transporters and Facilities
Existing Practices
There is one Mason County-based company registered with Ecology that can transport or recycle,treat, store,
and/or dispose of hazardous wastes as of February 2018. The Rail Yard at North Mason Fiber in Belfair is a
permitted Hazardous Waste Transfer Facility. A copy of the North Mason Fiber permit with Mason County is
included in Appendix I.
Mason County contracts with vendors from outside Mason County to transport and dispose of hazardous
wastes at the Eells Hill Transfer Station and Belfair, Hoodsport, and Union Drop Box Facilities.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 31
CHAPTER 6
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE WASTE STREAM
6.1 Municipal Solid Waste
WAC 173-350-100 defines municipal solid waste (MSW) as a subset of solid waste that includes unsegregated
garbage, refuse, and similar solid waste material discarded from residential, commercial, institutional, and
industrial sources and community activities. The term also includes residual material after the separation of
recyclables. MSW does not include:
• Dangerous wastes other than wastes excluded from the requirements of chapter 173-303 WAC,
Dangerous waste regulations and in WAC 173-303-071 such as household hazardous wastes;
• Any solid waste, including contaminated soil and debris, resulting from response action taken under
section 104 or 106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of
1980 (42 U.S.0 9601), chapter 70.105D RCW, Hazardous waste cleanup — Model Toxics Control Act,
chapter 173-340 WAC, the Model Toxics Control Act cleanup regulation or a remedial action taken
under those rules; or
• Mixed or segregated recyclable material that has been source-separated from garbage, refuse and
similar solid waste.
6.1.1 MSW Composition
EPA estimated in its Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2014 Fact Sheet that residential
waste comprised 55 to 65 percent of total MSW generated across the country. Wastes from commercial
businesses and institutions, such as schools and hospitals, made up the remaining 35 to 45 percent of
MSW.
Organic materials make up nearly 55 percent of MSW quantities by weight. These materials include
paper and paperboard products, yard trimmings, and food scraps. Plastics are the next largest single
waste product,followed by rubber, leather,and textiles, metals,wood, glass, and other.
Table 6.1 Estimate of Total Munici al Solid Waste Stream, Percent of Total Tons
Type of Municipal Solid Waste(MSW) Percent
Paper and paperboard products 26.6%
Food Scraps 14.9%
Yard Trimmings 13.3%
Plastics 12.9%
Rubber, leather and textiles 9.5%
Metals 9.0%
Wood 6.2%
Glass 4.4%
Other 3.2%
A study among Washington counties prepared by Ecology in 2016 found similar results as shown in Table 6.2.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 32
Table 6.2 Overall statewide disposed waste stream composition b material class
Type of MSW Percent
Organics 28.5%
Wood Debris 12.3%
Construction Materials 12.2%
Plastic 10.2%
Paper Products 7.7%
Consumer Products 7.3%
Metal 5.8%
Paper Packaging 5.7%
Residues 5.5%
Glass 2.3%
Hazardous/Special Wastes 1.1%
6.1.2 MSW Per Capita Generation Nationwide
The 2014 EPA publication Advancing Sustainable Materials Management: 2014 Fact Sheet provides
nationwide estimates for MSW generation. The average US per capita generation of MSW in 2014 was
4.4 pounds per day, or 0.80 tons per year. Recycling and composting removed 1.52 pounds per capita per
day, or 0.28 tons per year. Combustion with energy recovery removes 0.48 pounds per day, or 0.08 tons
per year. The remaining 2.40 pounds per day, or 0.44 tons per year, goes into landfills. Nationwide,
52.6% of the waste stream ended up in landfills. Of the remainder, recycling and composting removed
34.6%and combustion with energy recovery removed 12.8%.
6.1.3 MSW Generation in Mason County
Mason County maintains records of total tonnage of MSW brought to the Eells Hill Transfer Station for
export and recycling. Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. records tonnage that they dispose of in Kitsap
County at the Olympic View Transfer Station and also records their curbside recycling tonnage. The City
of Shelton records their recycling tonnage through their curbside program. The table below accounts for
the total county MSW for the years 2010 through 2015 from these three sources and uses Washington
Office of Financial Management(OFM) populations to determine per capita tonnage.
Table 6.3 reports both total and per capita tonnage generated in Mason County. The average per capita
generation rates of waste going to land disposal in Mason County is 0.531 tons. The recycling rate
averages 8.78%of waste and is far below the nationwide estimate. The approximately 0.6 tons generated
per capita is 25% lower than the nationwide average.
Table 6.3 MSYV Total and Per Capita Ton lorted, 2010-2015
Total Tonnage 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
Exported for land disposal 33,474 31,484 31,447 32,340 33,558 33,779
Collected through recycling 3,028 2,978 3,128 3,062 3,311 3,376
Total Tons generated 36,502 34,462 34,575 35,402 36,869 37,155
Per Capita Annual Tonnage 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
OFM Population for Mason County 60,699 61,100 61,450 61,800 62,000 62,200
Exported for land disposal 0.551 0.515 0.512 0.523 0.541 0.543
Collected through recycling 0.050 0.049 0.051 0.050 0.053 0.054
Total tons generated per capita 0.601 0.564 0.563 0.573 0.595 0.597
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 33
Table 6.4 compares MSW generation rates between the City of Shelton and unincorporated areas in
Mason County. This table assumes everything coming into Eells Hill not from City of Shelton trucks is
from unincorporated areas. So Shelton residents and businesses that take loads directly to Eels Hill are
counted as coming from unincorporated areas, skewing the number higher for unincorporated waste.
Taking that into consideration waste generation between the Shelton and the unincorporated County is
pretty close to the same on a per capita basis.
Table 6.4 CitE of Shelton and Unincor orated Area Waste Generation Comparison, 2010-2015
DisposedTotal Annual Tons Per Capita Tons
Area Population Generated Recycled
Mason County(Total)-2010 1 60,699 36,502 3,028 33,474 0.60
Unincorporated-2010 50,865 31,370 2,472 28,898 0.62
City of Shelton-2010 9,834 5,132 556 4,576 0.52
Mason County(Total)-2011 61,100 34,462 2,978 31,484 0.56
Unincorporated-2011 51,245 29,333 2,462 26,871 0.57
City of Shelton-2011 9,855 5,129 516 4,613 0.52
Mason County(Total)-2012 61,450 34,575 3,128 31,447 0.56
Unincorporated-2012 51,580 29,275 2,486 26,789 0.57
City of Shelton-2012 9,870 5,300 642 4,658 0.54
Mason County(Total)-2013 61,800 35,402 3,062 32,340 0.57
Unincorporated-2013 51,825 30,036 2,461 27,575 0.58
City of Shelton-2013 9,975 5,366 601 4,765 0.54
Mason County(Total)-2014 62,000 36,869 3,311 33,558 0.59
Unincorporated-2014 52,005 31,464 2,674 28,790 0.61
City of Shelton-2014 9,995 5,405 637 4,768 0.54
Mason County(Total)-2015 62,200 37,155 3,376 33,779 0.59
Unincorporated-2015 52,130 31,673 2,707 28,966 0.61
City of Shelton-2015 10,070 5,482 669 4,813 0.54
6.1.4 Countywide Trends
Table 6.5 estimates the future total tonnage of the waste stream using the OFM Growth Management
projections assuming Mason County continues to generate 0.6 tons of solid waste per person. In terms of
population and waste stream tonnage, Mason County has been following the mid-range growth rate.
Table 6.S Low, Intermediate, and Hi h Pro•ections for Total Waste Stream, 2020 to 2040
2040Year 2020 2025 2030 2035
High Range Population 76,239 82,618 89,093 95,472 101,583
High-Range Tonnage 45,743 49,571 53,456 57,283 60,950
Mid-Range Population 67,545 71,929 76,401 80,784 84,919
Mid-Range Tonnage 40,527 43,157 45,841 48,470 50,951
Low Range Population 58,741 61,075 63,489 65,821 67,925
Low Range Tonnage 35,245 36,645 38,093 39,493 40,755
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 34
6.2 Special Wastes
Special wastes include those wastes that fall outside the category of MSW because they require separate
handling and/or disposal. Special wastes of particular interest to Mason County include: Animal Carcasses,
Asbestos, Biomedical Waste, Biosolids, Construction and Demolition (C&D) Wastes, Disaster Debris, Electronic
Waste,Tires,and Wood Waste.
6.2.1 Animal Carcasses
The rural nature of Mason County and the presence of salmon-bearing waterways create the need for
planning for disposal of animal carcasses to protect the public health and the State's surface and ground
waters. Existing disposal methods currently include burial, cremation through, or at, local veterinary
clinics, use of a rendering service, composting, landfill disposal, or another method approved by the local
Health Department in accordance with general sanitation practices as stated in WAC 246-203-121.
Existing Practices
• Small animals (including household pets) may be buried on private property as long as distance to
property lines, depth of burial,total weight, distance to wells,and location of flood plains/high ground
water levels are considered. The local Health Department should be contacted for specific
requirements. Small animals may also be cremated or accepted at the transfer stations as long as they
are triple bagged.
• Livestock that have died because of disease or an unknown cause must be disposed of in accordance
with WAC 16-25 "Disposal of Dead Livestock."
• Wildlife found dead on personal property is the responsibility of the property owner. Disposal options
are the same as noted in 6.2.1.1. Dead wildlife along roads and highways are the responsibility of the
owning jurisdiction, i.e., Washington State Department of Transportation for state highways, Mason
County Public Works for county roads, and City of Shelton for city streets. The location of the dead
wildlife should be reported to the owning jurisdiction. Dead wildlife may also be harvested for food—
contact the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for specific requirements.
6.2.2 Asbestos
Asbestos is a fibrous mineral that was considered to be useful for many different applications, especially in
fireproofing and thermal insulation, until it was discovered that the fibers cause lung cancer and other
respiratory ailments. The fibers are "friable", or crumble easily into very small particles, that become
airborne and lodge in the lungs after being inhaled.
Existing Practices
Asbestos-containing waste must be disposed within 10 days of removal at a disposal site authorized to
accept asbestos waste. For disposal the waste owner must follow specific waste tracking guidelines
established by the Olympic Region Clean Air Authority (ORCAA). These guidelines may be found at
www.orcaa.org/services . If a building or residence is used for commercial purposes and a contractor,
other workers (besides the owner), or volunteers are used for work that disturbs asbestos containing
materials,the asbestos removal requirements of the Washington Department of Labor and Industries (L&I)
also apply. See the L&I website for additional information or contact the Mason County Solid Waste
Program Manager.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 35
Asbestos is not currently accepted at Mason County solid waste facilities unless it is in amounts sufficient
to fill an entire container so that it can remain segregated and shipped separately as a single load. For
large load coordination contact the Mason County Solid Waste Program Manager.
6.2.3 Biomedical Waste
Biomedical wastes are the potential infectious and injurious wastes from medical, veterinary, or
intermediate care facilities, as well as "sharps" (syringes)from residential sources.
Existing Practices
Medical facilities have the responsibility to determine which medical wastes are considered biomedical,
and then arrange for the proper handling and disposal of these wastes. These wastes should be placed in
special bags or rigid plastic containers and then removed by licensed biomedical waste collectors. All
biomedical wastes generated by medical facilities are disposed of by private contractors.
Incidental medical wastes generated by households, businesses, and government agencies may be
disposed of in the solid waste stream. These wastes should be properly prepared to prevent
unintentional human contact by solid waste employees through the use of sharps containers and red bio-
medical bags when appropriate.
"Residential sharps" should be disposed of in sharps containers or in rigid sided bottles with a screw on
top such as a detergent bottle and disposed of with MSW.
6.2.4 Biosolids
Biosolids are defined by WAC 173-308-080 as "municipal sewage sludge that is a primarily organic,
semisolid product resulting from the wastewater treatment process that can be beneficially recycled and
meets all applicable requirements. This type of material is specifically excluded from the definition of
solid waste and planning for this waste is not required in a Comprehensive Solid Waste Management
Plan. Other wastes from the wastewater treatment process (such as grit, screenings, sludge and ash) are
still classified as solid waste. Ecology is responsible for the permitting of biosolids disposal.
Existing Practices
Mason County and City of Shelton Treatment Facilities
Mason County operates one wastewater treatment plant and two water reclamation facilities.
Biosolids from these plants are collected by a private hauler and transported to the City of Shelton
Wastewater Treatment Plant as of December 2016. The City of Shelton has a press and dryer that turn
biosolids into a dry Class A product that can be put to beneficial use as fertilizer. All biosolids that
enter the City of Shelton sewage treatment plant are converted into this Class A product, unless their
dryer is down in which case the City has an alternative land application site. No monitoring is required
for placement of the Class A product after it has been created. Other wastewater plants like
Alderbrook and the Squaxin Tribe facilities are also sending their biosolids to Shelton in addition to
Mason County facilities.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 36
Needs and Opportunities
All biosolids applications within Mason County are subject to review by Ecology and must meet the
requirements established by Ecology. The County does not permit or review biosolids applications. At
one time the County did provide review of biosolids applications under an MOU with Ecology. RCW
70.95) does allow for Ecology to delegate the authority to the County to issue permits if the County
has the ability to effectively administer the program.
6.2.5 Septic Tank Sludge
Existing Practices
Approximately 1,300,000 tons of septic sludge is generated in Mason County every year. Currently,
septage wastes are disposed of mainly at the Bio-Recycling Webb Hill Facility. The LOTT (Lacey,
Olympia, Tumwater, and Thurston County) wastewater plant in Olympia and the Central Kitsap PUD
Plan also accept septage and at least one hauler has its own disposal facility located outside Mason
County. It is unknown what percentage of septic sludge is disposed of at the different locations.
Wastewater from homes and businesses may be collected in on-site disposal systems or by a sewerage
system connected to a sewage treatment facility. The on-site treatment systems must comply with
WAC 246-272A (On-Site Sewage Systems)which requires periodic pumping of the sludge product. The
sludge must be pumped and land applied at a permitted facility, trucked to a sewage treatment facility
for processing as a biosolid in accordance with WAC 173-308 (Biosolids Management), or disposed of
in a solid waste landfill that meets the requirements of WAC 173-351(Criteria for Municipal Landfills)."
Needs and Opportunities
The County needs to continue to support EHD in their efforts to provide education and help
homeowners to fix failing septic systems. The County should support efforts to field test new septic
system technologies and could explore additional ways to manage septage.
6.2.6 1 Construction and Demolition (C&D)Wastes
Construction and demolition wastes are defined simply as the wastes that are generated from construction
and demolition activities. These wastes consist of wood, concrete, gypsum, roofing, glass, carpet and pad,
metals, asphalt, bricks, and porcelain. Land clearing wastes, including soil, stumps and brush, are also
sometimes included in this category, but these materials are rarely treated as waste.
A category closely related to C&D is "inert wastes." Inert wastes (wastes that will not burn, or create
harmful leachate or gases, etc.) are defined to include some types of C&D wastes, such as concrete and
asphalt, but specifically exclude sheetrock, wood, roofing and demolition wastes. The State rules adopted
in February 2003 (Ch. 173-350 WAC) provide a more lenient regulatory status for inert wastes than C&D
wastes,with disposal requirements that are less strict.
Existing Practices
The production of C&D wastes peak during the spring and summer when most construction and
remodeling activities occur. C&D wastes that are brought to the Solid Waste Facility are currently
exported along with other MSW generated within Mason County. The County does not keep track of
C&D Waste tonnage separately from other MSW. There are a number of private facilities in Mason
County that accept some types of C&D wastes for end-uses as compost or hog fuel: Mason County
Wood Recyclers, North Mason Fiber, Peninsula Topsoil, and Bill McTurnal Enterprises.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 37
All known C&D dump sites are permitted by County Environmental Health. If County Environmental
Health becomes aware of any illegal sites, they work with the owners to bring them into compliance.
These sites contain C&D wastes,wood wastes, and other materials that may or may not include MSW.
Needs and Opportunities
With growth occurring and predicted into the future in the City of Shelton and unincorporated Mason
County, C&D wastes will continue to be a prominent special wastes issue. Mason County has the
opportunity to reach much higher diversion rates of C&D wastes than previously attained. Currently, if
C&D wastes reach the Solid Waste Facility they are not separated out of the from the MSW stream in
the way that scrap metal and tires are diverted.
6.2.7 Disaster Debris
Existing Practices
The contracted Eells Hill Transfer Station Long Hauler is contractually obligated to haul, without
charge,three days of disaster debris.
Needs and Opportunities
Planning needs for disaster debris, including large numbers of animal carcasses, should be part of the
Mason County Emergency Management Plan. Staff and citizens should look to that plan for dealing
with disaster debris.
6.2.8 Electronic Waste
For the purposes of this Plan, electronic waste—or "e-waste" as it is known in the solid waste industry—
refers to discarded computers, monitors,and televisions.
Washington State's legislature passed the Electronic Product Recycling Law (SB 6428) in 2006 requiring
computer and television manufacturers to provide free recycling of their products throughout the state.
The rules for this law are codified in Chapter 70.95N RCW and WAC 173-900. This service became
available to households, small governments, small businesses and charities on January 1, 2009, and
Ecology oversees this program. Electronic products that are covered include televisions, computers,
computer monitors, portable or laptop computers, tablet computers, e-readers, and portable DVD players.
Computer peripherals such as keyboards, mice, and printers are not included in this program. For more
information call 1-800-RECYCLE or go to www.ecy-wa-gov/programs/swfa/eproductrecycle/index.html.
Existing Practices
There are facilities in Mason County and neighboring counties that are designated E-Cycle Washington
sites that collect a-waste for free. To find a list of sites and which site is closest to you go to
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecv/recycle/UISearch/ServiceSearch aspx or call 1-800-RECYCLE. This site
includes a-waste sites and recycling locations for Appliances, Automotive, Batteries, Household
Hazardous Waste, E-Waste, Business Hazardous Waste, Light Bulbs, Glass Containers, Metals, Plastic,
Paper and Yard Waste, and other items. The County does not operate an E-Cycle Washington site.
Needs and Opportunities
With the implementation of the state program run by Ecology, there is not a need for the County to be
involved with the collection or recycling of a-waste other than directing residents to the appropriate
information and sites if asked.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 38
6.2.9 Waste Tires
Waste tires present several issues for storage and disposal:
a. Waste tires provide an ideal breeding ground for mosquitoes which can then transmit life-
threatening diseases.
b. Waste tire stockpiles can catch fire as a result of lightning strikes, handling equipment
malfunctions, or arson.
c. Waste tire disposal at landfill facilities can hamper proper compaction of waste layers and, once
covered, can eventually"float"to the surface because of their shape and tendency to hold air.
Existing Practices
Requirements for waste tire collection, storage and transport are contained within WAC 173-350
which pertains to facilities accumulating more than 800 automobile tires or 8 tons of all type tires.
Currently, waste tires are only accepted at the Eells Hill Transfer Station and the Belfair Sand Hill drop
box facility where they are segregated in temporary storage piles until they are transported off-site by
licensed waste tire transporters for eventual recycling. In 2015, 1,479 waste tires were collected at the
Eells Hill and the Belfair sites. In 2016 2,171 waste tires were collected.
Needs and Opportunities
No planning needs exist for the current method of handling and disposing of waste tires in Mason
County. Additional information on waste tire recycling can be found on Ecology's web site under the
"Waste 2 Resources" program.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 39
CHAPTER 7
CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PLANNING AREA
7.1 Physical Description
An understanding of the general physical description of Mason County is important because it provides a
frame of reference for discussions of existing solid waste handling facilities and practices. Specific physical
requirements for these facilities are found in WAC 173-304 Minimum Functional Standards for Solid Waste
Handling and WAC 173-350 Solid Waste Handling Standards.
Mason County has one landfill currently in a closure process and its specific physical characteristics can be
found in the Parametrix report 2015 Annual Groundwater Monitoring Report Mason County Landfill available
through the Mason County Utilities and Waste home page. A location specific physical description of the City
of Shelton C Street Landfill will be developed as its closure process is implemented.
7.1.1 Geology
Mason County occupies about 970 square miles of land area (See Figure 3.1). The northwestern part of
Mason County lies in the Olympic Mountains and the remainder lies in the Puget Sound Lowland.
Elevations within Mason County range from sea level to 6,612 feet (Mt.Stone).
Rocks exposed within Mason County consist of both volcanic rocks, with some consolidated sedimentary
rocks, and a thick sequence of unconsolidated glacial and non-glacial deposits. The volcanic and
consolidated sedimentary rocks are exposed within the Olympic Mountains. Most of Mason County is
underlain by the unconsolidated deposits.
Although there are no specific geologic requirements for solid waste handling facilities, local terrain
features and nearby slope stability have been considered during siting to allow easy all weather road
access and good traffic flow patterns. Consideration of geologic conditions was used to establish the
potential for groundwater or surface water pollution caused by the 24 hour, 25 year storm resulting in
excessive precipitation run-on problems.
7.1.2 Hydrology and Hydrogeology
The major source of groundwater recharge in Mason County is precipitation. Part of this precipitation
percolates downward into the soil, part drains off as surface runoff, and part returns to the atmosphere by
evaporation and transpiration from plants. The Olympics rise to elevations over 6,000 feet, and that
portion of Mason County experiences an average annual rainfall of 200 inches. On the other hand, at its
eastern most edge, along the Puget Sound, Mason County receives an average annual precipitation of 50
inches. The extent to which precipitation infiltrates the surface varies from place to place, depending on
the character of the subsurface materials. Essentially, all groundwater tapped in Mason County is from
aquifers within the more permeable materials of the various glacial drift deposits. Most groundwater
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 40
discharge is to streams, lakes and surrounding marine waters. The movement of groundwater toward
discharge points is typically in the direction of the land surface slope.
In most places, the main water table is within 50 feet of the land surface. In general,the water table rises
away from marine waterways and major stream valleys, and has a configuration similar to the rising land
surface. Deeper aquifers also occur within the coarser phases of the various glacial deposits.
Groundwater quality monitoring is a waste handling facility permitting requirement and during operation
inspection of leachate collection systems is performed along with gauging the effectiveness of run-on and
run-off prevention during storms.
7.1.3 Climate
Mason County has a mid-latitude west coast marine climatic regime typical of the Puget Sound. The
climate is influenced by the Pacific Ocean and Puget Sound water bodies as well as the Olympic and
Cascade Mountains. Generally, moderate temperatures are experienced year round and the climate is
mild with wet winters and dry summers. Rainfall is typically gentle precipitation with overcast and foggy
winter days. Except for higher mountain elevations,winter snowfall is intermittent and melts quickly.
Due to the terrain variations, bodies of water,and weather patterns the amount of precipitation deposited
varies considerably across Mason County. These variations were considered in establishing the 24 hour,25
year interval storm precipitation amounts to be expected at each waste handling facility location.
7.1.4 Air Quality
Air is an essential resource that must be protected from harmful levels of pollution including dust and
odors generated at waste handling facilities. Improving air quality is a matter of statewide concern and is
in the public interest so Chapter 70.94 RCW "Washington Clean Air Act" was developed to secure and
maintain levels of air quality that protect human health and safety, including the most sensitive members
of the population,to comply with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act,to prevent injury to plant,
animal life, and property, to foster the comfort and convenience of Washington's inhabitants, to promote
the economic and social development of the state, and to facilitate the enjoyment of the natural
attractions of the state.
Further the intent of the RCW is to protect the public welfare, to preserve visibility, to protect scenic,
aesthetic, historic, and cultural values, and to prevent air pollution problems that interfere with the
enjoyment of life, property, or natural attractions.
To achieve the above goals the Olympic Region Clean Air Agency (ORCAA) is the local agency charged with
regulatory and enforcement authority for air quality issues in Clallam, Grays Harbor, Jefferson, Mason,
Pacific, and Thurston counties.
There are occasional seasonal problems from slash burning and wildfires that occur in the summer
months. Slash burning is used to clear debris following clear cutting of timber areas and results in the
production of airborne particulates.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 41
7.2 Population
Population data for incorporated and unincorporated Mason County are provided in Table 7.1. Mason County
is the 201h most populous County in Washington State. About 16% of Mason County's population is
concentrated in the City of Shelton, the only incorporated city within Mason County. Overall, Mason County
population has grown by 26%since 2000.
Table 7.1: Mason Coun Po ulation 1990 to 2015
1990Area 000 2010 2015 Annual
Increase
Mason County(Total) 38,341 49,405 60,699 62,200 2.5%
Unincorporated (Total) 31,100 40,963 50,865 52,130 2.7%
City of Shelton (Total) 7,241 8,442 9,834 10,070 1.6%
The Office of Financial Management (OFM) developed 25-year population projections for each County in 2012
for planning under the Growth Management Act. The low, medium, and high projections prepared for Mason
County show negative to modest growth rates compared to most other Western Washington Counties.
Table 7.2:Mason County Po ulation Pro'ections, 2015 to 2040
Annual
Projection 2015040 Increase
Low 56,447 58,741 61,075 63,489 65,821 67,925 0.8%
Medium 63,203 67,545 71,929 76,401 80,784 84,919 1.4%
High 69,904 76,239 82,618 89,093 95,472 101,583 1.8%
Comparing the 2015 projections in 2012 with the OFM estimate of 62,200 in 2015, the Mason County
population is tracking the medium growth projection the closest. This 1.4% growth is slower than the 2.5%
growth experienced by Mason County from 1990-2015.
7.3 Employment and Economic Statistics
7.3.1 General Trends
Regional context
Mason County was first established as Sawamish County in 1854. Carved out of Thurston County, it
extended westward to the Pacific Ocean. In 1864, it was renamed Mason County in honor of Charles H.
Mason,first Secretary of Washington Territory. Mason County encompasses the southern part of Hood
Canal and many bays and inlets of south Puget Sound.The indigenous peoples include the Coast Salish. In
the 1840s,American settlers arrived and began farming.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 42
Local economy
Forest products quickly became the largest industry in Mason County, and expanded greatly when the
railroads made it possible to feed the various mills in the area. Work on creating a terminus for the
transcontinental railroad in Union came to an abrupt halt with the Panic of 1893, the most serious
economic crisis in the nation's history. In response, banker Alfred Anderson partnered with local loggers to
get them back to work and then with Sol Simpson to create the Simpson Logging Company, which became
the largest employer in the state. The last few decades of the twentieth century saw a significant decline
in the number of timber industry jobs due to mechanization, endangered species protection, and
diversification of the Washington and United States economies, with this trend continuing into the
present.
The corrections facilities in Shelton and Belfair added hundreds of beds beginning the 1980s, helping to
offset job losses in the forest industry. Recreation-based industries, as well as oyster and seafood
production and processing, have also increased in importance, and Mason County has become a bedroom
community for employees in Thurston, Pierce,and Kitsap counties. In 2014, 52.3 percent of earned income
came from residents working outside Mason County.
7.3.2 Labor Force and Unemployment Rates
Outlook
Mason County has reduced its unemployment rate levels to those last seen in 2008. However, the return
to pre-recession employment totals in some industries will be slow. Manufacturing had over 1,900 jobs as
recently as 2006 compared to an average of 1,320 so far in 2015. Construction also showed a decline of
over 37.0 percent.The only area showing growth since that time is the services sector, particularly in retail
trade, professional and business services and state and local government. These trends appear likely to
continue in 2016.
Labor force and unemployment
Current labor force and unemployment statistics are available on the employment security department
website (www.esd.wa.sov). The last 29 months of data have shown Mason County in single digit
unemployment, compared to the January 2010 high of 13.9 percent. The November 2015 rate was 6.9
percent, down from 8.4 percent in November 2014.
The labor force has declined on an annual average basis since 2008, when it stood at 25,400. In the first
eleven months of 2015 it has averaged 23,225. Some of the drop in unemployment rates results from this
declining labor force. That is a situation that has been seen throughout the state and country as more
people dropped out of active job searches or retired. Some of it can also be credited with steady strength
in the local job market and a return to more favorable labor market conditions.
Industry employment
Nonfarm industry employment in Mason County has been steadily improving since 2013. There have been
gains in most industries since the sharp declines beginning in 2009.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 43
The November 2015 total of 14,700 jobs is 230 more jobs than in November 2014.The largest industries in
the Mason County economy remain government (5,560)and trade,transportation and utilities (2,320). The
manufacturing industry in November accounted for 1,380 jobs, but saw a loss of 200 jobs over the year.
The 2015 industry employment represents a small increase in total nonfarm employment compared to the
first eleven months of 2014. This trend will likely be the norm heading into 2016 although manufacturing
will face significant headwinds.
Table 7.3:Mason County Unem lovment versos Statewide Unem lovment
Year Civilian Labor Employment Percent Unemployment
Force Mason County Statewide
2014 23,817 21,934 7.9 6.0
2015 24,099 22,373 7.2 5.7
2016 24,181 22,400 7.4 5.2
Source:Washington Employment Security Department
7.3.3 Median Household Income
The United States Census Bureau estimates the 2015 County annual median household income as$50,406.
The state median income is estimated at $61,062 resulting in the Mason County median income as 82.5%
of the statewide income.
Land Use Chances in the Dynamics of the Planning Area
Mason County has experienced 26% growth in population since 1990 which results in an annual growth
rate of 2.5%. Current economic conditions may slow growth throughout Mason County, however, as
growth over the next 25 years is projected at 1.4%growth.
Forestry-related activities, followed by agriculture, remain the dominate land uses in Mason County.
Denser residential zoning districts ranging from three to six dwelling units per acre typically lie in urban
growth areas.
Outside of the City of Shelton, Mason County remains primarily rural in its development patterns except
for unincorporated communities of Belfair,Allyn, Union, and Hoodsport.
Current development patterns in the unincorporated areas of Mason County show growth focused
primarily along the Puget Sound waterways, Hood Canal,Shelton, and the Belfair area.
Comprehensive plans and zoning codes in Mason County and Shelton do not specifically address the
location of municipal solid waste management facilities as permitted uses. The Eells Hill Transfer Station is
in a Rural Residential 20 District while the three Drop Box Stations lie in varying zoning districts. Mason
County Code requires a special use permit for any essential public facility. Due to a lack of demand for
expansion of solid waste management facilities, the County has not focused on siting these facilities in
their comprehensive plan.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 44
CHAPTER 8
PARTICIPANT ROLES IN PLAN DEVELOPMENT
8.1 Overview
The development and update of the Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP) is
a public process that involves the Solid Waste Advisory Committee, County staff from the Public Works and
Community Services, City of Shelton, Squaxin Island Tribe, Skokomish Tribe, citizens, and the Board of County
Commissioners (BOCC).
8.2 Participating Jurisdictions
RCW 70.95 delegates the authority and responsibility for the development of solid waste management plans
to counties. Other governing bodies (cities, tribes, state, and federal agencies) may participate in the County's
planning process or develop their own plans. State law allows cities to fulfill their solid waste management
planning responsibilities in one of three ways:
• By preparing their own plan for integration into the County's plan,
• By participating with the County in preparing a joint plan,or
• By authorizing the County to prepare a plan that includes the city.
The City of Shelton is the only incorporated municipality in Mason County. As in years past, they have agreed
to participate in the plan that the County prepares. In addition, because this CSWMP may impact their current
and future solid waste management options, careful review of this plan is recommended for the Skokomish
Tribe and the Squaxin Island Tribe.
8.3 Role of the Solid Waste Advisory Committee
The Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAC) acts as the representatives of the public to provide guidance to
the County and City of Shelton regarding the most environmentally safe and economically responsible
methods for waste reduction, recovery, and disposal. State law, RCW 70.95.165, requires each County to
appoint a SWAC with a minimum of nine members that represent a balance of interests: citizens, public
interest groups, business, the waste management industry, and local elected officials. The Board of County
Commissioners (BOCC) appoints members to the committee. The SWAC is an advisory committee only to the
BOCC and all actions must be taken by the BOCC.
The SWAC plays an instrumental role in developing and updating the CSWMP. With staff assistance, the SWAC
stays informed on all aspects of solid waste management in Mason County. During the plan preparation
process, the SWAC reviews current conditions and makes recommendations for future policies and programs.
The current membership (as of February 2017) and affiliations of the SWAC members are shown below in
Table 8.1 on the next page.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 45
Table 8.1 —Membershin of the Mason Colin SWAC
Name Representing
Eric Nelson Citizen District 1
Vacant Citizen District 1
Jeff Bickford Citizen District 2
Vacant Citizen District 2
Cheryl Williams Citizen District 3
Vacant Citizen District 3
Jason Dose City of Shelton
Vacant Special Groups—Tribes
Rik Fredrickson Special Groups—Waste Industry, Mason County
Delroy Cox Special Groups—Waste Industry,JDEL Consulting
Dan Teuteberg Agriculture
8.4 Role of Staff
Staff members from the Public Works Department and the Community Services Department, Environmental
Health Division support and provide comment to the SWAC about solid waste management activities within
Mason County. They play an active role during the plan development process by providing analysis and
making recommendations regarding goals, objectives,and recommendations.
8.5 Role of Citizens
As ratepayers, citizens also share their opinions in the plan development and update process. Once the SWAC
prepares a draft document, the (BOCC) will hold one or more public hearings to allow citizens to comment.
The BOCC may choose to remand citizen comments back to the SWAC or take action themselves.
8.6 Washington State Laws and Administrative Codes
The State of Washington, through the Revised Code of Washington (RCW), the Washington Administrative
Code (WAC), and the Department of Ecology, establishes requirements and guidelines for development of the
CSWMP. The Department of Ecology reviews and comments on the draft CSWMP and must approve or deny
the final plan. The Utilities and Transportation Commission and Department of Agriculture have also reviewed
and commented on the CSWMP.
8.7 Board of County Commissioners
The BOCC is the final point of local approval for the CSWMP and any subsequent updates. Their
subsequent role in budget development and approval is instrumental to the long-term implementation of the
plan.
8.8 Solid Waste Administration
The solid waste planning goal for administration is to ensure that Mason County Public Works, the
Environmental Health Division of the Mason County Community Services Department, and the City of Shelton
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 46
Public Works Department are adequately staffed, trained, and managed for coordination and implementation
of solid waste activities.
8.8.1 Existing Practices
Mason County Public Works
The County's solid waste utility is housed under the Utilities and Waste Management Division of the Public
Works Department. The Deputy Director for Utilities and Waste Management is responsible for managing
the solid waste, water, and sewer systems for the County. The solid waste services for Mason County are
funded through fees collected at the solid waste facility, drop box stations, and a solid waste grant funded
by Ecology. Solid waste staffing consists of the Public Works Director, Deputy Director, Solid Waste
Program Manager, six transfer station attendants, and four operators who work on the transfer station
tipping floor.
Mason County Community Services Department
The County's Solid Waste Program is part of the Environmental Health Division (EHD). The Environmental
Health Specialist for this program is responsible for the monitoring and enforcement of regulations at solid
waste handling facilities and sites, as well as, providing technical assistance for review and issuance of solid
waste permits. Other duties include the investigation, education, and enforcement of solid waste
regulations throughout Mason County. This program is funded by Ecology's Waste 2 Resources Local Solid
Waste Financial Assistance Grant Program (LSWFA) and solid waste permitting fees. This program
currently funds the position of one Environmental Health Specialist.
City of Shelton
The City's solid waste utility is included with other functions of the City's Public Works Department. The
Director of Public Works is responsible for garbage service, roads, water, sewer, and storm utilities for the
City. The solid waste programs for the City of Shelton are a separate utility and funded through garbage
collection fees. The Department of Public Works consists of a Director, City Engineer, Associate City
Engineer, part-time projects engineer, CAD technician, Engineering technician, Superintendent of Public
Works, Administrative Assistant, and 21 employees/operators who work on the division crews (water,
sewer,garbage, and roads). The solid waste utility has a total of three full time operators who handle all
day to day operations. In February of 2017 the Shelton City Commission voted to privatize its solid waste
utility functions. Mason County Garbage Co. Inc. now operates solid waste and recycling collection
services inside the City of Shelton.
8.8.2 Needs and Opportunities
As noted in Table 8.1 vacancies continue to exist in SWAC membership despite advertising the vacancies in
the local newspaper and posting application information on the Mason County Solid Waste web
Homepage. In addition to a lack of volunteers to serve as a SWAC member, public participation in SWAC
meetings is essentially "zero". The SWAC members and BOCC need to continue researching for a new
method(s)to improve citizen participation in Solid Waste activities.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 47
CHAPTER 9
RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS AND PERMITTING OF
SOLID WASTE FACILITIES
9.1 State Solid and Hazardous Waste Plan
Chapter 70.95 and Chapter 70.105 RCW require Ecology to develop a state solid and hazardous waste plan and
update it on a regular (5 year) basis. In 2004 the state plan was called the Beyond Waste Plan which had five
initiatives focused on waste reduction as the highest priority followed by recycling and then safe disposal. The
Beyond Waste Plan was Washington's statewide policy guidance document for local governments to follow in
developing their individual solid waste management plans to reduce wastes and toxic substances. The Beyond
Waste Plan stated that local solid waste plans had to be consistent with the state plan in order to receive grant
funds through the Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance (LSWFA) Grant program. The plan was updated in
2009 and provided state-wide progress toward achieving the three main priorities.
The most recent state plan update (published in June 2015) is renamed the Moving Washington Beyond Waste
and Toxics (Ecology publication 15-04-019) and was developed by incorporating the sustainable materials
management (SMM) approach initiated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and also
implemented by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. In this new approach, the state plan has
shifted from five initiatives and two current issues to five sections. Each section contains goals and actions for
the next five years:
1. Managing Hazardous Waste and Materials—addresses regulated hazardous waste generators,
pollution prevention plans, and moderate risk waste.
2. Managing Solid Waste and Materials—deals with the scope of solid waste and materials work,
including organic materials.
3. Reducing Impacts of Materials and Products —focuses on improving materials that eventually
become components of products or waste, by focusing on what is used and produced.
4. Measuring progress—addresses data needed for measuring progress.
5. Providing Outreach and Information.
Many of the goals and actions of the new Moving Washington Beyond Waste and Toxics Plan reflect changing
priorities and implementing large-scale state and national policies and regulations that are beyond the
resources or capacity of a local government the size of Mason County. However, there are modest objectives
and activities within this revised Consolidated Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP) that correlate to the
new state plan and these are identified in Chapters 1 and 2.
9.2 Previous County Solid Waste Planning
Other plans that are in effect or being developed in Mason County may interact with the requirements of this
Plan. Each is discussed separately below.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 48
-+ 2 1 Previous Solid Waste Management Plans
The most recently adopted Consolidated Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP) amendments were
approved in 2011. These amendments were to a plan that was adopted in 2008. This 2017 plan has been
developed in part to continue and expand upon actions to emphasize waste reduction, reuse and
recycling.
9 2.2 Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan
The County's Moderate Risk Waste Management Plan of 1991 addresses the need to remove moderate
risk wastes (MRW) from traditional solid waste handling and disposal paths. This plan was integrated into
the 2011 Revision of the CSWMP and is now part of this CSWMP.
9.3 Resource Lands and Critical Areas Designations
While Mason County does not fully plan under the Growth Management Act (GMA), it has designated resource
lands and critical areas, as well as adopted development regulations that protect critical areas as required by
RCW 36.70A. Title 17 of the Mason County Code contains provisions for protecting resource lands in Mason
County. The County does recognize the importance of comprehensive planning and continues to participate in
countywide long range planning efforts that incorporate those aspects of the GMA that are relevant to local
needs and circumstances.
Overall, the concerns that prompted development of the GMA, such as urban growth, sprawl, congestion, and
the loss of open space, are not generally applicable to Mason County. No changes to existing Mason County
Code regarding resource lands or critical areas are recommended in this plan.
9.4 Economic Development Plan
The latest Overall Economic Development Strategy for the Columbia-Pacific Region (CEDS) was completed in
2014-2015. The CEDS serves as a comprehensive statement of plans for district-wide economic growth and
development over the next twenty years in Mason, Grays Harbor, Thurston, and Pacific Counties. More locally,
the Economic Development Council of Mason County is working through a strategic planning process that
focuses on the industries of tourism, value-added agriculture, advanced manufacturing, career and technical
education, information and communications technology, forest products, and healthcare.
9.5 Other County Plans
All County Plans must be in compliance with the County Comprehensive Plan. County Commissioners (BOCC)
recently approved an updated Comprehensive Plan in 2017. An updated 2017-2022 Capital Facilities Plan was
approved by the BOCC in 2016. The development of any new or expanding waste handling facility must be in
accordance with Mason County Code Title 17 -Zoning. County Commissioners also approved a new Shorelines
Master Program in 2017.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 49
9.6 Permitting of Solid Waste Facilities
WAC 173-350 requires that no solid waste storage, treatment, processing, handling or disposal facility shall be
maintained, established, substantially altered, expanded or improved until the person operating or owning
such site has obtained a permit or permit deferral from EHD or a beneficial use exemption from Ecology.
EHD is the local enforcement agency for County, state and federal regulations regarding solid waste activities.
EHD is the responsible local authority (RCW 70.95.160) for issuing permits for solid waste facilities and
enforcing against illegal solid waste handling or disposal activities. Mason County code 6.72 empowers EHD to
issue operating permits, conduct inspections, and carry out enforcement related to solid waste facilities such
as landfills,transfer stations, moderate risk waste and recycling facilities. Authority to investigate complaints of
illegal garbage dumping is also defined in this local law.
Codes applying to environmental health issues such as Air and Water quality, SEPA requirements, and other
threats to human health or the environment include 90.48 RCW, 70.95 RCW, 70.105 RCW, 70.94 RCW, WAC
173-350,WAC 173-200,and WAC 197-11.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 50
CHAPTER 10
OVERVIEW OF PLANNING TO DATE
10.1 Previous Solid Waste Plans
Washington State enacted RCW 70.95 (requiring counties to develop solid waste plans) in 1969, and Mason
County adopted their first plan in 1971. The original plan was revised in 1992, with updates in 1998, 2008, and
2011. Table 10.1 shows the status of the recommendations from the most recent plan (2011). The Chapters
listed below correspond to the 2011 CSWMP, not the current CSWMP.
Table 10.1 Status of Recommendations from the Previous Plan 2011
Chapter 3 Waste Reduction Current Status
3.1 Outreach improvements—Improve and regularly update the information
available on Mason County's web site. Bilingual information to include signage at
Ongoing
blue-box sites and web page information. Prepare for direct mailing to all County
residents an annual summary of the County's solid waste and recycling programs.
3.2 Continue to evaluate the Blue-Box Recycling Program to improve opportunities Expansion of curbside
and improve site access. Consider adding sites on available public properties and recycling eliminated
develop an incentive for private site owners to continue to provide land for siting the need for
the boxes. implementation
3.3 Local governments should develop and expand electronic billing options to
reduce paper mailings.
Implemented
3.4 Offer businesses and schools waste audits and education designed to reduce Implemented by
their waste stream and disposal costs. Private Company
3.5 Improve recycling options for employees at local government facilities. Limited Activity
3.6 Support the efforts of the private sector to implement and expand curbside-
Ongoing
recycling program in Mason County.
3.7 Diversion of organics at county owned solid waste facilities for composting or Yard waste diverted,
other beneficial use. other organics are not.
3.8 Support local efforts to expand recycling options for common products,such as
Ongoing
electronics,Styrofoam, additional plastics and other materials.
Chapter 4 Solid Waste Collection,Transfer and Disposal
Develop separate organic waste and construction and demolition waste tipping Yard waste is diverted
4.1 areas at the Eells Hill Transfer Station Facility where materials collected could at Eells Hill. C&D and
either be processed onsite or transferred to an existing private composting other organics are not
operation in Mason County. diverted.
Continue to review and evaluate operational procedures at all of the solid waste
4.2 Ongoing
collection facilities to reduce waiting times during peak-use periods.
Explore new opportunities for public/private partnerships dealing with improving
4.3 Ongoing
solid and special waste collection, processing,transport, and disposal.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 51
Table 10.1 Status of Recommendations from the Previous Plan (2011 continued
Chapter 5 Solid Waste Administration and Enforcement Current Status
5.1 Explore abatement and public property cleanup funding alternatives.
Ongoing
5.2 Assist local regulatory and law enforcement agencies with the
implementation and enforcement of new and existing laws and solid Ongoing
waste regulations.
Chapter 6 Special Waste Streams Current Status
6.1 Explore alternatives to the disposal of large animals infected with Department of Agriculture
contagious diseases and provide education to farmers. Function
6.2 Participate in discussions and provide assistance where necessary to
assist with evaluations of proposed methods for handling salmon Function of State Agencies
carcasses.
6.3 Biomedical Waste Public Education Campaign
(No budget to add staffing for public education campaigns.) Not Implemented
6.4 Septic Tank Sludge disposal alternatives. Ongoing by private companies
6.5 Facility Diversion at Eells Hill Transfer Station (C&D)
(Additional staffing and facilities would be needed to implement.) Not Implemented
6.6 Public Education of private C&D Recycling Facilities Ongoing
6.7 Disposal Ban at County Facilities (C&D)-C&D brings in revenue for
County, not enough other C&D facilities in County to ban C&D. Not Implemented
6.7 State Plan Support by County and City(E-waste) Ongoing
6.8 County-operated Collection Site(E-waste) Implemented by private parties
6.9 Annual or seasonal a-waste collection events Implemented by private parties
6.10 Landfill Ban on E-Waste Implemented
6.11 Wood Waste Facility Diversion at Eells Hill Implemented
6.12 Public Education of private wood waste recycling facilities Ongoing
6.13 Disposal Ban of wood waste at Eells Hill within Municipal Solid Waste
(Too many customers bring in wood waste mixed with MSW). Not Implemented
HouseholdChapter 7 Hazardous
7.1 Hazardous Waste Education Ongoing
7.2 Collection of Household Hazardous Waste Ongoing
7.3 Business Technical Assistance and collection -County does not have
the budget to hire somebody to provide technical assistance. Not Implemented
7.4 Enforcement and Compliance Ongoing
7.5 Used Oil Recycling Program at County sites Ongoing
7.6 Health and Safety of operating staff. Ongoing
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 52
10.2 Jurisdictional Involvement
In accordance with RCW 70.95, the Mason County CSWMP is a collaborative effort between the County and
the City of Shelton. City of Shelton Resolution 892-0506 passed on June 11, 2006 authorizes Mason County to
include the City of Shelton in its CSWMP pursuant to RCW 70.95.080.
10.3 Plan Review
10.3.1 Annual Review
The SWAC will review the CSWMP annually, on the anniversary of BOCC approval of the CSWMP, to track
the status of recommended actions and their efficacy in achieving the plan goals.
10.3.2 Five-Year Review:2022
Every five years, Mason County Public Works will undertake a comprehensive review of the plan to
determine its overall performance. RCW 70.95 outlines the requirements for maintenance of plans. The
SWAC will assist in this process and generally advise the County of overall concerns and potential revisions.
Based on this input,the County may need a plan amendment or a plan revision.
10.4 Plan Amendment
Plan amendments constitute additions to an existing program or changes that implement a program. Plan
amendments do not require the same extensive level of review and adoption as required of a plan revision,
which often focuses on establishing a new overall vision or approach for solid waste management within
Mason County. The type of changes that prompt a plan amendment includes: updating the 6- and 20-year
projects that are in the same scope and scale as the current approved plan, adding an interim program to
provide an equivalent service because of an implementation delay of a full program, making minor changes in
the scope of the program, such as identifying the number of permitted facilities or the addition of new target
audiences for education, and inventorying actions and non-actions implemented from the original plan.
The amendment process entails the following steps:
1. County staff consultation with the SWAC
2. Development of a draft amended plan and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners, participating
jurisdictions, and the regional Department of Ecology solid waste planner
3. Receipt of letters of concurrence from all participating jurisdictions and comments from the Department of
Ecology on the draft amended plan
4. Adjustment of the draft amended plan, if necessary
5. Public hearing on the draft amended plan held before the Board of County Commissioners.
6. Action by the Board of County Commissioners and forward adopted amended plan to the Department of
Ecology.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 53
10.5 Plan Revision
A plan revision may include redefining the vision for solid waste management within Mason County and
updating each component of the plan to make it current. Examples of plan revision involve:
1. Major shifts in the level of service in a program that is not specified in the plan.
2. Closure of a local landfill and a transition to long-haul.
3. Development of a new private transfer or disposal facility.
4. Regionalization between previously independent planning entities
Plan revisions require the same adoption process as adoption of a new plan. The Department of Ecology
publication Guidelines for the Development of Local Solid Waste Management Plans and Plan Revisions
provides further detail on plan amendments and plan revisions.
10.6 Solid Waste Financial Plan
Mason County Solid Waste Fund #402 is an enterprise fund. All solid waste revenues are used for
expenditures within Fund #402. Budgets are set annually so that revenues from tipping fees, LSWFA grants,
and other revenues equal or exceed the expenditures annually. Revenues and expenditures are tallied and
reviewed on a monthly basis.
In 2017 total budgeted expenditures are $4,101,137. 2017 expenditures include $423,000 for transfer station
improvements and$130,000 for a Grizzly Crane Replacement. 2015 expenditures totaled $2,916,325 and 2016
expenditures totaled $3,417,892. These annual expenditures include payments to Republic Services for long
haul solid waste disposal of$1,480,356 in 2015, $1,953,099 in 2016, and a budget of$1,800,000 in 2017.
In accordance with Ecology guidelines Mason County has developed a six-year capital improvement program
as shown in Table 10.2. The improvements listed come from the Capital Investment Needs Report completed
by Parametrix in 2016 and included as Appendix A in the CSWMP.
Table 10.2:Mason Countv Six-Year Solid Waste Cavital Im rovement Pro ram
Project 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Funding
1)
Source
Replace Grizzly Crane $123,000
Tipping Fees
2) Main Transfer Station $423,000 Tipping Fees
Bldg. Improvements
3) HHW Improvements $250,000 Tipping Fees,
LSWFA Grant
4) Replace self-haul $275,000 Tipping Fees
transfer building
5) Upgrade Diesel
$25,000 Tipping Fees
Fueling Facility
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 54
The projects identified in Table 10.2 are discussed briefly below.
1) Replace Grizzly Crane — In February of 2017 the existing Grizzly Crane that is used to compact solid
waste into the long haul containers was replaced with a refurbished crane of the same model.
2) Main Transfer Station Building Improvements —This is a collection of improvements identified in the
Parametrix Report focused on the Main Transfer Station Building. The County has completed the
design for these improvements and Construction will be completed in 2018. The scope of work
includes:
a. Replace and extend transfer building topload chute with skirt.
b. Upgrade transfer building storm water and leachate drainage systems.
c. Install code compliant stairs between upper and lower level of transfer building.
d. Overlay transfer building asphalt tipping floor.
e. Overlay lower level of transfer building floor and install directional curbing.
3) HHW Improvements —The Parametrix report identified a potential cost of over $1 Million to replace
the existing Household Hazardous Waste Facility and create a code compliant facility. This is a very
large cost for our solid waste program. Because the amount of HHW that we collect is fairly limited
County Public Works has looked into other alternatives. One option Public Works found that might be
more cost effective is a pre-fabricated self-contained Hazmat Building. There are sizes available that
meet or exceed the amount of space we currently use for HHW. We have an existing concrete pad we
could place one of these units on next to our existing HHW facility so no site preparation is needed.
We would just need to hook up power and water to the unit. An estimated cost for this is$250,000.
4) Replace Self-Haul Transfer building — The self-haul transfer building is in need of replacement. The
Parametrix Report provided an estimated cost of$157,000 - $241,000. A cost of$275,000 is listed in
our plan to account for inflation between 2016 and 2019.
5) Upgrade Diesel Fueling Facility—Upgrades to the fueling facility to resolve code compliance issues.
Improvements at the Rural Drop Box Stations will be done under maintenance projects and are not included in
this capital improvement program.
Beyond six-years the County should consider options for constructing a new or expanded transfer station at
the Eells Hill location. The existing facility is nearing its capacity to handle the amount of waste it receives.
Table 10.3 provides projections of population,tonnage, and annual expenditures over the next 20 years for the
Mason County Solid Waste System assuming continued public operation of the facilities.
Table 10.3 Long Term Financial Pro'ections for Solid Waste S stem, 2020 to 2040
Year 2015 020 2025 2030 2035 2040
Population 62,200 67,545 71,929 76,401 80,784 84,919
Total Tonnage 37,155 40,527 43,157 45,841 48,470 50,951
Tipping Fee/Ton $91.25 $96.85 $102.81 $109.13 $115.83 $122.95
Expenditures/Ton $78.49 $83.31 $88.43 $93.87 $99.63 1 $105.76
O&M Expenditures $2,916,325 $3,376,300 $3,816,400 $4,303,100 $4,829,100 $5,388,600
Tipping fees and expenditures per ton in Table 10.3 are based on an annual CPI increase of 1.2%, the average
increase from 2015—2017. The population and tonnage projections are from Table 6.5.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 55
APPENDIX A
Solid Waste System Capital Investment
Needs
Prepared for
Mason County Public Works
100 W Public Works Drive
Shelton,Washington 98584
Prepared by
Parametrix
719 2nd Avenue,Suite 200
Seattle,WA 98104
T.206.394.3700 F. 1.855.542.6353
www.parametrix.com
October 5,2016 553-1682-043
56
CITATION
Parametrix. 2016. Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs.
Prepared by Parametrix, Seattle, WA. October 5, 2016.
57
Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs
Mason county Public works
CERTIFICATION
The technical material and data contained in this document were prepared under the supervision and
direction of the undersigned,whose seal,as a professional engineer licensed to practice as such, is
affixed below.
"k/ k*f jj
Prepared by Karl R Hufnagel, PE
Checked by Ian Sutton, PE
c
Approved by Jenifer Young
October 5,2016 1553-1682-043
58
Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs
Mason County Public works
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................1-1
2. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.........................................................................................2-1
2.1 FINDINGS....................................................................................................................................2-1
2.2 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................................................2-2
APPENDICES
A Cost Estimates
October 5,2016 1553-1682-043 i
60
Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs
Mason county Public Works
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
County Mason County Public Works
CSWMP Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
HHW Household Hazardous Waste
RCW Revised Code of Washington
October 5,2016 553-1682-043
62
Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs
Mason County Public Works
1 . INTRODUCTION
Mason County Public Works (County) is in the process of revising its Comprehensive Solid Waste
Management Plan(CSWMP)in accordance with the Revised Code of Washington (RCW)70.95.As
required by RCW 70.95,the CSWMP must include,at a minimum, in addition to other items:
• An inventory of any deficiencies in meeting current solid waste handling needs
• Long-range needs for solid waste handling facilities projected 20 years into the future
• A 6-year construction and capital acquisition program for solid waste handling facilities
Parametrix was retained to develop a prioritized list of facility recommendations for the County's solid
waste facilities for inclusion in the CSWMP.
The County's four solid waste facilities include:
• Shelton transfer station and recycling facilities, S01 W Eells Hill Road
• Belfair drop box station, 1611 NE Sand Hill Road
• Union drop box station, 1391 E McReavy Road
• Hoodsport drop box station,260 N Foothills Park Road
In accordance with the scope of work of the professional services agreement, number 16-002, executed
June 27, 2016,this assessment focuses on the following key areas of the facilities:
• Facility configuration,design and condition, including traffic circulation, materials
receiving,storage,and load-out areas
• Facility maintenance practices
• Equipment type,usage,and maintenance
• Customer and employee safety
• Operating procedures and practices,including hauling activities
• Customer service standards
• Staffing requirements,deployment,and training
The four facilities were inspected by a team consisting of the following Parametrix solid waste
professionals and County public works staff on July 12, 2016:
• Karl Hufnagel—Parametrix
• Ian Sutton—Parametrix
• Melissa McFadden—Mason County
• Sarah Grice—Mason County
• Zach Foster—Mason County
The purpose of the site inspection was to gather firsthand information regarding the condition and
functionality of the facilities in the key areas listed above.
October 5,2016 553-1682-043 1-1
64
Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs
Mason County Public Works
2. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 Findings
All four facilities are over 20 years old, and while generally they are in full serviceable condition, each
facility exhibits substantial amounts of deferred maintenance. Each facility is in need of routine minor
repair and, in some cases, major rehabilitation and/or improvement to continue to meet current
operational needs.
In assessing the facilities,the Parametrix-led team considered improvements that would deliver benefits
to the County in one or more of the following areas:
• Safety
• Operational efficiency and/or operating cost reduction
• Improved functionality
• Improved customer service
• Environmental enhancement
• Code compliance
• Staff welfare
• Routine facility maintenance and upkeep
• Major renewal and replacement(of equipment)
In addition to physical condition and possible code non-compliance issues,the team noted a number of
operational aspects that may benefit from improvements and/or changes to the facilities.
A total of 13 deficient conditions and/or areas of possible improvement were observed at the three
drop box stations,which are summarized in Table 2-1.
A total of 43 deficiencies and/or areas for possible improvement were observed at the Shelton transfer
station, which are summarized in Table 2-2.
Tables 2-1 and 2-2 also include a brief description of the deficiency and/or possible improvement, an
indication of whether the item will require outside assistance to address the issue, a list of
interdependent deficiencies or improvements,the primary and secondary benefits (see list above)from
addressing the item, a preliminary estimated order of magnitude cost to address the item, and, a
suggested time frame for addressing the item (Immediate, Mid-Term, and Long Term).Assignment of
the timing categories takes into account the apparent urgency of the corrective action.
Table 2-2 also includes suggested groupings of certain improvement items that are recommended for
implementation in the near term, which require similar skills and expertise to address, or may be
interdependent and best addressed in concert with each other.These improvements are likely most
efficiently accomplished by grouping and completing as a comprehensive effort. More specifically,there
are two suggested groupings as follows, listed by improvement number as shown in Table 2-2:
Transfer Station Improvements Group 1:
• 1. Restore and/or upgrade transfer building wastewater and surface water drainage systems
• 3. Replace failing self-haul tipping building superstructure
• 6. Replace and extend transfer building topload chute with skirt
• 7. Install transfer trailer scale in topload bay or elsewhere on site
• 8. Install sidewalk/stairs between upper and lower level of transfer building
October 5,2016 1553-1682-043 2-1
66
Solid Waste System Capital Investment Needs
Mason County Public Works
• 35. Resurface transfer building asphalt tipping floor
• 37. Evaluate use of wheel stops for commercial stalls in transfer building
In addition, this group could also include drop box station improvement 12, Evaluate roof framing for
snow load capacity, listed in Table 2-1.
Code Compliance Assessments Group 2:
• 15. Assess Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)facility code compliance and functional
performance
• 26. Assess on-site equipment diesel fueling facility code compliance
• 28. Assess liquid fuel receiving facility code compliance
• 30. Assess fire hazard risks and on-site response capabilities
In consultation with County staff, Parametrix identified a selected group of priority improvements and
developed planning level cost estimate ranges for these items. The total cost range for each of these
estimates is included in the far right-hand column in Tables 2-1 and 2-2. The backup estimates for the
cost ranges are included in Appendix A.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of this assessment, Parametrix recommends that Mason County initiate steps to
implement all improvements categorized as "Immediate," and begin planning for longer range items
categorized as "Mid-Term." If simultaneous undertaking of all the "Immediate" improvements exceeds
the County's capacity, it is recommended that these improvements be prioritized and action taken on
the highest priority items.
2-2 October 5,2016 1553-1682-043
67
Table 2-1.MASON COUNTY SOLID WASTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
UNION,BELFAIR,AND HOODSPORT DROP BOX STATIONS
October 5,2016
Related or Outside Benefit Cost Timing
Improvement Dependent consultant Improvement Planning Level Cost Relevant Codas 8
No. Improvement P Primary Secondary Low Medium High In'mediate Mid Term Long Term Est lm ate Standards'
(1 Year) (6 Years) (20 Years)
13 No Secure site perimeter with fencing at secondary gate-Union Drop Box Stator S X X $2,000-$3,000
4 21 3 No Restripe pavements throughout site as needeo RM X X
5 No Install wide"Red"safely zone paint along edge of all potential customer/employee S X
fall areas,and update safety signage X
R71 No Clean roof and gutter of drop box shelter(before repainting)Yes Evaluate roof framing for snow bad capacity 5 X X f7,000•59,000
No Restore missing downspouts and broken gutter at Union Drop Box Statior RM X X
7 Yes Repair damaged siding/framing and repaint exterior siding and trim of drop boxshelter items 6 and 7 shall be conducted rior to item 1 RM X X527,000-E36,000
No Install metals disposal box at Belfair Drop Box Station OE CC X Xq H
No Install secondary containment in MRW sheds for fuel reservoirs EEX X $9,000-$12.000 No Repair damaged and missing asphalt pavement RM X X No Repair/replace damaged fencing at Belfair Drop Box Station RM X X
3 2 No Overlay pavements RM X X
9 No valuate improved movable top ad chutes
OE X X
1 Benefit Categories: 2 Cost Ranges Per Drop Box Site 3 Relevant Codes&Standards
S-Safety Low: <$10,000 A-Mason County Code of Ordinances,Chapter 14.48 Stormwater Management 8
OE-Operational Efficiency/Operating Cost Reduction Medium_$10,000-$50,000 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Puget Sound Basin
IF-Improved Functionality High:-$50,000 B-International Building Code(IBC)as amended
CS-Customer Service C-International Fire Code(IFC)as amended
EE-Environmental Enhancement D-International Mechanical Code(IMC)as amended
CC-Code Compliance E-Uniform Plumbing Code(UPC)as amended
RM-Routine Maintenance F•Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA)Regulations
SW-Staff Welfare G-National Fire Protection Association(NFPA)Standards including,but not limited to.
NFPA 30,Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code
NFPA 70,National Electrical Code
NFPA 101,Life Safety Code
NFPA 395,Standard for the Storage of Flammable and Comuslible Liquids
at Farms and Isolated Sites
NFPA 497,Classification or Flammable Liquids,Gases or Vapors and of
Hazardous(Classified)Locations for Electica Installation in
Chemical Process Areas
H-Washington Administrative Code Title 173.Chapter 350,Section 360
Moderate risk waste handling
I-Washington Adminsitrative Code Title 173,Chapter 350,Section 310
Intermediate solid waste handling facilities
68
Table 2-2.MASON COUNTY SOLID WASTE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ASSESSMENT
SHELTON TRANSFER STATION
October 5,2016
Requires BenefitCost' Timing
Improvement Outside
No Consultant or Improvement Long Planning Level Cost Relevant Codes
Contractor Primary Secondary Low Medium Hi h Immediate Mid Term Term 20 Estimate
0 (1 Year) (6 Years) ( S Standards'
Assistance
Years)
25 No Install wide"Red'safely zone paint along edge of all potential
customer/employee fall areas,and update safety signage S X X $1,400-$1,800
37 Yes Evaluate use of wheel stops for commercial stalls in transfer building S X X $1,700-$1,000
6 Yes Replace and extend transfer building topload chute with skirt OE EE,S X X $179,000-$278,000
1 Yes Restore/Upgrade transfer building wastewater and surface water drainage
Main Transfer systems EE,CC RM X X $94,000-$135,000 A,I
BWlding 38 No Replace Gdzzty Crane OE,RR X X 5266.000-5344,000
35 No Resurface transfer building asphalt tipping Boor RM S X X
$74,000-553,000
7 Yes Install transfer trailer scale in topload bay or elsewhere on site OE I X X $154,000-1278,000
34 No Clearvclear transfer building gutters RM X x
33 Yes Install energy efficient lighting in transfer building OE S X
X
32 No Recoat transler building primary framing RM X X
8 No Install
;,7_
l ewe stairs elween upper and lower level o trans er ul Ing S 1 SW X % $24,000-$35,000
3 Yes Replace tailing self-haul lipping building superstructure 5 I CC X X $157.000-$241,000 B,F
Self-Haul 4 Yes Replace entire self-haul tipping building and relocate to exisBrg transfer building S,OE CC X X B.F
Transfer Building
5 Yes Construct self-haul tipping building wastewater collection system EE X x
2 Yes onslruct lop oa station or yar waste materia OE If,CS X X
16 No Repair and freeze-protect HHW facility emergency eyewash and shower unit SW,CC X X
$5,000-$7,000 E.F,M
17 No Replace HHW facility emergency eyewash and shower unit with freeze protected --
unit(instead of repairing existing unit) SW,CC X X $10,000-$15,000 E.F,H
42 Yes Modify HHW facility sump with pump to new wastewater holding tank CCEE X X A,B C.E G,H
43 No Install loading dock door type rain curtain at HHW facility oil handling bay CC EE X X A B C E G H
Household CC,OE,
Hazardous Waste 15 Yes Assess HHW facility code compliance and functional performance SW,S, X X $21,000-$27,000 B,C.D.E,F.G.
CS EE H
8 Yes
Replace existing HHW facility with new facility designed to current standards and CC, ,C.OE, BCD.E,F.G.
needs in accordance with facility assessment results SW,EE, X X $1,052,000-$1,599,000 H
S CS
Rehabilitate existing HHW facility to current standards and needs in accordance CC,OE, B.C.D,E.F,G.
19
Yes SW,EE, X X
with facility assessment results SCS M
26 Yes Assess on-site equipment diesel fueling facility code compliance CC S X x $7,o0o-$9,000 B C D F G
28 Yes Assess liquid fuel receiving facility code compliance CC S X
Fueling Facility X Included with Item 26 B C D F G
27 Yes Upgrade on-site equipment diesel fueling facility to meet code as required CC S X X
29 Yes Upgrade liquidfuelreceiving facility to meet code as required CC S X X B C D F G
B.C,D,F,G
Recycling Station 12 No Install new primary site access for self-haul recycle area OE CS X x
20 No Pave self-haul recycling area CS,OE I X X
13No Study cashiering methods in use at other counties to identify procedures that
could reduce transaction times and increase scale facility throughout OE CS X X
Scale House and 21 No Rehabilitate two existing employee support buildings and Scale House SW,CC X
Support Construct new central employee su X B,C,D,E,F
support building in lieu of rehabilitating existing
Buildings 22 Yes support buildings SW,CC X X X B,C,D,E.F
lins'all third(outbound)scale and second scale house and convert existing
11 Yes outbound scale to bi-directional use OE CS X X
69
Requires Benefit Cast Timing
Improvement Outside
No. Consultant or Improvement Immediate Mid Term Long Planning Level Cost Relevant Codes
Contractor Primary Secondary Low Medium High Term 20 Estimate t
Assistance (1 Year) (6 Years) ( E Standards
Long
9 No Repair failing/failed pavements throughout site RM S X X
10 No Ovenay pavements RM X X
36 No Resbipe pavements throughout site RM S X X
30 Yes Assess fire hazard risks and on-site response capabilities S X X $8,000-$11.000
31 Yes U rade on-site fire response capabilities as required S X X
Site wide 23 Yes Prepare site stonnwatermanagement plan CC,EE X X A I
24 Yes Implement improvements covered by new slormwaler management plan CC,EE X X
Prepare transfer station site master plan that addresses long range transfer, A I
recycling and HHW needs including handling of scrap metals,tires,organics, OE,SW,
14 Yes hazardous materials,traffic circulation,operational efficiency,customer S,IF, X X $78,000•f101,000 A,B.C,D,E.F,
convenience,safety,staff welfare,surface water management,on-site fire CS,EE, G,H,I
protection,etc. CC
41 No Replace 2007 Volvo L45 Loader(keep old as spare) RR #=4XX
Equipment 40 No Reace1999Sterling Roll-Off Truck(keep old as spare) RR39 No ep ace ttawa ar ration RR
X
if I
1 Benefit Categories: 2 Cost Ranges 3 Relevant Codes 8 Standards
S-Safely Low:-$10,000 A-Mason County Code of Ordinances,Chapter 14.48 Stormwater Management 8
OE-Operational Efficiency/Operating Cost Reduction Medium: $10,000-$50,000 Department of Ecology Stormwater Management Manual for Puget Sound Basin
C S-Customer Service-Improved Functionality 9 Code High:-$50,000 B-International Building as amended
C (IBC))
EE-Environmental Enhancement C-International Fire Code(IFC)as amended
CC-Code Compliance
D-International Mechanical Code(IMC)as amended
RM-Routine Maintenance E-Uniform Plumbing Code(UPC)as amended
SW-Staff Welfare F-Occupational Safety and Health Administration(OSHA)Regulations
RR-Renewal and Replacement
G-National Fire Protection Association(NFPA)Standards including,but not limited to:
NFPA 30,Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code
NFPA 70,National Electrical Code
NFPA 101,Life Safely Code
NFPA 395,Standard for the Storage of Flammable and Comustible Liquids
at Farms and Isolated Sites
NFPA 497,Classification of Flammable Liquids,Gases or Vapors and of
Hazardous(Classified)Locations for Electica Installation in
Certain improvements require similar skills and expertise and/or may be interdependent.These improvements may be most efficiently Chemical Process Areas
accomplished by grouping and completing as a composite effort.
H-Washington Administrative Code Title 173,Chapter 350,Section 360
Proposed Improvement Group 1-Transfer Station Improvements: Improvements 1,3,6,7,8,35,37 Moderate risk waste handling
Proposed Improvement Group 2-Code Compliance Assessments: Improvements 15,26,28,30 I-Washington Adminsitrative Code Title 173,Chapter 350,Section 310Intermediate solid waste handling facilities
70
Appendix A
Cost Estimates
72
August 3,2016
Mason County Solid Waste System Capital Improvement Assessmeni
Shelton Transfer Station Site
Cost Estimates
Table of Contents
Sheet 2 1.Restore/upgrade transfer building wastewater and surface water drainage systems
Sheet 3 3.Replace self-haul building superstructure
Sheet 4 6.Replace and extend transfer building topload chute with skirt
Sheet 5 7.Install 70'above grade transfer trailer scale in topload bay or elsehwere on site
Sheet 6 8.Install sidewalk and stairs between upper and lower levels of the transfer building
Sheet 7 14.Prepare transfer station site master plan
Sheet 8 15.Assess HHW facility code compliance and functional performance
Sheet 9 16.Repair and freeze protect HHW facility emergency eyewash and shower
Sheet 10 17.Replace existing emergency eyewash and shower in the HHW facility with a freeze-protected unit
Sheet 11 18.Replace existing HHW facility with new facility designed to current standards and needs
Sheet 12 25.Install wide"Red"safety zone coating along ede of all potential customer/employee fall areas
Sheet 13 26 and 28.Assess equipment diesel fueling and liquid fuel receiving facility code compliance
Sheet 14 30.Assess fire hazard risks and on-site fire response capabilities
Sheet 15 35. Resurface repair transfer building tipping floor surface
Sheet 16 37.Evaluate use of wheel stops for commercial unloading stalls in transfer building
Sheet 17 38.Replace Grizzly refuse crane
A-1 74
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
1.Restore/upgrade transfer building wastewater and surface water drainage systems
CONSTRUCTION:
Replace trench drains
Demolish old drains LF 170 $25.00 $4,250
Install larger,prefab,pre-sloped drains
set in concrete LF 170 $200.00 $34,000
Scope and jet clean wastewater piping LS LS LS $5,000
Cleanout wastewater holding tank LS LS LS $1,000
Scope and vacuum clean 8"stormwater infiltration line and catch basins LS LS LS $5,000
Test pit infiltration pipe location and assess LS LS LS $1,000
Pipe issue allowance LS LS LS $2,000
Wastewater holding tank rehab allowance LS LS LS $2,000
Construction Subtotal: $54,250
General Conditions/Profit 25% $13,563
Construction Total $67,813
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 100 $150.00 $15,000
Total Improvement 1 $82,813
Cost Range:
Low-20% $66,250
High+30% $107,656
Other County costs
Relocation of waste transfer operations
during construction Weeks 2 $3,000.00 $6,000
Procurement and Admin for design LS LS LS $5,000
Procurement and Admin for
construction LS LS LS $5,000
Consultant construction oversight and
shop drawing review HRS 40 $150.00 $6,000
Permits N/A $0
WSST of Construction,8.5% $5,764
Total Other County Costs $27,764
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$135,420 $94,014
Round $135,000 $94,000
A-2 75
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
3.Replace self-haul building superstructure
CONSTRUCTION
Demolish existing structure and dispose LS LS LS $5,000
Concrete foundation improvements LS LS LS $5,000
Construct new steel framed structure with
metal siding/roofing and daylight roof
panels SF 1750
$40.00 $70,000
Lighting with power feed SF 1750 $10.00 $17,500
Construction Subtotal $97,500
General Conditions/Profit 25% $24,375
Construction Total $121,875
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 250 $180.00 $45,000
Total Improvement 3 $166,875
Cost Range:
Low-20% $133,500
High+30% $216,938
Other County costs
Relocation of waste transfer
operations during construction Weeks 2 $1,000.00 $2,000
Procurement and Admin for design
and construction LS LS LS $0
Consultant construction oversight
and shop drawing review HRS 60 $150.00 $9,000
Permits,2%of Construction Cost LS LS LS $2,438
WSST of Construction,8.5% $10,359
Total Other County Costs $23,797
procurement and admin included with other improvement items
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$240,734 $157,297
Round $241,000 $157,000
A-3 76
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
6.Replace and extend transfer building topload chute with skirt
CONSTRUCTION
Demolish existing chute and recycle steel LS LS LS $5,000
Concrete repair allowance LS LS LS $4,000
Construct new chute with rubber belt skirt LB 40000 $3.00 $120,000
Construction Subtotal $129,000
General Conditions/Profit 25% $32,250
Construction Total $161,250
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 200 $180.00 $36,000
Total Improvement 6 $197,250
Cost Range:
Low-20% $157,800
High+30% $256,425
Other County costs
Relocation of waste transfer
operations during construction Weeks $0
Procurement and Admin for design
and construction LS LS LS $0 `*
Consultant construction oversight
and shop drawing review HRS 30 $150.00 $4,500
Permits,2%of Construction Cost LS LS LS $3,225
WSST of Construction,8.5% $13,706
Total Other County Costs $21,431
*relocation cost covered in other related improvements that will be done simultaneously
**procurement and admin included with other improvement items
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$277,856 $179,231
Round $278,000 $179,000
A-4 77
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
7.Install 70'above grade transfer trailer scale in topload bay or elsehwere on site(see Note 1)
CONSTRUCTION
Site Grading/Earthwork LS LS LS $10,000
Construct scale foundations/approach slabs CY 50 $400.00 $20,000
Install scale LS LS LS $55,000
Install peripheral equipment(card reader,digital display,ticket printer) LS LS LS $8,000
Bring electrical power to scale,grounding LS LS LS $15,000
Test and certify scale equipment LS LS LS $5,000
Construction Subtotal $113,000
General Conditions/Profit 25% $28,250
Construction Total $141,250
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 150 $180.00 $27,000
Total Improvement 7 $168,250
Cost Range:
Low-20% $134,600
High+30% $218,725
Other County costs
Impact on operations Weeks $0.
Procurement and Admin for design
and construction LS LS LS $0
Consultant construction oversight and
shop drawing review HRS 30 $150.00 $4,500
Permits,2%of Construction Cost LS LS LS $2,825
WSST of Construction,8.5% $12,006
Total Other County Costs $19,331
'no operational relocation required
procurement and admin included with other improvement items
Note 1: For this estimate it is assumed that the scale will be located outside the transfer building topload bay due to structural complications
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$238,056 $153,931
Round $238,000 $154,000
A-5 78
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
8. Install sidewalk and stairs between upper and lower levels of the transfer building(one side)
CONSTRUCTION
Site Grading/Earthwork LS LS LS $1,000
Construct concrete side walks and stairs CY 20 $400.00 $8,000
Install galvanized steel pipe handrail LF 60 $60.00 $3,600
Coat handrail LS LS LS $500
Construction Subtotal $13,100
General Conditions/Profit 25% $3,275
Construction Total $16,375
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 30 $180.00 $5,400
Total Improvement 8 $21,775
Cost Range:
Low-20% $17,420
High+30% $28,308
Other County costs
Impact on operations Weeks $0 '
Procurement and Admin for design
and construction LS LS LS $0 "
Consultant construction oversight
and shop drawing review HRS 30 $150.00 $4,500
Permits,2%of Construction Cost LS LS LS $328
WSST of Construction,8.5% $1,392
Total Other County Costs $6,219
'no operational relocation required
'*procurement and admin included with other improvement items
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$34,527 $23,639
Round $35,000 $24,000
A-6 79
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
14. Prepare transfer station site master plan
Prepare master plan documents Outside consultant HRS 200 $175.00 $35,000
HRS 150 $200.00 $30,000
HRS 60 $125.00 $7,500
HRS 30 $110.00 $3,300
Total Improvement 14 $75,800
Cost Range:
Low-10% $68,220
High+20% $90,960
Other County costs
Procurement and Admin for
consultant LS LS LS $10,000
Total Other County Costs $10,000
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$100,960 $78,220
Round $101,000 $78,000
A-7 80
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
15.Assess HHW facility code compliance and functional performance
Prepare HHW facility assessment
report Outside consultant HRS 80 $150.00 $12,000
HRS 20 $200.00 $4,000
HRS 10 $110.00 $1,100
Total Improvement 15 $17,100
Cost Range:
Low-10% $15,390
High+20% $20,520
Other County costs
Procurement and Admin for
consultant LS LS LS $6,000
Total Other County Costs $6,000
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$26,520 $21,390
Round $27,000 $21,000
A-8 81
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
16.Repair and freeze protect HHW facility emergency eyewash and shower
CONSTRUCTION
Repair piping LS LS LS $1,000
Install self-regulating electrical heat tracing and insulate unit LS LS LS $1,000
Install 10 gallon hotwater tank heater
to provide tempered water to
eyewash and shower unit with
dedicated 120V electrical circuit LS LS LS $2,000
Construction Subtotal $4,000
General Conditions/Profit 25% $1,000
Construction Total $5,000
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant N/A $0
Total Improvement 16 $5,000
Cost Range:
Low-20% $4,000
High+30% $6,500
Other County costs
Impact on operations Weeks $0#
Procurement and Admin for
construction LS LS LS $500
Permits,2%of Construction Cost NA
WSST of Construction,8.5% $425
Total Other County Costs $925
"no operational relocation required
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$7,425 $4,925
Round $7,000 $5,000
A-9 82
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
17. Replace existing emergency eyewash and shower in the HHW facility with a freeze-protected unit
CONSTRUCTION
Repair piping LS LS LS $1,000
Install eyewash and shower similar to
HAWS model 8317CTFP on 220V
dedicated electrical circuit LS LS LS $5,500
Install 10 gallon hotwater tank heater
to provide tempered water to
eyewash and shower unit with
dedicated 120V electrical circuit LS LS LS $2,000
Construction Subtotal $8,500
General Conditions/Profit 25% $2,125
Construction Total $10,625
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant N/A $0
Total Improvement 17 $10,625
Cost Range:
Low-20% $8,500
High+30% $13,813
Other County costs
Impact on operations Weeks $0 R
Procurement and Admin for
construction LS LS LS $500
Permits,2%of Construction Cost NA
WSST of Construction,8.5% $903
Total Other County Costs $1,403
"no operational relocation required
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$15,216 $9,903
Round $15,000 $10,000
A-10 83
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
18. Replace existing HHW facility with new facility designed to current standards and needs
CONSTRUCTION
Processing area SF 2500 $75.00 $187,500
Receiving area SF 1800 $45.00 $81,000
Storage area SF 2100 $65.00 $136,500
Civil work LS LS LS $50,000
Electrical work LS LS LS $125,000
Mechanical work LS LS LS $125,000
Construction Subtotal $705,000
General Conditions/Profit 25% $176,250
Construction Total $881,250
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 200 $200.00 $40,000
HRS 300 $180.00 $54,000
HRS 500 $145.00 $72,500
HRS 100 $125.00 $12,500
HRS 300 $110.00 $33,000
Total Improvement 18 $1,093,250
Cost Range:
Low-20% $874,600
High+30% $1,421,225
Other County costs
Impact on operations Weeks $0
Procurement and Admin for design
and construction LS LS LS $10,000
Consultant construction oversight
and shop drawing review HRS 500 $150.00 $75,000
Permits,2%of Construction Cost LS LS LS $17,625
WSST of Construction,8.5% $74,906
Total Other County Costs $177,531
no impacts on operations if new facility located in undeveloped area
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$1,598,756 $1,052,131
Round $1,599,000 $1,052,000
A-11 84
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
25.Install wide"Red"safety zone coating along ede of all potential customer/employee fall areas(done by County labor)
Pressure wash and prepare surfaces LS LS LS $500
Apply coating LS LS LS $1,000
Total Improvement 25 $1,500
Cost Range:
Low-10% $1,350
High+20% $1,800
Other County costs
None
Total Other County Costs $0
High/Low Cost Range High Low
Round $1,800 $1,350
$1,800 $1,400
A-12 85
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
26 and 28.Assess equipment diesel fueling and liquid fuel receiving facility code compliance
Assess code compliance Outside consultant HRS 30 $150.00 $4,500
HRS 4 $200.00 $800
HRS 4 $110.00 $440
Total Improvements 26 and 28 $5,740
Cost Range:
Low-10% $5,166
High+20% $6,888
Other County costs
Procurement and Admin for
consultant LS LS LS $2,000
Total Other County Costs $2,000
High/Low Cost Range High Low
Round $8,888 $7,166
$9,000 $7,000
A-13 86
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
30.Assess fire hazard risks and on-site fire response capabilities
Assess fire hazard risks and
capabilities Outside consultant HRS 40 $150.00 $6,000
HRS 4 $200.00 $800
HRS 4 $110.00 $440
Total Improvement 30 $7,240
Cost Range:
Low-10% $6,516
High +20% $8,688
Other County costs
Procurement and Admin for
consultant LS LS LS $2,000
Total Other County Costs $2,000
High/Low Cost Range High Low
Round $10,688 $8,516
$11,000 $8,000
A-14 87
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
35. Resurface repair transfer building tipping floor surface
CONSTRUCTION
Scarify top 6 inches of floor/recycle material SF 3240 $3.00 $9,720
Subgrade preparation allowance LS LS LS $5,000
Place new 6 inch lift of Class B asphalt concrete Ton 115 $100.00 $11,500
Construction Subtotal
$26,220
General Conditions/Profit 25%
$6,555
Construction Total
$32,775
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 12 $180.00 $2,160
24 $125.00 $3,000
Total Improvement 35 $37,935
Cost Range:
Low-20% $30,348
High+30% $49,316
Other County costs
Relocation of waste transfer
operations during construction Weeks $0.
Procurement and Admin for design
and construction LS LS LS $0 ;*
Consultant construction oversight and
shop drawing review HRS 4 $150.00 $600
Permits,2%of Construction Cost LS LS LS $656
WSST of Construction,8.5% $2,786
Total Other County Costs $4,041
relocation cost covered in other related improvements that will be done simultaneously
"procurement and admin included with other improvement items
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$53,357 $34,389
Round $53,000 $34,000
A-15
88
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
37. Evaluate use of wheel stops for commercial unloading stalls in transfer building(assume results in no change)
Evaluate wheel stop options Outside consultant HRS 4 $150.00 $600
HRS 4 $200.00 $800
HRS 1 $90.00 $90
Total Improvements 37 $1,490
Cost Range:
Low-10% $1,341
High+20% $1,788
Other County costs
Procurement and Admin for
consultant LS LS LS $0.
Total Other County Costs $0
*procurement and admin included with other improvement items
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$1,788 $1,341
Round $1,800 $1,300
A-16 89
Shelton Transfer Station
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
38.Replace Grizzly refuse crane(see Note 1)
CONSTRUCTION
Remove existing crane equipment/salvage to contractor LS LS LS $5,000
Modify foundation anchor bolts LS LS LS $5,000
Install crane and hydraulic power unit LS LS LS $195,000
Modifications to electrical supply to HPU LS LS LS $5,000
Test and certify crane equipment LS LS LS $5,000
Construction Subtotal
$215,000
General Conditions/Profit 15% $32,250
Construction Total
$247,250
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 80 $180.00 $14,400
Total Improvement 38 $261,650
Cost Range:
Low-10% $235,485
High+20% $313,980
Other County costs
Impact on operations Weeks $0
Procurement and Admin for design
and construction LS LS LS $0 **
Consultant construction oversight
and shop drawing review HRS 30 $150.00 $4,500
Permits,2%of Construction Cost LS LS LS $4,945
WSST of Construction,8.5% $21,016
Total Other County Costs $30,461
*no operational relocation required
*'procurement and admin included with other improvement items
Note 1: For this estimate it is assumed that the new crane will be similar
geometrically and in terms of electrical power demand to existing crane
but require modification of foundation bolts
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$344,441 $265,946
Round $344,000 $266,000
A-17
90
August 3,2016
Mason County Solid Waste System Capital Improvement Assessment
Union,Belfair and Hoodsport Drop Box Stations
Cost Estimates
Table of Contents
Sheet 2 1.Repair damaged sidinglframing and repaint exterior siding and trip of drop box shelter(cost is for one station;work required at all three stations)
Sheet 3 10.Install secondary containment in MRW sheds for fuel reservoirs(cost is for one station:work required at all three stations)
Sheet 4 12.Evaluate roof framing for snow load capacity(station drop box shelters are identical but work will be based on Union station)
Sheet 5 13.Secure site perimter with fencing at secondary gate at Union station
A-18 91
Union,Belfair and Hoodsport Drop Box Stations
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
1.Repair damaged siding/framing and repaint exterior siding and trip of drop box shelter(cost is for one station;work required at all three stations)
CONSTRUCTION:
Repair framing LS LS LS $1,000
Replace damaged siding LS LS LS $1,000
Paint exterior wall surfaces(2 coats) LS LS LS $2,000
Construction Subtotal:
$4,000
General Conditions/Profit 25%
$1,000
Construction Total
$5,000
Design/Bid Documents Outside consultant HRS 0 $0.00 $0
Total Improvement 1(per station) $5,000
Cost Range:
Low-20% $4,000
High+30% $6,500
Other County costs
Procurement and Admin for construction LS LS LS $5,000
Permits N/A $0
WSST of Construction,8.5% $425
Total Other County Costs $5,425
High/Low Cost Range(per station) High Low
Round $11,925 $9,425
$12,000 $9,000
A-19
92
Union,Belfair and Hoodsport Drop Box Stations
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
10.Install secondary containment in MRW sheds for fuel reservoirs(cost is for one station:work required at all three stations)
Work performed by County staff
CONSTRUCTION:
Fabricate custom containment pan or procure prefab units LS LS LS $1,000
Install containment plan LS LS LS $1,000
Installation Subtotal: $2,000
Total Improvement 1 (per station)
$2,000
Cost Range:
Low-20% $1,600
High+30% $2,600
Other County costs
Administration LS LS LS $1,000
Permits N/A $0
WSST of Construction,8.5% N/A $0
Total Other County Costs $1,000
High/Low Cost Range(per station) High Low
$3,600 $2,600
Round $4,000 $3,000
A-20 93
Union,Belfair and Hoodsport Drop Box Stations
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
12.Evaluate roof framing for snow load capacity(station drop box shelters are identical but work will be based on Union station)
Assess structural code compliance
and load capacity Outside consultant HRS 30 $180.00 $5,400
HRS 8 $200.00 $1,600
HRS 4 $90.00 $360
Total Improvement 12 $7,360
Cost Range:
Low-10% $6,624
High+20% $8,832
Other County costs
Procurement and Admin for
consultant LS LS LS $0
Total Other County Costs $0
Procurement and admin included with improvements for Shelton transfer station
High/Low Cost Range High Low
$8,832 $6,624
Round $9,000 $7,000
A-21 94
Union, Belfair and Hoodsport Drop Box Stations
Item Sub-item Unit Qty Unit Price Price
13. Secure site perimter with fencing at secondary gate at Union station
CONSTRUCTION:
Install short sections of fencing at gate LS LS LS 1,500
Construction Subtotal:
1,500
General Conditions/Profit 25% 375
Construction Total
1,875
Cost Range:
Low-20% 1,500
High+30% 2,438
Other County costs
Administration LS LS LS 500
Permits N/A 0
WSST of Construction, 8.5% N/A 159
Total Other County Costs 659
High/Low Cost Range(per station) High Low
Round $3,097 $2,159
$3,000 $2,000
A-22 95
APPENDIX B - REGULATORY OVERVIEW
The basis for the Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan (CSWMP) is a
"flowdown" of federal regulations to the state and county level.
Federal Regulations
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act — commonly referred to as RCRA — is our nation's
primary law governing the disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Congress passed RCRA on October
21, 1976 to address the increasing problems the nation faced from our growing volume of municipal
and industrial waste. RCRA, which amended the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965, set national goals
fo r:
• Protecting human health and the environment from the potential hazards of waste disposal.
• Conserving energy and natural resources.
• Reducing the amount of waste generated.
• Ensuring that wastes are managed in an environmentally-sound manner.
To achieve these goals, RCRA established three distinct, yet interrelated, programs:
• The hazardous waste program, under RCRA Subtitle C, establishes a system for controlling
hazardous waste from the time it is generated until its ultimate disposal — in effect, from
"cradle to grave."
• The solid waste program, under RCRA Subtitle D, encourages states to develop comprehensive
plans to manage nonhazardous industrial solid waste and municipal solid waste, sets criteria
for municipal solid waste landfills and other solid waste disposal facilities, and prohibits the
open dumping of solid waste.
• The underground storage tank (UST) program, under RCRA Subtitle I, regulates underground
storage tanks containing hazardous substances and petroleum products.
The requirements to implement RCRA programs are found in Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (40CFR) Parts 239-282. Title 40 arranges mainly environmental regulations that were
promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency(EPA), based on the provisions of United
States laws(statutes of the U.S. Federal Code).
Under subtitle C the EPA has primary responsibility for permitting hazardous waste treatment,
storage, and disposal (TSD) facilities until a state submits its own hazardous waste program
application and it is approved by the EPA.The Washington State program has been approved by the
EPA and the responsibility for implementing the program requirements was delegated to the
Washington Department of Ecology.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 96
In contrast to the hazardous wastes under subtitle C, Congress intended that non-hazardous wastes
covered by subtitle D would be an individual state responsibility. Under subtitle D the state and local
governments are the primary entities responsible for planning, permitting, regulating, implementing
and establishing enforcement agencies for the management and disposal of non-hazardous solid
wastes. However the EPA establishes minimum technical design and operating criteria for disposal
facilities which must be included in the state regulations.
Important CFR sections for reference:
• 40CFR256—Guidelines for Development and Implementation of State Solid Waste
Management Plans
• 40CFR257—Guidelines for Classification of Solid waste Disposal Facilities and Practices
• 40CRF258—Criteria for Municipal Waste Landfills
Washington State Regulations
Similar to federal regulations, laws for waste disposal are established in the Revised Code of
Washington (RCW) and implemented through the Washington Administrative Code (WAC). The laws
related to solid waste are found in several sections which include:
• Title 36 Counties -establishes all County authorities and responsibilities
• Title 70 Public Health and Safety—establishes programs and responsibilities for public health
and safety
• Title 80 Public Utilities—establishes the Public Utilities and Transportation Commission with
its authorities and responsibilities
• Title 81 Transportation—establishes laws relative transportation activities such as motor
transport, ferries, pipelines, railroads and air transport
Within these titles specific chapters of interest are:
Chapter 36.58 Solid Waste Disposal—provides the legislative authority of a county to develop
ordinances to establish a system or systems of solid waste handling for all unincorporated areas of a
county or portions thereof.
Chapter 70.05 Local Health Departments, Boards, Officers—Regulations—In part, the local Board of
Health shall have supervision over all matters pertaining to the preservation of the life and health of
the people within its jurisdiction and shall:
(1) Enforce through the local health officer or the administrative officer appointed under RCW
70.05.040, if any, the public health statutes of the state and rules promulgated by the state board
of health and the secretary of health;
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 97
(2) Supervise the maintenance of all health and sanitary measures for the protection of the public
health within its jurisdiction;
(3) Enact such local rules and regulations as are necessary in order to preserve, promote and
improve the public health and provide for the enforcement thereof
Chapter 70.93 Waste reduction, recycling, and model litter control act.
Chapter 70.95 Solid waste management—Reduction and recycling
Chapter 70.95A Pollution control—Municipal bonding authority
Chapter 70.95D Solid waste incinerator and landfill operators
Chapter 70.951 Used oil recycling
Chapter 70.95M Mercury
Chapter 70.95N Electronic product recycling
Chapter 81.77 Solid waste collection companies
The Washington Administrative Code (WAC) codifies the regulations established by the RCWs and
arranges them by subject or the agency responsible for implementation.
Title 173 Department of Ecology—through its regulations implements the applicable portions of the
RCWs noted above.
WAC 173-304 Minimum Functional Standards for Waste Handling: This regulation is promulgated
under the authority of chapter 70.95 RCW to protect public health, to prevent land, air, and water
pollution, and conserve the state's natural, economic, and energy resources by:
(1) Setting minimum functional performance standards for the proper handling of all solid waste
materials originating from residences, commercial, agricultural and industrial operations and
other sources;
(2) Identifying those functions necessary to assure effective solid waste handling programs at
both the state and local level;
(3) Following the direction set by the legislature for the management of solid waste in order of
descending priority as applicable:
(a) Waste reduction;
(b) Waste recycling;
(c) Energy recovery or incineration;
(d) Landfill.
(4) Describing the responsibility of persons, municipalities, regional agencies, state and local
government under existing laws and regulations related to solid waste;
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 98
(5) Requiring use of the best available technology for siting, and all known available and
reasonable methods for designing, constructing, operating and closing solid waste handling
facilities; and
(6) Establishing these standards as minimum standards for solid waste handling to provide a
statewide consistency and expectation as to the level at which solid waste is managed throughout
the state. Local ordinances setting standards for solid waste handling shall not be less stringent
than these minimum standards, and shall be adopted not later than one year after the effective
date of this regulation. Local ordinances need not adopt WAC 173-304-011, County planning
requirements, but shall otherwise comply with the requirements of WAC 173-304-011. Solid
waste regulations or ordinances adopted by counties, cities, or jurisdictional boards of health
shall be filed with the department ninety days following adoption.
WAC 173-331 Vehicle Battery Recycling: The department of ecology has been authorized under
RCW 70.95.670 to implement and enforce a vehicle battery recycling program. The purpose of
this chapter is to establish procedures for implementation and enforcement of RCW 70.95.610
through 70.95.660, which is designed to accomplish the recycling of used vehicle batteries
through a system of exchanging batteries at the point of sale.
WAC 173-345 Recyclable Materials –Transporter and Facility Requirements: The purpose of this
chapter is to establish minimum standards for the transportation of recyclable materials; establish
notice and reporting standards for recycling facilities and material recovery facilities (MRFs);
ensure that recyclable materials are not delivered for disposal; establish penalties for transporters
of recyclable materials, recycling facilities, and material recovery facilities (MRFs) that do not
meet the standards of this chapter.
WAC 173-350 Solid Waste Handling Standards: This chapter is adopted under the authority of
chapter 70.95 RCW, Solid waste management—Reduction and recycling, to protect public health,
to prevent land, air, and water pollution, and conserve the state's natural, economic, and energy
resources by:
(1) Setting minimum functional performance standards for the proper handling and disposal of
solid waste originating from residences, commercial, agricultural and industrial operations and
other sources;
(2) Identifying those functions necessary to assure effective solid waste handling programs at
both the state and local level;
(3) Following the priorities for the management of solid waste as set by the legislature in chapter
70.95 RCW, Solid waste management—Reduction and recycling.
(4) Describing the responsibility of persons, municipalities, regional agencies, state and local
government related to solid waste;
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 99
(S) Requiring solid waste handling facilities to be located, designed, constructed, operated and
closed in accordance with this chapter;
(6) Promoting regulatory consistency by establishing statewide minimum standards for solid
waste handling; and
(7) Encouraging the development and operation of waste recycling facilities and activities needed
to accomplish the management priority of waste recycling
WAC 173-900 Electronic Products Recycling Plan: 1) The Washington state legislature has
required that a convenient, safe, and environmentally sound system for the collection,
transportation, and recycling of covered electronic products (CEPS) be established throughout
Washington state. The legislature determined that such a system must encourage the design of
electronic products that are less toxic and more recyclable and that the responsibility for this
system must be shared among all stakeholders, with manufacturers financing the collection,
transportation, and recycling system.
(2) This chapter implements the Electronic Product Recycling Act, chapter 70.95N RCW. This
chapter:
(a) Defines the administrative and enforcement responsibilities delegated to the department
of ecology; and
(b) Describes the processes and procedures that ecology will use to carry out those
responsibilities.
WAC 173-910 Mercury-Containing Lights Product Stewardship Program: 1) Washington state law
requires establishment of a convenient and environmentally sound product stewardship program
for mercury-containing lights throughout Washington state by January 1, 2013. Every producer of
mercury-containing lights sold in or into Washington State for residential use must fully finance
and participate in the product stewardship program. Such a system is essential to collect spent
mercury lighting from covered entities which, when improperly disposed, releases mercury that
threatens human health and the environment.
(2)This chapter implements Mercury-containing lights—proper disposal, chapter 70.275 RCW.
(3) Washington state law established a statewide goal of recycling all end-of-life mercury-
containing lights by 2020 through expanded public education, a uniform statewide requirement
to recycle all mercury-containing lights, and the development of a comprehensive, safe, and
convenient collection system that includes use of residential curbside collection programs, mail-
back containers, increased support for household hazardous waste facilities, and a network of
additional collection locations.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 100
Title 197 Department of Ecology (Council on Environmental Policy)
WAC 197-11 establishes uniform rules for each agency to comply with the State
Environmental Policy Act (SEPA)
Title 480 Utilities and Transportation Commission
WAC 480-70 Solid Waste and/or Refuse Collection Companies:The legislature has declared
that operating as a solid waste collection company in the state of Washington is a business
affected with a public interest and that such companies should be regulated. The purpose of
these rules is to administer and enforce Chapter 81.77 RCW by establishing standards for:
• Public safety;
• Fair practices;
• Just and reasonable charges;
• Nondiscriminatory application of rates;
• Adequate and dependable service;
• Consumer protection; and
• Compliance with statutes, rules and commission orders
Mason County Code
Title 6.0—Sanitary Code of the Mason County District Board of Health:
Chapter 6.72 Solid Waste and Biosolids Handling and Facilities Regulations: Pursuant to RCW
Chapter 70.95, the primary responsibility for managing solid waste is assigned to local
government. The Mason County health department is authorized, by this regulation and by
WAC 173-350 as adopted in this chapter, to regulate residential, commercial/business solid
waste and biosolids handling activities through use permit requirements, site approval criteria
and may require limited purpose permits or agreements between the health department and
any person, company, corporation, trust or other business entity not required to obtain a
permit. The criteria for permits are contained in WAC 173-350-700.
Title 8.0—Environmental Policy—Adopts the SEPA requirements of WAC 197-11
Title 13— Utilities:
Chapter 13.30 Minimum Levels of Service for Residential Recycling Collection:The purpose of
this chapter is to define minimum levels of service for curbside recycling collection, which
shall be provided to households serviced by the solid waste collection company operating in
the urban and rural areas of Mason County
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 101
APPENDIX C - GLOSSARY
"Air quality standard" means a standard set for maximum allowable contamination in ambient air as set forth
in Chapter 173-400WAC, General regulations for air pollution sources.
"Aquifer" means a geologic formation,group of formations, or part of a formation capable of yielding a
significant amount of groundwater to wells or springs.
"Asbestos" is the commercial term for a group of highly fibrous minerals that readily separate into long thin
microscopic fibers.The fibers are heat resistant and chemically inert and possess a high electric thermal
insulation quality. The fibers are considered a carcinogenic air pollutant,when inhaled,and most uses were
banned in 1991.
"Biosolids" means municipal sewage sludge that is a primarily organic,semisolid product resulting from the
wastewater treatment process,that can be beneficially recycled and meets all applicable requirements under
Chapter 173-308 WAC, Biosolids management. Biosolids includes a material derived from biosolids and septic
tank sludge, also known as septage,that can be beneficially recycled and meets all applicable requirements
under Chapter 173-308 WAC, Biosolids management.
"Closure" means those actions taken by the owner or operator of a solid waste handling facility to cease
disposal operations or other solid waste handling activities,to ensure that all such facilities are closed in
conformance with applicable regulations at the time of such closures and to prepare the site for the post-
closure period.
"Closure plan" means a written plan developed by an owner or operator of a facility detailing how a facility is
to close at the end of its active life.
"Composting" means the controlled degradation of organic solid waste yielding a product for use as a soil
conditioner
"Conditionally exempt small quantity generator(CESQG)" means a dangerous waste generator whose
dangerous wastes are not subject to regulation under Chapter 70.105 RCW, Hazardous waste management,
solely because the waste is generated or accumulated in quantities below the threshold for regulation and
meets the conditions prescribed in WAC 173-303-070(8)(b).
"Container" means a device used for the collection, storage, and/or transportation of solid waste including but
not limited to reusable containers, disposable containers,detachable containers and tanks,fixed or
detachable.
"Construction and Demolition (C&D) Waste" means solid waste, largely inert waste, resulting from the
demolition or razing of buildings, roads and other man-made structures. Demolition waste consists of, but is
not limited to,concrete, brick, bituminous concrete, wood and masonry, composition roofing and roofing
paper, steel, and minor amounts of other metals like copper. Plaster(i.e.,sheet rock or plaster board) or any
other material, other than wood,that is likely to produce gases or a leachate during the decomposition
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 102
process and asbestos wastes are not considered to be demolition waste for the purposes of Chapter 173-304
WAC.
"(The)County" means the government of Mason County. This includes the Board of County Commissioners
(BOCC) and the different governmental departments within the County Governmental structure. The BOCC is
responsible for approving all contracts or agreements with the County. The BOCC also approves the CSWMP.
The Public Works Department is responsible for operations and maintenance of County Solid Waste Facilities
and the landfill. The Environmental Health Division (EHD) is responsible for permitting and enforcement of
solid waste facilities. Other departments that are involved with solid waste include the Sheriff's Office and the
WSU Extension Office.
"Dangerous wastes" means any solid waste designated as dangerous waste by the department under Chapter
173-303 WAC.
"Disaster Waste" refers to debris created as a result of a natural or man-made disaster such as an earthquake,
flooding, or fires.
"Disposal" or"deposition" means the discharge,deposit, injection, dumping, leaking, or placing of any solid
waste into or on any land or water.
"Drop box facility" means a facility used for the placement of a detachable container including the area
adjacent for necessary entrance and exit roads, unloading and turn-around areas. Drop box facilities normally
serve the general public with loose loads and receive waste from offsite.
"Ecology"Washington State Department of Ecology
"Facility" means all contiguous land (including buffer zones) and structures, other appurtenances, and
improvements on the land used for solid waste handling
"Facility structures" means buildings,sheds, utility lines,and drainage pipes on the facility.
"Garbage" means unwanted animal and vegetable wastes and animal and vegetable wastes resulting from the
handling, preparation, cooking and consumption of food, swill and carcasses of dead animals,and of such a
character and proportion as to be capable of attracting or providing food for vectors, except sewage and
sewage sludge
"Groundwater" means that part of the subsurface water that is in the zone of saturation.
"Landfill" means a disposal facility or part of a facility at which solid waste is permanently placed in or on land
including facilities that use solid waste as a component of fill.
"Leachate" means water or other liquid that has been contaminated by dissolved or suspended materials due
to contact with solid waste or gases there from.
"Medical waste" (or Biomedical Waste) means all the infectious and injurious waste originating from a
medical,veterinary, or intermediate care facility
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 103
"Moderate risk waste(MRW)" means solid waste that is limited to conditionally exempt small quantity
generator(CESQG)waste and household hazardous waste (HHW)as defined in Chapter 173-350 WAC.
"Municipal solid waste(MSW)" means a subset of solid waste which includes unsegregated garbage, refuse
and similar solid waste material discarded from residential,commercial, institutional and industrial sources
and community activities, including residue after recyclables have been separated. Solid waste that has been
segregated by source and characteristic may qualify for management as a non-MSW solid waste, at a facility
designed and operated to address the waste's characteristics and potential environmental impacts.The term
MSW does not include:
■ Dangerous wastes other than wastes excluded from the requirements of chapter 173-303 WAC,
Dangerous waste regulations, in WAC 173-303-071 such as household hazardous wastes;
■Any solid waste, including contaminated soil and debris, resulting from response action taken under
section 104 or 106 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980(42
U.S.C. 9601), Chapter 70.105D RCW, Hazardous waste cleanup—Model Toxics Control Act, Chapter 173-340
WAC,the Model Toxics Control Act cleanup regulation or a remedial action taken under those rules; nor
■ Mixed or segregated recyclable material that has been source-separated from garbage, refuse and
similar solid waste.The residual from source separated recyclables is MSW.
"Organics" refers to carbon-based materials that include food,yard debris, manures, and other agricultural
residues.
"Parametrix" means an engineering consulting firm with offices in Washington that completed the Capital
Investment Needs Report included as Appendix A.
"Septage" or"domestic septage" is liquid or solid material removed from septic tanks, cess pools, portable
toilets,type III marine sanitation devices, vault toilets, pit toilets, RV holding tanks, or similar systems that
receive only domestic sewage. Septage may also include commercial or industrial septage mixed with domestic
septage if approved in accordance with the provisions in WAC 173-308-020(3)(g).
"Sewage sludge" means solid,semisolid, or liquid residue generated during the treatment of domestic sewage
in a treatment works. Sewage sludge includes, but is not limited to, domestic septage;scum or solids removed
in primary,secondary,or advanced wastewater treatment processes; and a material derived from sewage
sludge. Sewage sludge does not include ash generated during the firing of sewage sludge in a sewage sludge
incinerator or grit and screenings generated.
"Solid waste" or"wastes" means all putrescible and nonputrescible solid and semisolid wastes including, but
not limited to,garbage, rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, swill,sewage sludge, demolition and construction
wastes, abandoned vehicles or parts thereof, contaminated soils and contaminated dredged material, and
recyclable materials.
"Solid waste handling" means the management, storage, collection,transportation,treatment, use,
processing or final disposal of solid wastes, including the recovery and recycling of materials from solid wastes,
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 104
the recovery of energy resources from such wastes or the conversion of the energy in such wastes to more
useful forms or combinations thereof.
"Solid waste handling unit" means discrete areas of land,sealed surfaces, liner systems,excavations,facility
structures, or other appurtenances within a facility used for solid waste handling.
"Source separation" means the separation of different kinds of solid waste at the place where the waste
originates.
"Storage" means the holding of solid waste materials for a temporary period.
"Surface water" means all lakes, rivers, ponds,wetlands,streams, inland waters, salt waters and all other
surface water and surface water courses within the jurisdiction of the state of Washington
"Twenty-five-year storm" means a storm of twenty-four hours duration and of such intensity that it has a four
percent probability of being equaled or exceeded each year.
"Waste recycling" means reusing waste materials and extracting valuable materials from a waste stream.
"Waste reduction" means altering practices to reduce the amount of waste going into the waste stream.
"Waste tires" means any tires that are no longer suitable for their original intended purpose because of wear,
damage or defect. Used tires, which were originally intended for use on public highways that are considered
unsafe in accordance with RCW 46.37.425, are waste tires. Waste tires also include quantities of used tires that
may be suitable for their original intended purpose when mixed with tires considered unsafe per RCW
46.37.425.
"White Goods" is defined as appliances, such as washing machines,water heaters,clothes dryers,stoves,
refrigerators and freezers. White goods are easily recycled for their metal value after an appliance has been
stripped of insulation, plastic,glass, non-ferrous metals, lubricants, refrigerants, and other contaminants. Most
of the materials in white goods are recyclable, but certain components,such as PCB-contaminated capacitors
in older appliances, mercury-containing switches and oil-filled compressors, or refrigerants in refrigerators,
freezers or air conditioners can cause environmental contamination when damaged.
"Wood waste" means solid waste consisting of wood pieces or particles generated as a by-product or waste
from the manufacturing of wood products, construction, demolition, handling and storage of raw materials,
trees and stumps. This includes, but is not limited to, sawdust, chips,shavings, bark, pulp, hogged fuel, and log
sort yard waste, but does not include wood pieces or particles containing paint, laminates, bonding agents or
chemical preservatives such as creosote, pentachlorophenol, or copper-chrome-arsenate.
"Yard debris" means plant material commonly created in the course of maintaining yards and gardens and
through horticulture,gardening, landscaping or similar activities. Yard debris includes, but is not limited to,
grass clippings, leaves, branches, brush, weeds,flowers, roots,windfall fruit, and vegetable garden debris.
"Zone of saturation" means that part of a geologic formation in which soil pores are filled with water and the
pressure of that water is equal to or greater than atmospheric pressure
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 105
APPENDIX D - ACRONYMS
BOCC—(Mason County) Board of County Commissioners
C&D—Construction and Demolition Waste
CAD—Computer aided design
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations
CESQG -Conditionally exempt small quantity generator
CPG—Coordinated Prevention Grant (Administered by Ecology, now called LSWFA)
CSWMP—Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
CY—Cubic Yard
DOE—Washington State Department of Ecology(commonly referred to as Ecology)
EHD—(Mason County) Environmental Health Division
EPA—Environmental Protection Agency
EPP—Environmentally Preferable Purchasing
FEMA—Federal Emergency Management Agency
GMA—Growth Management Act
HHW—Household hazardous waste
JHD—Jurisdictional Health Department
L&I—Washington Department of Labor and Industries
LSWFA—Local Solid Waste Financial Assistance Grant(Administered by Ecology)
LOTT—Wastewater Agency in Thurston County for Lacey, Olympia,Tumwater, and Thurston County
MCC—Mason County Code
MCSWS—Mason County Solid Waste System
MRW—Moderate Risk Waste
MSW—Municipal Solid Waste
ORCAA—Olympic Region Clean Air Authority
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 106
PCB—Polychlorinated biphenyls
PET—Polyethylene Terephthalate (common use is for beverage bottles)
RCRA—Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RCW—Revised Code of Washington
SEPA—State Environmental Protection Act
SQG—Small quantity generator
SMM—Sustainable Materials Management
SWAC—Solid Waste Advisory Committee
SWP—Solid Waste Program
UTC—Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission
WAC—Washington Administrative Code
WFM—Washington Office of Financial Management
WSDOT—Washington State Department of Transportation
WSU—Washington State University
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 107
APPENDIX E - UTC COST ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Please provide the information requested below:
PLAN PREPARED FOR THE COUNTY OF: Mason
PLAN PREPARED FOR THE CITY OF: Shelton
PREPARED BY: Bart Stepp, Deputy Director/Utilities and Waste Management Mason County
CONTACT TELEPHONE: 360—427—9670 x652 DATE: July 5, 2017
DEFINITIONS
Please provide these definitions as used in the Solid Waste Management Plan and the Cost Assessment
Questionnaire.
Throughout this document:
YR.1 shall refer to 2018.
YR.3 shall refer to 2020.
YR.6 shall refer to 2023.
Year refers to calendar(Jan 01 - Dec 31)
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 108
1. DEMOGRAPHICS: To assess the generation, recycling and disposal rates of an area, it is
necessary to have population data. This information is available from many sources (e.g., the State
Data Book, County Business Patterns, or the State Office of Finance and Management).
1.1 Population
1.1.1 What is the total population of your County?
YR.1 -65,407 YR.3 - 67,545 YR.6- 70,176
1.1.2 For counties, what is the population of the area under your jurisdiction? (Exclude cities
choosing to develop their own solid waste management system.)—Not Applicable
YR.1 YR.3 YR.6
1.2 References and Assumptions
2. WASTE STREAM GENERATION: The following questions ask for total tons recycled and
total tons disposed. Total tons disposed are those tons disposed of at a landfill, incinerator, transfer
station or any other form of disposal you may be using. If other please identify.
2.1 Tonnage Recycled
2.1.1 Please provide the total tonnage recycled in the base year, and projections for years three and
six.
YR.1 —3,440 YR.3 -3,558 YR.6-3,697
2.2 Tonnage Disposed
2.2.1 Please provide the total tonnage disposed in the base year, and projections for years three and
six.
YR.1 —35,738 YR.3 —36,969 YR.6—38,408
2.3 References and Assumptions
3. SYSTEM COMPONENT COSTS: This section asks questions specifically related to the types
of programs currently in use and those recommended to be started. For each component (i.e.,
waste reduction, landfill, composting, etc.) please describe the anticipated costs of the program(s),
the assumptions used in estimating the costs and the funding mechanisms to be used to pay for it.
The heart of deriving a rate impact is to know what programs will be passed through to the
collection rates, as opposed to being paid for through grants,bonds,taxes and the like.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 109
3.1 Waste Reduction Programs—Page 21 of Plan
3.1.1 Please list the solid waste programs which have been implemented and those programs which
are proposed. If these programs are defined in the SWM plan please provide the page number.
(Attach additional sheets as necessary.)
IMPLEMENTED PROPOSED
Web site links to reuse sites Method to quantify waste reduction
Waste audits for businesses
Environmentally Preferable Purchasing
3.1.2 What are the costs, capital costs and operating costs for waste reduction programs
implemented and proposed?
IMPLEMENTED
YR.1 $00 YR.3 $0 YR.6 $0
PROPOSED
YR.1 $90 YR.3 $0 YR.6 $0
3.1.3 Please describe the funding mechanism(s)that will pay the cost of the programs in 3.1.2.
Not Applicable
IMPLEMENTED
YR.1 YR.3 YR.6
PROPOSED
YR.1 YR.3 YR.6
3.2 Recycling Programs—Page 22 of Plan
3.2.1 Please list the proposed or implemented recycling program(s) and, their costs, and proposed
funding mechanism or provide the page number in the draft plan on which it is discussed.
(Attach additional sheets as necessary.)
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 110
IMPLEMENTED
PROGRAM COST FUNDING
Blue Box Self-Haul Program $27,000/year LSWFA Grant
County Curbside Program $0 to County Customer Rates
Shelton Curbside Program $0 to County User Rates
PROPOSED
PROGRAM COST FUNDING
None proposed
3.3 Solid Waste Collection Programs—Page 14 of Plan
3.3.1 Regulated Solid Waste Collection Programs
Fill in the table below for each WUTC regulated solid waste collection entity in your jurisdiction.
(Make additional copies of this section as necessary to record all such entities in your jurisdiction.)
WUTC Regulated Hauler Name Mason County Garbage Co. Inc.
G-permit# G-00088
YR. 3 YR. 6
RESIDENTIAL(projected)
-#of Customers 11,594 12,051
-Tonnage Collected 9,918 10,309
COMMERCIAL (projected)
-#of Customers 933 970
-Tonnage Collected 10,931 11,362
3.4 Energy Recovery& Incineration(ER&I)Programs—Not Applicable
(If you have more than one facility of this type,please copy this section to report them.)
3.5 Land Disposal Program—Not Applicable
(If you have more than one facility of this type,please copy this section to report them.)
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 111
3.6 Administration Program—Page 19 of Plan
3.6.1 What is the budgeted cost for administering the solid waste and recycling programs and
what are the major funding sources?
Budgeted Cost
YR.1 $4.3 Million YR.3 �$5.0 Million YR.6 $6.0 Million
Funding Source
YR.1 Tipping Fees and LSWFA`YR.3 Fees and LSWFA YR.6 Fees and LSWFA
3.6.2 Which cost components are included in these estimates?
MSW disposal costs, recycling, HHW system, staffing, operations and maintenance expenses, and
minor capital improvements are included in these estimates.
3.6.3 Please describe the funding mechanism(s)that will recover the cost of each component.
Tipping fees and rates for Mason County support all operations. No general fund monies are used.
LSWFA funds are used to support the recycling and HHW programs in the County.
3.7 Other Programs—Page 47 of Plan
For each program in effect or planned which does not readily fall into one of the previously described
categories please answer the following questions. (Make additional copies of this section as
necessary.)
3.7.1 Describe the program, or provide a page number reference to the plan.
Mason County Community Services, Environmental Health Division, provides permitting and
enforcement of solid waste facilities within Mason County. This includes enforcement of illegal
dumping and littering on private property(Pages 47 and 49)
3.7.2 Owner/Operator: Mason County
3.7.3 Is WUTC Regulation Involved? If so,please explain the extent of involvement in section 3.8.
3.7.4 Please estimate the anticipated costs for this program, including capital and operating expenses.
YR.1 $75,000 YR.3 $80,000 YR.6 $90,000
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 112
3.7.5 Please describe the funding mechanism(s)that will recover the cost of this component.
This program is funded through the LSWFA Enforcement funding and permit fees associated
with permitting or review of solid waste facilities.
3.8 References and Assumptions (attach additional sheets as necessary)
4. FUNDING MECHANISMS: This section relates specifically to the funding mechanisms
currently in use and the ones which will be implemented to incorporate the recommended
programs in the draft plan. Because the way a program is funded directly relates to the costs a
resident or commercial customer will have to pay, this section is crucial to the cost assessment
process. Please fill in each of the following tables as completely as possible.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 113
Table 4.1.1 Facility Inventory (2016)
Facility Name Type of Tip Fee Transfer Transfer Station Final Disposal Total Tons Total Revenue Generated
Facility per Ton Cost" Location Location Disposed (Tip Fee x Tons)
Belfair Drop Box Drop Box $126.00 $40.34/ton Eells Hill Roosevelt
Union Drop Box Drop Box $126.00 $29.01/ton Eells Hill Roosevelt
Hoods ort Drop Box Drop Box $126.00 $29.01/ton Eells Hill Roosevelt
Eells Hill Transfer Sta. Transfer $92.16 Roosevelt 34,572.16 (from $3,402,083.92
Station all 4 facilities
Table 4.1.2 Tip Fee Components
Tip fees have not been broken out into components
Tip Fee by Facility Surcharge City Tax County Tax Transportation Operational Cost Administration Closure Costs
Cost Cost
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 115
Table 4.1.3 Funding Mechanism
Name of Program Bond Total Bond Bond Due Grant Name Grant Amount Tip Fee Taxes Other Surcharge
Funding Mechanism Name Bond Rate Date
will defray costs Debt
CPG Grant 2015-2017 CPG $156,094
LSWFA Grant 2017- LSWFA $111,000 (est.)
2019
Table 4.1.4 Tip Fee Forecast
Tip Fee per Ton by Year Year Year Three Year Four Year Five Year Six
Facility One Two
All Drop Box Stations 128.52 131.09 133.71 136.39 139.11 141.90
Eells Hill Transfer Sta. 94.00 95.88 97.80 99.76 101.75 103.79
Tip fee forecast assumes CPI adjustment of 2% every year starting in 2018.
4.2 Funding Mechanisms summary by percentage: In the following tables, please summarize the way programs will be funded in the key
years. For each component, provide the expected percentage of the total cost met by each funding mechanism. (e.g. Waste Reduction
may rely on tip fees, grants, and collection rates for funding). You would provide the estimated responsibility in the table as follows:
Tip fees=10%; Grants=50%; Collection Rates-40%. The mechanisms must total 100%. If components can be classified as "other,"
please note the programs and their appropriate mechanisms. Provide attachments as necessary.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 116
Table 4.2.1 Funding Mechanism by Percentage
Year One
Component Tip Fee % Grant% Bond % Collection Tax Other% Total
Rates %
Waste Reduction 100 100%
Recycling 50 50 100%
Collection 100 100%
ER&I 100 100%
Transfer 100 100%
Land Disposal 100 100%
Administration 100 100%
Other 100 100%
Table 4.2.2 Funding Mechanism by Percentage
Year Three
Component Tip Fee % Grant% Bond % Collection Tax Other% Total
Rates %
Waste Reduction 100 100%
Recycling 50 50 100%
Collection 100 100%
ER&I 100 100%
Transfer 100 100%
Land Disposal 100 100%
Administration 100 100%
Other 100 100%
Table 4.2.3 Funding Mechanism by Percentage
Year Six
Component Tip Fee % Grant% Bond % Collection Tax Other% Total
Rates %
Waste Reduction 100 100%
Recycling 50 50 100%
Collection 100 100%
ER&I 100 100%
Transfer 100 100%
Land Disposal 100 100%
Administration 100 100%
Other 100 100%
4.3 References and Assumptions
The 2017 solid waste budget is attached to this document.
4.4 Surplus Funds
There is a solid waste reserve fund for capital improvements that has a balance of$511,000.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 117
2017 MASON COUNTY SOLID WASTE UTILITY BUDGET
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION REVENUE BUDGET
402.000000.000.000.308.80.300000.0000.00. BEGIN FUND BAL UNRESERVED 985,376.00
402.000000.000.000.334.03.324005.0000.00. DEPT OF ECOLOGY 64,367.00
402.000000.000.000.343.70.300000.0000.00. GARBAGE/SOLID WASTE FEES/CHGS 3,180,000.00
402.000000.000.000.361.11.300000.0000.00. INVESTMENT INTEREST 1,250.00
402.000000.000.000.369.10.300000.0000.00. SALE OF SCRAP AND JUNK 6,000.00
402.000000.000.000.369.81.300000.0000.00. CASHIER'S OVERAGES AND SHORTAG 50.00
402.000000.000.000.386.00.307000.0000.03. REFUSE TAX-SHELTON 60,000.00
402.000000.000.000.397.00.300406.0000.00. TRANS IN FROM 406 25,276.00
Total 402 Solid Waste Revenue 4,322,319.00
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE BUDGET
402.000000.000.000.508.80.500000.0000.00. END FUND BAL UNRESERVED 221,182.00
Total 10 SALARIES&WAGES 607,315.00
Total 20 PERSONNEL BENEFITS 335,583.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.531030.0000.00. OPERATING SUPPLIES 13,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.532010.0000.00. FUEL 9,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.535010.0000.00. SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 10,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.531030.0000.00. OPERATION SUPPLIES/GIVEAWAYS/P 2,500.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.531010.0000.00. ADMIN SUPPLIES 2,650.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.535010.0000.00. SMALL TOOLS&MINOR EQUIPMENT 795.00
Total 30 SUPPLIES 37,945.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.541017.0000.00. COUNTY WIDE WASTE-HEALTH DEPT 48,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.541040.0000.00. GROUNDWATER MONITOR/CONSULT 0.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.541070.0000.00. MISC CONTRACTED PROF SVCS 25,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.541080.0000.00. ADVERTISING 1,500.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.542010.0000.00. PHONES 3,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.543010.0000.00. TRAVEL 750.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.545020.0000.00. OPERATING RENTALS AND LEASES 22,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.546010.0000.00. INSURANCE 20,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.547010.0000.00. UTILITIES 10,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.547030.0000.00. MISC DISPOSAL(LEACHATE,TIRES 10,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.547040.0000.00. LONGHAUL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 1,800,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.548020.0000.00. REPAIRS AND MAINT/STRUT& EQUI 45,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.549010.0000.00. SCALE PERMIT RENEWAL 500.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.549020.0000.00. SOLID WASTE DROP BOX CONTRACT 40,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.541010.0000.00. HHW DISPOSAL 30,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.541020.0000.00. ADVERTISING 500.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.541050.0000.00. SCALE INSPECTION SERVICES 5,000.00
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 118
ACCOUNT ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION EXPENDITURE BUDGET
402.000000.000.000.537.81.543010.0000.00. TRAVEL 500.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.549010.0000.00. DUES/REGISTRATION/MEMBERSHIPS 1,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.549020.0000.00. PRINTING/BINDING/SIGNAGE 1,200.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.549050.0000.00. RECYCLE DROP BOX CONTRACT 111,065.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.541030.0000.00. ADVERTISING 265.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.541040.0000.00. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,961.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.542010.0000.00. TELEPHONES/COMMUNICATIONS 3,975.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.542020.0000.00. POSTAGE/SHIPPING 7,420.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.543010.0000.00. TRAVEL/MILEAGE 1,153.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.545010.0000.00. ADMIN RENTALS& LEASES 1,590.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.546010.0000.00. INSURANCE 5,035.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.548010.0000.00. REPAIRS&MAINTENANCE 530.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.549010.0000.00. DUES/TRAINING 1,709.00
Total 40 SERVICES 2,198,653.00
402.000000.000.000.537.10.553010.0000.00. EXCISE TAX 60,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.551010.0000.00. PERMIT FEES 2,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.551030.0000.00. STATE AUDIT CHARGES 3,369.00
402.000000.000.000.537.81.551010.0000.00. KITSAP HHW CONTRACT 52,350.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.551010.0000.00. STATE AUDIT CHARGES 3,489.00
Total 50 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 121,208.00
402.000000.000.000.594.37.563031.0000.00. MINOR FACILITY IMPROV SW-04-00 423,000.00
Total 60 CAPITAL OUTLAYS 423,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.531093.0000.00. INTERFUND SUPPLIES 2,500.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.541019.0000.00. INDIRECT COSTS 65,981.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.541501.0000.00. RESERVE FOR TECHNOLOGY 2,850.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.545951.0000.00. ER&R VEHICLES 254,791.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.546096.0000.00. UNEMPLOYMENT 2,000.00
402.000000.000.000.537.80.548098.0000.00. INTERFUND REPAIRS/MAINT 6,000.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.531093.0000.00. INTERFUND SUPPLIES 530.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.541019.0000.00. INDIRECT COSTS 29,283.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.541501.0000.00. RESERVE FOR TECHNOLOGY 733.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.542092.0000.00. IT PHONES 1,173.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.545952.0000.00. IT COMPUTERS 9,160.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.545953.0000.00. BUILDING RENTAL 1,918.00
402.000000.000.000.538.10.546096.0000.00. UNEMPLOYMENT ALLOCATION 514.00
Total 90 INTERNAL SERVICES 377,433.00
Total 402 Solid Waste 4,322,319.00
Expenditures
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 119
APPENDIX F — SEPA CHECKLIST
SEPA Environmental Checklist: Non-Project
Mason CorurtvPermit Center Use:
❑ Single Family DNS: $385
SEP
❑ Other DNS: 0 to 9.99 acres: $630
10 to 20 acres: $755 Date Rcvd:
Over 20 acres: $945
❑ DS/EIS:$2,525+70 Per hr
i
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use "Not Applicable"or
"does not apply"only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or Incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: hel
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D) Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words "project," "applicant," and "property or
site should be read as proposal, proponent, and affected geographic area, respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non-projects) questions in Part B - Environmental Elements—that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 120
A. Background ItLeM
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: hel
Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
2. Name of applicant:1hel
Mason County Public Works
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: hel
Mason County Public Works
100 W. Public Works Drive
Shelton, WA 98584
Attn: Bart Stepp, PE, Deputy Director/Utilities &Waste Management
(360)427-9670 x652
4. Date checklist prepared: hf elpl
07/21/17
5. Agency requesting checklist:ltgM
Washington Department of Ecology
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): Itpio
July 2017—Submit SEPA to Mason County Community Development for approval
August/September 2017—BOCC public hearing on plan and SEPA DNS issuance
September 2017—Submit plan to Ecology
December 2017—Received Ecology and WUTC comments on plan
February 2018— Respond to and incorporate Ecology and WUTC comments into plan
March 2018—Adoption of plan by County and City of Shelton
April 2018—Submit adopted plan to Ecology for 45 day review.
June 2018— Plan approved by Ecology
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. Lhel
This SEPA covers the County's Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
(CSWMP). It provides recommendations for future operations of the County's Solid
Waste System and identifies capital improvements needed within the Solid Waste
system. This plan identifies improvements needed at the existing Eells Hill transfer
station and rural drop box stations to maintain adequate facilities and improve safety
issues at the facilities. As a non-project SEPA, most of the questions in the application
do not apply and are answered Not Applicable.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 121
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal. hel
Not Applicable
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. Ltem
No
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
hel
The Department of Ecology will approve the CSWMP. The Department of Ecology requires
the County to complete the SEPA process and to adopt the plan before Ecology will approve
the plan. Approval of the CSWMP by Ecology will make the County eligible for some funding
opportunities at the state level.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the
size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on
project description.) hel
The CSWMP identified the existing conditions of the County Solid Waste system and provides
recommendations on improvements in facilities and operations. It also provides goals and objectives of
the solid waste system. This proposal is just for the CSWMP. Any infrastructure improvements
identified in the CSWMP would go through their own permitting process when they are implemented.
Identified infrastructure improvements are focused on the existing transfer station and drop box facilities.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the
precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section,
township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the
range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and
topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit
applications related to this checklist. hem
The CSWMP is a county wide planning document. It not only identifies improvements at County Solid
Waste Facilities, but discusses permitting of private facilities throughout the County and enforcement
illegal dumping sites.
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS hel
1. Earth Jhel
a. General description of the site: hel
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 122
(circle one): Flat, rolling, ham, steep slopes, mountainous, other II —County Wide Pro osal
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?1hel
Not Applicable
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils. h
Not Applicable
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe. hI e
Not Applicable
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area
of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. hf e
Not Applicable
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
hel
NOT APPLICABLE
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? hel
NOT APPLICABLE
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: JtgjpJ
NOT APPLICABLE
2. Air h
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe. hf e
NOT APPLICABLE
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: hf elpl
NOT APPLICABLE
3. WaterhI �
a. Surface Water:
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 123
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. 1hel
NOT APPLICABLE
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. hf elpl
No
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
hfe
NOT APPLICABLE
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Ground Water:
1)Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. h( elpl
NOT APPLICABLE
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
c. Water runoff(including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water)and method of collection
and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
NOT APPLICABLE
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 124
2)Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.[Lel
NOT APPLICABLE
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe. h( elpl
NOT APPLICABLE
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any: h� gjpl
None
4. Plants hel
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site: hel
_deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
_evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
_shrubs
_grass
_pasture
_crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
_water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? hel
NOT APPLICABLE
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
d. Proposed landscaping, use of Native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any: hj elpl
Not Applicable
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site. hel
Not Applicable
5. Animalshf elpl
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are
known to be on or near the site. hI elpl
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 125
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site. hel
PJ
NOT APPLICABLE
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. Lhel
The County is part of the Pacific Flyway.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: hel
None
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
6. Energy and Natural ResourcesItp!pJ
a. What kinds of energy(electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet the
completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc. hf e
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe. h( g-to
No
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: hel
NOT APPLICABLE
7. Environmental Health Lhel
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe. Lhel
A Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) Plan is part of the CSWMP. The County solid waste
facilities accept some types of HHW for free. By accepting HHW Mason County reduces the
amount of HHW that might be illegally dumped in the County. The HHW received by the
County is sent to hazardous waste disposal facilities for proper disposal.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
[Le l
None known
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project
development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas
transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity. LL210
NOT APPLICABLE
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 126
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project.Jt@jpJ
Household hazardous waste is stored at County Solid Waste Facilities.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required. h� e
NOT APPLICABLE
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: hel
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Noise hel
1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?LLgjpJ
NOT APPLICABLE
2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site. hf elgl
NOT APPLICABLE
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: hel
NOT APPLICABLE
8. Land and Shoreline Use h� elpl
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so,
describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be
converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been
designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to
nonfarm or nonforest use? hel
NOT APPLICABLE
1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how: Lbel
NOT APPLICABLE
c. Describe any structures on the site. [help]
NOT APPLICABLE
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?Lhel
NOT APPLICABLE
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 127
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? hel
NOT APPLICABLE
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?1hel
NOT APPLICABLE
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?Jb@jPJ
NOT APPLICABLE
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so,
specify. lbpjpj
NOT APPLICABLE
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?Lhel
NOT APPLICABLE
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? hf e
Zero
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: hf elgl
None needed
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any: hf g1d
NOT APPLICABLE
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-
term commercial significance, if any: hel
NOT APPLICABLE
9. Housing 1hel
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or
low-income housing. hI elp]
Zero
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing. hel
Zero
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: LLLeM
None needed
10. Aestheticshf e
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? hf e
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 128
NOT APPLICABLE
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? hI gm
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:JtPjPJ
NOT APPLICABLE
11. Light and Glare 1hel
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?1hel
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
hel
NOT APPLICABLE
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?lbpjpj
None
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: hI elpl
None
12. Recreation 1hel
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
h[ eM
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. JbPipj
No
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: LLQjPJ
None
13. Historic and cultural preservation tteM
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45
years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If
so, specifically describe. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or
occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material
evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any
professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 129
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic
resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the
department of archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps,
GIS data, etc. h
NOT APPLICABLE
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and
disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be
required. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
14. Transportation h
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. [tgjPJ
NOT APPLICABLE
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? hel
NOT APPLICABLE
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate? hf pial
This proposal would not create or destroy any parking spaces.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private). h
The proposal would not require any improvements to transportation facilities.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of)water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. hel
NOT APPLICABLE
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or
proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the
volume would be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or
transportation models were used to make these estimates? hel
NOT APPLICABLE
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe. hI elgl
NOT APPLICABLE
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: hel
None needed.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 130
15. Public Services Lhel
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire
protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally
describe. hel
No
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.LteM
None needed
16. Utilities JbgjpJ
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site:Jhel
electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system,
other NOT APPLICABL
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed. Lhel
NOT APPLICABLE
C. Signature Ltgipj
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature: '�•a 'd`�°'s'''
Name of signee Bart Stepp
Position and Agency/Organization Deputy Director/Utilities and Waste Management for
Mason County Public Works
Date Submitted: 7/24/17
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 131
D. supplemental sheet for nonproject actions LtLeM
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in
conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
Improvements to solid waste facilities that increase their capacity would lead to an
increase of emissions or storage, production of noise, or storage of hazardous
substances. This would be due to increased use by the public but this is expected over
the next 20 years due to an increase in County population.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
All facility improvements will be designed to comply with all State and County
regulations. Specific projects will go through their own SEPA approval as part of the
County Site Plan Approval process. The treatment and storage of stormwater runoff
will comply with the Western Washington Manual for Stormwater by the Department of
Ecology.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
Improving the Solid Waste Facilities should better protect natural resources by
improving the receiving and hauling of waste from the County. The CSWMP does not
propose any new solid waste facility sites, only improvements on existing sites. The
identified solid waste facility improvements would improve protections of land and
groundwater so they should not affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
Comply with Department of Ecology regulations and County Site Plan Approval
requirements for all facility improvements identified in the CSWMP.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
The CSWMP does not deplete energy or natural resources. Improvements identified in
the CSWMP that are completed should reduce the degradation of natural resources.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
Infrastructure improvements in the CSWMP will be energy efficient.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 132
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study)for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
All of the improvements identified in the CSWMP are located within existing facilities
that are already permitted for solid waste use. The CSWMP also discusses cleaning
up of illegal dump sites. The cleaning up of these dump sites could improve
environmentally sensitive areas.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
All proposed improvements would be outside of sensitive areas. Cleanup of dump
sites in sensitive areas would help protect the resource.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
None of the proposed improvements in the CSWMP are within any shorelines and the
existing facilities are located outside shoreline areas.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
Cleaning up illegal dump sites in shoreline areas well reduce shoreline impacts.
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
The improvements identified in the CSWMP would not increase transportation
demands. Traffic is expected to increase to Solid Waste Facilities as the population
grows. The improvements proposed in the CSWMP would assist the County in serving
the growing population but the improvements would not create additional traffic.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
None
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
This proposal does not conflict with local, state, or federal laws. The County is
required to have a CSWMP by state law. The CSWMP assists in protecting the
environment by setting goals and objectives to improve solid waste facilities and
identifying specific projects needed to improve the facilities.
2018 Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan 133
pN-STA tF MASON COUNTY
c DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
° S N = 100 W Public Works Dr, Shelton, WA 98584
s� N v( 360)427-9670
of �pY
1864
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
(WAC 197-11-340)
SEP2017-00044
Description of Proposal: COUNTY WIDE: MASON COUNTY 2017 COMPREHENSIVE
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN
Proponent: MASON COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS
Location of Proposal: 100 W PUBLIC WORKS DR SHELTON
Parcel Number: 420021000010
Legal Description: PCL 2 OF BLA #06-72 PTN OF W1/2 NE
Directions to Site:
Lead Agency: Mason County
The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required
under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed
Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is
available to the public upon request.
Please contact Paula Reeves at ext. 360-427-9670x286 with any questions. This MDNS is issued
under WAC 197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the
date shown below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of
Public Works,100 W Public Works DR, Shelton WA 98584 by 8/31/2017. Appeal of this
determination must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per
Mason County Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals.
Authorized Local Government Official Date
134
APPENDIX G - CITY OF SHELTON AND KITSAP
COUNTY DOCUMENTATION c(OF"T
RESOLUTION NO. 892-0506
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SHELTON,WASHINGTON AUTHORIZING MASON
COUNTY TO INCLUDE THE CITY OF SHELTON IN THE MASON COUNTY
COMPREHENSIVE SOLID WASTE MANANGEMENT PLAN.
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW Chapter 70.95, Mason County is responsible for preparation,
adoption,and implementation of a comprehensive solid waste management plan,and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 70.95 the comprehensive solid waste management plan must
be maintained in current and applicable condition through periodic review and revision,and
WHEREAS,the existing Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan is dated October
1998 and requires a complete revision,and
WHEREAS, under the provisions of RCW 70.95.080 the City of Shelton chooses to authorize the
County to include the City's plans for solid waste management in the Mason County Comprehensive
Solid Waste Management Plan;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Commission of the City of Shelton,
Washington,as follows:
Pursuant to RCW 70.95.080, Mason County is hereby authorized to include the City of Shelton in its
preparation of a comprehensive solid waste management plan.
INTRODUCED AND PASSED by the City Commission of the City of Shelton on day of
June, 2006.
ATTEST: ayor Tarrant
City Clerk Look ommissioner a for
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Commissioner Pannell
City Attorney Harksen
06/14/06 1 4:42 PM 135
ot
0 0
0
n
N
0
-1Z
'10,
October 4, 2018
Mason County
Utilities and Waste Management
100 W Public Works Dr.
Shelton, WA 98584
SUBJECT: Letter of Concurrence
Dear Mason County:
This letter is to advise you of our concurrence with the Solid Waste Management Plan as written(2018)
and prepared by Mason County Solid Waste Advisory Committee.This meets the provisions and
standards of the City of Shelton's Resolution No.892-0506,the agreement signed by the Mayor of
Shelton and the City Commissioners on June 19, 2006.
If you have any questions, please contact me at(360)432-5125.
Sincerely,
Craig Gregory
Director of Public Works
136
KC-465-16
INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT
BETWEEN KITSAP COUNTY AND MASON COUNTY TO PROVIDE RESIDENTIAL
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
OPPORTUNITIES
This agreement is executed between Kitsap County ("Kitsap") and Mason County
("Mason") for the purpose of providing a permanent site with year-round availability for
proper disposal of household hazardous waste ("HHW") to Mason County residents at
the Kitsap County Household Hazardous Waste Collection Facility.
BACKGROUND
WHEREAS, the Kitsap County Moderate Risk Waste ("MRW") Management Plan
(hereinafter the "Plan")was written pursuant to RCW 70.95.220 and adopted by the
Kitsap County Commissioners; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap constructed the HHW Collection Facility (hereinafter"the
Facility") and has operated the Facility since April 18, 1996, and
WHEREAS, the Facility provides year-round availability for the proper disposal of
HHW to Kitsap County residents; and
WHEREAS, HHW disposal is funded through a combination of tipping fees
collected at Olympic View Transfer Station and a portion of the Coordinated Prevention
Grant between the State of Washington Department of Ecology and Kitsap County; and
WHEREAS, Mason residents have utilized the Facility over the past twenty (20)
years and desire to continue use of the Facility; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap and Mason share common goals to: protect watersheds;
protect groundwater and drinking water quality; provide opportunities for residents to
properly dispose of HHW; educate residents about potential hazards regarding storage
of hazardous products; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap and Mason find it is in the best interest of their citizens and in
the public welfare to enter into an interlocal agreement pursuant to RCW 39.34
regarding these common goals; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap agrees to provide year-round HHW collection opportunities to
Mason residents for the waste stream set forth in Exhibit 1, attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, Kitsap agrees to provide year-round HHW collection opportunities to
Mason residents for the fee to Mason set forth below; and
KC-465-16 HHW Disposal for Mason County Residents 1 I P a g e
137
WHEREAS, Kitsap and Mason are authorized to enter into Interlocal Agreements
pursuant to Chapter 39.34 RCW;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties mutually agree as follows:
The recitals are hereby incorporated into the Agreement by this reference.
Kitsap shall make its facility services available to Mason residents according to
the terms of this Interlocal Agreement, and shall serve as the "lead entity" in the ongoing
administration and implementation of this Agreement.
Mason agrees to (a) advertise the expanded opportunities for HHW collection to
Mason residents; and (b) provide Kitsap with Mason specific MRW education materials
for distribution to Mason customers.
Mason agrees to reimburse Kitsap $50.00 per documented Mason customer.
Notwithstanding the preceding, Mason payments are not to exceed $55,000.00 per year
(1,100 customers) unless specifically approved in writing in advance.
Kitsap shall submit monthly invoices for collection and disposal services pursuant
to this Agreement to which Kitsap is entitled to compensation. Invoices shall detail the
number of Mason customers and describe their waste stream. A copy of Mason
customer sign in sheets will accompany each invoice. Mason shall make payment within
thirty (30) days following receipt of billing. Kitsap shall maintain adequate records to
support billings under this Agreement.
This Agreement shall commence at time of signing, with the effective date on
January 1, 2017, for purposes of cost reimbursement for services, and shall extend
through December 31, 2018. The parties may agree to extend this Agreement for an
additional year by amendment as set forth below.
Kitsap may terminate this Agreement whenever Kitsap determines, in its sole
discretion, that such termination is in the best interests of Kitsap County. Termination of
this Agreement by Kitsap at any time during the term, whether for default or
convenience, shall not constitute a breach of this Agreement.
Mason County may terminate this Agreement upon provision of sixty (60) days
written notice to Kitsap, and shall be liable for all actual costs incurred through the
termination date specified in such notice, consistent with the per customer fees
prescribed above.
If sufficient funds are not appropriated or allocated for payment under this
Agreement for any future fiscal period by Mason, Kitsap shall not be obligated to
provide services after the end of the current fiscal period.
Mason and Kitsap agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless each other, at
their sole expense, including attorneys' fees, from and against any and all claims,
demands, losses, damages, liabilities, and expenses of any nature whatsoever,
KC-465-16 HHW Disposal for Mason County Residents 21 P ay e
138
including, but not limited to personal injury or property damage, arising out of the
performance of this Agreement, whether the demand, loss or claim is due to the
negligence of either Mason, or Kitsap, or of their elected and appointed officials,
officers, employees and agents, except for injury or damages caused by the sole
negligence or willful misconduct of either Kitsap or Mason, its elected or appointed
officials, officers, employees or agents.
This Agreement may be amended only upon the written agreement of the parties
executed with the same formalities required for the execution of this Agreement. There
will be a review of per customer costs if an extension is desired.
No separate entity is created by this Agreement and any property purchase
under this Agreement shall be the property of the purchaser.
This Agreement shall be, at a minimum, recorded with the Kitsap County Auditor.
Any notices and payments shall be mailed to, and the contract shall be administered by:
For Kitsap County: For Mason County:
Kitsap County Public Works Mason County Public Works Department
Solid Waste Division Utilities and Waste Management Division
614 Division Street, MS-27 P.O. Box 578
Port Orchard, Washington 98366 Shelton, Washington 98584
Attn- Patricia Campbell Attn: Melissa McFadden
DATED this):Z day T fDw rte, y!, 2016 DATED this +a- day-J7)-1c--C— , 2016
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON KITSAP COUNTY,WASHINGTON
TERRI JEFFRW ; Chair ED11V RD E. WOLFE, Ch it
TIM SHELDON, Commissioner Cp E G'4PTIDO, Commissioner
RANDY NEATHERLIN, Commissioner ROBERT GELDER, Commissioner
ATTEST: ATTEST:
Clerk of he Board Dana Daniels, Clerk of the Board
Approved as to form: Approved as to form by the IGtsap County Prosecuting
Tim Whitehead,CghiefDP-A Attorney's Office
KC-465-16 HHW Disposal for Mason County Residents 31 P a g e
139
EXHIBIT 1
A-Fuels
Aerosols
Antifreeze
Auto Batteries
Cleaners
Household Batteries
Latex Paints
Mercury Lamps
Motor Oil
Oil Based Paints
Poisons
KC-465-16 HHW Disposal for Mason County Residents 4 1 P a g e
140
(9/21/2017) Bart Stepp- Re: SEP2017-00044_MC Solid Waste Plan Page 1
APPENDIX H - PUBLIC OUTREACH DOCUMENTATION
From: Paula Reeves
To: Stepp, Bart
Date: 9/18/2017 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: SEP2017-00044_MC Solid Waste Plan
No-none. Thanks.
Paula Reeves,AICP CTP
Mason County Planning Manager
615 W Alder Street, Building#8
Shelton, WA 98584
P: 360-427-9670 x286
E: PReeves@co.mason.wa.us
>>> Bart Stepp 9/15/2017 3:06 PM>>>
Did Community Services receive any comments on the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
during the SEPA comment period which closed 9/13/17?
Thanks,
Bart
Bart Stepp, PE
Mason County
Deputy Director Public Works- Utilities and Waste Division
100 Public Works Drive
Shelton, WA 98584
(360)427-9670 x652
BStepp@co.mason.wa.us
>>> Marissa Watson 8/31/2017 12:54 PM >>>
Please use the Mason County ftp site to access applicant's SEPA and related documents.
ftp://216.235.103.242
User Name: DCD
Password: 1 Planning!
Find the directory named "Mason County 2017 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan", 2
pdf. files are within.
Please access these files soon as you receive this email. If you are unable to open files, please let us
know in a timely manner. Site may not be accessible on hand held devices.
Thank you,
Marissa L. Watson
Community Services- Planning Clerical
615 W Alder St.
Shelton, Wa 98584
360.427.9670 ext. 367 Email: mwatson(o)co.mason.wa.us
141
8/28/17 CSWMP PAC MEETING NOTES
INTRODUCTION
On August 28, 2017 1 gave a short presentation to the Mason County Planning Advisory
Commission (PAC) about the draft Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. I then
answered questions from the PAC about the Plan and how to comment. I indicated if they
provided comments within the next couple of weeks that would fit within my timeline for
submitting to the Department of Ecology.
SWAC MEMBERS AT MEETING
Cheryl Williams and Delroy Cox.
FEEDBACK AT MEETING
Beyond their questions about the solid waste system and the plan a few comments came up.
GLASS RECYCLING WITHIN THE COUNTY
One commissioner asked about Mason County Garbage providing glass recycling service within the
County and not just the City. Delroy Cox with the SWAC and I explained that the curbside service
with Mason County Garbage is regulated by the UTC and not the County. The recycling contract
we have with Mason County Garbage is for the Blue Box Recycling at our stations, not curbside
service. In addition the glass Mason County Garbage collects does not come to the County so we
have no role as a County in regulating what they do with it.
LITTER CONTROL ON ROADSIDES
One commissioner asked what role Solid Waste plays in roadside litter control. I explained that
the Sheriff does apply for litter grants that pay for roadside cleanup. Environmental Health also
does enforcement of dump sites with assistance from the Sheriff. The commissioner expressed
interest in this becoming a part of the solid waste program by charging a fee for users of the
station to pay for it. I told her that is something that has not been done in the past and is not
typical of other solid waste systems but that it might be possible that it could be done.
FOOD COMPOSTING
One commissioner asked about starting a food composting program. This is discussed in the plan
but I told her it is a very labor intensive program. Delroy Cox also mentioned that he felt in order
for that type of program to work it needs to be regional with multiple counties to make it work.
Sincerely,
Bart Stepp, PE
Deputy Director/Utilities and Waste Management
142
Mason County
Comprehensive Solid
Waste Pian
8/28/17 MASON COUNTY PLANING ADVISORY COMMISSION
SHELTON, WA
BART STEPP, PE, DEPUTY DIRECTOR
County SBasics �
Mason County owns and operates the Eells Hill Transfer Station and
rural drop box stations at Belfair, Union, and Hoodsport.
Mason County provides solid waste, recycling, and household
hazardous (HHW) services.
Mason County Garbage provides curbside services throughout the
County and City of Shelton. Mason County Garbage is a private
company and is the only certificated hauler in Mason County.
Republic Services disposes of solid waste Mason County collects at
their Roosevelt Landfill in Klickitat County in Eastern Washington.
1 0 1 N
Consolidated Solid Waste
Management Plan Basics
An approved CSWMP is required by the State (Department of Ecology is
the approval agency).
z An approved CSWMP makes County eligible for state funding (CPG and
Public Works Trust Fund).
y Mason County and the City of Shelton need to approve it in addition to
the Department of Ecology and UTC for the plan to be approved.
Plan supposed to identify needs of the solid waste system and how the
system will grow over the next 20 years.
Solid Waste Advisory Committee (SWAG) and County Staff have been
working on the new plan for 2 years.
Capital Priorities
v Repair tipping floor, waste chute, and transfer station building drainage
system. These repairs are currently under design by a consultant.
Improve Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) facilities to meet code
related requirements.
Improve capacity of Eells Hill Transfer Station .
General maintenance at drop box stations.
A secondary access at Eells Hill for recycling only would improve service
at the transfer station.
Financial
2017 tipping fee of $93.45/TON
Revenues from tipping fees and CPG (Coordinated Prevention Grant)
funding pays for operation and maintenance of system. No current
expense funds are used.
Annual O&M Budget of $3.5 Million in 2017.
The landfill reserve fund ($500,000) is intended solely for activities
related to the landfill closure.
Improvements in 2017 and 2018 will be paid solely through solid waste
revenues.
> No CPG funding is budgeted for 2018 due to a lack of a state capital
budget.
Operational
Currently staffed with 4 full time operators, 4 full time booth attendants,
2 extra help attendants, and a solid waste manager.
Long haul contract with Republic Services and recycling contract with
Mason County Garbage expires in August of 2020.
The CSWMP recommends the County evaluate the potential for
privatization of the utility prior to the expiration of the long haul
contract.
�- If a private company took over operations they would upgrade or build a
new transfer station at Eells Hill.
9/OS/17 BOCC PUBLIC HEARING NOTES
INTRODUCTION
On September 5, 2017 1 gave a short presentation to the Mason County Board of County
Commissioners (BOCC) about the draft Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan. The public
was then invited to make comments on the Plan to the BOCC. No comments were made by the
public or the BOCC.
The Plan will be presented to the board again after Ecology has reviewed and provided comments
and the SWAC has addressed Ecology's comments into the Plan.
SWAC MEMBERS AT MEETING
Cheryl Williams, Delroy Cox, and Rik Fredrickson.
Sincerely,
Bart Stepp, PE
Deputy Director/Utilities and Waste Management
149
NOTICE OF HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of Mason County Commissioners will hold
a public hearing at the Mason County Courthouse Building I, Commission Chambers, 411 North
Fifth Street, Shelton, WA 98584 on Tuesday, September 5, 2017 at 9:30am.
SAID HEARING will be to present and take public comments on the draft 2017 Mason
County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(CSWMP),requirements of RCW 70.95
and the Washington Department of Ecology. This is a complete revision of,and supersedes,the
Mason County Solid Waste Management Plan 2006 and its 2011 Addendum. The hearing is not to
approve,just to take in public comment; another hearing will be set at a later date for the adoption o
the plan.
Copies of the plans are available on the County website at: www.co.mason.wa.us on the Utilities
Waste Management Solid Waste homepage under"News and Links".
If special accommodations are needed, please contact the Commissioners' office,
(360) 427-9670 (Shelton), (360) 482-5269 (Elma) or (360) 275-4467 (Belfair), Ext. 419 or any
questions contact Bart Stepp, 360-427-9670, Ext. 652.
DATED this 15`l'day of Au ust,2017.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
MASON COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Melissa Drewry, Clerk of the Board
Cc: Auditor
Clerk of the Board
Public Works
Applicant
Journal- Publ 2t: 8/24/17 & 8/31/17 (not less than 5 days prior to hearing)
Post: 3 public places 15 days before hearing — No later than August 28. 2017
(Bill Public Works— 100 W Public Works, Shelton, WA 98584)
150
MASON COUNTY
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/COUNTY ENGINEER
SHELTON, WASHINGTON
INTER-DEPARTMENTAL COMMUNICATION
August 17, 2017
TO: BART STEPP, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/U&W MANAGER
FROM: KELLE MEDCALF, OFFICE MANAGER
SUBJ: County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan CSWMP—
Notice Posting
Attached is a Notice of Hearing to present the draft 2017 CSWMP and take public comments.
The hearing is not to approve,just take public comment.
Please post the attached laminated"Notice of hearing"copies in three (3)public places before
August 28, 2017, 2017 and return the IDC with the bottom information completed.
Thank you,
Kelle Medcalf
Office Manager
1, 1 �`�j P _, do hereby certify that I posted copies of the attached
in 3 public places (as shown below) on_�, 20 17 .
` CELL
1 at� G�-1 9---� r,�r' 1®.j
1 at
"1 b V
Signature:
151
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Bart Stepp, Deputy Director/ Utilities and Waste Management
DEPARTMENT: Public Works EXT: 652
BRIEFING DATE: August 7, 2017
ITEM: Set Hearing: Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Since 2015 the Solid Waste Advisory Committee for the County
has been working on a revision of the Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
(CSWMP). Mason County is required to have a CSWMP under RCW 70.95.080.
The approval process of the CSWMP requires several steps. This includes SEPA
determination, holding a public hearing, review by state agencies and implementation of
their comments, approval by County and the City of Shelton, and then final approval by
Ecology. The CSWMP was submitted to the Department of Community Development for
SEPA review on July 24, 2017. I will also be briefing the Planning Commission on the
CSWMP on August 28th and incorporating their comments.
This briefing is to provide the initial presentation of the CSWMP to the Board and to
schedule a public hearing on the CSWMP to receive comments. The Board would not
approve the CSWMP after the hearing, just take in comments. After the CSWMP is
reviewed by Ecology and all public comments are incorporated into it then the CSWMP
would come back to the Board for approval. That will probably be in early 2018.
Cost Impact to the County: This Plan was completed by the SWAC with the help of
County Staff using existing resources except for the Capital Investment Needs report
(Appendix A of the CSWMP) which was completed by a consultant in 2016.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION• Recommend the Board of Commissioners
set a public hearing on September 5th to take public comment on the Comprehensive Solid
Waste Management Plan.
Attachment
• 2017 Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan
• Notice
Briefm.-Summary
152
October 26, 2017
Bart Stepp
Mason County Public Works
100 W Public Works Dr.
Shelton, WA 98584
RE: Mason County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan Cost Assessment
Questionnaire, TG-170990
Dear Mr. Stepp:
The Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (Commission) has completed its
review of the cost assessment questionnaire for the preliminary draft of the Mason County
Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan(Plan), submitted September 21, 2017.
The cost assessment questionnaire in the 2018-2023 Plan proposes increases in tip fees each year
at the Eells Hill transfer station and the regional drop box locations in Mason County. As a
result, there will be a rate impact to ratepayers served by Mason County Garbage Co., Inc., the
regulated solid waste collection company in Mason County. The projected rate effects are
detailed in the table below.
2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total
--------- _-..---T —
Eells Hill Transfer Station
Projected Disposal Fees
Per Ton Disposal Cost $94.00 ! $95.88 j $97.80 $99.76 $101.75 $103.79
Per Ton Increase $0.55 $1.88 $1.92 $1.96 $1.99 $2.04 $10.34
i
Projected Rate Increases
Residential
Monthly rate for one 32- $0.04 ! $0.14 $0.14 $0.14 1 $0.15 j $0.15 $0.76
gallon can per week service
Commercial
Monthly rate for one-yard 1 $0.21 $0.71 $0.73 $0.74 1 $0.75 1 $0.77 $3.91
per pickup service
153
Staff has no further comment on the cost assessment questionnaire. Please direct questions or
comments to Greg Hammond at(360) 664-1278 or by email at ghammond@utc.wa.gov.
Sincerely,
Steven V. King
Executive Director and Secretary
cc: Greg Gachowsky,Department of Ecology, Solid Waste Planner
154
T.17}•
- Kl
STATE OF WASHINGTON
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Division of Plant Protection
P.O. Box 42560•Olympia, Washington 98504-2560•(360)902-1800
October 31, 2017
Bart Stepp
Mason County Public Works
100 W Public Works Dr.
Shelton,WA 98584
Greg Gachowsky
Waste 2 Resources Program
Ecology SW Regional Office
300 Desmond Drive SE
Lacy,WA 98503
Dear Mr. Stepp and Ms. Gachowsky:
The Washington State Department of Agriculture(WSDA)reviewed Mason County's Draft Solid Waste
Management Plan(SWMP)and our staff has determined that the draft SWMP is in compliance with state
plant pest and disease quarantines as described in Chapter 16-470 WAC. We reviewed the waste
management plan with particular emphasis to the state's apple maggot quarantine,described in Chapter
16470-101 WAC. The transport of municipal green waste and municipal solid waste from the apple
maggot quarantine area to the pest free area is prohibited without a WSDA special permit. WSDA will
not require Mason County to have a special permit to ship municipal solid waste or green waste.
However,if the conditions contained in the SWMP change and you have questions about whether Mason
County is in compliance with the apple maggot quarantine rule please do not hesitate to contact me or
WSDA Pest Program staff.
Thank you for providing our agency with the opportunity to comment on the Mason County Solid Waste
Waste Management Plan. RCW 70.95.096 requires the Washington State Department of Agriculture to
review solid waste permit applications for any increased risks of introducing a quarantine plant pest or
disease into a pest free area.
Regrds,
Jim Marra,Ph.D.
cc:
Randy Taylor, Rian Wojahn, Leah Doyle
155
APPENDIX I
Number Facility/Site ID Facility/Site Name Address City Izip Code
1 82874881 Mason Cnty Drums T23N R3W S12 BELFAIR 98528
2 9750028 SMITH TOWING 655 E PINE AKA HWY 3 SHELTON 9858-
3 35516372 Kens Auto Body Repair SE 1111 HWY 3 SHELTON 9858,
4 5377913 BPA Right of Way Paint Dump 200 YDS NW OF 1892 E JOHNS PRAIRIE RD SHELTON 98584
5 48163889 WA DFW GEORGE ADAMS FISH HATCHERY 40 W SKOKOMISH VALLEY RD SHELTON 98584
6 85224554 Hartstene Island Pick UP T20N R2W S12 COLMEL WRIGHT RD HARTSTEN 98584
7 86824413 Alderbrook Drug Lab COUNTRY CLUB DR E UNIT 38 UNION 98592
8 1183 MASON COUNTY LANDFILL 501 W EELLS HILL RD SHELTON 98584
9 81428124 WA AGR Mason 1 751 A W FAIRGROUNDS RD SHELTON 98584
10 85279679 Shelton City Police Dept 2ND&FRANKLIN SHELTON 98584
11 1049634 Mason Cnty Central Shop Shelton 100 W PUBLIC WORKS DR SHELTON 98584
12 2958438 Bay Decking Company Inc 2020 OLD BELFAIR HWY BELFAIR 98528
13 94197779 SODHI CHEVERON 1730 OLYMPIC HWY S SHELTON 98584
14 3765226 Farm Credit Bank of Spokane 1190 PHILLIPS RD SHELTON 98584
15 38918544 HOODSPORT RANGER STATION N 150 LAKE CUSHMAN RD HOODSPO 98548
16 23634752 MASON COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COOP 3740 SHELTON SPRINGS RD SHELTON 98584-9105
17 22646752 Belfair Drums Admiral 131 ADMIRAL DR BELFAIR 98528
18 89922321 Repairs Plus 1022 E JOHNS PRAIRIE RD SHELTON 98584
19 23769563 Northwest Pipeline GP Shelton M/S 981 W DEEGAN RD W SHELTON 98584
20 43766789 GG Auto Service SE 251 NORDQUIST RD SHELTON 98584
21 56493627 Sanderson Industrial Park Bldg 3 430 W ENTERPRISE RD SHELTON 98584
22 29418493 WESTERN PARTS&MACHINE INC 128 E RAILROAD AVE SHELTON 98584
23 95481922 Mason Cnty Fairground SAND HILL RD 1 MI N N SHORE RD BELFAIR 98528
24 72367697 Simpson Timber Co Front St 421 S FRONT ST SHELTON 98584-0460
25 44713249 QWEST Communications Hoodsport Co LAKE&WILLARD ST HOODSPO 98548
26 8362 Fiberglass Marine Products 393 SE DAHMAN RD SHELTON 98584
27 16049 Olympic Fabrication LLC 410 W ENTERPRISE RD SHELTON 98584
28 24576917 WASHINGTON CORRECTIONS CENTER W 2321 DAYTON AIRPORT RD SHELTON 98584
29 61252676 SIMPSON TIMBER CO ST YD SAWMILL 5 3851 W MARTIN RD SHELTON 98584-0460
30 82875198 Premier Inc NE 22751 HWY 3 BELFAIR 98528
31 47312131 Aero Controls Inc Dayton Airport Rd W 520 DAYTON AIRPORT RD SHELTON 98584
32 13975422 Wal Mart Store 2121 100 E WALLACE KNEELAND BLVD SHELTON 98584
33 64487875 Arco 82609 106 E WALLACE KNEELAND BLVD SHELTON 98584
34 74575237 Black Star E 510 MASON LAKE RD SHELTON 98584-9628
35 52423924 Pantorium Cleaners Shelton 215 S 2ND ST SHELTON 98584
36 53445682 US EPA Logging Rd Abandoned Drums WHEELWRIGHT RD ALLYN 98524
37 44379468 Krueger Enterprises Inc Belfair 14241 HWY 106 E BELFAIR 98528
38 17998716 Shelton City Shop 1000 W PINE ST SHELTON 98584
39 15727 Rite Aid#6544 23940 NE STATE ROUTE 3 BELFAIR 98528
40 44639929 American Cushion Industries W 890 GOLDEN PHEASANT RD SHELTON 98584
41 7407509 RK CUSTOM 340 E MILLWRIGHT RD SHELTON 98584
42 75752393 Classic Chrome Clean Up SE 514 CHANNEL PT RD SHELTON 98584
43 53878546 Barnes Machine Inc 790 E JOHNS PRAIRIE RD SHELTON 98584
44 94383331 Vander Wals Garage 321 S 2ND ST SHELTON 98584-2252
45 78462861 North Mason School Dist 403 E 50 N MASON SCHOOL RD BELFAIR 98528
46 94728763 WA DSHS Mission Crk Youth Camp 5 MI N OF BELFAIR ON SANDHILL RD BELFAIR 98528
47 41699928 B Plus Inc SE 220 NIGHTHAWK PL SHELTON 98584
48 53825133 Allen Shearer Trucking Lands NE 121 LOG YARD RD BELFAIR 98528
49 13245341 TAYLOR UNITED 130 LYNCH RD SE SHELTON 98584
50 99954995 Belfair Pipeline Dump E TRAILS RD 1/2 MI W OF DREAM LN BELFAIR 98528
51 3614008 Green Diamond Resource Company W 41 HANKS LAKE RD SHELTON 98584
52 57242558 US DEA Tahuya Blacksmith Rd 2000 NE TAHUYA BLACKSMITH RD BELFAIR 98588
53 82136361 Belfair Truck&Paint NE 23530 HWY 3 BELFAIR 98528-9301
54 77732584 WA DOT PIT X48 SR 3 MP 7 LEFT SHELTON 98584
55 1744198 Sunrise Fiberglass Engineering W 171 SANDERSON WAY SHELTON 98584
56 38354436 Mell Chevrolet Olds 305 S FIRST ST SHELTON 98584
57 83142551 DOUGLAS FIR CHRISTMAS TREE LLC 2621 E JOHNS PRAIRIE RD SHELTON 98584
58 2100284 Olympic Panel Products LLC 204 E RAILROAD SHELTON 98584
59 4342162 WA WSP Academy W 631 DAYTON AIRPORT RD WS05 SHELTON 98584
156
Number Facility/Site ID Facility/Site Name Address City Zip Code
60 24899121 McLendons Hardware NE 51 HWY 300 BELFAIR 98528
61 57354366 WA DNR Goat Ranch Rd Dump T23N R2W SESWQ BELFAIR 98528
62 41566798 Gillis Auto Center Inc W 180 HULBERT RD SHELTON 98584
63 74856494 WA DOT PIT X13 SR 101 MP 320.00 LEFT ELDON 98555
64 7618237 Shelton City Water Tank HARVARD AVE AT 15TH ST SHELTON 98584
65 7463982 Belco Forest Products Inc 1890 E JOHNS PRAIRIE RD SHELTON 98584
66 79425949 North Shore Quality Auto Repair NE 3700 N SHORE RD BELFAIR 98528
67 62317316 SKOOKUM LUMBER PLANT 780 W HWY 108 SHELTON 98584
68 2422752 Manke Lumber Co Inc Shelton Log Dump 321 E MILL ST SHELTON 98584-1409
69 25461188 ITT Rayonier Research Center 409 E HARVARD AVE SHELTON 98584
70 82694132 Les Auto Repair W 191 HULBERT RD SHELTON 98584
71 12748556 Belfair Valley Auto Repair NE 481 OLD BELFAIR HWY BELFAIR 98528
72 72464732 QWEST Communications Belfair Co PE 26099 T23N R1W S29 SW1/4 SE1/4 E SIDE SR 148 BELFAIR 98528
73 96369192 Bastian Drug Lab 309 W UNIVERSITY SHELTON 98584
74 98374177 Belfair Auto Repair NE 23791 HWY 3 BELFAIR 98528
75 55359328 US DA FS Fir Creek T21N R5W S3 HOODSPO 98548
76 5926111 WA ECY Fox Run FOX RUN LN DRUG LAB SHELTON 98584
77 72759425 Canal Automotive NE 23481 HWY 3 BELFAIR 98528
78 1877882 WA ECY 181 Firwood Hghts Drug Lab 181 FIRWOOD HEIGHTS DR BELFAIR 98528
79 4971970 Shelton School District 309 909 W PINE ST SHELTON 98584
80 93855811 US NAVY RR Line Bremerton to Shelton CAPITOL HILL RD AT RR TRACK SHELTON 98584
81 23333162 ALDERBROOK RESORT&SPA 10 E ALDERBROOK DR SOUTH FORTY UTILITIES UNION 98592
82 62294393 Aero Controls Inc Sanderson Way W 231 SANDERSON WAY SHELTON 98584
83 21745352 Mason Cnty Central Shop 3620 E JOHNS PRAIRIE RD SHELTON 98584
84 94787131 US DEA 5402 SE Cole Rd 2402 SE COLE RD SHELTON 98584
85 6756777 Simpson timber Company Shelton Fairmount 1698 FAIRMOUNT AVE SHELTON 98584
86 89756429 South Grays Harbor Timber Reso SE 801 CRAIG RD SHELTON 98584-9264
87 1189 OLYMPIC WOOD PRODUCTS E 30 EXPORT RD SHELTON 98584
88 36292444 Tacoma Public Utilities Cushman Dam N 21451 HWY 101 SHELTON 98584
89 41855348 Shelton Port Business Park Rd W 410 BUSINESS PARK RD SHELTON 98584
90 42249937 Freeway Mini Storage 631 SE CRAIG RD LOCKER 508 SHELTON 98584
91 35651653 Olympic Tool Engineering Inc W 21 SANDERSON WAY SHELTON 98584-1279
92 21389127 Elfendahl Pass Belfai T23N R2W S22 BELFAIR 98528
93 4987545 Manke Lumber Company Inc Cap Hill E CAPITAL HILL RD DUMP SITE SHELTON 98584
94 24168976 TIME OIL CO PROPERTY 01369 108 1ST N SHELTON 98584-3547
95 55656758 WA DOT PIT X115 CORNER OF BROCKDALE&MCREAVY RD SHELTON 98584
96 79875812 Transformer Svc Co PORT OF SHELTON SANDERSON FLD SHELTON 98584
97 83271142 SAFEWAY INC BELFAIR UST NUMBER 586153 23961 NE SR 3 STE A BELFAIR 98528
98 72915915 WA DOT Skokomish River Br 101418 SR 101 MP 338.77 SHELTON 98584
99 6321899 CROWN AUTO SALES 23771 NE SR 3 BELFAIR 98528
100 19861 Simpson Lumber Co.,LLC 100 N FRONT ST SHELTON 98584
101 23763 Safeway Store 585 600 W FRANKLIN ST SHELTON 98584
102 45521314 Mason Cnty PUD 3 116 E K ST SHELTON 98584
103 20503 GREEN DIAMOND RESOURCE CO 4044 E MASON LK RD SHELTON 98584
104 14197 Blue Heron Condominium Association 6520 E SR 106 UNION 98592
105 23579928 Shelton Port W 400 ENTERPRISE RD SHELTON 98584
106 35343399 Squaxin Island Natural Resources W 81 HWY 108 SHELTON 98584
107 49653548 QWEST Communications Inc W00335 522 RAILROAD AVE SHELTON 98584
157
Number Facility/Site ID Facility/Site Name Address City Zip Code
1 2100284 Olympic Panel Products LLC 204 E RAILROAD SHELTON 98584
2 3670483 Simpson Timber Co Dayton Operations 3851 W MARTIN RD SHELTON 98584
3 61252676 SIMPSON TIMBER COST YD SAWMILL 5 3851 W MARTIN RD SHELTON 98584-0460
4 72367697 Simpson Timber Co Front St 421 S FRONT ST SHELTON 98584-0460
5 1189 OLYMPIC WOOD PRODUCTS E 30 EXPORT RD SHELTON 98584
158
MASON COUNTY
=� COMMUNITY SERVICES
Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health
I
SOLID WASTE HANDLING PERMIT
For North Mason Fiber
` PERMIT#SWF-0000012 EXPIRATION DATE: December 31, 2017
This permit authorizes the following solid waste handling activities at:
431 NE LOG YARD RD BELFAIR WA:
PARCEL # 12321-10-01070
XX Composting per WAC 173-350-220
XX Other per WAC 173-350-490.
Specify: Rail Load Transfer Station
The Permitee
North Mason Fiber
Robert Dressel
431 NE Log Yard RD Belfair WA By -
360-275-6557 Maria Machado EHS I
Mason County Community Services
Effective Date of Permit: January 1, 2017
Date of Expiration: December 31, 2017
Date of Issuance: July 31, 2017
Please direct any questions about this permit or regulatory requirements to Maria Machado,
(360)427-9670 Ext 584 mmachado(@co-mason.wa.us.
Corrective Actions and Compliance Schedule
To ensure continued issuance of this permit and avoid suspension of all or parts of this permit, North Mason Fiber
must complete the following activities by the provided deadline:
A. None at this time.
Composting managed under WAC 173-350-220 and in accordance with the following:
• Plan of Operation dated August 21, 2014.
• Closure Plan dated August 21, 2014.
• Acceptable wastes: Yard waste, leaves, wood waste, fin fish waste, and hatchery pond slurry
• Special Conditions, Exceptions, Variances: N/A
Rail load Transfer station managed under WAC 173-350-490 and in accordance with the following:
• Plan of Operation updated January 28, 2017.
• Closure Plan dated January 28, 2017.
• Acceptable wastes: Non-hazardous and non-dangerous waste soil-based materials including
'excluded' status 2 remediation soils, and non-hazardous/non-dangerous construction and demolition
debris(C&D)
• Special Conditions, Exceptions,Variances: N/A
2
160
In addition to the requirements above, North Mason Fiber must abide by the following conditions:
General Conditions
1. North Mason Fiber must handle solid waste in conformance with chapters RCW 70.95, WAC 173-
350 and local ordinances Mason County Code,the local comprehensive solid waste management
plan, conditions in this permit, and other federal, state, and local regulations with requirements
applicable to the facility.
2. Mason County Community Services may suspend this permit if it finds that:
a. North Mason Fiber misrepresented or omitted information that could have affected issuance of
this permit or will affect operation of the facility; or
b. the quantity or character of the solid waste or solid waste handling changed without prior
approval from Mason County Community Services; or
c. operating personnel are unfamiliar with or are not following approved plans as referenced
above; or
d. there has been a violation of any part of this permit.
If the permit is suspended, North Mason Fiber may appeal the action according to RCW
70.95.210.
3. If Mason County Community Services suspends any part of this permit, or a court of competent
jurisdiction finds parts to be invalid, the rest of this permit remains in effect.
4. North Mason Fiber must display or store this permit and the approved Plan of Operation in a
manner that allows easy access by operating personnel.
5. North Mason Fiber must ensure operating personnel receive training and understand the approved
Plan of Operation and other requirements of this permit.
6. North Mason Fiber must allow agents of Mason County Community Services and the Washington
Department of Ecology to enter, inspect, sample, and move freely about the premises of any
permitted solid waste handling facility to determine compliance with this permit at any reasonable
time.
7. North Mason Fiber must submit for approval by Mason County Community Services changes to
facility design and permit requirements, including referenced plans, prior to implementation.
8. North Mason Fiber must not accept solid waste regulated under Chapter 173-303 WAC, Dangerous
Waste Regulation. It may accept solid wastes that have been excluded, exempted or otherwise
removed from regulation under Chapter 173-303 WAC if Chapter 173-303 WAC and applicable solid
waste handling rules allow its acceptance.
9. North Mason Fiber must retain environmental monitoring, inspection, waste collection and other required
records for five years. They must retain these records indefinitely during the course of any unresolved
3
161
problems or litigation regarding solid waste handling at the site or when requested by Mason County
Community Services.
10. North Mason Fiber must provide environmental monitoring, inspection,waste collection,financial
assurance and other records at the request of Mason County Community Services or Washington
Department of Ecology.
11. North Mason Fiber must submit an annual report for the previous calendar year to Mason County
Community Services and the Washington Department of Ecology by April 1 each year, on forms supplied by
the Washington Department of Ecology. North Mason Fiber must also submit by April 1 each year annual
groundwater and gas monitoring reports and financial assurance audits, if required by applicable solid
waste rules or this permit.
12. If needed to protect public health or the environment, Mason County Community Services may amend this
permit. Amendments may be more stringent and will be in writing.
13. Mason County Community Services may temporarily waive or change permit provisions if the President of
the United States,the Governor of Washington, the County Executive or a health order issued by a local
health officer declares a state of emergency or imminent public health risk.
14. If this permit expires before Mason County Community Services has rendered a decision on renewal of a
permit for the facility, North Mason Fiber can continue all activities in conformance with this permit.
15. In the event North Mason Fiber is unable to comply with any of the conditions of this permit, they must:
a. immediately take action to stop the problem, and if applicable, clean up any spills; and
b. immediately notify Mason County Community Services of the failure to comply
Compliance with this condition does not relieve North Mason Fiber from liability for failure to comply.
4
162
Attachment B
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Jim Madsen
DEPARTMENT: Juvenile Court Services EXT: 332
BRIEFING DATE: 10/22/18
PREVIOUS BRIEFING DATES:
If this is a follow-up briefing, please provide only new information
ITEM: Juvenile Detention Officer
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: (If applicable, please include available options and
potential solutions):
The Mason County Juvenile Detention Center is down one full time regular Detention
Officer (male). Our department would now like to fill the position and bring the facility
back up to regular staffing.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
There are not any financial impacts of hiring this position. All funding for this position
is already accounted for in the approved Juvenile Detention budget.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION:
Allow Juvenile Court Services to open a recruitment for a Juvenile Detention Officer
(male) position.
ATTACHMENTS:
N/A
Briefing Summary 10/17/2018
Attachment B
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Jim Madsen
DEPARTMENT: Juvenile Court Services EXT: 332
BRIEFING DATE: 10/22/18
PREVIOUS BRIEFING DATES:
If this is a follow-up briefing, please provide only new information
ITEM: Functional Family Therapy Contract 2018-2019.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: (If applicable, please include available options and
potential solutions):
Functional Family Therapy (FFT) is an evidence based service that is provided to
probation youths and their families who have scored moderate or high risk on a
validated court assessment tool. The program is paid for by state grant monies and
does not require any county funding.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
There was no financial change to the Evidence Based Expansion grant that pays for
this therapeutic intervention.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION:
Approve the Contract for Professional Services between Mason County and
Strengthening Foundations Counseling, LLC, to continue FFT services with probation
youth and families.
ATTACHMENTS:
Contract for Professional Services with Strengthening Foundations Counseling L.LC to
provide Functional Family Therapy for the 2018-2019 grant year.
Briefing Summary 10/17/2018
CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This Contract for Professional Services is entered into by Mason County, a municipal
corporation,having its principal offices at 411 North 5th Street, Shelton, Washington, 98584
(the County) and Strengthening Foundations Counseling LLC, 1105 D 15`h Avenue 4186,
Longview, WA.98632. (the Contractor).
SECTION 1. EFFECTIVE DATE OF CONTRACT
The Contract will become effective on July 1, 2018 and terminate on June 30, 2019. In no
event will the Contract become effective unless and until it is approved and executed by the
Mason County Board of Commissioners.
SECTION 2. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED
2.1 A description of the services to be performed by the Contractor is set forth in Exhibit
A: Description of Services, which is attached to the Contract and incorporated by this
reference. The Contractor agrees to provide its own labor and materials. Unless
otherwise provided for in the Contract, no material, labor or facilities will be
furnished by the County.
2.2 The Contractor will perform the work specified in the Contract in accordance with
standard industry practice.
2.3 The Contractor will complete its work in a timely manner and in accordance with the
schedule agreed to by the parties.
2.4 Time is of the essence in the performance of the Contract.
2.5 The Contractor will confer with Juvenile Court Services from time to time during the
progress of work. The Contractor will prepare and present status reports and other
information that may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be requested by Juvenile
Court Services.
1of16
SECTION 3. CONTRACT REPRESENTATIVES
The County and the Contractor will each have a contract representative. A party may change
its representative upon providing written notice to the other party. The parties'representatives
are as follows:
County's Contract Representative
James W. Madsen
Mason County Juvenile Court Probation Department
P.O. Box 368
Shelton, WA 98584
Contractor's Contract Representative
Nelita Wallingford, MA, MHCA
1105 D 15`h Avenue #186
Longview, WA. 98632
SECTION 4. COMPENSATION
4.1 A description of the compensation to be paid to the Contractor is set forth in Exhibit B:
Compensation, which is attached to the Contract and incorporated by this reference.
4.2 Unless otherwise provided in the Contract,the Contractor may submit an invoice to the
County once a month for payment of work actually completed to date. Subject to the
other provisions of the Contract, the County generally will pay such an invoice within
30 days of receiving it.
4.3 The Contractor will be paid only for work expressly authorized in the Contract.
4.4 The Contractor will not be entitled to payment for any services that were performed
prior to the effective date of the Contract or after its termination, unless a provision of
the Contract expressly provides otherwise.
4.5 If the Contractor fails to perform any substantial obligation and the failure has not been
cured within 10 days following notice from the County,the County may, in its sole
discretion and upon written notice to the Contractor, withhold all monies due the
Contractor, without penalty,until such failure to perform is cured. For the purposes of
this provision, "substantial" means faithfully fulfilling the terms and conditions of the
Contract with variances only for technical or minor omissions or defects.
2of16
SECTION 5. AMENDMENTS AND CHANGES IN WORK
5.1 In order to be effective, any Contract renewal, amendment or modification must be in
writing,be signed by both parties and be attached to the Contract. Work under a
renewal, an amendment or a modification may not commence until the renewal,
amendment or modification has been approved by the County and has become effective.
SECTION 6. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION
6.1 The Contractor will hold harmless, indemnify and defend the County, its officers,
officials, employees and agents, from and against any and all claims, actions, suits,
liability, loss, expenses, damages and judgments of any nature whatsoever, including
reasonable costs and attorneys' fees in defense thereof, for injury, sickness, disability
or death to persons or damage to property or business, caused by or arising out of the
Contractor's or subcontractor's acts, errors or omissions in the performance of the
Contract. Provided, however,that the Contractor's obligation under this provision will
not extend to injury, sickness, disability, death or damage caused by or arising out of the
sole negligence of the County, its officers, officials, employees or agents.
6.2 With regard to any claim against the County, its officers, officials, employees and
agents by any employee of the Contractor, subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly
employed by any of them, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable,the
indemnification obligation under this Section will not be limited in any way by any
limitation on the amount or type of damages, compensation or benefits payable by or
for the Contractor or subcontractor under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit
acts or other employee benefit acts. It is clearly agreed and understood by the parties
to the Contract that the Contractor expressly waives any immunity the Contractor might
have had under such laws. By executing the Contract,the Contractor acknowledges
that the foregoing waiver has been mutually negotiated by the parties and that the
provisions of this Section will be incorporated, as relevant, into any contract the
Contractor makes with any subcontractor or agent performing work under the Contract.
6.3 The Contractor's obligations under these provisions include, but are not limited to,
investigating, adjusting and defending all claims alleging loss from action, error or
omission, or breach of any common law, statutory or other delegated duty by the
Contractor, the Contractor's employees, agents or subcontractors.
SECTION 7. INSURANCE
7.1 Professional Legal Liability. The Contractor will maintain professional legal liability or
professional errors and omissions coverage appropriate to the Contractor's profession.
The coverage will have a limit of not less than $1 million per occurrence. The coverage
will apply to liability for a professional error,act or omission arising out of the
Contractor's or subcontractor's services under the Contract. The coverage will not
3of16
exclude bodily injury or property damage. The coverage will not exclude hazards related
to the work rendered as part of the Contract or within the scope of the Contractor's
services under the Contract, including testing, monitoring,measuring operations or
laboratory analysis where such services are rendered under the Contract.
7.2 Workers' Compensation and Employee Liability. The Contractor will maintain
workers' compensation insurance as required by Title 51, Revised Code of Washington,
and will provide evidence of coverage to the Mason County Risk Management Division.
If the Contract is for over $50,000,then the Contractor will also maintain employer
liability coverage with a limit of not less than $ 1 million.
7.3 Commercial General Liability. The Contractor will maintain commercial general
liability coverage for bodily injury,personal injury and property damage, subject to a
limit of not less than $1 million per occurrence. The general aggregate limit will apply
separately to the Contract and be no less than$2 million. The Contractor will provide
commercial general liability coverage that does not exclude any activity to be performed
in fulfillment of the Contract. Specialized forms specific to the industry of the Contractor
will be deemed equivalent provided coverage is no more restrictive than would be
provided under a standard commercial general liability policy, including contractual
liability coverage.NOT APPLICABLE FOR FFT.
7.4 Automobile Liability. The Contractor will maintain automobile liability insurance as
follows: (check ONE of the following):
X Not Applicable.
The Contractor will maintain commercial automobile liability insurance with a
limit of not less than$1 million each accident combined bodily injury and property
damage. The aggregate limit will be at least$2 million. Coverage will include owned,
hired and non-owned automobiles.
The Contractor will maintain automobile liability insurance or equivalent form
with a limit of not less than $100,000 each accident combined bodily injury and property
damage. The aggregate limit will be at least$300,000. If a personal lines automobile
liability policy is used to meet this requirement, it must include a business rider and must
cover each vehicle to be used in the performance of the Contract and the certificates of
insurance must evidence that these conditions have been met. If the contractor will use
non-owned vehicles in performance of the Contract,the coverage will include owned,
hired and non-owned automobiles.
7.5 Miscellaneous Insurance Provisions
A. The Contractor's liability insurance provisions will be primary and non-contributory with
respect to any insurance or self-insurance programs covering the County, its elected and
appointed officers, officials, employees and agents.
4of16
B. When such coverage is required,the Contractor's commercial general liability insurance
and automobile liability insurance will include the County, its officers, officials,
employees and agents with respect to performance of services.
C. When such coverage is required,the Contractor's commercial general liability insurance
and automobile liability insurance will contain no special limitations on the scope of
protection afforded to the County as an additional insured.
D. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies will not affect coverage
provided to the County, its officers, officials, employees or agents.
E. The Contractor's insurance will apply separately to each insured against whom claim is
made or suit is brought, subject to the limits of the insurer's liability.
F. The Contractor shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or will
furnish separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor naming Mason
County, its elected and appointed officers, officials, employees and agents. All coverage
for subcontractors will be subject to all of the requirements stated in these provisions.
G. The insurance limits mandated for any insurance coverage required by the Contract are
not intended to be an indication of exposure, nor are they limitations on indemnification.
H. The Contractor will maintain all required policies in force from the time services
commence until services are completed. Certificates,policies and endorsements
scheduled to expire before completion of services will be renewed before expiration. If
the Contractor's liability coverage is written as a claims-made policy,then the Contractor
must evidence the purchase of an extended-reporting period or"tail" coverage for a
three-year period after completion of the services.
7.6 Verification of Coverage and Acceptability of Insurers
A. The Contractor will place insurance with insurers licensed to do business in the State of
Washington and having A.M. Best Company ratings of no less than A-VII,with the
exception that excess and umbrella coverage used to meet the requirements for limits of
liability or gaps in coverage need not be placed with insurers or re-insurers licensed in the
State of Washington.
5of16
B. The Contractor will furnish the County with properly executed certificates of
insurance or a signed policy endorsement which will clearly evidence all insurance
required in this Section within 10 days after the effective date of the Contract. The
certificate will, at a minimum, list limits of liability and coverage. The certificate
will provide that the underlying insurance contract may not be canceled, or allowed
to expire, except on 30-days' prior written notice to the County. Any certificate or
endorsement limiting or negating the insurer's obligation to notify the County of
cancellation or changes must be amended so as not to negate the intent of this
provision.
C. The Contractor will furnish the County with evidence that the additional-insured
provision required above has been met. Acceptable forms of evidence are the
endorsement pages of the policy showing the County as an additional insured.
D. Certificates of insurance will show the certificate holder as Mason County and
indicate"care of the appropriate County office or department. The address of the
certificate holder will be shown as the current address of the appropriate County
office or department.
E. The Contractor will request that the Washington State Department of Labor and
Industries, Workers Compensation Representative, send written verification to
Mason County that the Contractor is currently paying workers' compensation.
F. Written notice of cancellation or change will be mailed to the County at the
following address:
Risk Management Division
Mason County Support Services
411 N. 5th
Shelton, WA 98584
G. The Contractor or its broker will provide a copy of all insurance policies specified in
the Contract upon request of the Mason County Risk Manager.
SECTION 8. TERMINATION
8.1 The County or Contractor may terminate the Contract in whole or in part whenever
either party determines, in its sole discretion,that such termination is in the best
interests of the party. The party may terminate the Contract upon giving 10-days'
written notice. In that event, the County will pay the Contractor for all costs
incurred by the Contractor in performing the Contract up to the date of termination,
subject to the other provisions of the Contract.
6of16
8.2 If funding for the underlying project or matter is withdrawn,reduced or limited in any
way after the Contract is signed or becomes effective, the County may summarily
terminate the Contract notwithstanding any other termination provision in the Contract.
Termination under this provision will be effective upon the date specified in the written
notice of termination sent by County to the Contractor. No costs incurred after the
effective date of the termination will be paid.
8.3 If the Contractor breaches any of its obligations under the Contract, and fails to cure the
breach within 10 days of written notice to do so by the County,the County may terminate
the Contract. In that event,the County will pay the Contractor only for the costs of
services accepted by the County. Upon such termination,the County, at its discretion,
may obtain performance of the work elsewhere, and the Contractor will bear all costs and
expenses incurred by the County in completing the work and all damages sustained by
the County by reason of the Contractor's breach.
SECTION 9. ASSIGNMENT,DELEGATION,AND SUBCONTRACTING
9.1 The Contractor will perform under the Contract using only its bona fide employees or
agents, and the obligations and duties of the Contractor under the Contract will not be
assigned, delegated or subcontracted to any other person or firm without the prior express
written consent of the County.
9.2 The Contractor warrants that it has not paid, nor has it agreed to pay, any company,
person, partnership or firm, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for
Contractor, any fee, commission, percentage,brokerage fee, gift or other consideration
contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of the Contract.
SECTION 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
10.1 The Contractor's services will be furnished by the Contractor as an independent
contractor and not as an agent, an employee or a servant of the County. The Contractor
specifically has the right to direct and control Contractor's own activities in providing the
agreed services in accordance with the specifications set out in the Contract.
10.2 The Contractor acknowledges that the entire compensation for the Contract is set forth in
the compensation provisions of the Contract and the Contractor is not entitled to any
County benefits, including, but not limited to: vacation pay; holiday pay; sick leave pay;
medical, dental or other insurance benefits; fringe benefits; or any other rights or
privileges afforded to Mason County employees.
7of16
10.3 The Contractor will have and maintain complete responsibility and control over all of
its subcontractors, employees, agents and representatives. No subcontractor,
employee, agent or representative of the Contractor will be or be deemed to be, or act
or purport to act, as an employee, agent or representative of the County.
SECTION 11. NON DISCRIMINATION
The Contractor, its assignees, delegates or subcontractors will not discriminate against any
person in performance of any of its obligations under the Contract on the basis of race, color,
creed, religion, national origin, age, sex, marital status, veteran status or the presence of any
disability.
SECTION 12. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS/WORKS PRODUCED
12.1 All reports, drawings,plans, specifications, all forms of electronic media, and data and
documents produced in the performance of the work under the Contract will be"works
for hire" as defined by the U.S. Copyright Act of 1976 and will be owned by the County.
Ownership includes the right to copyright,patent, and register, and the ability to transfer
these rights.
12.2 An electronic copy of all word processing documents will be submitted to the County
upon request or at the end of the job using the word processing program and version
specified by the County.
SECTION 13. PATENT/COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
The Contractor will hold harmless, indemnify and defend the County, its officers, officials,
employees and agents, from and against any claimed action, cause or demand brought against the
County, where such action is based on the claim that information supplied by the Contractor or
subcontractor infringes any patent or copyright. The Contractor will be notified promptly in
writing by the County of any notice of such claim.
8of16
SECTION 14. DISPUTES
Differences, disputes and disagreements between the Contractor and the County arising under or
out of the Contract will be brought to attention by either party at the earliest possible time so that
the matter may be settled or other appropriate action promptly taken. Any dispute relating to the
quality or acceptability of performance or compensation due the Contractor will be decided by
the County's contract representative or designee. All rulings, orders, instructions and decisions
of the County's contract representative will be final and conclusive.
SECTION 15. CONFIDENTIALITY
The Contractor, its employees, subcontractors and their employees will maintain the
confidentiality of all information provided by the County or acquired by the County in
performance of the Contract, except upon the prior express written consent of the County or an
order entered by a court of competent jurisdiction. The Contractor will promptly given the
County written notice of any judicial proceeding seeking disclosure of such information.
SECTION 16. CHOICE OF LAW,JURISDICTION AND VENUE
16.1 The Contract will be construed as having been made and delivered within the Sate of
Washington, and it is agreed by each party that the Contract will be governed by the
laws of the State of Washington, both as to its interpretation and performance.
16.2 Any action at law, suit in equity or other judicial proceeding arising under or out of the
Contract may be instituted and maintained only in a.court of competent jurisdiction.
SECTION 17. CRIMINAL HISTORY REQUIREMENTS
17.1 Background Checks. Contractor understands that the Juvenile Department is required
by the State of Washington to conduct yearly background checks on individual contract
service providers who will have unsupervised access, as the result of the service
provider's regularly scheduled activities or work duties,to juveniles under the
jurisdiction of the Juvenile Department.
17.2 Unsupervised Access to Juveniles. Contractor will ensure that individual service
providers will not have unsupervised access to juveniles under the jurisdiction of the
Juvenile Department if the service provider has been convicted of any crime noted on
Exhibit C, attached and incorporated by this reference.
9of16
17.3 Reporting of Charges and Convictions. Contractor will report any charge or conviction
of service providers for any felony sex offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030 and RCW
9A.44.130 or any violent offense as defined in RCW 9.94A.030 to the Juvenile
Department within seven days of the conviction. Failure to report within seven days
constitutes misconduct under Title 50 RCW.
SECTION 18. MISCELLANEOUS
18.1 No Waiver. The parties agree that the excuse or forgiveness of performance or waiver
of any provisions of the Contract does not constitute a waiver of such provision or
future performance or prejudice the right of the waiving party to enforce any of the
provisions of the Contract at a later time.
18.2 Tax Payments. The Contractor will pay all applicable federal, state and local taxes,
fees (including licensing fees) and other amounts.
18.3 Personnel Removal. The Contractor agrees to remove immediately any of its
subcontractors, employees, agents or representatives from assignment to perform
services under the Contract upon receipt of a written request to do so from the County's
contract representative or designee.
18.4 Legal Compliance. The Contractor and its subcontractors, employees, agents and
representatives will comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws,rules and
regulations in their performance under the Contract.
18.5 Records Inspection and Retention. The County may, at reasonable times, inspect the
books and records of the Contractor relating to the performance of the Contract. The
Contractor will retain for audit purposes all Contract-related records for at least six
years after termination of the Contract.
18.6 Successors and Assigns. The County,to the extent permitted by law, and the
Contractor each bind themselves,their partners, successors, executors, administrators
and assigns to the other party to the Contract and to the partners, successors,
administrators and assigns of such other party in respect to all covenants to the Contract.
18.7 Severability. If a court of competent jurisdiction holds any provision of the contract to
be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, the validity of the remaining
provisions will not be affected, and the parties' rights and obligations will be construed
and enforced as if the Contract did not contain the particular provision held to be
invalid. If any provisions of the Contract conflicts with any statutory provision of the
State of Washington, the provision will be deemed inoperative to the extent of the
conflict or modified to conform to statutory requirements.
10 of 16
18.8 Entire Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the Contract is the complete
expression of their agreement regarding the subject matter of the contract. Any oral or
written representations or understandings not incorporated in the Contract are
specifically excluded.
18.9 Notices. Any notices will be effective if personally served upon the other party or if
mailed by registered or certified mail,return receipt requested,to the addresses set out
in the contract representatives provision of the Contract. Notice may also be given by
facsimile with the original to follow by regular mail. Notice will be deemed to be given
three days following the date of mailing, or immediately if personally served. For
service by facsimile, service will be effective at the beginning of the next working day.
Dated this_day , 201_ Dated this day 201
CONTRACTOR
Strengthening Foundations Counseling LLC
By: By:
Signature Jim Madsen
Juvenile Court Administrator
Printed Name:
Title:
Commissioner Drexler
Commissioner Neatherlin
Commissioner Shutty
11 of 16
EXHIBIT A: DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
Responsibilities of the Contractor:
A. Contractor agrees to maintain current licensing and certification as a Mental Health
Counselor Associate(MHCA)in accordance with RCW 18.225. Contractor shall provide
copies of applicable licenses and certifications to the Mason County Juvenile
Department.
B. The Contractor agrees to provide Functional Family Therapy to up to twelve (12)
families referred from Mason County Juvenile Court before June 30, 2019.
C. Contractor agrees to submit written reports for each client, in a timely fashion to the
Juvenile Court Services Department at PO Box 368, Shelton, Washington 98584.
D. Contractor agrees to participate in State approved Quality Assurance Workgroup for the
Functional Family Therapy (FFT)program as required by the State of Washington
Juvenile Justice and Rehabilitation Administration
E. Contractor agrees to not seek reimbursement from the county for any services in excess
of the rates and amount set forth in Exhibit B.
12 of 16
EXHIBIT B: COMPENSATION
Payment to the Contractor shall be made as follows:
• The contractor will bill a total of$2500.00 for each referred case that successfully completes
all phases of the Functional Family Therapy intervention. Completed phases shall be paid as
follows:
a. Engagement and Motivation$833.33
b. Behavior Change $833.33
c. Generalization$833.34
d. 208.33 per completed session to be invoiced monthly
• The Juvenile Court Administrator and FFT provider must agree upon the need for any
session(s)that exceed the number prescribed by FFT in advance of the session. The fee will
not exceed $200.00 per session.
Payments shall be made by Mason County to the Contractor, usually within thirty (30) days of
the receipt of the correctly completed documents requesting and supporting demand for payment,
subject to:
1. Failure of the Contractor to comply with the terms of this agreement shall give the County
the right to withhold payment under this agreement.
The Contractor shall submit monthly billings to the Mason County Juvenile Department P.O.
368, Shelton, Washington or fax to, 360-427-7785 (attention Mike Dunn), within fifteen(15)
days following the last day of the previous month. The County reserves the right to withhold
payment for any claim not submitted for payment within fifteen(15) days following the
termination of this agreement.
13 of 16
EXHIBIT C: DISCLOSURE OF CRIMINAL BACKGROUND
Pursuant to the requirements of Sections 43.43.830 to 43.43.845 of the Revised Code of Washington,
we must ask you to disclose the following information. The information will be kept confidential;
1. A. Have you ever been convicted of a crime against children or other persons? (A crime
against persons means a conviction of any of the following offenses: Aggravated murder; first
or second degree murder; first or second degree kidnapping; first, second or third degree
assault; first, second or third degree assault of a child; first, second or third degree rape; first,
second or third degree rape of a child; first or second degree robbery; first degree arson; first
degree burglary; first or second degree manslaughter; first or second degree extortion; indecent
liberties; incest; vehicular homicide; first degree promoting prostitution; communication with
a minor; unlawful imprisonment; simple assault; sexual exploitation of minors; first or second
degree criminal mistreatment; first or second degree custodial interference; first or second
degree custodial sexual misconduct;malicious harassment; firs, second or third degree child
molestation; first or second degree sexual misconduct with a minor; patronizing a juvenile
prostitute; child abandonment;promoting pornography; selling or distribution erotic material
to a minor; custodial assault; violation of child abuse restraining order; child buying or selling;
prostitution; felony indecent exposure; criminal abandonment; or any of these crimes as they
may be renamed in the future.)
Yes No
B. Have you ever been convicted of a crime relating to financial exploitation if the victim was
a vulnerable adult? (Crimes relating to financial exploitation means a conviction for first,
second or third degree extortion; first, second or third degree theft; fust or second degree
robbery; forgery; or any of these crimes as they may be renamed in the future.)
Yes No
If you answer"yes"to either part A or B of question 1, please describe and provide the following
information:
Date State Conviction Sentence Cause Number Court State ID#
2. A. Have you ever been found in a dependency action or domestic relations proceeding to have
sexually assaulted, abused or exploited any minor, or to have committed child abuse or neglect
as defined in RCW 26.44.020?
Yes No
B. Have you ever been found in any disciplinary board final decision to have sexually or
physically abused or exploited any minor or developmentally disabled person or to have
abused or financially exploited any vulnerable adult?
Yes No
C. Have you ever been found by a court in a protection proceeding to have abused or
financially exploited a vulnerable adult?
14 of 16
Yes No
If you answer "Yes"to part A,B or C of question 2,please describe and provide the following
information:
Date State Findings/Penalty Cause Number Court State ID# (SID)
3. Have you ever been convicted of a crime relating to drugs? (A crime relating to drugs means a
conviction of a crime to manufacture, delivery or possession with intent to manufacture or
deliver a controlled substance.)
Yes No
Mason County Personnel may request your fingerprints to obtain from the criminal identification
system a report of your record of criminal convictions for offenses against children or other persons,
crimes relating to financial exploitation of vulnerable adults, crimes relating to drugs, civil
adjudications of child abuse, domestic relations proceedings, disciplinary board final decisions, and
protection proceedings. If you are hired before that report is available, YOUR EMPLOYMENT
WILL BE CONDITIONAL UPON THE RECEIPT OF A SATISFACTORY REPORT.
You will be notified of the response within ten days after Mason County Personnel receives the report.
We will make a copy of the report available to you upon request.
UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, I certify under the laws of the State of Washington that the
above information is true, correct and complete. I understand that if I am hired, I can be discharged
for any misrepresentation or omission in the above statements. I also understand that if I am hired,
my employment is conditioned on Mason County's receipt of a satisfactory report.
Signature:
Name (Please print):
DATE:
I signed this document while in , Washingtion
(city or town)
15 of 16
EXI-IIBIT C: Continued
DISQUALIFYING CRIMES AGAINST PERSONS
As listed in RCW 43.43.830 and RCW 43.43.842
Listed below are the crimes that disqualify an applicant from appointment to a position that requires a
Washington State Patrol Check. The duties and responsibilities of these positions include the
requirement of unsupervised contact with youth, developmentally disabled persons or vulnerable
adults. This information is taken from the DSHS form for criminal background checks for individual
providers (DSHS 09-803) (06/94).
Aggravated Murder Patronizing a Juvenile Prostitute
Arson 1St Degree Promoting Prostitution 1St Degree
Assault 1St Degree Prostitution(3 years or more)
Assault 2nd Degree Rape 1"Degree
Assault 3`d Degree Rape 2nd Degree
Assault 4th Degree (3 years or more) * Rape 3`d Degree
Burglary 1St Degree Rape of a Child 1St Degree
Child Abandonment Rape of a Child 2nd Degree
Child abuse or neglect(RCW 26.44.020) Rape of a Child 3`d Degree
Child buying or selling Robbery 1St Degree
Child Molestation 1St Degree Robbery 2"d Degree
Child Molestation 2"d Degree Selling/Distributing Erotic Material to a Minor
Child Molestation 3`d Degree Sexual Exploitation of a Minor
Communication w/minor for immoral purposes Sexual Misconduct w/a Minor 1"Degree
Criminal Mistreatment 1St Degree Sexual Misconduct w/a Minor 2nd Degree
Criminal Mistreatment 2"d Degree Theft 1St Degree
Custodial Assault Theft 2nd Degree (5 years or more)
Custodial Interference 1St Degree Theft 3`d Degree (3 years or more)
Custodial Interference 2"d Degree Unlawful Imprisonment
Extortion 1"Degree Violation of Child Abuse Restraining Order
Extortion 2"d Degree
Extortion 3`d Degree
Felony Indecent Exposure
Forgery (5 years or more)
Incest
Kidnapping 1St Degree
Kidnapping 2nd Degree
Malicious Harassment
Manslaughter 1St Degree
Manslaughter 2"d Degree
Murder 1St Degree
Murder 2"d Degree
* The crimes above marked with an asterisk are not disqualifying as long as the conviction date is established to be 3 or
5 years prior to application.
16 of 16
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Kell Rowen, Planning Manager
DEPARTMENT: DCD EXT: 286
BRIEFING DATE: October 22, 2018
ITEM: Proposed Rezone from Medium Density Residential (R-5) to Multi Family
Residential (R-10) in Belfair Urban Growth Area.
BACKGROUND: The Mason County Planning Advisory Commission voted (4-0) to
recommend approval of the proposed rezone application. The applicant (property
owner) submitted a rezone application and fees to the Permit Assistance Center on July
31, 2018.
BUDGET IMPACTS:
This proposal has no cost.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION:
A Public Hearing for Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. has been set. This
briefing is to provide the Board with the staff report and attachments and to answer any
questions about the rezone request.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Staff Report
• Map
• SEPA DNS and Checklist
• Rezone Application
• Citizen Comments (emails and letters)
• Media Articles
• PAC Minutes (page 4-7)
• 10 Year Moratorium Agreement
Briefing Rezone R-5 to R-10 10-22-2018
Page I October 22,2018
REQUEST FOR REZONE
APPLICANT PROPOSAL - PROPOSED REZONE OF 10 ACRES FROM
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-5) TO MULTI FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL (R-10) IN THE BELFAIR UGA
STAFF CONTACT
Kell McAboy, Planning Manager
Ext#286
APPLICANT PROPERTY OWNER
Dean Mauerman Same
PCI LLC.
1415 College Street
Lacey,WA 98503
SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL
Rezone parcel 12328-23-00011 from Medium Density Residential (R-5) to Multi Family Residential
(R-1o). This parcel is in the Belfair Urban Growth Area (UGA).This does not require an amendment
to the Future Land Use Map and is considered a Development Regulations rezone.
PARCEL INFORMATION
Parcel No. :12-428-2-:t-00011: is 10 acres in size and is located at the north end of Roy Boad Rd, where
the pavement ends and west of and adjacent to State Route 3 in the Belfair Urban Growth Area.
ZONING INFORMATION
CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION:
R-5 Medium Density Residential
The purpose of the R-5 district is to provide a medium density housing option within the Belfair
urban growth area. Locations are restricted to sites not significantly impacted by critical areas
and slopes. Locations should generally be away from development nodes and commercially
zoned areas, beyond a normal walking distance of one-half to three-quarters of a mile. The
district allows for a density of five dwelling units per acre, except where "critical lands" are
present—which reduce the permitted density. Clustering of the dwelling units and properties is
encouraged to protect open space and water quality, reduce infrastructure needs, and enhance
energy efficiency. Multi family dwelling units are permitted as long as they do not exceed the
density requirement and minimize impacts to adjacent single family dwelling units.
PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION:
R-3.o Multi Family Residential
The purpose of the R-10 district is to provide a high-density residential-area housing option
within the Belfair urban growth area. Locations should be within or adjacent to development
nodes and commercially zoned areas within a normal walking distance of one-half to three-
quarters of a mile. Locations generally are areas not significantly impacted by critical areas and
slopes.The district allows for a density of ten dwelling units per acre,except where "critical lands"
Staff Report-BOCCBOCC
Page 2 October 22,2018
are present—which reduce the permitted density. Clustering of the dwelling units and properties
is encouraged to protect open space and water quality, reduce infrastructure needs, and enhance
energy efficiency. Design standards are important to minimize environmental and visual impacts
of developments and provide amenities for residents. Protection of creeks and wetlands is
critical—these features should be preserved and integrated into the development as an asset and
amenity for residents. Open space and play areas will be important, particularly for young
families. Pedestrian access—between developments and to provide access to parks, open space,
commercial, and civic uses—is also very important.
BACKGROUND
The applicant(property owner) submitted a rezone application and fees to the Permit Assistance
Center on July 31, 2o18. The parcel was partially logged in 2014 under a DNR Forest Practices
Permit. If proposed future development occurs prior to the completion of a so-year development
moratorium resulting from FPA NBR 2416867, it will require an application for a "Release"from the
moratorium including a public hearing with the County's Hearing Examiner to determine the work
is compliant with Mason County Regulations(wetlands,slopes, stormwater, etc.).
ANALYSIS
Mason County Code Section 17.oS.o8o(a) describes the eight rezone criteria used to review a
rezone proposal. These criterions have been established and adopted specifically for Mason
County to establish standards by which each rezone is to be reviewed. The Code requires that each
rezone be evaluated considering these standards; however, it does not require that they all be met.
Below is Staff and Applicant response to the proposed request:
i.. Development allowed by the proposed rezone designation shall not damage public health,
safety and welfare.
This criterion is met as the applicant's proposed rezone of the property will not damage public
health, safety or welfare. The proposed rezone will allow development that furthers the goals and
vision of the Belfair UGA plan and the Mason County UGA Plan.
2. The zone designation shall be consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan,
Development Regulations, and other county ordinances, and with the Growth Management
Act; and that designation shall match the characteristics of the area to be rezoned better than
any other zone designation.
Staff believes this criterion has been met as it is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan,
development regulations and other ordinances. The location is less than three-quarters of a mile to
the central core of Belfair.
3. No rezone shall be approved if, either by itself or together with other rezoning and/or
development, whether actual or potential, the cumulative impacts of such zoning would be to
materially increase sprawling, low-density rural development, or to significantly increase uses
incompatible with resource-based uses in the vicinity.
Staff Report-BOCCBOCC
Page 3 October 22,2018
This criterion is met as the rezone of this parcel supports the alternative to an increase in sprawl or
low-density development or cause it to occur. The public infrastructure and resources in the vicinity
have been upgraded in recent years to support development consistent with the proposed rezone.
4. No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together
with other rezoning and/or development, whether actual or potential, the cumulative impacts
of such zoning would be to materially increase demand for urban services in rural areas,
including but not limited to streets, parking, utilities,fire protection, police, and schools.
N/A This is in an Urban Growth Area.
5. No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together with
other rezoning and/or development, whether actual or potential, the cumulative impacts of
such zoning would be to materially interfere with the Growth Management Act goal to
encourage development in urban areas where adequate public services and facilities exist or
can be provided in an efficient manner.
This criterion is met as the proposed rezone of this parcel would not materially interfere with the
Growth Management Act goal to encourage development in urban areas where adequate public
services and facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner. The rezone is within the
Belfair UGA where public facilities exist including sewer facilities, which is currently underutilized.
6. No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together with
other rezoning and/or development, whether actual or potential, the cumulative impacts of
such zoning would be to materially interfere with the Growth Management Act goal to
encourage retention of open space, to conserve fish and wildlife habitat, and generally to
protect the environment, including air and water quality.
This criterion is met as the proposed rezone would not materially interfere with the Growth
Management Act goal to encourage retention of open space, to conserve fish and wildlife habitat,
and generally to protect the environment, including air and water quality. The parcel size and
topography is sufficient to support development and meet the development regulations to protect
critical areas.
7. No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together with
other rezoning and/or development, whether actual or potential,the cumulative impacts of such
zoning would be to create pressure to change land use designations of other lands or to increase
population growth in rural areas as projected in the Mason County Comprehensive Plan.
This criterion is met as the proposed rezone is in a UGA and would not create pressure to change
surrounding rural land uses and will not affect population growth in the rural areas.
8. These criteria shall not be construed to prevent corrective rezoning of land necessitated by
clerical error or similar error of typography or topography committed in the original zoning of
such land.
This criterion is not applicable and not being requested as the result of any mapping errors.
Staff Report-BOCCBOCC
Page 4 October 22,2018
STATE ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ACT (SEPA)
A SEPA checklist was prepared for this project. A formal SEPA Determinations of Non-Significance
was made on August 31, 2o18. Comment period for this determination closes on September 14,
2oi8. Timely comments were received and are included in this packet.
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
All property owners within 300 feet of the subject parcel was notified by mail informing them of the
proposal to rezone the property. In addition, Public Notice of this public hearing was published in
the Mason Shelton Journal on September 6 and 13, 2oi8. The Public Notice was posted onsite on
August 31, 2o18. Public Notice of this public hearing was published in the Mason Shelton Journal on
October 25& November 1, 2o18.
PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION
On September 17, 2o18, the Planning Advisory Commission held a public hearing on this proposal.
After calling for testimony and deliberation, they made a unanimous recommendation (4-0) that
the Board of County Commissioners approve the request to rezone the parcel. The draft minutes
are attached for the Board's review.
SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mason County Board of Commissioners approve this rezone.
Staff Report-BOCCBOCC
Mason County WA GIS Web Map
i,
Fir e ezone
Mediur6 Denso Residenti
ul
a, Roy Boal R�
1
�s.
N,
Safeway
� 1
8/31/2018, 3:07:21 PM 1:3,058
0 0.03 0.05 0.1 mi
OJ County Boundary a General Commercial
0 0.04 0.08 0.16 km
❑ Tax Parcels(Zoom in to 1:30,000) General Commercial&Business Industrial
Belfair Zoning U Long Term Agricultural
Low Density Residential
Mixed Use Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe,GeoEye,Earthstar Geographies,CNES/Airbus
Business Industrial DS,USDA,USGS,AeroGRID,IGN,and the GIS User Community
E Single Family Residential
Festival Retail
Mason County WAGIS Web Map Application
Earthstar Geoqraphics I
ON-STAT,& MASON COUNTY
�P5 C �� Department of Community Services
M
o AS ° Planning Division
~ N T �? 616 W Alder St, Shelton, WA 98684
Y roti (360)427-9670
1864
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
(WAC 197-11-340)
SEP2018-00069
Description of Proposal: APPLICATION FOR REZONE WITHIN THE BELFAIR UGA: R-5
(medium density residential) TO R-10 (multifamily residential)
Proponent: PCI, LLC
Location of Proposal:
Parcel Number: 123282300011
Legal Description: TR 4 OF SW NW, W OF HWY
Directions to Site: END OF ROY BOAD RD, BELFAIR
Lead Agency: Mason County
The Lead Agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant
adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required
under RCW 43.21 C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed
Environmental Checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. This information is
available to the public upon request.
Please contact Kell Rowen at ext. 286 with any questions. This DNS is issued under WAC
197-11-340(2). The Lead Agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date shown
below, when the determination is final. Comments must be submitted to Dept. of Community
Development, 615 W Alder St, Shelton WA 98584 by 9/14/2018. Appeal of this determination
must be filed within a 14-day period following this final determination date, per Mason County
Code Chapter 15.11 Appeals.
�j a V'U�� S/I-SI11-�) I
A thorized Local Government Official Date
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Mason County Permit center use:
SEP
❑ Single Family DNS: $600.00 Parcel#: oZo�B r o2.3y �
Other DNS: 0 to 9.99 acres: $730 Date Rcvd:
10 to 20 acres: $880
Over 20 acres: $1100 RECEIVED
❑ DS/EIS: $5000 + $90 per hour J11t 3 12018 VL
-6151N. ACder Street
Purpose of checklist:
Governmental agencies use this checklist to help determine whether the environmental impacts of your
proposal are significant. This information is also helpful to determine if available avoidance, minimization
or compensatory mitigation measures will address the probable significant impacts or if an environmental
impact statement will be prepared to further analyze the proposal.
Instructions for applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Please
answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. You may need to consult
with an agency specialist or private consultant for some questions. You may use"not applicable" or
"does not apply"only when you can explain why it does not apply and not when the answer is unknown.
You may also attach or incorporate by reference additional studies reports. Complete and accurate
answers to these questions often avoid delays with the SEPA process as well as later in the decision-
making process.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of
time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal
or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your
answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant
adverse impact.
Instructions for Lead Agencies:
Please adjust the format of this template as needed. Additional information may be necessary to
evaluate the existing environment, all interrelated aspects of the proposal and an analysis of adverse
impacts. The checklist is considered the first but not necessarily the only source of information needed to
make an adequate threshold determination. Once a threshold determination is made, the lead agency is
responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the checklist and other supporting documents.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
For nonproject proposals (such as ordinances, regulations, plans and programs), complete the applicable
parts of sections A and B plus the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NON PROJECT ACTIONS (part D). Please
completely answer all questions that apply and note that the words"project,""applicant," and "property or
site" should be read as "proposal," "proponent,"and "affected geographic area," respectively. The lead
agency may exclude (for non-projects)questions in Part B- Environmental Elements—that do not
contribute meaningfully to the analysis of the proposal.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11.960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 1 of 14
A. Background HELP
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
N/A.
2. Name of applicant:
PCI, LLC.
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
1415 College Street, Lacey, WA 98503
Contact: Dean Mauerman, 360-280-0784
4. Date checklist prepared:
7/18/2018
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Mason County Planning Department
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Proposed zoning change: As soon as possible.
Proposed multi-family developement: Following zoning change.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or
connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
PCI, LLC intends to build multi-family housing consistent with the vision of the Mason County
Comprehensive Plan, similar to Hearthstone Appartments, Tumwater, WA. See www.hearthstonelife.com.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be
prepared, directly related to this proposal.
If the zoning change is approved, a biologist and soils engineer will be used
as required for site developement.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other
proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None known.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
The proposed zoning change only requires an Application for Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size
of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to
describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this
page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project
description.)
PCI, LLC proposes to change the zoning density of the subject parcel from R-5 to R-10 to support
developement of multi-family housing. The parcel is 10.0 acres.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 2 of 14
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise
location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and
range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic
map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you
are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications
related to this checklist.
Parcel 12328-23-00011 is located in the Belfair UGA, on Roy Boad Road, begining where the road
changes from asphalt to gravel. TR4 of SW NW, West of WA-3.
Maps of the parcel are shown on pages 5 and 6 of the Application for Comprehensive Plan Map
Amendment.
B. Environmental Elements fHELPI
1. Earthhf elpl
a. General description of the site:
(circle one): Flat, rollin , hilly, eep slopes, mountainous, other
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Unknown at this time.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat,
muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any
agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in
removing any of these soils.
Unknown at this time.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
There are no indications of unstable soils in the immedaite vicinity.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of
any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
N/A for zoning change application.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
The parcel was logged about 5 years ago and no erosion has occurred.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)?
N/A for zoning change application. Unkonwn for future uses.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11.960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 3 of 14
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
N/A for zoning change application. Future developement will be properly engineered and in compliance
with Mason County Code.
2. Air hf elpl
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction,
operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and
give approximate quantities if known.
N/A.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so,
generally describe.
None known.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
N/A.
3. Waterhf eM
a. Surface Water: hf elpl
1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including
year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe
type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
No.
2)Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet)the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
N/A.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate the source of fill material.
N/A.
4)Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
N/A for zoning change applicaton.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
No.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 4 of 14
b. Ground Water: h� gM
1)Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so,
give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities
withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
N/A for zoning change application.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
other sources, if any(for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the
following chemicals. . . ; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the
number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
N/A for zoning change application.
c. Water runoff(including stormwater):
1) Describe the source of runoff(including storm water) and method of collection
and disposal, if any(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow?
Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
N/A for zoning change application.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
N/A for zoning change application.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If
so, describe.
N/A for zoning change application.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage
pattern impacts, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 5 of 14
4. PlantshI gj
a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
V evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other
V shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops.
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
N/A for zoning change application.
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance
vegetation on the site, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
5. Animalsh( gj
a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known
to be on or near the site.
Examples include:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other
None known.
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
None known.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 6 of 14
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
None known.
6. Energy and Natural Resourceshf eM
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar)will be used to meet
the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating,
manufacturing, etc.
N/A for zoning change application.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties?
If so, generally describe.
N/A for zoning change application.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
7. Environmental HealthhI gM
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk
of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal?
If so, describe.
None known.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
None known.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development
and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines
located within the project area and in the vicinity.
None known.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced
during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating
life of the project.
None known.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None known.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 7 of 14
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
b. Noise
1)What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project(for example:
traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
N/A for zoning change application.
2)What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indi-
cate what hours noise would come from the site.
N/A for zoning change application.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
8. Land and Shoreline Use hel
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?Will the proposal affect current
land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
The site is vacant land. Adjacent properties are primarily residential. The proposed zoning change
will have no effect on adjacent properties.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe.
How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to
other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated,
how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or
nonforest use?
None known.
1)Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal
business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides,
tilling, and harvesting? If so, how:
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
None.
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
No.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
R-5. Cme-c�-L)WN
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Belfair UGA, zoned R-5.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 8 of 14
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
N/A.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
None known.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
N/A for zoning change application.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
N/A for zoning change application.
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
L. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land
uses and plans, if any:
The proposed zoning change is consistent with vision of the Mason County Comprehensive Plan.
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term
commercial significance, if any:
N/A.
9. Housing [Lel
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, mid-
dle, or low-income housing.
N/A for zoning change application. Any future devemopement by PCI, LLC would require 100 unit
mutli-family developement and would strive for a mixture of low and middle income rents.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
None.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
N/A for zoning change application. Any future devemopement would be consistent with vision of
the Mason County Comprehensive Plan.
10. Aestheticshf e
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is
the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
N/A for zoning change application. Any future devemopement would not exceed 3 stories.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 9 of 14
11. Light and Glare hf elpl
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly
occur?
N/A.
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
N/A.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
N/A.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
N/A.
12. Recreationhf eg!
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
N/A for zoning change application.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
N/A for zoning change application.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation
opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
N/A for zoning change application.
13. Historic and cultural preservationhf gj
a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years
old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so,
specifically describe.
None known.
b. Are there any landmarks,features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation?
This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts,
or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies
conducted at the site to identify such resources.
None known.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources
on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of
archeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
Detailed site visual inspection, records research, GIS data, historic maps, interviews with the family
that previously owned the parcell for approximately 80 years.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 10 of 14
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance
to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
N/A, see 13.a, 13.b, and 13.c above.
14. Transportation hf p
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and
describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
The only public access is via Roy Boad Road. WA-3 runs along the East boundary of the site
and is not affected by this zoning change application. Future developement would not change
site access.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally
describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
The site is currently served by the nearby Mason County Park and Ride, approximately one block
South on Roy Boad Road. Service includes Mason County Transit and Puget Sound Naval Shipyard
Worker-Driver busses.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal
have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
N/A for zoning change applicaton. Future developement would add parking spaces in accordance
with Mason County Code.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian,
bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe
(indicate whether public or private).
N/A for zoning change applicaton. Future developement would likely extend the paved portion of Roy
Boad Road in accordance with Mason County Code.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal?
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would
be trucks (such as commercial and nonpassenger vehicles). What data or transportation
models were used to make these estimates?
N/A for zoning change applicaton. Future developement would address traffic impacts.
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and
forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
N/A for zoning change applicaton.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 11 of 14
15. Public Services [tgjpJ
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection,
police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
N/A for zoning change applicaton. Future developement would address these impacts.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
N/A for zoning change applicaton.
16. Utilitiesh( elpl
a. utilities currently available at the site:
electric y, natural gas, water, refuse service, t lephon , sanitary sewer, septic system,
o er
c. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service,
and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might
be needed.
N/A for zoning change applicaton. Future developement would specifically address utility needs, however
city water, sewer and storm drain systems are located nearby the site.
C. Signature lffLpl
The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the
lead agency is relying on them
/to make its decision.
Signature: �,��iro�
Name of signee Dean Mauerman
Position and Agency/Organization Member, PCI LLC.
Date Submitted: '7151118
D. Supplemental sheet for nonproject actions HELP
(IT IS NOT NECESSARY to use this sheet for project actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction
with the list of the elements of the environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of
activities likely to result from the proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or
at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond briefly and in
general terms.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 12 of 14
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; pro-
duction, storage, or release of toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
The proposed zoning change is not likely to increase the discharge to water; emissions to air; production,
storage, or release of toxic of hazardous substances; or production of noise. Storm water for future
development will be in accordance with Mason County building/site development codes.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
N/A, see above.
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
The proposed zoning change is not likely to change any affect plants, animals, fish or marine life
because the land use will remain as multi-family residential and sufficient sewer and storm water
services exist nearby. The proposed change only increases density.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
N/A, see above.
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
Not Applicable. The proposed zoning consistent with the Belfair UGA plan in the Mason County
Comprehensive Plan.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
N/A, see above.
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or
areas designated (or eligible or under study)for governmental protection; such as parks,
wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered species habitat, historic or
cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
The proposed zoning change is not likely to affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated
(or eligible or under study) for governmental protection. Preliminary research indicates that the only
environmentally sensitive areas are moderate slopes on the East side of the property. Any development
on moderate slopes would be appropriately engineered and in accordance with Mason County Codes.
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
See above.
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it
would allow or encourage land or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
The proposed zoning consistent with the Belfair UGA plan in the Mason County Comprehensive Plan.
The parcel does not contain any shoreline.
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
N/A, see above.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 13 of 14
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public
services and utilities?
The proposed zoning consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan and is not likely to increase
demands on public services. The Mason County Comprehensive Plan has been upgrading transportation
and public services for years, specifically to support the kind of UGA development proposed by this application.
Additionally, Mason County recently installed a park-and-ride facility just one block away from the subject parcel.
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
See above.
7. Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or
requirements for the protection of the environment.
The proposed zoning consistent with the Mason County Comprehensive Plan, there are no conflicts with local,
state, or federal laws.
SEPA Environmental checklist(WAC 197-11-960)(MC version) July 2016 Page 14 of 14
Io
FEE: $2,220.00 RECEIVED
JUL 31 2018
MASON COUNTY 615 W. Alder Street
40 COMMUNITY SERVICES
Building,Planning,Environmental Health,Community Health
615 W.Alder St.—Bldg.8,Shelton,Wa 98584
Phone:(360)427-9670 ext.352 ♦ Fax:(360)427-7798
APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP AMENDMENTS
(FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND ZONING CHANGES)
[One application per parcel or contiguous group of parcels. This application does not guarantee approval.
To legally approve a rezone request,the submitted request must meet the rezone criteria listed in the
Mason County Development Regulations. You should discuss your proposal with the County Long
Range Planner prior to application.]
Applicant: (-
Mailing Address: ( H l S c OLLEGE SST
City: LA Ckk/ State: WA Zip: K S C);
Telephone No.: 36o 073q
3q
Parcel Number(s): I - L3 - 00011
Parcel Size and Legal Description: l o O Aazs
T—4 OF S(..) k)LAJ . Li aF DA--.3.
What kind of change in map information is requested?
IZE_-4>LZST _ZpNINC. Ck Nvt;E EWA IZ-S 7-0 2 —/0
Rationale for the Request: (include information on the property features, land use,and maps that will
be used in considering your application) (see the attached information sheet)
SEE h�C1i� SFtEL-T
Signature and date
Revised August 2017
Rationale for the Request:
The Mason County Comprehensive Plan desires multifamily development in the Downtown
Belfair area to support the vision of a walk-friendly, open-air type city center and prevent urban
sprawl. PCI, LLC shares that vision and wants see it come to life with a viable,modern
multifamily development.
The current UGA zoning does not support the Mason County Comprehensive Plan vision
because most of the properties currently zoned for maximum density multifamily have
characteristics that make multifamily development cost prohibitive, such as:
• Many properties are too small, and would require several adjacent properties to be
purchased and combined, this quickly becomes cost prohibitive and overly
complicated.
• PCI, LLC considers small multifamily complexes to be not economically viable.
The cost of land acquisition, development, and construction is high, therefore the
number of units must be large to balance those costs and be economically viable.
• Many properties have decent homes and accessories structures which command
high values, and those structures would need to be immediately demolished at
additional cost.
• Many properties are encumbered by Tidelands and/or Wetlands (properties West
of WA-3), Steep Slopes (properties East of WA-3) and other critical areas that
reduce buildable area and incur significant cost.
• Many properties are encumbered by poor access and egress. Unfortunately, WA-
3 traffic through Belfair is often terrible and left turns onto WA-3 are difficult.
Few properties allow metered and protected access to WA-3, or alternate egress
routes (Old Belfair HWY).
PCI, LLC requests to rezone parcel 12328-23-00011, from R-5 to R-10 with the intention to
develop a 100 unit apartment complex in accordance with the Mason County Comprehensive
Plan and the Belfair UGA plan. The intended result would be modern style apartments similar to
new apartments built in neighboring cities (See Hearthstonelife.com), within walking distance to
groceries, fuel,restaurants and other community services.
Additional benefits to this site are close proximity to park&ride and protected access to WA-3.
Environmental impacts for zoning change are negligible because requested land use is
maintained as Residential, and the site is large enough to allow responsible development that
preserves green spaces.
Application for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments- PCI, LLC.
Page 2
Response to Rezone Criteria 1-8:
17.05.080-Rezone criteria.
(a) Rezone Criteria. The county shall review a rezone proposal and enter written findings for the
following criteria:
(1) Development allowed by the proposed rezone designation shall not damage public
health, safety and welfare;
■ Response: Development allowed by the proposed rezone will not damage public
health, safety and welfare. The proposed rezone will allow development that
furthers the goals and vision of the Belfair UGA plan(Para) and the Mason
County Comprehensive plan(para).
(2) The zone designation shall be consistent with the Mason County comprehensive plan,
development regulations, and other county ordinances, and with the Growth
Management Act; and that designation shall match the characteristics of the area to be
rezoned better than any other zone designation;
■ Response: he requested zone designation of R-10 is consistent with the Mason
County comprehensive plan, development regulations, and other county
ordinances, and with the Growth Management Act. The requested zone
designation is better suited to allow development that aligns with the vision and
goals of the Belfair UGA plan(Para) and the Mason County Comprehensive plan
(para).
(3) No rezone shall be approved if, either by itself or together with other rezoning and/or
development, whether actual or potential,the cumulative impacts of such zoning would
be to materially increase sprawling, low-density rural development, or to significantly
increase-uses incompatible with resource-based uses in the vicinity;
■ Response: The proposed rezone will not increase sprawling or low-density rural
development. The public infrastructure and resources in the vicinity have been
upgraded in recent years, in accordance with the Belfair UGA plan and the
Mason County Comprehensive plan,to support development consistent with the
proposed rezone.
(4) No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together
with other rezoning and/or development, whether actual or potential, the cumulative
impacts of such zoning would be to materially increase demand for urban services in
rural areas, including, but not limited to, streets,parking, utilities, fire protection,
police and schools;
■ Response: The proposed rezone is located in the Belfair UGA and has no effect
on rural areas.
Application for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments - PCI, LLC.
Page 3
Response to Rezone Criteria 1-8: Continued.
(5) No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together
with other rezoning and/or development,whether actual or potential,the cumulative
impacts of such zoning would be to materially interfere with the Growth Management
Act goal to encourage development in urban areas where adequate public services and
facilities exist or can be provided in an efficient manner;
■ Response: The proposed rezone is located in the Belfair UGA,where public
services and facilities exist,and have been recently upgraded to support
development that is consistent with the proposed rezone.
(6) No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together
with other rezoning and/or development,whether actual or potential,the cumulative
impacts of such zoning would be to materially interfere with the Growth Management
Act goal to encourage retention of open space,to conserve fish and wildlife habitat,and
generally to protect the environment, including air and water quality;
■ Response: The proposed rezone will not interfere with the Growth Management
Act and furthers the goals and vision of the Belfair UGA plan and the Mason
County Comprehensive plan. The parcel size and topography is sufficient
support retention of open space,to conserve fish and wildlife habitat and
generally to protect the environment, including air and water quality.
(7) No rezone to more intensive land use shall be approved if, either by itself or together
with other rezoning and/or development,whether actual or potential,the cumulative
impacts of such zoning would be to create pressure to change land use designations of
other lands or to increase population growth in rural areas as projected in the Mason
County comprehensive plan;
■ Response: The proposed rezone is located in the Belfair UGA and has no effect
on rural areas.
(8) These criteria shall not be construed to prevent corrective rezoning of land necessitated
by clerical error or similar error of typography or topography committed in the original
zoning of such land.
■
Response: Likely not applicable to this parcel.
Application for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments - PCI, LLC.
Page 4
Vicinity Map and Assessor's Office parcel map:
.rd N..be, Q 123292204000 -
123251100000 123202200010 123202203010
3
123292300011
123251491030
�I � 123292300011
;1 is 00 1 9555
9B3 C �
NEjAKO
12329500f
123291400020 123202390010 123202390010
2 - 3-00011
_. WA-3
Roy-Bo- ad Roa
Safeway,strip retail,Starbucks
19VAMTrafficlight
R=4
Application for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments-PCI, LLC.
Page 5
Vicinity Map and Assessor's Office parcel map: Continued.
Pa rce 112328-23-00011
'I
f
Application for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments-PCI, LLC.
Page 6
List of names and mailing addresses of adjacent property owners of lots within 300 feet of the
boundary of the subject property:
Parcel# Owner Owner Address
12329-11-00000 GREAT PENINSULA CONSERVANCY 423 PACIFIC AVE STE 401, BREMERTON WA 98337
12328-22-00010 TORPEY, MARTA PO BOX 2502, BELFAIR WA 98528
12328-22-04000 FURNISH, ELI A PO BOX 1374, BELFAIR WA 98528
12328-22-03010 CHEUNG INC,STEVEN N S 16521 13TH AVE.,W.#208, LYNNWOOD WA 98037
12329-14-91030 DAVIES DEVELOPMENT INC PO BOX 1095,ALLYN WA 98524
12329-14-00020 PEDEFERRI, REV TRUST OF JOSEPH PO BOX 4427, KAILUA KONA HI 96745
12328-23-90010 EGER, RICHARD B & PATRICIA A 8129 187TH ST SW, EDMONDS WA 98026
12329-14-90130 BICKNESE,JONATHAN F &CINDY K PO BOX 2621, BELFAIR WA 98528
12328-23-90011 NORTH RIDGE PROPERTIES, LLC ATTN: LENNYJOHNSON, PO BOX 488, BELFAIR WA 98528
12328-50-00003 TOM&LAURIE LLC P 0 BOX 997, PORT ORCHARD WA 98366
UK,vf-J 94�JZ A1,-447.c` PO —tso?° 1 l 2'-t`l Q I,�w•Q;•� , �� "t l�Sv B
Mailing labels enclosed as a separate sheet.
Application for Comprehensive Plan Map Amendments- PCI, LLC.
Page 7
A-ric`
From: <nana@hctc.com>
To: <krowen@co.mason.wa.us> C`�""� SS <"' a �S
CC: may- "Phil and Karen Best" <pandkbest@wavecable.com>, "Gary Cunningham" <ga...
Date: 8/21/2018 3:43 PM
Subject: Proposed rezone in Belfair
Attn: Ken Rowen, Planner, Mason County:
I have just learned about an application from PCI - LLC for a rezone from
R5 to R10 off the north end of Roy Boad Road in Belfair. My understanding
is that the applicant wants to build 100 units on the rezoned land.
The Hood Canal Environmental Council (HCEC) may have some concerns about
this application. Please include our organization on your list of
interested citizens and organizations to receive more information about
this proposed rezone. More specifically, we would like to know where Mason
County is in the approval process and whether there will be opportunities
for public involvement. A map of the area proposed to be rezoned would be
helpful also.
The HCEC's address is P.O. Box 87, Seabeck, Washington 98380. E-mails
should be sent to me at nana@hctc.com.
Donna Simmons, President
Hood Canal Environmental Council
(360) 877-5747
nana@hctc.com
Page 1 of 1
Kell Rowen - Fw: Parcel 123282300011 request for rezone
From: "Ken VanBuskirk" <kenvanb@gmail.com>
To: "Kell Rowen" <krowen@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 9/6/2018 10:06 PM
Subject: Fw: Parcel 123282300011 request for rezone
CC: "Jason Wells" <jwells@co.mason.wa.us>, "Loretta Swanson" <lorettas@co.ma...
Attachments: Mcculloughs map phase 2.pdf, Belfair WWRF full staff report.pd£pdf, Belfair Herald
2002.doc
Please forward this email and attachments to the planning commission and enter into the record for the rezone
request for parcel 12328-23-00011..Please acknowledge that they received. thanks ken
360-801-0550
-----Original Message -----
From: Ken VanBuskirk
To: kell Rowen
Cc: Jason Wells ; Loretta Swanson ; nana(L�hctc.com ; Sandra
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 8:49 AM
Subject: Parcel 123282300011 request for rezone
Kell, Mason Counties hydrology layer for the Belfair UGA is woefully inaccurate. I have met with the GIS people at
public works for several years and they agree and they have not yet changed the County maps to reflect the
location of critical areas.
I have attached some background information for your consideration of the rezone request for
parcel 123282300011.
Mr. McCullough map, which I attached, is based on the work that I did in 2002 while serving on the Belfair
subarea planning group. His map is conveniently not complete.
CH2MHill has much more accurate maps based on data I gave to them which depict water drainages closer to
the parcel in question. See Page 17 and 18 of Belfair VWURF full staff report.
I think a careful review of the Critical Aquifer Recharge Area map and water drainage is in order for this particular
rezone and also revisiting the Belfair subarea plan in its entirety.
Any questions feel free to call.
Best ken
360-801-0550
file:///C:/Users/krowen/AppData/LocaUTemp/XPGrp Wise/5B 9 l A4D3 Masonmail 10013 56... 9/24/2018
Phase 2 Preliminary Design with Zoning and Wetlands
� I
BI
R R-3
R
W
o�
o
0
dee
eel R-3 R-5
3
P
Wetlands
e0.1
De
L —3
i ♦ 1►
� y;
Y
A L� Y
9444f f
# -
JEFFERSON \'
lot KITSAP r R
r�
/Of
3
MASON 0
J
—_— r—II o GC
z
i 106 r
t Plo= CE I NEMCKNIGHTRD ° r
R-10
R-3 1
R-5
\tz1� y V. �f �I z z
'
1NU t S av I I O f 0
/ O : Q
1 ' e$, U) U1
r R-10 1 Y
r - I R-3
300
R-10 1
Pump - 1 water
i - Statlon 91 I Reciamition
Facility1
Treated Water
Y' Storage Pond
� _ "-V T�n�RD MU Location
LynchU
y I 1
m I M '
Cove I
Gr —R-3 — I t Pump
2 Pump
P9 Station N3 I
Station#2 RR-5
P9 I I
1 I
R-3 I R-5 I r r i�t�o n
r e'a
1,.. ,'.. C`egk I I
I
' { -10 -----, ' I
j418r Creek
rot
s
Go
106
3
Zoning Category source:Data from Mason county(2007)and Puget sound Lidar consortium(2002).
Business Industrial(B-1) t-J Long Term Agricultural(LTA) Proposed Force Main Belfair UGA
Ml Festival Retail(FR) Medium Density Residential(R-5) Proposed Gravity Sewer (_J Boundary
IM General Commercial(GC) F---3 Mixed Use(MU) Proposed Low County Boundary
General Commercial& Multi Family Residential(R-10) Pressure Sewer Access Road
'E`er Business Industrial(GC-BI) Single Family Residential(R-3) 0 Proposed Pump Station �� Stream
ELFAI}p� Rural Residential 5(RR-5) 1__; Service Area
wA6tM':Atdr dH
nie,-cclatrat on lacd,vcA Figure 3-1
Zoning
0 0.25 Mile A Land Use and Socioeconomics
\\S[NIMPROAMASONCOUNTY1363850\GIS\MAPDOCUMENTS\ENVPERMITTINGWEPA EA"NDUSE\ZONING.MXD DMORINI41312009 CH2MHILL
S
1111[]9
r. JEFFERSON + rr ~
_.
KITSAP
f M A S O N_ 1 ,-f..z �j E ►�
- _ ut a • " }
r toe f Sox t{ 5 * ! 1
NEE MC GHT RD
I
4 R
a
R
OF 7-
<
ti, s
Station#1 1 Water
Facility
r rA
NV' > - .m.�•J f it-.� �..�.
tp+/� � Troated Water f �-�y}
Storage Pond { ,.
Locallon
m �s
.Lynch L
Cove
z+,
a ump..\
atlon f3�
f�grr,igal!jion
,'did rCreak- �
�. EALQ RCR�E
Source:Data from Mason County(2007)and WSDOT(2008).Aerial photos from WSDOT(2008)and WADNR(2005).
^V Proposed Force Main Service Area
^V Proposed Gravity Sewer G Belfair UGA Boundary
Proposed Low Pressure Sewer County Boundary
MP Proposed Pump Station Proposed Access Road
Stream
ELFAIR
waste+ralara " Figure 1-1
Ovate,vt'amaFon rad've.
Project Location
0 0.25 Mlle and Vicinity
11SIMBA\PRO.AMASON000NTY\3638501GIS1MAPDOCUMENTSXBASEMAPSIAERIAL_S.SXll.MXD 3/3/2009 CH2MHILL
Local resident is retracing streams in the Belfair Urban Growth Area
By SARAH COUDER I BELFAIR HERALD 2/7/2002
He was taking a look at Belfair's history—flipping through a book published last year by the
Mason County Historical Society when he noticed a discrepancy between the then and now of
Belfair.
"See the two streams here on this map," said Ken VanBuskirk,pointing at a small map of Belfair
that precedes the introduction in The History of Belfair and the Tahuya Peninsula,written by
VanBuskirk's mother-in-law, Irene Davis. Two streams are shown to meander to the Union
River from the east.
"THEY'RE NOT shown on this one," VanBuskirk said,pulling out the county's map of the
Belfair Urban Growth Area, as the county hasn't had the resources to map them.
The proposed UGA is presently 2,500 acres and is where the bulk of the development in Belfair
is expected in the coming years. The 2,500 acres is broken into 570 parcels with 46 percent of
the parcels being residential use in the Union River Valley.
The discrepancy between the two maps threw VanBuskirk into action.
HE RETRACED the two streams with a global positioning system.
His next step he petitioned the Washington State Board on Geographic Names to have the stream
furthest south named Irene Creek as an honor for his mother-in-law Irene, who was
tremendously active in the North Mason community before she passed away in November, and
for Irene McKnight, who died in 1987. She and her husband, Claude, founded McKnight farm,
one of the few existing farms in the area. The stream runs through the McKnight family property.
The name would also be a tribute to Irene Hill. Irene and Guy Hill were the parents of the
NewKirk family who owns the property near the beginnings of the stream. 'The NewKirk family
is one of the original families to settle on NewKirk Road which was named for their family.
VANBUSKIRK ALSO plans to submit names for the tributaries that break off from the stream
and for the stream north of it.
He hopes to be a voice for the residents of the proposed UGA,he said.
"I am concerned about water quality issues in the lower Hood Canal, storm water generated by
Highway 3 and maintaining the rural quality of life I've enjoyed on the Old Belfair Highway for
the last three decades," he said.
"I hope to map as many streams in the UGA-as I can," VanBuskirk added. "My main goal is to
get more residents involved in the monthly public planning meetings regarding Belfair."
THE BELFAIR Subarea Planning Committee is hiring a consultant to help with the plan and
VanBuskirk said, "The more input from residents, one of the stake holders in the plan,the better
quality plan Belfair will have.
"I feel it will go much smoother if the residents can feel a sense of ownership in the plan," he
said. "Irene Davis would like that."
M A S O N C O U N T Y COMMISSIONERS
THOMAS J. FARMER
LINDA R.GOTT
r
BRUCE E.JORGENSON
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT MANAGER
ANNETTE CREEKPAUM
September 7, 2018 r
Mason County Department of Community Services
B�OZ � ti d3S
Attn: Kell Rowen (13A13048
615 W.Alder Street
Shelton,WA 98584
krowen@co.mason.wa.us
RE: Mason County Public Utility District 3—SEPA comments regarding Parcel No. 12328-23-00011
proposed rezone from Medium Residential (R-5) to Multi Family Residential (R-10) within Belfair UGA;
SEP2018-00069; DDR2018-00110; Applicant: PCI, LLC
SYSTEM CAPACITY FEE NOTIFICATION
Dear Ms. Rowen:
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Determination of Nonsignificance issued by Mason
County Department of Community Services—Planning Division, regarding the above-referenced project.
Mason County PUD 3 ("PUD") has reviewed the information provided and has the following comment(s):
SYSTEM CAPACITY FEE
A system capacity fee, representing a new customer connection's proportionate share of building a new
substation, is required to he paid bS,customers who request new or increased electricity service for npw
or expanded development improvements.
The system capacity fee is based on the ampacity rating at the point where service is provided to a
customer. Applicants will be assessed a fee proportionate to their energy needs, pursuant to the System
Capacity Fee Schedule effective at the time a complete application for service is received by the PUD.
Although the information provided to the PUD through the SEPA process does not include specific
details regarding this project's potential need for power, the PUD hereby provides notice that any new
electrical load is subject to the PUD's capacity and ability to serve the load.All applicants seeking to
connect to the PUD's electrical system must comply with all PUD service rules and regulations, including
but not limited to the PUD's system capacity fee.
P.O. Box 2148 • Shelton, WA 98584 • (Bus) 360-426-8255 • (Fax) 360-426-8547
www.masonpud3.org
M A S O N C 0 U N T Y COMMISSIONERS
THOMAS J. FARMER
LINDA R.GOTT
BRUCE E.JORGENSON
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT MANAGER
ANNETTE CREEKPAUM
PUD's comments contained in this correspondence are based upon information provided by the lead
agency, and may not constitute an exhaustive list of the various authorizations that must be obtained or
legal requirements that must be fulfilled in order to carry out the proposed action.
If you have any questions or would like to respond to these comments, please contact Dale Knutson,
Director of Engineering& Utility Services, at (360)426-8255 or dalek@masonpud3.org.
Sincerely,
Annette Creekpaum, Manager
Mason County Public Utility District 3
cc: PCI, LLC
Attn: Dean Mauerman, Project Contact
Attn:Joe D. Frawley, Registered Agent
1415 College Street SE
Lacey,WA 98503
P.O. Box 2148 • Shelton, WA 98584 • (Bus) 360-426-8255 • (Fax) 360-426-8547
www.masonpud3.org
L
RECER��
SEP 17 2018
Great Peninsula 615 W. Alger 5u
Conservancy
Protecting our lands and waters for generations to come
September 13,2018
Mason County Department of Community Services
615 W.Alder Street
Shelton,WA 98584
Re: Public Hearing on the proposed Rezone of Parcel No. 12328-23-00011
Dear Mason County Department of Community Services,
Great Peninsula Conservancy(GPC)opposes the proposed rezone of Parcel 12328-23-00011(the rezone parcel)on
Roy Boad Road, because it does not meet Mason County's Rezone Criteria. Please enter these comments into the
public record.
The rezone parcel borders GPC's permanent, 17-acre nature preserve on Irene Creek(parcels 12329-11-00000 and
12329-11-00040). GPC's preserve features fish-bearing Irene Creek, a sensitive wetland complex,and mature
second-growth forest. The rezone parcel features both a stream that crosses its western border(according to
Figure 1-1, Project Location and Vicinity Map, provided by CH2MHill for the Belfair Wastewater and Water
Reclamation Facilities Project—March 2009)and steep slopes on the full eastern half of the property(according to
publicly-available Lidar data). An increase in the intensity in development of the rezone parcel,which consists
mainly of steep slopes, riparian and riparian buffer areas,will likely produce significant negative impacts on GPC's
preserve through increased stormwater runoff. Mason County's Rezone Criteria#6 states that rezones must not
interfere with the Growth Management Act goal to conserve fish and wildlife habitat. Intense development of a
parcel with riparian areas and steep slopes,directly uphill and adjacent to a nature preserve with fish-bearing
streams and sensitive wetlands,fails to meet this criterion.
In addition,the July 31st SEPA Environmental Checklist for the proposed rezone,in Section 3,states that there are
no water resources on the property,or work within 200 feet of a water resource, and this is likely not the case. In
GPC's experience,stream maps nearly always underestimate the extent of streams, and this is evidenced by recent
water-typing projects conducted by Wild Fish Conservancy and funded by the State Salmon Recovery Funding
Board. Wild Fish Conservancy has conducted stream studies across many Mason and Kitsap County priority
watersheds,and found that the State's current stream maps underestimate the extent of nearly every stream. The
CH2MHill maps for the Belfair Wastewater and Water Reclamation Facilities Project indicate water resources exist
on the proposed rezone parcel,and an increase in the intensity of development of the parcel will likely produce
negative impacts on GPC's adjacent preserve.
For these reasons,Great Peninsula Conservancy opposes the proposed rezone.
Thank you for your consideration,
Sandra Staples-Bortner
Executive Director
423 Pacific Avenue, Suite 401, Bremerton, WA 98337
(360) 373-3500 • info@greatpeninsula.org • www.greatpeninsula.org
10 a
Page 1 of 1
Kell Rowen - SEPA comments and Rezone comments for parcel#12328-23-00011
From: "Ken VanBuskirk" <kenvanb@gmail.com>
To: "Kell Rowen" <krowen@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 9/13/2018 7:32 AM
Subject: SEPA comments and Rezone comments for parcel#12328-23-00011
CC: <PAC@co.mason.wa.us>, "Marilyn Vogler" <mjvogler@mtu.edu>, "Erik Pederse...
Attachments: Sepa comments for rezone.docx; Rezone request R-5 to R-l0.docx
Kell please accept these comments into the record for the Sepa comment deadline of
tomorrow September 14 and for the public hearing scheduled for Monday the 17th. Please
confirm that the PAC received this email and attachments. .
I am disappointed I did not receive the requested SEP97-00154 or the FPA97-00028 file for
this parcel, which included the geotechnical report required due to steep slopes, and the
stormwater site plan. I wanted to review files before I submitted my comments. I called Mariah
earlier this week as you are on leave and still did not receive. Please consider extending the
SEPA comment deadline and tabling the rezone until the PAC, I and the Public can review
this material.
Thank you,
Ken VanBuskirk
360-801-0550
file:///C:[Users/krowen/AppData/Local/Temp/XPGrp Wise/5 B 9A 12A2Masonmai110013 5 6... 9/17/2018
September 13, 2018
Kell Rowen
426 W. Cedar St.
Shelton WA 98584
Re: SEPA comments on Determination of Nonsignificance parcel#12328-23-00011,
I realize this is a "non-project"SEPA. I disagree with staff that this is a development regulation
amendment and I feel that it is a Comprehensive plan amendment, (which includes changes to maps
and the Belfair subarea plan) and as such the applicant failed to meet the application deadline of May
31St
I believe the public notification process has had some serious flaws.When the property was posted on
August 31 it was posted with two different notices 1500 feet apart.The notice posted at the actual site
was for a different rezone. In addition the Bremerton Sun printed a newspaper article that incorrectly
placed the rezone a mile away near the"proposed" MTA park and ride.At the time of determination of
NonSignificance all the property owners had not been notified.
Regarding the specific SEPA environmental checklist and application I feel it is incomplete and
inaccurate.To make informed comment on the SEPA and Determination of NonSignificance on
September 5th I requested all other materials staff considered before issuing a Determination of
Nonsignificance for the project. I am particularly interested in the mitigated conditions in the SEP97-
00154 permit to include the geotechnical report required due to steep slopes, and the stormwater site
plan. I also asked to be provided with the corresponding FPA97-00028 file. To date I have not received!
Sepa checklist:
A-8 there has been Mason County Public Works consultant studies of stormwater and drainage issues in
the Belfair UGA.There were also conditions placed on this property prior to logging by the previous
owner that required a geo tech assessment due to steep slopes.There is also a considerable amount of
environmental information contained in Belfair sub-area plan.
A-10 Applicant acknowledges that it requires an application for"Comprehensive Plan amendment" not a
development regulation amendment.
A-11 Fails to mention the United States owns property that divides the ten acres.
B 1 a. Portions of property contain steep slopes
B 1 b.Answer should be required before a DNS is issued.
63a1.Surface water answer inaccurate! Extensive wetlands and Irene Pond and Irene Creek are to the
NW of parcel and a seasonal streams which originate on property feeds into wetland. See page 17 of
Belfair WWRF full staff report.
B3a2.See above.
B 4a.Additional vegetation should be checked as many deciduous and perhaps water plants exist on the
parcel west of Roy Boad road.
135a. Hawks, eagles and deer have been on and near the property.
B 14a. County's Roy Boad Road terminates at site. Private road beyond serving several other properties.
US government owned parcel# 12328-00-60000 bisects parcel.
1314b.Area is currently serviced by Mason County transit however site is temporary and new permanent
site is planned a mile away.
B 16b. Water and sewer are near site; however there is not a city or county owned storm water system.
D 2.There are not sufficient storm water services nearby.
D 4.There are environmentally sensitive wetlands to the West side of Roy Boad Road.
D5. Proposed zoning is not consistent with Belfair UGA plan.
D 6.Transit stop is temporary. Mason County is not meeting infrastructure planning and
"concurrency"requirements to support this zoning change.
Thank you for your consideration,
Ken Van Buskirk
Belfair
September 13, 2018
Mason County Planning Advisory Commission
426 W. Cedar St.
Shelton WA 98584
Re: Rezone request parcel 12328-23-00011
1 feel the meeting scheduled for September 17 is invalid as it wasn't properly"publically" noticed.
I believe the PAC should table this request and reschedule it a "work session" for more information.
Similar to what happened with the public hearing being changed to a "work session" for the RR5 to RTC
rezone scheduled for the 17th as well. One item to request would be the Belfair sub area plan in its
entirety; complete with all environmental features. Perhaps most importantly the "historical" Google
Earth pictures of the GPC's Irene Pond and adjoining properties.These would be helpful to see the
cumulative effects of development on that wetland complex. Belfair WWRF full staff report page 17 is
another good reference to request.
Regarding the specific SEPA environmental checklist and application I feel it is incomplete and
inaccurate.To make informed comment on the SEPA, Determination of Nonsignificance and this rezone
on September 5th I requested all other materials staff considered before issuing a Determination of
Nonsignificance for the project. I am particularly interested in the mitigated conditions in the SEP97-
00154 permit to include the geotechnical report required due to steep slopes, and the stormwater site
plan. I also asked to be provided with the corresponding FPA97-00028 file. To date I have not received
that information! I think it would be valuable for the PAC to consider this as well.
I disagree with staff's belief that this request is a development regulation amendment. I feel that the
rezone is a Comprehensive plan amendment to include changes to maps and the content and intent of
Belfair subarea plan.As such the applicant failed to meet the application deadline of May 31St. 1 believe
the County accepted the rezone request in error. I did an official request for the "official notice"that
specifies the requirements and process for comprehensive plan amendments. The County was unable
to provide me with that"official notice".
I believe the public notification process has had some serious flaws as well. When the property was
posted on August 31 it was posted at two separate locations 1500 feet apart.The notice posted at the
actual site was an entirely different rezone. In addition the Bremerton Sun printed a newspaper article
that incorrectly places the "rezone" a mile away near the proposed future MTA Park and ride. People
who read the paper were confused about where the rezone actually was.At the time of determination
of nonsignificance all the property owners had not been notified.
After review of the staff analysis for this proposal I disagree that this rezone is consistent with the
intent and vision of the Belfair sub-area plan. There are not adequate public services and I doubt they
will be provided in an efficient manner.
The parcel size,topography and proximity to wetlands are not sufficient to support a change to R-10
zoning.
In the original proposal adopted by the subarea planning committee this parcel was zoned R-10! (See
figure 13 on page 19 of sub area plan.)
https://staticl.sguarespace.com/static/59af58ce37c5817a2Oc87aO2/t/59b4260be9bfdf95033f32eb/15
04978454855/belfair uga plan.pdf
After months, multiple meeting and consideration of environmental features the "zoning"was
changed to R-5 by consensus of the plan's participants and the consultant. Later the plan was approved
by the Planning Commission but only two of the three Board of County Commissioners. Two of the
issues with this particular area were the slopes in area and the other was the US government owned
property
(See figure 22 page 28 of sub area plan.)
In conclusion I feel this rezone request illustrates why a sub area planning committee should be
reestablished.The sub area plan has not been reviewed or amended since adoption 15 years ago.
The cumulative impacts of approval of this rezone or any other rezone to a greater density could create
pressure for other landowners with R-5 zoned lands to receive a tax incentive by rezoning to R 10 and
establish a precedence. Population allocations and projections to the Counties three urban growth
areas could be affected dramatically.
In summary I suggest the Planning Commission table this request until there is a thorough review of
the Belfair sub area plan and supporting environmental studies.
Thank you,
Ken VanBuskirk
Belfair
From: <nana@hctc.com>
To: <krowen@co.mason.wa.us>
CC: "Phil and Karen Best" <pandkbest@wavecable.com>, "Gary Cunningham" <ga...
Date: 9/17/2018 12:19 PM
Subject: Belfair Rezone
September 17, 2018
Re: Parcel 123282300011
Attn: Kell Rowen,
The Hood Canal Environmental Council (HCEC) has been following the
application process for an R-5 to R-10 rezone in the Belfair UGA and may
have some concerns about potential environmental impacts to the Union River
watershed. I apologize for not submitting comments before the deadline of
9-14-18. 1 have been away from my computer for the past week and was not
aware of the deadline. Unfortunately, I am unable to attend the public
hearing scheduled for this evening to due health issues.
Will the HCEC will have another opportunity to provide your office with
comments spelling out our concerns about the rezone application?
Donna Simmons, President
HCEC
Page 1 of 1
Kell Rowen - Belfair rezone
From: "Ken VanBuskirk" <kenvanb@gmail.com>
To: "Kell Rowen" <krowen@co.mason.wa.us>, <PAC@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 9/18/2018 6:30 AM
Subject: Belfair rezone
CC: "'Scott Brewer"' <sbrewer@hccc.wa.gov>, "Patty Michak" <pmichak@hccc.wa....
Attachments: Rezone request R-5 to R-l0.docx; GPC Rezone letter.pdf
Please enter these comments and attachments into the record for the Belfair rezone which the PAC approved
last evening and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners. It was a very busy meeting and by scheduling
the Strong rezone as a work session the same evening as the PBRS ordinance and Belfair rezone was, in my
opinion, a disservice to the public.
I am disappointed the PAC held the Belfair rezone hearing even though the property had not been
properly "public noticed" a fact which I told staff about ten days before the public hearing. I am dismayed that the
PAC did not table the request for more information and further review.
The chair and staff failed to acknowledge receipt of CPC's comment letter or any other comment letters until after
I asked! There were no staff materials or copies of the comment letters available for the public, they were only
provided to the applicant.
Staff and the PAC instead seemed to be more focused on the perceived urgent need for immediate hookups to
the Belfair sewer system, affordable multi family housing with tax incentives for the applicant and other
developers.
I feel strongly that approval of this rezone deviates from the intent, infrastructure planning and vision of the Belfair
sub area plan and sets a dangerous precedence for the Belfair community.
Mr. Brewer please forward this email and attachments to the full board of the HCCC as this rezone request
borders the HCCC first"mitigation" property for the SR-3 widening project which is also in the Belfair UGA.
Ms. Rowen please keep me informed when this rezone and the PBRS matters are briefed before the Mason
County Board of Commissioners and when they plan to hold a public hearings regarding.
Thank you,
Ken VanBuskirk
360-801-0550
file:///C:/Users/krowen/AppData/Local/Temp/XPGmWise/5BA09B74Masonmail10013 56... 9/18/2018
Page 1 of 3
Kell Rowen - Re: Belfair rezone
.s— .
From: "Ken VanBuskirk" <kenvanb@gmail.com>
To: "Kell Rowen" <krowen@co.mason.wa.us>
Date: 9/26/2018 7:20 AM
Subject: Re: Belfair rezone
Please enter the email below into the record for the rezone.
thanks Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken VanBuskirk
To: Kell Rowen
Cc: Michael MacSems ; Tim Whitehead ; Erik Pedersen ; Patty Michak ; nana(@,hctc.com ; Marilyn Vogler;
PAC anco.mason.wa.us ; Commissioner Shutty
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 7:12 AM
Subject: Re: Belfair rezone
Kell, I'm curious why this wasn't discussed at the PAC meeting or the BOCC briefing! When did the applicant
discuss the waiver option with Michael?What is a waiver option?
Again I feel this establishes a precedence. In my review of the Forest Practices application there is a 10 year
continuing Forest Land obligation that both the buyer and seller had to agree to and mail to DNR.
Please give me a call. In my opinion this is highly irregular and the rezone should never have been brought as
a public hearing before the PAC without this knowledge for their consideration.
Ken VanB
360-801-0550
-----Original Message-----
From: Kell Rowen
To: Ken VanBuskirk
Cc: Michael MacSems ; Tim Whitehead ; Erik Pedersen ; Patty Michak ; nana(cDhctc.com ; Marilyn Vogler
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2018 3:32 PM
Subject: Re: Belfair rezone
Hi Ken,
Here is the link to DNR's Forest Practices page: https://fortress.wa.gov/dnr/protection/fparssearch/
I talked to Michael about the moratorium and he indicated that because it is in the UGA, it is actually a 10-
year, not 6-year moratorium.Apparently the applicant has discussed the waiver option with Michael.The
waiver will require a public hearing with the County's hearing examiner.
Also,I need to let you know that I am going to have them schedule the public hearing on November 6
instead of October 23 because I will not be available on the 23rd.
Sincerely,
file:///C:/Users/krowen/AppData/Local/Temp/XPGrp Wise/5BAB333DMasonmai11001356... 9/26/2018
Page 2 of 3
Kell Rowen I Planning Manager
Mason County Community Services
krowen@co.mason.wa.us
360.427.9670 ext.286
Please note our new hours:Mon-Thurs 8:00-4:30&Friday 8:00-12:00
>>> "Ken VanBuskirk" <kenvanb@gmail.com> 9/24/2018 12:22 PM >>>
Kell thank you for providing the materials regarding this parcel. I think these historic documents should have
been provided to the PAC for their consideration of the rezone. The original owner's Sepa Application
incorrectly lists the"steepest" slopes at 10 % and that the storm water would simply "go into ground"!
Also I feel it is rather significant that there is a 6-year development moratorium until 9/5/20. 1 would
suggest that this be remanded to the PAC and brought to the attention of the BOCC so that they might
consider cancelling the public hearing they set today for October 23.
If I had known about the moratorium I would have brought it up at the briefing this morning!
Can you tell me how to track down the DNR "logging permit"?
Please include this email into the record for the rezone.
thank you,
Ken VanBuskirk
360-801-0550
----- Original Message -----
From: Kell Rowen
To: kenvanba�gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2018 2:18 PM
Subject: Fwd: FPA&SEPA
Hi Ken,
I sent Mariah to our on-site archives and she was able to find the SEPA checklist and the FPA application.It
appears the geotech was a condition of the FPA, but the FPA was never approved/issued and there is no
finding of a geotech report.
I did look at historic google earth images and it appears nothing was logged until 2014, which was done
with a DNR permit.There is a 6-year development moratorium until 9/5/2020.
I'm considering this public records request to be closed.Thanks for your patience.
Sincerely,
Kell Rowen I Planning Manager
Mason County Community Services
krowen@co.mason.wa.us
360.427.9670 ext.286
Please note our new hours:Mon-Thurs 8:00-4:30&Friday 8:00-12:00
file:///C:/Users/krowen/AppData/Local/Temp/XPGrpWise/5BAB333DMasonmai110013 56... 9/26/2018
Page 3 of 3
>>> Mariah Frazier 9/20/2018 12:00 PM >>>
See attached scanned copies.
Mari as Fro zi e+-
Community Development-Planning Clerical 11
615 W Alder St
Shelton,WA 98584
360.427.9670 ext 365
file:///C:/Users/krowen/AppData/Local/Temp/XPGrpWise/5BAB 3 3 3 DMasonmai11001356... 9/26/2018
;lfair habitat saved as part of Highway 3 project htip://archive.ldtsapsuiLcorn/news/local/belfair-habitat-saved-as-part-o£..
!P1
SECTIONS Search... p Kit "-"S n (2460 : SUBSCRIPTION
LOCAL NEWS C-v
Belfair habitat saved aof
Highway3project
<p>Contributed photo</p><p>The Hood Canal Coordinating Council tore down this 1942 residential
structure as part of a wetland mitigation project near Irene Creek in Belfair.The abandoned house had
become a nuisance to neighbors</p>
By Arla Shephard
March 15,2015 !0 f V u
BELFAIR? Seventeen acres of wetland habitat near Irene Creek off Old
Belfair Highway will be preserved as part of watershed mitigation efforts
related to the Highway 3 widening project in Belfair.
The Hood Canal Coordinating Council ? a council of governments from
around the watershed, including leaders from Kitsap, Mason and Jefferson
counties and the Skokomish and S'Klallam tribes ? has been working since
the fall on identifying a project to offset wetland impacts from the
Washington Department of Transportation's upcoming highway widening.
9/17/2018 737 AM
.elfair habitat saved as part of Highway 3 project hitp://archiveJdtsapsua.com/nem s/lor-al/belfair-habitat-saved-as-part-of...
SECTIONS Kit-s-apun 0460 S SUBSCRIPTION
mitigation program manager Patty Michak
Under the in-lieu fee guidelines, an individual or agency, such as DOT,
seeking federal or state permit approval for projects that will impact
wetlands can, instead of undergoing mitigation efforts themselves, pay a
fee to an outside group that will then allot them mitigation credits.
Those credits satisfy regulatory permitting agencies, and the outside group,
in this case the Hood Canal Coordinating Council, can then implement a
mitigation project in the area, Michak said.
"We do mitigation typically off site from where the agency's project
occurs, but within an ecologically similar area," she said. "We look at
where the impacted watershed is located and we try to look as close to
that site as we can, so the ecological benefits stay as close as possible."
In the case of DOT's Highway 3 widening, regulatory agencies identified
approximately five to seven wetland impacts, all located at the site of the
project.
The coordinating council looked at several possible mitigation sites within
the same lower Hood Canal watershed and found the Irene Creek property
the most ideal, N ichak said.
"We were really fortunate to find a property within the watershed," she
said. "It was the best fit and it was on the market for sale. It all came
together."
The Irene Creek property is situated on the former Cecil Nance estate, less
than a mile down Old Belfair Highway from the Highway 300 intersection
in Belfair, on the east side of the highway.
The coordinating council began work on the property in mid-February,
clearing out years of garbage that had amassed, pulling out blackberry and
other invasive species and tearing down an abandoned residential
structure that dated back to 1942.
"The house was in considerable disrepair and did not qualify as historic
_rn
3elfair habitat saved as part ofIlighway 3 project http://archive.ldtsapstm.coni/news/local/belfair-habitat-saved-as-part-o£..
f4 :
,^SECTIONS Kit / 6-
un 460 S SUBSCRIPTION
become a nuisance and a site for teens partying and drug activity."
The council recycled more than 1 ton of metal on the property, more than
65 tons of concrete and nearly 50 tons of garbage from the residential
structure, contracting with Belfair's Cascade Excavators and Tacoma
Abatement.
In the spring or fall, the council will contract with the Mason
Conservation District to plant native shrubs and trees on the property,
which supports a large beaver complex, bears, coyotes, amphibians and a
vast assortment of bird species.
The Great Peninsula Conservancy owns the property now and will protect
it in perpetuity, said Scott Brewer, executive director of the Hood Canal
Coordinating Council.
"The conservancy will conduct annual surveys of the property and look at
long-term encroachment issues,"he said. "It's really a sweet piece of
property that was a perfect grab for mitigation."
The property will not contain trails or other public access, but will serve
as a protected wetland, Michak added.
"We have been looking at other sites in Kitsap County and in Port
Gamble, but this is the first one," she said. "It's exciting."
More information on the Hood Canal Coordinating Council's in-lieu fee
mitigation program can be found at hccc.wa.gov.
qb 0 f Share !I Tweet u EmaiL PF Print
- News Sports Opinion Entertainment Obits Kitsap Life
)i 4 -
9/21/.2018 Rezone for Belfair apartment complex moves ahead
Rezone for Beffair apartment ee fex moves ahead
,Arta Shephard Buil,Special to Kitsap Sun Pubfistled 4:27 p.m.FT Sept 20,2018
r
4 CONNECT TWEET IRASEOIN COMMENTEMAd MORE
` A Mason County citizen advisory group has
+ g<u approved a property owner's request to rezone 10
acres to eventually build a 100-unit apartment
complex in Belfair.
(Photo:ana sheprardaun-
Speclalto Kd-p sun) The Mason County Planning Advisory Commission
heard testimony regarding PCI LLC's rezone request
at a public hearing on Monday in Shelton,and subsequently approved the request,
pushing it forward to the Board of County Commissioners for final approval tater this
year
PCI LLC,represented by Dean.Mauerman,requested a rezone of a 10-acre parcel
from a rural residential 5 designation to rural residential 10—meaning
the landowner may develop Up to 10 dwelling units per acre,except where criticat
lands are present versus up to 5 units per acre.
The decision to approve or reject the rezone does not involve approval of a specfic
project(which would undergo a separate permitting and approval process),but
Mauerman did share that he intended to build one-to three-bedroom units that could
include low-income housing.
The project,located near Roy Boad Road and Mason Transit Authority's temporary
paridng lot behind Safeway,does not impact wetlands and steams,
t
9012018 Rezone for Belfair apartment complex moves ahead
Mauerman said,and would require fully paving Roy Boad Road and making any
necessary water and sewer improvements.
More: Beffair campaign marred by vandalism
"There are a lot of question marks here,'Mauerman acknowledged."But the first step
is having the property rezoned'
Belfair resident Ken VanBuski•k argued that the rezone could encourage landowners to
rezone their properties for increased development and said the zoning change impacts
the comprehensive plan and thus should have met additional guidelines before
approval.
"This property was originally an R-10,but it was subsequently changed to R-5 because
of the slopes and the environmental concerns,'VanBuskirk said,bringing up work the
Beifair subarea planning group did 15 years ago.'This is a change for the subarea
plan.'
The property borders the Great Peninsula Conservancy's 17-acre nature:preserve on
Irene Greek,and GPC executive director Sandra Staples-Bonner expressed her
concern in a Sept 13 letter to Mason County's Community Services department.
'An increase in the intensity in development of the rezone parcel,which consists
mainly of steep slopes,riparian and riparian buffer areas,will likely produce significant
negative impacts on GPC's preserve through Increased stormwater runoff,'Staples-
Bortner wrote_
Vlore: Program that has succeeded getting Bremerton students to coliaga comes to
hamth Mason
Planning advisory board member Deb Soper Echoed VanBuskirk's concerns and
wandered whether her fellow members would be as supportive of the rezone request ff
Mauerman had proposed building high-rise luxury condominiums.
.Board chairwaman Marilyn Vogler said the type of housing didn't matter to her.
ihings have changed(since the parcel was last zoned),'she said.ihere's so much
pressure for housing in the north end of the county.Housing is housing.Any increase,
in housing will improve things down the line.'
The planning advisory board.also heard testimony about a potential rezone off Strong
Road in the Pickering area of Mason County,south of Grapeview,of a 1.0-acre parcel
from rural residential 5 to rural tourist campground.
A.designation of a rural tourist campground would allow for the development of an
overnight lodging facility,including an RV park,campground,golf course and retreat
center,as well as under a special permit,motorized commercial outdoor
recreation and T le ranges.
The request,put forward by landowner Michael O'Reilly,attracted more than 100
comments in the form of letters and oral testimony from neighbors against the rezone,
vAth residents citing concerns such as noise,safety,righting and increased traffic.
Mare: Mason County.Jail atmosphere aimed by new K9 vlstwrs
Vire do have concerns,"said neighbor Bill Giles.-How is ft-tis supposed to improve our
neighborhood?This is sftA a quiet place to live.This could really alter our
neighborhood,and for what benefit?"
httpy/Avww.kitsapsurLcomistory/newsAocaV2018/09/20ire one-beftr-apartment-complex-inoves-aheadtl371575002/ 213
912112018 Rezone for Belfair apartment complex moves ahead i
O'Reilly had initially applied for the designation of master planned resort district but
Mason County realized its comprehensive plan does not have policies in place to allow i
a master.planned resort,so that is no longer an option,said Mason County planning
r
manager Kell Rowan. 4
The planning advisory board opted to hold a workshop and informal hearing about
O'Reilly's request-to air out the concerns and answer the public's questions.The board
did not approve the request since O'Reilly's application is incomplete.
If O'Reilly moves forward with the application,Rowan will make a recommendation.to j
approve or deny the request to the planning advisory board,which will then make its
own recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners for final approval of
the rezone request.
Any actual development would be subject to additional permits and environmental
review.
i
i
I
i
i
I
httpsJ/www.k'ttsapsun.com/story/nevisAocaU2018/09M/rezone-belfEir-apartmerit-complex-moves-ahead/1371576002/ 3/
Eleanor Vernell, who left recently lett to accept a the Belfair Herald. "You correctional officer, clas- lowing the board to compare both and gradually .
for a position as a deputy director position at South have different goals and sification counselor and transition to the new system. Graeber said ide-
prisons director. In early Correctional Entity Re- things that you want to unit supervisor. ally,the fire authority could completely take over
December, Wofford left gional (SCORE) Jail in accomplish."
to take a superinten- Des Moines. Tabb offs- Tabb most recently see MISSION, page A-27 see FIRE, page A-29
County advisory commission debates Proposed Grapeview
rezoning for. 1 00*-unit Belfair complex budget leaves $600
BY DANA KAM PA low-to medium-income residents. between them would be that the in operations aecount
dana@masoncounty.com Though the PAC only takes Belfair complex likely would not
into account how rezoning could include studio apartments. BY DANA KAMPA
Big changes could be coming to affect the area in the long term, According to a State Environ- dana@masoncounty.com
Roy Boad Road, a dead-end street board members touched on the mental Policy Act (SEPA) envi-
located in downtown Belfair off need for affordable housing in ronmental checklist Mauerman The Port of Grapeview presented its official
state Route 3 near Safeway, as Belfair. submitted, the parcel was logged preliminary budget Tuesday at the Horton Com-
a result of actions set in The parcel in question, five years ago and showed no evi- munity Center during its monthly meeting, with
motion Monday by the . ` No. 12328-23-00011, falls dente of erosion.County Planning a focus on funding the final elements of renovat-
Mason County Planning y within the Belfair Urban Manager Kell Rowen wrote in her ing its public boat ramp and dock at Fair Harbor.
Advisory Commission. Growth Area. It is cur analysis of the proposed rezoning The port broke ground on Phase 1 of the prof
Dean Mauerman, the �� rently designated as Me- that it would not damage pub- ect, the boat ramp, on Jan. 3. However, the idea
property owner of a 10- dium Density Residential lic health, safety or welfare, and originated in 2012, long before shovels hit the
acre lot on Roy Boad (R5) and would become a would be consistent with the Ma-
dirt. Following the lengthy process of obtaining a
Road, recently submitted Multi Family Residential son County Comprehensive Plan. grant from the state Recreation and Conservation
a rezoning application to ': ; (R10) area. In the application, Mauerman Office (RCO) to cover 75 percent of the cost, port
the county. The current Mauerman submitted said "any future development commissioners accepted a bid in September 2017
zoning regulations Mauerman his application July 31, would not exceed 3 stories." of$264,600 from Quigg Bros Inc. of Aberdeen.
allow a maximum of in which he compared his This year's budget focuses on the dock, Phase
five dwelling units per acre, and vision for the apartment complex
Mauerman aims to construct a to Hearthstone Apartments in see COMPLEX, page A-30
P see BUDGET, page A-31
100-unit apartment complex for Tumwater.The notable difference
9.19.18 CHAMBER MONTHLY LUNCHEON Luncheon Sponsor
Noxrx MASONWednesday, September 26 • 11:30 - 1 pm • Alderbrook Resort & Spa 0 L Y M P I A
S ecial Program Pricing - $20 for all guests CHAMBEk
Aft 196-' -- 20 1 X "Mason County Business Showcase"
n�
Join Lisa Smith, Executive Director of Enterprise For Equity, L
JOIN U S ! as she introduces new Mason County Business Owners and
And your first Chamber graduates of the Business Training for Entrepreneurs program. K s'aS un
luncheon is free! f .
RSVP Required•360.275.4267 • adeno@northmasonchomber.com Shop.Local Media Sponsor-
Visit
ponsorVisit North Mason Chamber, Belfair Licensing,and Visitor Center in Belfair& Union 360.275.4267 north masonchamber.com explorehoodcanal.com
Page A-30-Shelton-Mason County Journal-Thursday, Sept. 20, 2018
Complex: Rezoning approval moves forward to BOCC
continued from page A-26 ogist from Olympia to examine the
area before moving forward with
Mauerman also wrote that state construction plans.
Route 3 would not be affected by When one attendee questioned 0
the rezoning, though "future de- if the change could be an issue
velopment would likely extend the with spot rezoning, Rowen said `
paved portion of Roy Boad Road," the county is allowed to make five d" Roy Boad
and future project proposals would changes to areas no bigger than 50 `� '1 p Road, which
address possible effects on traffic acres in a year without it becoming r' y 4 dead ends at a
flow. an issue, and Mason County had
private property
As for environmental concerns, not yet reached that threshold. }p T in Belfair, is
Mauerman said "preliminary re- Other issues raised at the meet-. "` one step closer
search indicates that the only en- ing included how the rezoning could
vironmentally sensitive areas are set a precedent for the number of to becoming
home to 100-
moderate slopes on the East side R5-zoned areas in Belfair, and en- unit apartment
of the property,"and proposed proj- suring the cost of building new util- complex for low-
ects would take that into consider- ities would be part of future project and medium-
ation. development costs rather than fall income residents
PCI LLC, a Lacey-based com- to taxpayers.
after Mason
pany, sent in its application July Ken VanBuskirk, a Belfair resi-
�� County Planning
31 for comprehensive plan map dent, requested that the rezoning Advisory
amendments. application be tabled until the �� Commission
"The Mason County Compre- PAC's next meeting because he meeting Monday
hensive Plan desires multifamily felt the public had not been prop-
. in Shelton.
development in the Downtown Bel- erly notified about the proposal.
fair area to support the vision of Rowen noted the concern and said 7 �� Herald photo by Dana
a walk-friendly, open-air type city the county is somewhat behind the "_e `\ Kampa
center and prevent urban sprawl," times in its public notification pro-
reads the application. "PCI, LLC cess, which one attendee charac-
shares that vision and wants to see terized as a single poster nestled ;
it come to life with a viable,modern outside in a pile of Scotch Broom. :, ,+J
multifamily development." The planning commission voted
During the public hearing Mon- unanimously to recommend ap- i
day, Mauerman addressed con- proval of the rezoning to the Board
cerns about the environmentally of Mason County Commissioners, *`
sensitive areas, saying PCI had al- for consideration at one of its future `
ready hired an environmental biol- meetings.
MARY'S MEMOIRS
0 opposed
0 abstentions
Motion passed
Public Comment-6:22pm
• Kim Oliver—Kim stated she had an administrative comment and informed the
commission that according to her records,the October meeting is supposed to be a joint
meeting with the BOCC.
Request for Rezone of 10 ac from Medium Density(R-5) to Multi Family Residential(R-10)in the
Belfair UGA-(6:23 p.m.)
Kell gave a staff report and informed the PAC that staff is recommending approval.The parcel
was zoned in 2003 as Medium Density(R5) and the biggest change has been the addition of the
Belfair sewer. If zoning is approved,the applicant would need to go through all the
environmental regulations that come with a development proposal at a later date. Kell
introduced the applicant, Dean Mauerman, a representative of PCI Industries who stated he was
available to answer any questions.
Commissioner Vogler asked Dean based on the proposal that the future project would require
100 units to be economically feasible, if there was enough ground space for that size footprint
after considering nearby wetlands, slope and construction of a road for access. Dean responded
that PCI had considered those and has measured what they believe to be enough space for that
many units. Dean also stated that they have already hired a wetland biologist who has done a
primary investigation and found no streams in the wetlands.
Commissioner Vogler also questioned Dean on the intent of the proposed future units being low
income and/or affordable housing, and if he was aware of the county tax benefit for affordable
housing and if they would be taking advantage of it. Dean responded that PCI believes there is a
need for affordable housing in the area and that they are aware of the tax benefit and will utilize
if available at the appropriate time in the process.
Commissioner Vogler asked if the applicant has previously completed similar projects and about
the varying sizes of units for affordable housing from studio to multi-bedroom. Dean stated that
other team members of PCI have completed projects just like this proposed future project in
other areas, and that sizes of units would be one, two, or three-bedroom apartments,with most
likely no studio apartments.
Commissioner Cleveland asked Kell about the wording of the application.The original
application was for a comprehensive plan amendment and the department of commerce
application is specifically for development regulation. Kell responded that it is unclear because
there is currently only one form used by the county for both comp plan amendments and
development regulations and will be working on updating forms in the future.As this rezone
4 1 P a g e
would still be in the UGA it would not change the future land use map and is therefore a
development regulations amendment.
Commissioner Ireland confirmed that the public access and road improvements would be part
of the development regulations. Kell stated that they would be more a part of the development
application, but the applicant may be able to speak to it now. Currently Roy Boad Road is a
county road up to a certain point and then turns private. Dean responded that initial
conversations and intent would be to improve Roy Boad Road up to the property.
Before opening public comment,Commissioned Vogler asked Dean if he would take notes on
comments and address them after all comments had been made in order to help move things
along in a timely manner.
Public Comment Opened—6:33 pm
• Drew Davies 6:33 pm—Drew stated his support for rezoning the property in order
to put affordable housing in the area, but expressed his concern with the access
road, Roy Boad Road, stating that it has no width to it and is an abandoned railroad
making no guaranteed access at this point in time.
• Rich Eger 6:34 pm—Rich asked the commission if there was any state law for spot
zoning. Kell responded that there is, but this property doesn't reach the threshold
and does not impact it. Rich also expressed concern that there is no water there and
expressed that the cost of getting water to the site as well as development of Roy
Boad Road should be put on the applicant.
• Ken Van Buskirk 6:38—Ken confirmed that the commission received the letter he
sent via email. Ken stated he disagreed with Kell in that this rezone would change
the map in regards to the number of R5's and R10's in the UGA. Ken said that during
his time on the Belfair sub-committee, this property was originally zoned as an R5
from an R10 because of the slopes and environmental concerns. Ken also informed
the PAC that this property had originally been one of the four properties considered
for the Mason Transit park and ride and taken off consideration for the same
concerns. Ken provided an article from the Kitsap Sun regarding an adjoining parcel
that was preserved as part of watershed mitigation efforts in 2015 as part of the
Highway 3 widening project in Belfair.Additionally, Ken stated that running through
the property is government owned old railroad.
Commissioner Soper asked Ken Van Buskirk to identify on the map provided, which parcel the
article was referring to,to better understand proximity. Commissioner Soper also asked what
the concern of the government owned property would have regarding the rezone.
Commissioner Vogler asked Kell if it would be an issue with roadway development in the future.
Kell said it would be a problem for the applicant to consider and address at the time of the
development application and would depend on if it were abandoned or not.
Dean Mauerman was invited by Commissioner Vogler to respond to public comment. Dean
stated in response Drew Davies that there are documented easements for transit and for
5 1 P a g e
utilities off Roy Boad Road. He also addressed the government owned railroad running through
the property by saying it was still up in the air and that they have already hired a dedicated
person to look into it. Dean stated that there is good evidence that it is abandoned.
In response to Rich Eger, Dean stated that concerns about cost of utilities were more of a
council question.
• Rich Eger 6:49pm—Rich stated that he remembered from a WSDOT meeting he
attended several years ago; a long-range goal was set have a road coming down
connecting to Roy Boad Road to bypass the Safeway and busy intersection.
Commissioner Vogler thanked Rich for the information, and confirmed will Kell that typically,
the cost of bringing utilities to site and road improvements would fall on the developer.
Dean responded to Ken Van Buskirk's concerns stating that he was unaware of this property
having been considered for the Mason Transit Center, and in his application, was referring to
the current location of the transit center, if that was unclear.
Public Comment Closed—6:51 p.m.
Commissioner Soper began PAC deliberations by expressing her concerns with the wetlands not
being properly addressed in the SEPA. Commissioner Ireland asked if wetlands were mapped
and available electronically for the public to view in Mason County. Kell stated wetlands are not
mapped in that way and that regarding the rezone application it is not required to have all the
information concerning wetlands; that it is more of a developmental concern and would be
required at a later stage. Commissioner Vogler asked Dean if she recalled correctly that they had
already hired a specialist. Dean stated they had, and no streams were found on the property in
question.
Commissioner Soper also stated that she felt strongly about the fact the Belfair area sub group
had put a lot of consideration into zoning this parcel as R5 and not R10. Kell stated that, as staff,
she believes there has been change enough to consider the rezone.The parcel had been zoned
as R5 in 2003 and that fifteen years is a pretty significant time for change to occur, and that in
this particular case,the biggest change has been the addition of the Belfair sewer.
Commissioner Cleveland said that he believes the community needs the housing for low to
middle income, as emphasized by the Comp Plan. Commissioner Ireland pointed out that zoning
for R5 doesn't preclude development, and therefore rezoning to allow an increase in units
doesn't change that it is already zoned to allow development.
Commissioner Soper reminded the PAC that they are not to be project specific and asked if it
would make a difference if it were high end apartments that were planned to be built instead of
affordable housing. Commissioner Vogler stated that to her it didn't make a difference because
Mason County could use housing across all brackets. Commissioner Soper also asked about a
61 Page
request Ken Van Buskirk had made about the property, asking to review the FPA, SEPA, and
geotechnical report. Kell stated that the paperwork had been looked for and not found,
however, as the paperwork requested was from 1997, it would be out dated and be required to
be re-done if a development application were filed.
Commissioner Cleveland made a motion at 7:01 pm to recommend the approval of the rezone
request to the BOCC. Motion was seconded by Commissioner Ireland.
Vote:
4 in favor
0 opposed
0 abstentions
Motion passed
5. WORK SESSION (7:02pm)
Proposed Rezone from Rural Residential 5 (RR5)to Master Planned Resort or Rural Tourist
Campground(7:02 pm)
Commissioner Vogler began the work session by explaining the expectations for how to address
public comments during the work session as there were many members of the public present
and wishing to testify.
Kell stated that this rezone is applicant requested and had originally looked at rezoning to a
Master Planned Resort or Rural Tourist Campground. After doing some research, it was
discovered that state law specifically does not allow Mason County to entertain Master Planned
Resort rezone requests as the comp plan no longer contains policies to allow for it. Kell
explained that she had talked to the applicant who was okay with it being a rezone to Rural
Tourist Campground. Kell also explained that typically a rezone is considered a non-project
action, meaning once zoned,the owner of the property can develop the property as anything
allowed in that zone.
The applicant, Michael O'Reilly, said that he had met with April Pooler and Marilyn Adams that
morning to discuss the project. Michael stated that his overall goal is to have the community
involved to help shape the project. Michael suggested that the neighborhood could come
together to make a list of covenants, codes, and restrictions (CCR's) so that whoever the project
is sold to,will have to abide by the neighborhood guidelines.
Commissioner Vogler asked that Michael take note of comments and questions of the public
and address them after everyone has had a chance to speak.
Public Comment Opened—7:10 pm
7 1 P a g e
LANDOWNER'S STATEMENT TO MAINTAIN LANDS WITHIN A URBAN
GROWTH AREA AS A PRODUCT FOREST LANDS FOR A TEN-YEAR
PERIOD FROM THE DATE OF APPROVAL OF THE LANDOWNERS'FOREST II
PRACTICE APPLICATION/NOTIFICATION
FPA NBR:_ I��(Q1
(FOR DNR.USE)
Mason County
Name of city or county
12328-23-00011
Tax,Parcel Numbers)
Robert Edward Millard
i
Landowner's name(PRINT)
I am the legal owner of the above listed parcel(s)and by way of this statement,I am opting
out of the requirements of a Class IV-General Forest Practice Application within an urban growth
area. I assure the local government and the State of Washington,that by opting out;I intend NOT
TO CONVERT TO A USE OTHER THAN COMMERCIAL FOREST PRODUCT OPERATIONS
FOR A TEN YEAR PERIOD from the date of approval of the application or notification for the
parcel(s)listed above,and I will manage the forest land in accordance with that accompanying
I forest management plan.
Landowner's Signature
City/County Verification of Parcel Number(s)
�Yl�►.s �-c n-�`1
Signature and date of city/county v6rification
Date
This signature only verifies that the tax number, owner's name and acreage
match County Assessor's records.
J
i
Appeal Information
You have thirty(30)days to appeal this Decision and any related State Environmental Policy Act determinations to
the Pollution Control Hearings Board in writing at the following addresses:
Physical address. 1111 Israel Rd.SW,Ste 301,Tumwater,WA 98501
Mailing address: P.O. BOX 40903,OLYMPIA,WA 98504-0903
Information regarding the Pollution Control Hearings Board can be found at-. http://www.eho.wa.gov/
At the same time you file an appeal with the Pollution Control Hearings Board,also send a copy of the appeal to the
Department of Natural Resources'region office and the Office of the Attorney General at the following addresses:
Office of the Attorney General Department Of Natural Resources
Natural Resources Division South Puget Sound Region
1125 Washington Street SE And 950 Farman Ave. N
PO Box 40100
Olympia,WA 98504-0100 Enumclaw,WA 98022
I
Other Applicable Laws
Operating as described in this application/notification does not ensure compliance with the Endangered Species
Act,or other federal,state,or local laws.
Hydraulic Proiect Approval(HPA)(Chapter 77 55RCW and WAC 222-50-020(2))
The Department of Fish and Wildlife(WDFW),as the jurisdictional agency issuing HPAs, has final authority for
approving water crossing structures in Type S and F waters.WDFW continues to have authority on Type N waters
and may exercise that authority on some Type N waters_
Notice:The HPA water crossing requirements supersede what is indicated on the FPA.Landowners are
required by law to follow the provisions as directed on the HPA.
Transfer of Forest Practices Application/Notification(WAC 222-20-010)
Use the`Notice of Transfer of Approved Forest Practices Application/Notification"form.This form is available at
region offices and on the Forest Practices website: h_ttp:/fwww.dnr.wa.aovibusinesspermitstforestpractices.
Notify DNR of new Operators within 48 hours.
Continuing Forest Land Obllstations(RCW 76.09.060,RCW 76.09.070,RCW 76.09.390,and WAC 222-20-055)
Obligations include reforestation, road maintenance and abandonment plans, conversions of forest land to non-
forestry use and/or harvest strategies on perennial non-fish habitat(Type Np)waters in Eastern Washington_
Before the sale or transfer of land or perpetual timber rights subject to continuing forest land obligations,the seller
must notify the buyer of such an obligation on a form titled"Notice of Continuing Forest Land Obligation'.The seller
and buyer must both sign the"Notice of Continuing Forest Land Obligation"form and send it to the DNR Region
Office for retention_This form is available at DNR region offices.
If the seller fails to notify the buyer about the continuing forest land obligation,the seller must pay the buyer's costs
related to continuing forest land obligations, including all legal costs and reasonable attorneys'fees incurred by the
buyer in enforcing the continuing forest land obligation against the seller.
Failure by the seller to send the required notice to the DNR at the time of sale will be prima facie evidence in an
action by the buyer against the seller for costs related to the continuing forest land obligation prior to sale.
DNR affidavit of mailing:
On this day 05/09/2014 1 placed in the United States mail at Enumclaw WA
(date mm/dd/yyyy) (post office location)
postage paid,a true and accurate copy of this document Notice of Decision FPA#2416867
Charlotte Bass
(Printed name) (Signature)
Washington State Department of Natural Resources•Notice of Decision•July 10,2012 page 2 of 2
MASON COUNTY
BRIEFING ITEM SUMMARY FORM
TO: BOARD OF MASON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
FROM: Kell Rowen, Planning Manager
DEPARTMENT: DCD EXT: 286
BRIEFING DATE: October 22, 2018
ITEM: Public Benefit Rating System (PBRS).
BACKGROUND: The Mason County Planning Advisory Commission voted (4-0) to
recommend approval of the Public Benefit Rating System as drafted (with an exception
to include indemnity language). The BOCC made some recommended changes during
their scheduled Briefing on October 16, 2018 to bring back to the PAC. The BOCC also
had a question for Department of Revenue (see requested action).
BUDGET IMPACTS:
The PBRS will change the way property tax reductions are applied under the current
Open Space program.
RECOMMENDED OR REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff is sharing additional information obtained from the Department of Revenue
regarding transitioning existing Open Space properties to PBRS and accepting new
applications under the PBRS.
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft PBRS document w/ BOCC recommended edits/comments.
BOCC Briefing PBRS 10-22-2018
DRAFT
Chapter 17.18–Mason County Public Benefit Rating System
Sections:
17.18.010—Purpose and intent.
17.18.020—Definitions.
17.18.030—Operation of the county public benefit rating system.
17.18.035—Eligibility of high,medium and low priority public benefit resources.
17.18.040—Ineligible lands.
17.18.050—Assessed valuation schedule—Public benefit rating system.
17.18.070—Basis of assessment.
17.18.080—Application to the county under the public benefit rating system.
17.18.090—Application fees.
17.18.100—Time to file.
17.18.110—Application review.
17.18.120—Board decision.
17.18.130—Unincorporated lands.
17.18.140—Incorporated lands.
17.18.150—Monitoring for compliance.
17.18.160—Removal of land classification by county assessor.
17.18.170—When removal of land is not subject to additional tax,interest,and penalties.
17.18.180—Transfer of lands between certain current use taxation classifications.
17.18.190-0wner may request withdrawal from classification.
17.18.200—Action on withdrawal from classification.
17.18.210—Owner to notify assessor of change in use in classification.
17.18.220—Sale of open space classified land.
17.18.230—Review of previously approved open space applications.
17.18.240—Duties of the Planning Commission.
17.18.250—Severability.
17.18.010-Purpose and intent.
A. Purpose. It is in the best interest of the county to maintain,preserve,conserve,and otherwise
continue in existence adequate open space lands for the production of food,fiber,and forest
crops, and to assure the use and enjoyment of natural, historic and cultural resources and
scenic beauty for the economic and social well-being of the county and its citizens.
Additionally, it is in the county's interest to provide incentives that encourage the retention of
open space in compliance with Growth Management Act principles.
B. Intent. It is the intent of this chapter to implement Revised Code of Washington (RCW), as
amended, by establishing procedures, rules, and fees for the consideration of applications
made by land owners for public benefit rating system assessed valuation on'open space land"
as defined in RCW 84.34.020(1) and (8). The provisions of Chapter 84.34 RCW, and the
regulations adopted thereunder shall govern the matters not expressly covered in this chapter.
17.18.020-Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter,unless otherwise required by the context,words and phrases shall have
the following meaning:
(1) "Assessor'means the Mason County assessor or his or her designated representative.
(2) 'Board"means the Board of County Commissioners of Mason County.
10-22-2018 Page 1
(3) "County"means Mason County,state of Washington.
(4) "Open space land"means any land area so designated by the Mason County comprehensive
land use plan adopted by the County and zoned accordingly,or any land area,the preservation
of which in its present use would:
(i)conserve and enhance natural or scenic resources,or
(ii)protect streams or water supply,or
(iii)promote conservation of soils,wetlands,beaches or tidal marshes,or
(my)enhanee the value to the publis of abutting er neighboring parks,feFests,wild" a presewes,
(v)enhance recreation opportunities,or
(vi)preserve historic sites,or
(vii)preserve visual quality along highway,road,and street corridors or scenic vistas,or
(viii)retain in its natural state tracts of landnot less than one acre situated in an urban area and
open to public use on such conditions as may be reasonably required by the legislative body
granting the open space classification,or any land meeting the definition of farm and agricultural
conservation land in RCW 8.34.020(8).
(5) "Planning Commission"means the Mason County Planning Advisory Commission.
(6) "Planning Department" means the Mason County Planning Department under the Community
Services Division.
(7) "Public Benefit"means any activity or activities that accomplish a public purpose and/or provide
for a community's social,economic,and cultural well-being,public health,and safety.
(8)"Rural Lands"means those areas outside of the designated Resource Lands and Urban Growth
Areas.
(9) "Shoreline Environments" means those designated lands as defined in the Mason County
Shoreline Master Program.
109) "Urban Areas"are those designated in Urban Growth areas around the incorporated area
of Shelton and the two unincorporated areas of Allyn and Belfair.
17.18.030-Operation of the county public benefit rating system.
To be eligible for open space classification under the county's public benefit rating system,property must
contain six(6)or more open space resource points listed below as defined in Mason County Code(MCC)
Section 17.18.035 of this Chapter. These resources are defined in this chapter and ranked as high,
medium or low priority open space resources.High priority open space resources receive ten(10)points
each, medium priority open space resources receive six (6) points each, and low priority open space
resources receive two(2)points each.Properties can receive a maximum of thirty(30)points.Portions of
property may also qualify for open space designation.
A. High priority open space resources.Ten(10)points each:
1. Public recreation area;
2. Trail linkages and recreational corridors;
3. Natural shoreline environments;
4. Aquifer protection areas;
5. Special plant or ecological sites,
10-22-2018 Page 2
i6. Regulated wetiaAds;
7. Significant fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas;
8. Historic land marks/archeological sites;
9. PF'vate lands within designated feder-al lands(Olympie Natienal Pa*eF Qly��
FeFesti and
10.Farm and agricultural conservation land__ ___________________-- Commented[KR1]:BOCC split.Either leave in High
B. Medium priority open space resources.Six(6)points each: category or move to Medium.PAC[o discuss.
1. Conservancy shoreline environments;
2. Scenic natural resources,viewpoints,and view corridors;
3. Urban open space;
4. Dural open space[ __________ _ -' Commented[KR2]:BOCC split.Either move to Low
C. Low priority open space resources.Two(2)point each: category or remove altogether.
1. Restored lands;
2. Other shoreline environments.
D. Properties with at least one(1)high priority open space resource,which allows unlimited public
access,or limited public access[f due to resource sensitivity,�hall_ -------
be automatically el�ible for__- Commented[KR3]:staff to add indemnity language after
current use value at ten(10)percent of market value.[_______________________1 consultation with County Attorney per MV comment.
E. Special exceptions to this priority framework that do not violate state(RCW 84.34)law and that Commented[KR4]:Strike this section altogether.See
have the support of either the Washington State University Cooperative Extension Service,the 17.18.050 for properties receiving an additional 10%
Washington State Department of Natural Resources, the USDA, Natural Resource reduction when access allowed.
Conservation Service, Mason County Conservation District, or any other agency with
knowledge or expertise regarding any open space reclassification or other current use
application will be considered on a case by case basis.
F. Completed restoration projects pursuant to provisions of the County's Shoreline Master
Program which specifically address one of the priority actions in MCC 17.50.260(A)(8)(a.-m.)
shall be automatically eligible for current use value at ten(10)percent market value.Property is
eligible during the monitoring phase.
17.18.035—Eligibility of high,medium and low priority public benefit resources.
A. High priority resources.
1. Public recreation area means property which is currently devoted to providing active or
passive non-motorized recreation use or which complements or substitutes for government
facilities.The facility must be open to the public and,if charging a use fee,that fee shall be no
higher than the fee charged by a like public facility. In addition,the facility must be managed
using best management practices for environmental sustainability. An eligible site is then
identified by the planning department or its designee as meeting the definition of an active or
passive recreation area.
2.Trail linkages and recreational corridors means privately owned trails and corridors that
are publicly accessible and used for hiking, biking,walking,horseback riding,and jogging.The
trails may vary in scale and surfacing and may also be used as a means of non-motorized
transportation connecting one (1) destination point to another. Streets, roads, and highways
with widened shoulders or bike lanes are not included in this category. Eligible lands must be
10-22-2018 Page 3
used as a public trail or corridor that remains in private ownership. Public access on the trail
from a public road or public trail is required.
3.Natural shoreline environment means a marine,lake,or river shoreline and its"associated
wetlands"designated as"natural"under the County's Shoreline Master Program. To qualify
there must be no structures or buildings including bulkheads from the ordinary high water mark
(OHWM)to the established common-line plus 50-feet.To be eligible,this area shall be covered
with native vegetation.
4. Aquifer protection areas means those areas as regulated under MCC 8.52.120 (Critical
Aquifer Recharge Areas), which are determined to have an important recharging effect on
aquifers used as a source for potable water, recharging salmon streams and/or vulnerable to
contamination from recharge.To be eligible,this area shall remain undeveloped,free from the
storage of materials, including parking, etc.and must have a plant community in which native
plants are dominant.At least one acre of open space shall be designated as a critical aquifer
recharge area.
5. Special plant or ecological sites means sites with naturally occurring concentrations of
those plants defined as being monitor species and meeting the criteria for native plant
communities by the Washington State Department of Natural Resources; or an old growth
forest stand at least five(5)acres in size.An eligible site must be listed in the Natural Heritage
Data Base or be identified by an expert acceptable to the department confirming that qualified
species are present on the property.
6.Regulated wetlands Fneans wetlands as defiRed by MCC 8.52.110 and shall be delineat
buffeF aveFaging,sha 11 have at least 10 pement gFeateF buffeF than Fequi Fed by MGG 8.52.119.
81-Iffe-FS;--;hall he eeveFed with native vegetatien.
7.Significant fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas means areas identified as being
of critical importance to the maintenance of fish and wildlife species including areas with which
endangered, threatened, and sensitive species have a primary association; habitats and
species of local importance; and streams. To be eligible, this area shall be at least 10,000
square feet in size and protecting a critical area with at least 10 percent greater buffer than
required by MCC 8.52 or MCC 17.50. Buffers shall be covered with native vegetation. The
Planning Department may require preparation and submittal of a biological site assessment or
habitat management plan that shall provide a description of the fish and wildlife habitat
conservation area, the location of the protected features, the location of buffers and a
description of efforts to protect the fish and wildlife habitat conservation area,or a description of
restoration efforts in those instances where the critical area has been damaged.
8. Historic land markslarchaeological sites means lands which constitute or upon which is
situated a formally designated historic landmark , including buildings, structures or sites of
significance in the county's historic or prehistoric heritage, such as Native American sacred
sites and settlements, traits, pioneer settlements,farmsteads, roads, industrial works, bridges,
burial sites, prehistoric and historic archaeological sites and landscapes,or traditional cultural
properties and landscapes. Eligible properties must be listed on the county, State or Federal
register of historic places or landmarks for which there is regulatory protection. Eligible
properties include contributing properties within designated historic districts. Improvements to
the land are not eligible for other federal or state tax credits.Additionally, land that has been
10-22-2018 Page 4
verified through an archaeological report prepared by a qualified archaeologist that contains
archaeological resources may be eligible.The county will review and make determinations on
eligibility.
9. Private lands within federal lands means officially designated areas under private
ownership located within federal lands that remain undeveloped and are maintained to protect
the landscape of the park or forest. Eligible lands are privately owned parcels dominated by
native vegetation.
10. Farm and agricultural conservation lands means either: (a) Land that was previously
classified under"farm and agricultural land" (84.34.020 (2) RCW) that no longer meets the
criteria for that program and is reclassified as open space land under the criteria of the public
benefit rating system;or(b)Land that is traditional farmland that is not classified under chapter
84.33 or 84.34 RCW, that has not been irrevocably devoted to a use inconsistent with
agricultural uses,and that has a high potential for returning to commercial agriculture.
B. Medium priority resources.
1. Conservancy shoreline environment means a marine, lake or river shoreline and
associated wetlands designated as"conservancy environment' under the County's shoreline
master program.To qualify there must be no structures or buildings including bulkheads from
the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) to the established common-line plus 50-feet. To be
eligible,this area shall be covered with native vegetation.
2. Scenic natural resources, viewpoints, and view corridors means areas of ten (10) or
more acres of natural features which are visually significant to the aesthetic character of the
county, contains features which otherwise qualifies as a historic landmark or archaeological
site, or which includes significant wildlife gathering or nesting sites. No lands that have been
subject to commercial logging or mineral extraction within twenty-five(25)years of the date of
the open space classification application are eligible under the public benefit rating system.
Eligible sites must be significant to the identity of the local area and be visible to a significant
number of the public from public rights-of-way. Such lands must be of sufficient size to
substantially preserve the scenic resource value and must be at least ten(10)acres in size.
a.Viewpoint means property that provides a view of an area which is visually significant to
the aesthetic character of the county and which provides unlimited public access identified
by a permanent sign readily visible from a road or other public right-of-way Eligible sites
must provide a view of a scenic natural resource in the county or other visually significant
areas and must provide for unlimited public access.
b.View corridor means an area of adjoining parcels which individually may be less than
one (1) acre but which, when combined, total at least one (1) acre and create a view
corridor critical to maintaining a view of a scenic resource area or other visually significant
area.
3. Urban open space means land located within the boundaries of an urban growth area that
has a plant community in which native plants are dominant and that under the applicable
zoning is eligible for more intensive development or use. To be eligible as urban open space,
the enrolling area must be at least one acre or be at least one-half acre if the area is protecting
a critical area with at least 10 percent greater buffer than required by MCC 8.52 or MCC 17.50.
10-22-2018 Page 5
4. h2ural open space kneans an area of five_(5� or more contiguous acres that has @plant__- Commented[KR5]:Low category or remove.
community in which native plants are dominant and that is located outside of the urban growth
area as identified in the Mason County Future Land Use Map, except that an eligible site may
include former open farmland, woodlots, scrublands or other lands that have been replanted
with native vegetation.
C. Low priority resources.
1.Oestored lands means an area of at least one-half acre(21,780 square feet]ofpreviously__- Commented 1KR61:BOCC split.one acre minimum or 10
disturbed land that has been restored with native vegetation.To be eligible,restoration shall be acre minimum?BOCC recommends moving to Medium for
determined as established and thriving native plant community. Disturbed lands include lands total of 6 points.
previously cleared and/or lands dominated by invasive plants and/or noxious weeds.Additional
paints ean be given fein every one half aeFe restored up to a total of five(6)aGFes(IQ points).
2. Other shoreline environments means a marine, lake or river shoreline and associated
wetlands designated as "rural, residential or commercial environment" under the County's
shoreline master program. To qualify there must be no structures or buildings including
bulkheads from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM) to the established common-line or
standard buffer plus 50-feet.To be eligible,this area shall be covered with native vegetation.
17.18.040-Ineligible lands.
The following properties shall not be eligible for open space classification:
A. Properties less than one(1)acre or eligible areas less than one-quarter acre(10,890 square
feet)in size unless otherwise specified herein.
B. Properties that do not contain an open space resource identified as either high,medium,or low
priority or meet the criteria under 17.18.030 E.
C. Open space areas or buffers required by zoning,subdivision conditions,mitigation or other land
use regulations, unless the owner provides additional public benefit as described in section
17.18.035.
D. Commercial nurseries, arboretums or other maintained garden sites with native or nonnative
plantings.
E. Properties with outstanding code violations as tracked and reported by the county as an open
enforcement case.
F. Properties or portions of property that have been disturbed by clearing, grading,filling, or any
other non-natural event.
17.18.050-Assessed valuation schedule—Public benefit rating system.
The public benefit rating system for open space land bases the level of assessed fair market value
reduction on the total number of awarded points.The market value reduction establishes the current use
value. This current use value will be expressed as a percentage of market value based on the public
benefit rating of the property and the valuation schedule below:
Public Benefit Rating Points Current Use Value
(0-5-9points) 100%of assessed value
45- 9 peint� ° of assessed value FormattedTable
(10-19 points) 48509/6 of assessed value
10-22-2018 Page 6
(20—29 points) 30%of assessed value
30+points 20%of assessed value
Properties that allow public access shall receive an additional 10 percent reduction in assessed value.
17.18.070-Basis of assessment.
In determining the market value reduction of a tax lot comprised of property qualifying for a current use
assessment as an open space priority resource with non-open space land areas,the open space current
use value is applicable to only that portion of the lot containing one(1)or more of the priority open space
resources defined in this chapter,except in the case of public access and parcels with an approved rural
stewardship plan. For each priority resource, the county will determine the appropriate land area that
receives credit for a priority resource and accompanying tax reduction.
17.18.080-Application to the county under the public benefit rating system.
An owner of open space land desiring assessed valuation under the public benefit rating system shall
make application to the Planning Department by filing an application with the county's Permit Assistance
Center. The application shall be upon forms supplied by the county and shall include such information
deemed reasonably necessary to properly classify an area of land under Chapter 84.34 RCW.
17.18.090-Application fees.
A. Each application for current use open space taxation as defined in RCW 84.34.020, must
include an application fee as established in the most current Mason County Planning Permit
Fee Schedule. Upon adoption,application fees shall be set at five hundred(500)dollars.
B. If an application is filed to add farm and agricultural conservation land,forest stewardship land,
resource restoration or rural stewardship land to a parcel that is already enrolled in the Public
Benefit Rating System,no fee shall be charged for the application.
C. In the case of all farm and agricultural land applications, whether the application is based on
land within or outside of an incorporated area,the entire fee shall be collected and retained by
the county. In the case of open space or timber land applications based on land in an
incorporated area,where the city legislative authority has set no filing fee,the county fee shall
govern, and the entire fee shall be collected and retained by the county. Where the city
legislative authority has established a filing fee,the fee established consistent with Section A of
this section shall be collected by the county from the applicant and the county shall pay the city
one-half of the fee collected.
17.18.100-Time to file.
Applications shall be made to Mason County by March 30 of the calendar year preceding the year in
which such classification is to begin.Actual tax reduction will not be recognized until one(1)year after the
classification of the property has been made.
17.18.110-Application review.
A. Applications under the public benefit rating system shall be reviewed by the county and
approved directly by the Board of Mason County Commissioners. By Chapter 84.34 RCW such
10-22-2018 Page 7
applications are exempt from the comprehensive plan annual review amendment cycle and are
SEPA exempt.
B. In determining whether an application made for open space current use taxation status should
be approved or disapproved, pursuant to RCW 84.34.020 and this chapter, the county shall
consider whether preservation of the current use of the land, when balanced against the
resulting revenue loss or tax shift from granting the application under the provisions of this
chapter will:
1. Conserve or enhance natural,cultural or scenic resources;
2. Protect streams,stream corridors,wetlands,natural shorelines,and aquifers;
3. Protect soil resources and unique or critical wildlife and native plant habitat;
4. Promote conservation principles by example or by offering educational opportunities;
5. Enhance the value of abutting or neighboring parks, forests, wildlife preserves, nature
reservations,or sanctuaries or other open spaces;
6. Enhance recreation opportunities;
7. Preserve historic and archeological sites;or
8. Affect any other factors relevant in weighing benefits to the general welfare or preserving
the current use of the property as delineated in this chapter.
17.18.120-Board decision.
The Board of County Commissioners shall consider an application to the public benefit rating system as
defined by RCW 84.34.037.They shall approve the application,with or without terms and/or conditions,
and set the public benefit rating for assessment abatement, or deny the application. In so doing the
following provisions will apply:
A. They shall rate the land applying for classification according to the public benefit rating system;
B. They may approve the application with respect to only part of the land that is the subject of the
application;
C. If any part of the application is denied or conditions attached the applicant may withdraw the
entire application.
17.18.130-Unincorporated lands.
In all unincorporated areas, the Board of County Commissioners shall act as the granting authority for
applications for classification as open space land.
17.18.140-Incorporated lands.
Applications for open space classification of land in an incorporated area shall be acted upon by a
determining authority composed of the three (3) members of the Board of County Commissioners and
three(3)members of the city legislative body in which the land is located (RCW 84.34.037).Where the
county legislative body concurs with a recommendation of the city council to accept or reject an
application for open space classification,such council's recommendation will be adopted as the decision
of the determining authority.
17.18.150-Monitoring for compliance.
30-22-2018 Page 8
A. Monitoring of lands for continuing eligibility for current use assessment as open space lands
shall include an affidavit,to be submitted annually by the landowner, of continuing compliance
with the terms and conditions under which open space classification was granted and the current
uses of the property.The requisite form and contents of the affidavit required for monitoring shall
be described more fully in the county guidelines implementing this chapter. The failure of the
owner to submit the affidavit of compliance shall be grounds for the county to remove and/or
reevaluate the property under the PBRS.
B. Where the Planning Department determines that the land is no longer being used for the
purpose for which the classification was granted or there has been a change in use,it will report
its findings within thirty(30)days to the county assessor.
17.18.160-Removal of land classification by county assessor.
A. Classified land may be removed from the public benefit rating system classification if it is no
longer used for the purpose for which classification was granted or for any other classified use
within the current use program. The assessor may determine, after giving the owner written
notice and an opportunity to respond, that the land classified as open space is no longer
primarily devoted to and used for the purposes for which it was granted classification.
B. When land is removed from classification an additional tax, applicable interest, and penalties
are due unless the removal meets one(1) of the exceptions listed in this chapter. The owner
may appeal the removal of classification to the Hearing Examiner consistent with MCC
15.11.020.
17.18.170-When removal of land is not subject to additional tax,interest,and penalties.
Removal of land is not subject to additional tax,interest,and penalties in the following instances:
A. Land is transferred to a government entity in exchange for other land located in the State of
Washington;
B. Land is taken by power of eminent domain or transferred in anticipation of the exercise of such
power,
C. Land is sold or transferred within two(2)years of the death of the owner of at least fifty-percent
interest in the land;
D. A natural disaster such as a flood,windstorm,earthquake,or other such calamity rather than by
virtue of an act of the landowner which changes the use of such property;
E. Official action by the state,county or city disallows the present use of such land;
F. The land is transferred to a church or other non-profit organization, such that the land would
qualify for a property tax exemption;
G. Acquisition of property interests by agencies or organizations qualified under RCW 84.34.210
and 64.04.130 for protecting, preserving, maintaining, improving, restoring, limiting the future
use of,or otherwise conserving,selected open space land as defined in Chapter 84.34 RCW for
public use and enjoyment.
17.18.180-Transfer of lands between certain current use taxation classifications.
Land reclassified between the following current use assessment resource categories pursuant to RCW
84.34.070 are not considered withdrawals and are not subject to the additional tax interest and penalties:
A. Reclassification between farm and agricultural lands and timber lands;
10-22-2018 Page 9
B. Reclassification of farm and agricultural lands or timberlands to open space lands;
C. Reclassification of farm and agricultural lands or timber lands to forest land classified under
Chapter 84.33 RCW;and
D. Reclassification from open space designated farm and agricultural conservation land under
RCW 84.34.020(1)(c) to farm and agricultural land under RCW 84.34.020(2) if the land was
previously classified as farm and agricultural land.
An application fee must be paid at the time the application is submitted consistent with Section 17.18.090
of this chapter. If the type of transfer is not listed in this section, it is a new application for which the
applicable fees will be applied.
17.18.190-Owner may request withdrawal from classification.
A. After ten(10)years the landowner may request that all or part of his/her land be withdrawn from
the classification.
B. If a portion of a parcel is removed from classification the remaining portion must meet the same
requirements, as did the entire parcel when the land was originally granted classification.
Following withdrawal from classification,future valuation of such land as open space resource
property under the public benefit rating system is contingent upon reapplication and approval
under this chapter.
17.18.200-Action on withdrawal from classification.
Upon receipt of a request for withdrawal,the assessor shall notify the legislative authority that originally
approved the application, and after one(1)year from the date of the withdrawal request, the assessor
shall withdraw the land from classification.The land which is removed shall be subject to a tax equal to
the difference between the amount of tax paid under the open space classification and the tax at true and
fair value for seven (7) years last past, plus the statutory interest rate charged on delinquent property
taxes.
17.18.210-Owner to notify assessor of change in use in classification.
If an owner changes the use of the classified land, the owner must notify the county assessor of the
change within sixty(60)days. The assessor shall then impose an additional tax equal to the difference
between the tax paid on current use value and the tax that would have been paid on that land had it not
been so classified, payable for the seven (7) years last past, plus interest on this additional tax at the
same rate as charged on delinquent property taxes, plus a penalty of twenty (20) percent of the total
amount.
17.18.220-Sale of open space classified land.
When classified open space land is sold,the seller or transferor becomes liable at the time of sale for the
additional tax,interest,and penalty of all or a portion of classified lands, unless the new owner signs the
notice of continuance which is attached to or shown on the excise tax affidavit.
17.18.230-Review of previously approved open space applications.
A. Upon adoption of a public benefit rating system,the Planning Department shall review and re-
rate the existing open space land current use assessment program parcels according to the
10-22-2018 Page 10
public benefit rating system in determining whether to recommend that an application be
approved or denied.
B. Owners of property classified under the existing open space land current use assessment
program shall be notified of their new assessed value in the same manner as provided in RCW
84.40.045.These lands may be removed from classification under the existing open space land
assessment program,without payment of penalties, back taxes, and interest, upon request of
the owner,within thirty(30)days of notification of their newly determined value under the public
benefit rating system.
C. Property which does not qualify under the public benefit rating system and whose owner
chooses not to remove the property from the open space land current use assessment program
shall be rated according to the public benefit rating system(RCW 84.34.037[3]).
17.18.240—Duties of the Planning Commission.
The Planning Commission shall review participation in the public benefit rating system for open space
classification under the county's current use assessment program after the first two(2)years of adoption
and thereafter once every two(2)years.The planning commission shall make written recommendation to
the Board of County Commissioners on the following matters:
A. The fundamental elements of the public benefit rating system,including the assessed valuation
schedule,open space resource definitions,and other procedures defined in this chapter,;and
B. The overall administrative process, including issues such as staffing, outreach to prospective
applicants,application forms, processing,monitoring,etc.;and
C. The public benefit of the open space designated properties, the magnitude of the tax shift
resulting from the designated properties and recommendations for expanding or restricting the
program.
17.18.250-Severability.
If any provision of this chapter or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the
remainder of this chapter or its application to other persons or circumstances is not affected.
10-22-2018 Page 11